Fedora CI testing affected by systemd/selinux issues
Hi, There is an ongoing issue with systemd update breaking plenty of tests in Fedora CI. We are trying to resolve the issue. You can watch for status updates here: https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-11-23-public-ranch-systemd-selinux/ It is affecting a lot of installability tests, possible also some functional tests might be affected: https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/447 Best regards, /M -- 六 Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE Red Hat Slack :: mvadkert :: #testing-farm #tmt Fedora Matrix :: mvadkert :: #Fedora CI ️ Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [status] Fedora CI / 2023-11-03
Forgot to CC devel list for a larger audience ... On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:16 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi all, > > Fedora CI is very well alive! We will be sending out bi-weekly updates > like this one about some of our plans, interesting information and status > updates. > > Find us on the Fedora CI matrix chat <https://chat.fedoraproject.org/> in > case you would like to discuss something. > > > ⏱️ Plans > >- > >Close the mailing list and replace it with the Discourse tag >- > >Move Fedora CI Jenkins under Testing Farm infrastructure | >fedora-ci/general#440 <https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/440> >- > >Deprecate STI tests via Fedora 40 Change Proposal | general/issue#443 ><https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/443> > > > Info > >- > >It is now easy to do integration testing of Fedora packages hosted on >GitHub, see this blog post for details: >https://cockpit-project.org/blog/tmt-cross-project-testing.html >- > >Support for testing on AWS instances with dedicated AMD GPUs was >deferred to November | fedora-ci/general#422 ><https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/422> >- > >A prototype for running tmt tests against aarch64 on a pagure.io >project was implemented for pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions >project >https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/441 >https://pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions/pull-request/48 ><https://pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions/pull-request/48#> > > > Status > >- > >Pull requests created >- > > Installability support for CS8 and CS9 prepared for review | > fedora-ci/general#439 > <https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/439> > https://github.com/fedora-ci/mini-tps/pull/27 > https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline/pull/24 > - > >Closed issues >- > > general/issue#423 <https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/423> - > moved to upstream Zuul > - > > general/issue#441 <https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/441> - > prototype for testing on aarch64 for > https://pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions > > >- > >Outages >- > > Occasional missing triggers for dist-git testing | general/issue#442 > <https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/442> > - > > currently, the reason is unknown, please let us know if you > encounter this in the above issue > > > 輸 *Status **Contributors* > >- Aleksandra Fedorova (bookwar) >- Miroslav Vadkerti (mvadkert) > > > Best regards, > /M > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)
Rawhide testing with Zuul was disabled until the issue is fixed. Please use, the testing results from Fedora CI PR testing until it the dnf5 issues are resolved. Best regards, /M On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:45 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disable Rawhide testing via Zull in > dist-git PRs: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/180 > > /M > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:19 PM Miroslav Vadkerti > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use the results >> `Fedora CI - dist-git test` in the PR testing. >> >> The upstream bug that will need to be fixed to unblock Zuul testing: >> >> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 >> >> Other problems are hopefully resolved. >> >> Best regards, >> /M >> >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:16 AM Miroslav Vadkerti >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> a few more issues appeared: >>> >>> 1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5 >>>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 >>> >>>No ETA for fixing this one .... >>> 2. Packit's sanity copr installation test fails due to to dnf5-plugins >>> needed for copr plugin. >>> >>>ETA 30 min. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> /M< >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:39 PM Miroslav Vadkerti >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked >>>> again \o/ >>>> >>>> Thanks to all who helped! >>>> >>>> /M >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing >>>>> Farm. >>>>> >>>>> We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against >>>>> Rawhide. >>>>> >>>>> ETA 2 hours. >>>>> >>>>> For updates watch: >>>>> https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> /M >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >>>>> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >>>>> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >>>> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >>>> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >>> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >>> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >> >> >> > > -- > Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE > IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 > Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o > > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)
To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disable Rawhide testing via Zull in dist-git PRs: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/180 /M On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:19 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use the results > `Fedora CI - dist-git test` in the PR testing. > > The upstream bug that will need to be fixed to unblock Zuul testing: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 > > Other problems are hopefully resolved. > > Best regards, > /M > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:16 AM Miroslav Vadkerti > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> a few more issues appeared: >> >> 1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5 >>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 >> >>No ETA for fixing this one >> 2. Packit's sanity copr installation test fails due to to dnf5-plugins >> needed for copr plugin. >> >>ETA 30 min. >> >> Best regards, >> /M< >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:39 PM Miroslav Vadkerti >> wrote: >> >>> Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked >>> again \o/ >>> >>> Thanks to all who helped! >>> >>> /M >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing >>>> Farm. >>>> >>>> We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against >>>> Rawhide. >>>> >>>> ETA 2 hours. >>>> >>>> For updates watch: >>>> https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> /M >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >>>> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >>>> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >>> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >>> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >> >> >> > > -- > Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE > IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 > Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o > > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)
Hi, A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use the results `Fedora CI - dist-git test` in the PR testing. The upstream bug that will need to be fixed to unblock Zuul testing: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 Other problems are hopefully resolved. Best regards, /M On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:16 AM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > a few more issues appeared: > > 1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5 >https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 > >No ETA for fixing this one > 2. Packit's sanity copr installation test fails due to to dnf5-plugins > needed for copr plugin. > >ETA 30 min. > > Best regards, > /M< > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:39 PM Miroslav Vadkerti > wrote: > >> Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked >> again \o/ >> >> Thanks to all who helped! >> >> /M >> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. >>> >>> We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against >>> Rawhide. >>> >>> ETA 2 hours. >>> >>> For updates watch: >>> https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ >>> >>> Best regards, >>> /M >>> >>> -- >>> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >>> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >>> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >> >> >> > > -- > Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE > IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 > Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o > > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm (partially)
Hi, a few more issues appeared: 1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5 https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549 No ETA for fixing this one 2. Packit's sanity copr installation test fails due to to dnf5-plugins needed for copr plugin. ETA 30 min. Best regards, /M< On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:39 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked > again \o/ > > Thanks to all who helped! > > /M > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. >> >> We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against >> Rawhide. >> >> ETA 2 hours. >> >> For updates watch: >> https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ >> >> Best regards, >> /M >> >> -- >> Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE >> IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 >> Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o >> >> >> > > -- > Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE > IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 > Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o > > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm
Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked again \o/ Thanks to all who helped! /M On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. > > We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against > Rawhide. > > ETA 2 hours. > > For updates watch: > https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ > > Best regards, > /M > > -- > Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE > IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 > Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o > > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm
Hi, Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against Rawhide. ETA 2 hours. For updates watch: https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ Best regards, /M -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Help understanding Fedora CI failure wrt RPM Sequoia
Hi all, https://gitlab.com/testing-farm/infrastructure/-/merge_requests/90/diffs That would be the reason. We would never think this would cause so much confusion, our bad :( As the original issue is gone, we have reverted this workaround and I hope it is resolved now. Best regards, /M On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:39:27AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > > So, overnight somebody updated the koji package in > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/ to the current > unsigned > > rawhide build, which makes the issue go away. > > Nothing should have updated the koji package. > > The last change was in october: > > Wed Oct 26 14:08:39 2022 koji-1.30.1-2.fc38 tagged into f38 by bodhi > [still active] > > In fact there's no such actual build: > > ➜ ~ koji list-history --build koji-1.28.1-1.fc38 > 2022-11-10 12:39:45,017 [ERROR] koji: GenericError: No such build: > 'koji-1.28.1-1.fc38' > > Very odd that ci would use a build that doesn't exist. (I guess it's a > scratch build it made itself?) > > kevin > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Support for excluding packages enabled in Fedora CI and RHEL 9 CI
Hi, Testing Farm Team is glad to announce possibility to test packages with conflicting RPMs in Fedora CI [1] and RHEL9 CI [2] via the `exclude` option in the `prepare` step in the TMT test definition [3]. For an example of a test using this see (test excludes maven-openjdk8 from installation): https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/maven/-/merge_requests/7/diffs Relevant issues: https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/184 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TFT-489 Best regards, /M [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/tmt/ [2] https://docs.engineering.redhat.com/display/TT/Quick+Start+Guide [3] https://tmt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/spec/plans.html#install -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, CR ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT
FTR verified, when TMT is not around, it is now skipped: https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status/change/189,a906cee4eafd4a13c699b8964a1a69f6acdd03c9 On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:04 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 07. 21 1:02, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > > > yeah, this slipped through with the initial review. Was a Zuul > misconfiguration: > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/129# > > <https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/129#> > > > > Fabien fixed this 3 hours ago. > > > > It should be better on `recheck`. > > > > Trying now ... > > Awesome, thanks for a fast reply! > glad to help :) Best regards, /M > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, CR ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT
Hi Miro, yeah, this slipped through with the initial review. Was a Zuul misconfiguration: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/129# Fabien fixed this 3 hours ago. It should be better on `recheck`. Trying now ... Best regards, /M On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 12:49 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 07. 21 15:04, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Today we are gladly announcing that the Zuul CI system for Fedora, which > is > > running checks for pull requests against src.fedoraproject.org > > <http://src.fedoraproject.org>, will also run Test Management Tool > (tmt) based > > tests via the new `rpm-tmt-test` check, if they are available. The test > > environment is the same as with Fedora CI, as both CI systems use our > Testing > > Farm service as the backend. > > Hello Miro, > I see rpm-tmt-test FAILUREs for packages without TMT tests. > > E.g.: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy/pull-request/19 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy3/pull-request/24 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/pull-request/189 > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, CR ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora Zuul had been integrated with Testing Farm and TMT
Dear all, Today we are gladly announcing that the Zuul CI system for Fedora, which is running checks for pull requests against src.fedoraproject.org, will also run Test Management Tool (tmt) based tests via the new `rpm-tmt-test` check, if they are available. The test environment is the same as with Fedora CI, as both CI systems use our Testing Farm service as the backend. For more information about: * Fedora Zuul: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Zuul-based-ci * Test Management Tool (tmt): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/tmt/ This change is opening up doors for the same functionality for the up-coming CentOS Stream CI, once there are available images for CI, we will enable the same check also there. We would like to especially thank Guy Inger (Testing Farm), Fabien Boucher (Zuul) and Tristan De Cacqueray (Zuul) for contributing to this change. Best regards, /M -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm IRC mvadkert #fedora-ci ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Update gating test is "failed" with no useful information
> Hi Richard, > > > This is https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/161, only know workaround > is to rerun > the test (by logging in to the Jenkins instance and hitting the Rebuild > button). Not yet > sure why this is happening, I will try to concentrate on it in next weeks, it > is quite > random. > > > I believe you can now configure rpminspect do not run tests which are not > interesting to > you. I am looking for a documentation how to do that. So announcement for this feature is just coming according to #fedora-ci IRC channel > > Best regards, > /M > > > > > Rich. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Update gating test is "failed" with no useful information
Hi Richard, > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-667db9b546 > > Some tests have failed, but as usual there seems to be no easy way to > work out why. For example the hivex test has this useless console > output: > > > https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-... > > The closest thing to an error message in all that seems to be: > > ERROR: There was an infrastructure failure. This is https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/161, only know workaround is to rerun the test (by logging in to the Jenkins instance and hitting the Rebuild button). Not yet sure why this is happening, I will try to concentrate on it in next weeks, it is quite random. > > The virt-top test has failed with "ABSENT" and no further information > at all. (I actually ran the virt-top test locally and it's fine.) > > Other tests are kind of random. I mean, what does this mean? > > https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-... > > Stuff like: > > 1) File /usr/lib64/ocaml/cmdliner/cmdliner.a changed content on x86_64. > > Amazing! The package was rebuilt, what did you expect? > > Ideally I'd like to skip all this and tell it to put the update out. I believe you can now configure rpminspect do not run tests which are not interesting to you. I am looking for a documentation how to do that. Best regards, /M > > Rich. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: ELN build order
Actually that would not help in this situation, I was talking about Fedora, ELN builds are not planned to be gated .. I stand corrected, thanks @Michal Srb /M On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:42 AM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > can we share the timeline for making rpmdeplint and installability gating > pls? Not sure where we have it. > > Thank you!, > /M > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:23 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:57 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >> > >> > Also, rubygem-eventmachine should be installable after rebuild. But >> certainly, there might happen race conditions a it happened this time. >> >> This reminds me - over a year ago, I triggered discussion about making >> the dist.rpmdeplint test blocking for all packages, which would solve >> this exact problem. However, taskotron was retired shortly after, and >> Fedora CI has only been catching up lately. Is there an installability >> check in Fedora CI now? Can we make it so that if packages contained >> in an update do not install correctly the update fails gating checks? >> >> Fabio >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > > > -- > Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI > IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 > TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 > Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, CR > > > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, CR ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: ELN build order
Hi, can we share the timeline for making rpmdeplint and installability gating pls? Not sure where we have it. Thank you!, /M On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:23 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:57 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Also, rubygem-eventmachine should be installable after rebuild. But > certainly, there might happen race conditions a it happened this time. > > This reminds me - over a year ago, I triggered discussion about making > the dist.rpmdeplint test blocking for all packages, which would solve > this exact problem. However, taskotron was retired shortly after, and > Fedora CI has only been catching up lately. Is there an installability > check in Fedora CI now? Can we make it so that if packages contained > in an update do not install correctly the update fails gating checks? > > Fabio > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, CR ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Running a test from dist-git
Hi, sorry for the late response :( On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:42 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > > For this time I rescheduled the run: > > > > > > > https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline/detail/fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline/850/pipeline > > It appears to have failed, but I've got no clue why. How do I see > the output of the command? > Ugh, logs are now gone. Which package were you testing? We can take a look what was the problem. > > I think it would be easier if we could just drop a shell script into > tests/ and have it run that and display the output. The current > system seems elaborately overengineered and I don't understand why. > Well, it was decided that we will use Ansible to wrap around our tests. Not my idea. I agree the results could be presented better though, even if the runner is Ansbile. We are preparing a dashboard to view the result of testing, to give a better user experience in the future. If the pipeline goes through (i.e. tests were run), the pipeline ends up with Pass (test passed) or Unstable state (tests failed). If the test failed, the pipeline did not execute the testing. In the former case you should find logs in the Artifacts tab in Jenkins (test results are prefixed with PASS_ or FAIL_). If you encounter an error, we are here to help an investigate. HTH, /M > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com > virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many > powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Principal QE :: BaseOS QE Security IRC mvadkert #osci #baseosci #qe :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 Desk Phone +420 532 294 129 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 99/71, 612 00, Brno, CR ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Running a test from dist-git
Hi, On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > As directed by: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/Tests > > I tried to add a test to libguestfs dist-git: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs/blob/master/f/tests/tests.yml > > It's very simple initially. It just needs to run > ‘libguestfs-test-tool’ (a program installed by the libguestfs package > which does some self-tests). Ideally as non-root, but I think I've > set it up to run as root to start with. > Cool :) > > I did a scratch build initially, but it seems like the tests only run > from what's been pushed to dist-git. That is correct. Tests are not bundled into the src.rpm. > In any case the test didn't look > as if it had run. So I pushed the test to dist-git -- see above -- > and did another scratch build. However I've still no real idea if the > test really ran. > > I got an email containing this link: > > > https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline/detail/fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline/846/pipeline/ Nice, seems fedora notifications works again :) > > > which looks like there are lots of failures, but it's also not clear > if the test ran / tried to run / didn't run / if this link has nothing > to do tests. > Yeah, sorry for that, must have been som outage. I agree seeing that is not very helpful, to somebody not experienced in the CI pipeline. Also rescheduling anything else as a pull-request testing is not easily possible currently :( In the future this should be possible via fedpkg. > > So, that was the end of my experiment. Not a very good result :-( > For this time I rescheduled the run: https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline/detail/fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline/850/pipeline Seems it will end up with something more meaningful this time ... HTH, /M > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com > libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, > bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Principal QE :: BaseOS QE Security IRC mvadkert #osci #baseosci #qe :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95 Desk Phone +420 532 294 129 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 99/71, 612 00, Brno, CR ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases
> The issue described in the article was fixed by requiring an absolute > path in core_pattern (If I understand it correctly). > > If core_pattern is unsafe, the process is not dumped at all (man 5 proc). > > The kernel commit adds a warning, because kernel was silently ignoring > crashes and no one could notice. If this is true, shouldn't we be safe to set the default to 2? Note also, that having suid_dumpable = 0 is sometimes blocking other security features in Fedora, for example sssd running as non-root by default - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212503 Regards, /M > > > Regards, > Jakub > > On 02/12/2016 07:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
