Yum translation update request

2011-12-15 Thread Misha Shnurapet
Hi.

How's it going?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726878
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/trans/2011-December/009532.html

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fwd: Zif and SOS projects on Fedora Upstream

2011-10-23 Thread Misha Shnurapet
Hi.

There is a project named SOS in Fedora collection on Transifex. I'd like to 
know if there is anyone maintaining it, because it seems like it needs to be 
translated, but there is no maintainer assigned in Tx and no translation team 
creation request has been fulfilled in 7 months. The latest change to code in 
Github is 6 months old. We tried to contact Adam Stokes mentioned in the source 
readme on Github, but no reply yet. Any help with getting response is much 
appreciated.

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306

 Пересылаемое сообщение  
21.10.2011, 20:42, Daniel Cabrera lo...@fedoraproject.org:

On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 00:13 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:

  Zif: I would send a message to Jorge González (aloriel at gmail.com), also 
 nudge him in Transifex.
  Sos: I would contact the maintainer Adam Stokes (ajs AT redhat.com) or file 
 a report in Github [1] where the code has moved. Also [2].

  [1] https://github.com/sosreport/sosreport
  [2] https://github.com/sosreport/sosreport/blob/master/README

  --
  Best regards,
  Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
  Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
  --

Misha,
Unfortunately until today I did not get any response to the emails I
sent to Adam Stokes.

Best regards,
Daniel Cabrera (es)

--
trans mailing list
tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
 Завершение пересылаемого сообщения --
trans mailing list
tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Misha Shnurapet
26.07.2011, 18:34, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com:
 On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:

  Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are
  supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that
  directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose
  that it is also added because technically it is ~/bin's brother.

 I've never heard of ~/.local/bin .  Are there many people who use
 this?  ~/bin is common.

~/.local/bin has been there by default.

Unlike ~/bin, which is in PATH though not even created.

--
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-26 Thread Misha Shnurapet
27.07.2011, 10:17, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
 I've used ~/bin since before Linux was available, so I don't really see
 the point in trying to hide it (of course, I alias ls to ls -FCA, so
 ~/.bin wouldn't be hidden, just one extra character to type when I need
 to access it).

Noone has asked to hide it. :-) The proposal here is that both paths are 
included in $PATH by default. Your personal preference won't be hurt. In fact, 
it's a different story.

27.07.2011, 01:49, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
  PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin

 This was added between bash-4.2.10 -2 and -3:

I did a fresh install of F15 in the late May, and it's not there.

27.07.2011, 04:15, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
 IMHO adding directories to the default path should get a little more
 discussion than a single BZ request (and probably shouldn't be changed
 mid-release without notice).

Yes! Fedora *is* a place to do mid-release changes.

A notice, however, must be issued on critical changes (which is not the case 
here).

--
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: vsftpd in the news

2011-07-06 Thread Misha Shnurapet
06.07.2011, 16:07, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
 And for a sufficiently large tarball of a project with N1 devs, has the
 signer been able to actually verify all source code changes prior to
 signing the tarball? Or is the signature only used to flag a package as
 coming from a trusted project developer without any additional guarantees?
 A tarball sig is just one layer of safety, but no ultimate protection.

  The uploaded tarball checksum enters the sources file in git, and any
  tarball downloaded from the lookaside cache MUST match that checksum.
  Else it wouldn't be downloaded and used. Source RPM build in koji would
  fail.
  This is just a checksum against the tarball that enters the lookaside
  cache. Yes, I know about this. A malicious package could have been
  uploaded to the lookaside cache, however. This leads to demanding
  everyone have signatures available, but what do you do about SVN/Git
  checkouts or projects that don't wish to provide signatures?

 Obviously, one needs to be very careful, skim over diffs, monitor commits
 regularly, archive snapshots regularly, be familiar with upstream release
 habits. Upstream also needs to do that, to avoid that a compromised account
 from a committer is used to infiltrate the project. If a source code 
 repository
 is modified without permission and no developer (or release manager) notices 
 it,
 would the person adding the tarball sig notice it?

The developer of vsftpd didn't notice the change, but still there was early 
prevention possible.

The issue is *one* of the ways source code can be exploited, and checking the 
gpg signatures for the projects that allow it is a measure against the 
particular kind of attack. Literally, it would close one vulnerability in the 
distro. Which is enough.

--
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

vsftpd in the news

2011-07-04 Thread Misha Shnurapet
There's something to consider about Chris Evans blog post as of July 3 [1]:

 An incident, what fun! Earlier today, I was alerted that a vsftpd download 
 from the master site (vsftpd-2.3.4.tar.gz) appeared to contain a backdoor.

 $ gpg ./vsftpd-2.3.4.tar.gz.asc
 gpg: Signature made Tue 15 Feb 2011 02:38:11 PM PST using DSA key ID 3C0E751C
 gpg: BAD signature from Chris Evans ch...@scary.beasts.org

 The backdoor payload is interesting. In response to a :) smiley face in the 
 FTP username, a TCP callback shell is attempted.

 There is no obfuscation.

I have a question: how does that relate to our package building process, and 
are GPG signatures verified?

Thanks.

[1] 
http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2011/07/alert-vsftpd-download-backdoored.html

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: GNOME Shell fixes

2011-06-19 Thread Misha Shnurapet
03.05.2011, 20:56, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com:
 On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 20:21 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:

  Hello, teams!

  Is there any chance for this to land in Fedora 15?

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701609

  It is rather an important fix because it changes the label of the search 
 bar in Overview mode which is currently mistranslated. The fix is on its way 
 to upstream, but they say the earlier it shows up is the next version of 
 GNOME 3 that is to come out this Autumn. Getting it in sooner is strongly 
 desired.

 That looks like a fix that we can easily get into 3.0.2, which will find
 its way into F15 updates in about a month.

What is the deadline for corrected translations? Another bugfix is being 
applied.

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-15 Thread Misha Shnurapet
15.06.2011, 21:37, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net:
 My only concern is that there be a command-line replacement available.  I
 currently fetch my ISOs with bittorrent-curses and screen.  Can someone
 with experience with any of them offer a recommendation?  Python, C and
 C++ clients especially.  I've searched, but there are many out there.

I think you should look at deluge-console for there is also a daemon that runs 
separately, supporting tasks priority, queueing, automatic torrent management, 
and they've got a nice bandwidth tweaking how-to for it [1].

[1] http://dev.deluge-torrent.org/wiki/UserGuide/BandwidthTweaking

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
Email: shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, IRC: misha on freenode
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/shnurapet, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Pidgin is string and API frozen!

2011-06-07 Thread Misha Shnurapet
07.06.2011, 06:30, Andrew Victor avictor...@gmail.com;:
  hi,
   I intend to release Pidgin 2.8.0 on 2011-05-08, so I'm asking that all
   translations be submitted before 23:59:59 US EDT on 2011-05-07 (that leaves
   approximately 6 days for translations!)  Any translations submitted after 
 this
   deadline will be ignored.
  I was just wondering what happened to the 2.8.0 release.
  Has it been postponed?

  Regards,
   Andrew Victor

Could someone please drop them a note about Transifex?

--
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: NetworkManager to reconnect silently

2011-05-19 Thread Misha Shnurapet
19.05.2011, 21:12, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com:
 On 19/05/11 09:55, Misha Shnurapet wrote:

  Hi.

  I asked this question in NetworkManager mailing list, but everyone there 
 seems to be busy, so I decided to ask here.

  I run torrents on my notebook. On an electricity outage NetworkManager 
 starts asking for a new password, so when I'm not around and the light goes 
 back on (powering up the WLAN router), it just stands stalled with the 
 dialog open.

  Is there a way to tell NM not to ask for a new password ever? Because I use 
 a 63-symbol passphrase once set up on all the (two) machines so to forget 
 about it.

  Thanks!

  NetworkManager-gnome-0.8.4-1.fc14.x86_64

  --
  Best regards,
  Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
  shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306

   As far as i can tell there is no easy, if any, solution that would not
 breach the security of your 63-symbol pass phrase. In my experience
 using knetworkmanager a password is required for each secure Wireless
 connection  and for security these are stored in a secure encrypted
 area, (kwallet in my case), which needs just a single password for
 access. Hence a password is always required for wireless access to
 reconnect after a power out.
   This is not required for wired connections, so unless you can use some
 wired connection that restarts on power up to do the torrent downloads,
 you have little choice, without breaching the security provided by your
 pass phrase, but to accept the problem.
   From what I can gather you use long random pass phrases for any
 external available access which I heartily recommend. Nearly all
 security breaches are made because it's easy to guess pass phrases that
 relate to the person who created it.

 Regards

 cpp4ever

Many thanks for your answer. However, the nm-applet in GNOME does *not* require 
you to enter passphrase *each* time you establish the connection you've *once 
configured*. And this behavior is absolutely correct. Also, makes it feel like 
with a wired connection.

What is not absolutely correct is that, when it can't get response from the 
router, it starts thinking the passphrase has changed (which is wrong because 
the router is simply off). As soon as power is back on, the AP is back online 
with the same settings and the same passphrase (how mean of a manufacturer 
would it be not to implement this). But the client device stands idle  waiting 
for a passphrase.

I tested a couple of possible scenarios lately. NetworkManager reconnects 
nicely on outages that last no more than ~1 minute. Beyond that, it starts 
asking the question. 

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Intel N10 graphics and i915 driver

2011-05-13 Thread Misha Shnurapet
06.05.2011, 11:10, Misha Shnurapet shnura...@fedoraproject.org:
 04.05.2011, 23:02, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com;:

  On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:36 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
   driconf
   device screen=0 driver=dri2
   application name=Default
   option name=vblank_mode value=0 /
   /application
   /device
  We're absolutely never doing this by default.  0 means never sync with
  vertical retrace even if the app asks to.

  The other values for this option are:
  1: Default swap interval is 0, but respect app settings
  2: Default swap interval is 1 (ie, the refresh rate), but respect app
  settings
  3: Swap interval is never  1, but otherwise respect app settings

  2 is the default, and in the absence of a particularly strong argument
  to change it, I'd prefer not.

 OK. So, if the default swap interfal is the refresh rate, and the desktop 
 setting is 60 Hz, why does it go down to 30 FPS hardly I turn on the effects?

bump

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: anaconda-15.31-1.fc15 - Update the requirements for memory..

2011-05-09 Thread Misha Shnurapet
10.05.2011, 05:33, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
 this is already known and discussed at:

768 megs for an installer? Sweet Georgia Brown of Kingston town, I think 512 is 
pretty much.

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680542

Not specifically related, just asks for a correct message error.

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Fedora 15 / Gnome 3 gotchas

2011-05-07 Thread Misha Shnurapet
07.05.2011, 18:58, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com:
 On 06/05/11 23:51, Jason D. Clinton wrote:

  On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 09:03, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
  mailto:frankl...@gmail.com wrote:

  Any plans for a gui replacement for gnome-schedule?

  It doesn't appear to be abandoned:
  http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-schedule/log/

 It's obsoleted by gnome-panel in F15.

Is there a GUI tool to manage cron tasks?

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Intel N10 graphics and i915 driver

2011-05-05 Thread Misha Shnurapet
04.05.2011, 23:02, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
 On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:36 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:

  driconf
  device screen=0 driver=dri2
  application name=Default
  option name=vblank_mode value=0 /
  /application
  /device

 We're absolutely never doing this by default.  0 means never sync with
 vertical retrace even if the app asks to.

 The other values for this option are:
 1: Default swap interval is 0, but respect app settings
 2: Default swap interval is 1 (ie, the refresh rate), but respect app
 settings
 3: Swap interval is never  1, but otherwise respect app settings

 2 is the default, and in the absence of a particularly strong argument
 to change it, I'd prefer not.

OK. So, if the default swap interfal is the refresh rate, and the desktop 
setting is 60 Hz, why does it go down to 30 FPS hardly I turn on the effects?

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

GNOME Shell fixes

2011-05-03 Thread Misha Shnurapet
Hello, teams!

Is there any chance for this to land in Fedora 15?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701609

It is rather an important fix because it changes the label of the search bar in 
Overview mode which is currently mistranslated. The fix is on its way to 
upstream, but they say the earlier it shows up is the next version of GNOME 3 
that is to come out this Autumn. Getting it in sooner is strongly desired.

Thank you.

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Russian L10N Team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: GNOME Shell fixes

2011-05-03 Thread Misha Shnurapet
03.05.2011, 20:56, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com:
 On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 20:21 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:

  Hello, teams!

  Is there any chance for this to land in Fedora 15?

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701609

  It is rather an important fix because it changes the label of the search 
 bar in Overview mode which is currently mistranslated. The fix is on its way 
 to upstream, but they say the earlier it shows up is the next version of 
 GNOME 3 that is to come out this Autumn. Getting it in sooner is strongly 
 desired.

 That looks like a fix that we can easily get into 3.0.2, which will find
 its way into F15 updates in about a month.

That sounds great!

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Intel N10 graphics and i915 driver

2011-05-03 Thread Misha Shnurapet
04.05.2011, 07:41, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
 On 5/3/11 4:37 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
  (b) is the i915 driver expected to provide better
  video performance for this type of use in the future?

 Maybe.  Much depends on what kind of video you're trying to play (which
 you haven't said).  That particular chip can do mpeg2 in hardware, but
 the driver story for that isn't especially well hooked up yet.

 - ajax

Hi, Adam.

The question is the overall video performance. I have a Dell mini 10, and it 
seems to me that something just stopped working since Fedora 13 or 14.

I filed a bug about this in January:
 Performance on Dell Inspiron mini (Intel 945GMA)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668186

Later, a guy from my LoCo gave me a configuration snippet taken from Ubuntu 
forums that solved my problem and turned it back to how it was on Fedora 12.

~/.driconf

driconf
device screen=0 driver=dri2
application name=Default
option name=vblank_mode value=0 /
/application
/device
device screen=0 driver=i915
application name=Default
option name=force_s3tc_enable value=false /
option name=no_rast value=false /
option name=always_flush_cache value=false /
option name=early_z value=false /
option name=stub_occlusion_query value=false /
option name=always_flush_batch value=false /
option name=bo_reuse value=1 /
option name=texture_tiling value=true /
option name=vblank_mode value=0 /
option name=allow_large_textures value=2 /
option name=fragment_shader value=false /
/application
/device
/driconf

I have a question: can we get this to work out of the box? I'm willing to 
provide any logs if needed. You may see the video performance is different like 
heaven and hell.

-- 
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel