Re: libqalculate soname bump
On 7/5/24 15:10, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 7:45 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote: I am updating libqalculate to v5.2.0 which bumps the soname version. I will rebuild the following packages that depend on libqalculate. plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde Looks like you forgot to rebuild these packages and just submitted the update as-is? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-944fd900df Fabio I did not forget. koji wait-repo had this output - unsuccessfully waited 492:09 for libqalculate-5.2.0-1.fc41 to appear in the f41-build repo I had no idea what had happened until I saw the bodhi email this morning. I used to do soname builds on rawhide directly but based on the feedback on bodhi, it looks like I should do it on side-tag now.-- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
libqalculate soname bump
I am updating libqalculate to v5.2.0 which bumps the soname version. I will rebuild the following packages that depend on libqalculate. plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde Thanks, Mukundan. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Intent to orphan several python packages
On 8/13/23 17:17, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to
pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each
release.Several of these packages do not have dependencies packaged in
Fedora.
spyder (docstring-to-markdown)
python-rope (pytoolconfig)
python3-lsp-server (yapf >=0.33)
python-lsp-black
python-lsp-server
python-lsp-jsonrpc
python-pyls-spyder
python-qdarkstyle
In addition, I will also orphan the following packages -
python-spyder-kernels
python-textdistance
python-three_merge
python-libsass
python-qtsass
python-qtconsole
python-nbconvert
python-nbclient
python-QtAwesome
Some/most of these were packaged by me for spyder. I intend to orphan
these unless someone wants to pick up.
thanks.
I have now orphaned the following packages -
python-rope
python-lsp-server
python-lsp-black
python-lsp-jsonrpc
python-pyls-spyder
python-qdarkstyle
python-spyder-kernels
python-versioneer
python-textdistance
python-three_merge
python-libsass
python-qtsass
python-qtconsole
python-QtAwesome
python-QtPy
python-qstylizer
python-Rtree
python-whatthepatch
python-wurlitzer
python-apply-defaults
python-entrypoints
python-jupyterlab_pygments
python-pickleshare
python-helpdev
spyder
I have transferred python-{nbclient,nbconvert} to churchyard.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Intent to orphan several python packages
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several of these packages do not have dependencies packaged in Fedora. spyder (docstring-to-markdown) python-rope (pytoolconfig) python3-lsp-server (yapf >=0.33) python-lsp-black python-lsp-server python-lsp-jsonrpc python-pyls-spyder python-qdarkstyle In addition, I will also orphan the following packages - python-spyder-kernels python-textdistance python-three_merge python-libsass python-qtsass python-qtconsole python-nbconvert python-nbclient python-QtAwesome Some/most of these were packaged by me for spyder. I intend to orphan these unless someone wants to pick up. thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Intent to orphan several python packages
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several of these packages do not have dependencies packaged in Fedora. spyder (docstring-to-markdown) python-rope (pytoolconfig) python3-lsp-server (yapf >=0.33) python-lsp-black python-lsp-server python-lsp-jsonrpc python-pyls-spyder python-qdarkstyle Let me know if you want to pick up any of these. Thanks. Mukundan. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Any interest in maintaining spyder (python IDE)?
On 4/3/23 12:53, Blaise Pabon wrote: Hi Mukundan, Jonathan, I have been working on becoming a fedora maintainer and I would love to help. When I followed the links to the build logs I got a 404. Blaise Hi Blaise, I will be happy to help you with becoming a packager. I am also happy to add you as a collaborator on my COPR. Build logs may have been deleted since these packages were built sometime ago. Let me know if you would like to be added to COPR. Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Any interest in maintaining spyder (python IDE)?
I have been maintaining spyder in Fedora for sometime now. Since the time I took up maintaining spyder, the dependencies have expanded considerably (I have packaged several of these dependencies in the past). Unfortunately, I am not able to devote as much as time as needed to maintain this package (at least in working condition) anymore. I should point out that there are specific version dependencies for certain packages (e.g. ipython) that are not in sync with Fedora. I have relaxed the dependencies in the Fedora package (so that spyder continues to work, albeit with some issues). I did start updating spyder to 5.4.x series. Two more packages need to be packaged. See COPR - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/spyder/builds/ Is anyone interested in maintaining spyder and potentially its dependencies? Some of these dependencies are being maintained by python-sig already. I will be happy to continue on as co-maintainer and try to help out when I can. Thanks. Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > That said, until then I can try and run things on weekends. Is there a formal process to volunteer to hold the keys to the kingdom? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
fedpkg clone not working
I am unable to clone repos from src.fpo since this morning. $ fedpkg co xfce4-power-manager Cloning into 'xfce4-power-manager'... nonamed...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command. Same issue with other packages (e.g. htop) $ ssh-add -l 256 SHA256: nonamedotc@imladris/fedora (ED25519) $ klist -A Ticket cache: KEYRING:persistent:1000:1000 Default principal: nonamed...@fedoraproject.org Valid starting Expires Service principal 06/08/2022 18:58:14 06/09/2022 18:58:08 krbtgt/fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org renew until 06/15/2022 18:58:08 I have even tried changing my ssh key ... 'fedpkg co -a' works fine. What else can I try? Help is appreciated. Thanks, Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: libqalculate soname
On 3/21/22 20:35, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: I will be updating libqalculate (and qalculate-gtk) involving soname bump on rawhide in the coming days. The following packages will be affected - cantor step plasma-workspace qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages and open bug reports if there are issues. Thanks, Mukundan. My mistake - this update of libqalculate does not bump soname version. Sorry for the noise. I will not touch the above mentioned packages. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
libqalculate soname
I will be updating libqalculate (and qalculate-gtk) involving soname bump on rawhide in the coming days. The following packages will be affected - cantor step plasma-workspace qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages and open bug reports if there are issues. Thanks, Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: orphaning rarian
On 8/22/21 10:18 AM, Iago Rubio wrote: On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 09:00 -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 6:25 PM Mukundan Ragavan < nonamed...@gmail.com> wrote: I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rarian). If Mukundan want to take it over again, and there is a consensus about maintaning the package, he can use my spec as a starting point, if he don't want to take it again I may submit a review request and try to get an sponsor, or let other packager take it over once the review is done. If the decision to let it go, goes ahead, it may live on Copr as is for the time being in case someone needs it. Igor, I see that Troy has taken up rarian which is great. If you are looking to get sponsored into packager group, feel free to email me. I will be glad to assist. Cheers, Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed
On 8/18/21 3:51 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: Hello, I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so -> libquazip1-qt4.so and libquazip5.so -> libquazip1-qt5.so), I will need the dependent packages' maintainers (in Bcc) to rebuild them in a side tag (I'm not a provenpackager, so I can't do that myself, although Nicolas (@kwizart) offered to help if needed). Affected packages: bletchmame ckb-next fritzing gimagereader GLC_lib keepassxc krita nomacs qcad qmapshack texstudio I've just checked, whether there are builds of these packages are going on in another sidetag, and it turns none of the packages currently has any builds, that are not tagged for Rawhide / F36 currently. If you want to, you can open a sidetag and build the new version of quazip inside; give me a short note, and I'll take care of rebuilding all the listed consumers, so things can settle within the same day. Cheers Björn I co-maintain keepassxc. I am good with either of the plans - side tag or Björn building it. Cheers, Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
orphaning rarian
I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rarian). As far as I can tell, nothing in Fedora depends on it anymore. # dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires librarian\* Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:50 ago on Wed 11 Aug 2021 06:03:30 PM EDT. rarian-compat-0:0.8.1-27.fc34.x86_64 rarian-devel-0:0.8.1-27.fc34.i686 rarian-devel-0:0.8.1-27.fc34.x86_64 Last upstream release was in 2008 and this is currently FTBFS on rawhide/F35. Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
libqalculate soname bump 21->22
libqalculate 3.20.1 updates soname version to 22. I will rebuild the affected packages. $ dnf repoquery --releasever=rawhide --whatrequires libqalculate cantor-libs-0:21.04.2-2.fc35.x86_64 plasma-workspace-libs-0:5.22.4-1.fc35.x86_64 qalculate-kde-0:0.9.7.10-31.nmu1.fc35.x86_64 step-0:21.04.3-1.fc35.x86_64 Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
orphaning some python packages
I am orphaning the following packages. They should not be needed for anything else in Fedora (acc. to dnf repoquery --whatprovides). python-jsonrpcserver (there is another package of similar name that is needed by spyder) All these are required by the package above. python-aiozmq python-flask-socketio python-socketio python-engineio Feel free to take any of the packages. Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: help with building nextcloud-client
On 2/22/21 9:33 PM, Jerry James wrote: The compiler is telling you that it saw "#include " inside an extern "C" block, but that glib.h ultimately pulls in headers with C++ definitions. It looks like the glib headers already take care of defining things correctly depending on whether they are being consumed by a C compiler or a C++ compiler. Tell upstream to move all #include statements for glib headers out of extern "C" blocks. Thank you! That helped. I am able to build successfully on mock. I will update this soon and submit the patch upstream. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
help with building nextcloud-client
Hi,
I am trying to update nextcloud-client to 3.1.3. Build keeps failing
with this -
/builddir/build/BUILD/desktop-3.1.3/src/gui/cloudproviders/cloudprovidermanager.cpp:15:1:
note: 'extern "C"' linkage started here
15 | extern "C" {
Can someone please explain how I can fix this failure?
Complete build logs -
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62549250
Thank you!
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly
On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit > BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used. > nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Mukundan, your package misses. > Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit > changes to it. > Hi Antonio, This is done. Please add gtkhash to your update as well. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45107523 Thanks, Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has the buildroot override expired? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601 On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Mukundan, your package misses. > Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit > changes to it. > > On 25/05/20 19:18, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: >> I made builds for R-argon2 last night as well, which you can >> include in your update. >> >> - R-argon2-0.2.0-7.fc31 >> >> Actually, there's no need for a _new_ update; you can just edit >> the existing one. >> >> On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 08:41, Felix Schwarz >> wrote: >>> >>> builds for borgbackup done (finally): - borgbackup-1.1.11-3.el7 - >>> borgbackup-1.1.11-5.fc31 >>> >>> Please add these once you submit the final update. >>> >>> Felix >>> -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libqalculate soname change
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.8.0. The following packages are affected - - qalculate-gtk - plasma-workspace - step - cantor I will rebuild all these packages on rawhide. qalculate-kde will also affected but this is already FTBFS. So, I won't touch this. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Help needed to fix FTBFS (gcc-10 caused failures)
Hi all, I have two packages that fail to build from source. As far as I can tell from the build logs, they are gcc-10 failures. The typical "extern" solution does not work me (or, I am not adding 'extern' at the correct places). Can someone give me pointers for fixing this FTBFS? Here are the links containing the build logs - xfce4-panel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800267 xfce4-sensors-plugin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800268 Direct koji links no longer show the build logs and hence Thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libqalculate soname change
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.6.0. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild all the packages on rawhide. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
package review request: python-wurlitzer
Can someone review this package for me? This should be fairly straightforward. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752298 Thanks, Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libqalculate soname change
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.3 (libqalculate.so.21.2.0). The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild the packages on both rawhide and F31 tomorrow. Maintainers, if you do not want me to touch F31, please let me know. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
packages stuck in f31-updates-testing-pending
Can someone from releng re-tag these packages and push them to stable? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344119 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344089 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344114 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344121 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344125 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344127 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344130 They are stuck in f31-updates-testing-pending. Thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: orphaning bleachbit
On 5/19/19 1:58 PM, Andrew Toskin wrote: >> I'm already a packager, and I'd be willing to take over BleachBit. This way >> you >> don't have to wait for Silvia to learn the ropes before handing off control. > Oops, I'm used to having my email client do the signature for me, but I > responded here in HyperKitty... > > Name: Andrew Toskin > FAS: terrycloth Thanks. I have transferred the package over to you and removed myself. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: orphaning bleachbit
On 5/19/19 5:05 AM, Silvia Sánchez wrote: > > Hello, > > Yes, I know Python 2 will be soon removed, but I can't just let > Bleachbit die. It's too useful for that. > Finding a sponsor seems to be the hard bit. I've been looking for one > for ages. > Thanks for the answer. > > Kind regards, > Silvia > FAS: Lailah > > Silvia, I am a sponsor. Can you provide me a list of packages you have reviewed? I can probably help you becoming a packager. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
orphaning bleachbit
I intend to orphan bleachbit soon. If anyone is interested please let me know and I will transfer the package. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bleachbit Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libqalculate soname change
libqalculate soname bump is happening with update to v3.1. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these in the coming days.Note that qalculate-kde is FTBFS right now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
soname update - libqalculate
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.0 (libqalculate.so.21). The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed. I did not build v2.9.x despite my earlier email. Are there objections if I do this for F30 as well or is it too late? Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libqalculate - soname change
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.9. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
soname change - libqalculate
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.8.2. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned python2-astroid and python2-pylint
On 10/24/18 1:49 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24.10.2018 01:47, Mukundan Ragavan wrote> I think I can just drop > python2 version of spyder. Thank you for letting >> me know. > > That would be awesome, it would also unblock: > > python-spyder-kernels > python-cloudpickle > python-rope > python-pickleshare (after sagemath) > python-QtAwesome > spyder-kernels, rope and QtAwesome have dropped py2 packages now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned python2-astroid and python2-pylint
On 10/23/18 8:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > I've just orphaned python2-astroid and python2-pylint. > > I don't need them and I don't want to maintain legacy python2 packages. > > Those are needed for python2-spyder, python2-asttokens, > python2-flake8-import-order. Please consider removing those, so we can > retire python2-astroid and python2-pylint. If you need to keep them, > please consider maintaining python2-astroid and/or python2-pylint. > > Thanks, I think I can just drop python2 version of spyder. Thank you for letting me know. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: orphaning LabPlot
On 9/23/18 4:46 AM, Christian Dersch wrote: > On 9/23/18 2:23 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: >> I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer >> this package to that person. >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot > Hi, > > I'll take care of the package as it is part of the Astronomy Lab. > > Greetings, > Christian I have transferred the package to you. Thank you! Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
orphaning LabPlot
I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer this package to that person. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: orphaned blueberry and bluez-tools
On 9/9/18 4:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 09/09/2018 06:56 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: >> I don't use or have the time to maintain blueberry and bluez-tools so I have >> orphaned them. > Since the Xfce spin uses these, I'll take em. Co-maintainers welcome. > > kevin I would like to co-maintain. Can you please add me to both these packages? Thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
soname change - libqalculate.so.19
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.6.2. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages for rawhide and F29 before Sunday. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5IWIPPXL47BRKWYOOPW5EFR4UWGM6JU7/
Review request - python-spyder-kernels
Can someone please review this package for me? This should be relatively straightforward. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599026 I need this to update python IDE spyder to version 3.3.0. I can review a package in return. Thanks, Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BY6LZTS7RVE5FN4ZZ5AI3XBKJVQKTNA4/
soname change - libqalculate.so.18
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.6.0. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DMMRURKI4DGRCHZCI4BYTTXZK7TMICUC/
soname change - libqalculate.so.17
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.5.0. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: orphaning and retiring some packages
On 05/06/2018 07:31 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 6:54 PM Mukundan Ragavan > wrote: >> fityk (depends on cmpfit) >> cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this) > Unless someone else wants these two, I will take them. Co-maintainers more > than welcome. > FAS name: alexpl I have transferred both projects to you and removed myself. Thank you! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
orphaning and retiring some packages
I am orphaning certain packages and retiring some others that are no longer needed. Packages being **orphaned** fityk (depends on cmpfit) cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this) rarian csmith python-cclib Unfortunately, I fell behind in maintaining these packages (particularly csmith and cclib). These will need to be updated. Package being **retired** SuperLU43 This was brought into Fedora SuperLU as a compat package. Nothing in Fedora needs this packages any more and so is no longer needed. If interested, send me your FAS and I will transfer the project to you. If not, I will orphan/retire these packages in a few days (wednesday probably). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libqalculate soname change
Since 2.4.0 is out, soname change will be to libqalculate.so.16. I will submit pull requests for the affected packages. I might miss F28. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libqalculate soname change
I will be updating libqalculate to the latest upstream release (v2.3.0 instead of 2.2.1 as per my previous email). This involves a soname change. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will build qalculate and the affected packages in rawhide and Fedora 28 in the coming days (most likely during the weekend well before the final freeze). Mukundan. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libqalculate soname change
> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 20:46 -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > Thanks for the notification. > > Note F28 is currently in freeze for Beta; this is a long freeze, and > honestly, might get longer, given the current state of things. So I'm > not sure whether it'd be optimal to have this committed and built for > F28, but not able to go stable due to the freeze. Might be better to > wait till after Beta, *or* get a freeze exception. Is there any > significant benefit for us in the new libqalculate, which would justify > a freeze exception? I was worried about pushing this during freeze as well. While I do want to get this pushed out to F28 (this and previous two releases that never made to Fedora have bug fixes and new features), I can certainly do so after beta is out and freeze is lifted. I will build only for rawhide on Friday and leave F28 updates for after the freeze is lifted. Thanks for replying. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
libqalculate soname change
I will be updating libqalculate to the latest upstream release (v2.2.1). This involves a soname change. The following packages are affected. plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I have built all these packages for rawhide and F28 in a COPR [0]. Since we have the same versions on both rawhide and F28, I hope to push libqalculate to both and rebuild all these packages. If building for F28 is not preferred, please let me know. I anticipate building everything by Friday (2018-03-08) and will proceed unless I hear otherwise. Mukundan. [0] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/libqalculate/builds/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
planning to orphan 4 packages
I am planning to orphan the four packages (list below) in a few days. If anyone is interested in maintaining these packages, I can make you the person admin instead of orphaning. These are the packages - autodocksuite gaussum qmforge webcpp These packages have very little to no development upstream. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
group "hardware support" in anaconda
I noticed in comps that the group "hardware support" is set to false under tag. This group is also not shown as "add ons" for minimal installation in anaconda. Why is the group hidden? Can we show "hardware support" group in Anaconda (non-live installers, of course)? Installing this group is the easiest way to get wireless network access on laptops. Thanks, Mukundan. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upcoming libqalculate soname bump
libqalculate-2..0.0 is now built on rawhide. I have submitted pull requests for cantor, qalculate-kde and plasma-workspace to rebuild for the soname bump. I have not touched step (I could not get it to build in mock so I did not touch the package). The COPR is now deleted. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
upcoming libqalculate soname bump
I will be updating libqalculate and qalculate-gtk for rawhide on Tuesday. This will involve libqalculate soname bump. The following packages will be affected - cantor step plasma-workspace qalculate-kde I have setup COPR for building against the update library [1]. Packages other than step build without problems. I will push libqaculate to rawhide on Tuesday (Sep 19, 2017) and will submit pull requests for cantor, plasma-workspace and qalculate-kde. I do not have experience with step and will not touch the package. Mukundan. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/libqalculate-soname-update-test/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
spyder3 is now on rawhide
I am building spyder 3.1.3 on *rawhide* right now. We do not have py3 version of rope yet and jedi is one version too recent in rawhide at the moment. But, this should be fixed with 3.1.4 (when upstream releases it). please test this version of spyder. I am looking at pushing this to F26 absent too many issues. Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: last Spyder IDE under Fedora from Spyder 2.3.9 to the last
On 04/02/2017 05:46 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > the problem with build from source under Fedora distro of the last > Spyder IDE > > https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/4318 > Yes. Some of spyder dependencies were recently built and I was away. I will update to 3.x this week. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: centos epel xfce bluetooth broken
On 02/07/2017 03:30 AM, andr...@benzlerweb.de wrote: > Hello Guys, > > bluetooth is broken. I installed all xfce4 package and xfe-bluetooth did not > installed (dependency). The package can be straight forward compiled from fedora. > > http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/other/SRPMS/xfce-bluetooth-0-0.5.20150130git.el7.centos.src.rpm > > on my private server. > > Sincerely > > Andy It appears xfce-bluetooth is orphaned. I can take the package but I am unsure as to why it was orphaned. Upstream does not seem to be terribly active ... -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [embree] patch refused to be applied
On 01/29/2017 12:37 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > I applied a patch sent by upstream but some odd reason, the build kept > on failing > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254 > > I include the patch for preview so someone can see what went wrong. > > Thanks > + /usr/bin/patch -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch The text leading up to this was: -- |diff -ru embree-2.13.0-orig/kernels/common/accel.cpp embree-2.13.0/kernels/common/accel.cpp |--- embree-2.13.0-orig/kernels/common/accel.cpp2016-11-21 01:12:33.0 -0800 |+++ embree-2.13.0/kernels/common/accel.cpp 2017-01-28 20:47:13.979363972 -0800 Using, for example, %patch0 -p1 should fix the issue. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
library version update - libqalculate
I recently update libqalculate to latest upstream version 0.9.10. Unfortunately, I forgot to send out a soname bump email (I emailed one affected package maintainer though) - which I realized only when I saw the broken dependency emails. The list of affected packages are 1/ step 2/ qalculate-kde 3/ cantor 4/ plasma-workspace My apologies for the late notice. Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: review swap
On 09/30/2016 06:52 AM, Björn Esser wrote: > Hello, > > there is another small python-package from me that needs review [1]. > Any offers? > > Cheers > Björn > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380671 Taken. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Reviews swap (python packages; spyder runtime dependencies)
On 09/24/2016 06:30 PM, gil wrote: > hi > > Il 25/09/2016 00:00, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto: >> 1/ python-qtconsole >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090 > take! > have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845 ? > thanks in advance > regards > .g thanks! taken. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Reviews swap (python packages; spyder runtime dependencies)
Hi folks, Spyder 3 was released recently and several runtime dependencies are not present in Fedora repositories (as far as I can tell). I have review requests that will address these runtime dependencies (below). Please take up the packages for review. I am, of course, willing to swap reviews. Here is the list of packages for review - 1/ python-qtconsole https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090 2/ python-QtPy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091 3/ python-QtAwesome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092 4/ python-pickleshare https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379093 5/ python-flit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094 blocks #6 (1379095) 6/ python-entrypoints https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379095 depends on #5; blocks #7 (1379096) 7/ python-nbconvert https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379096 depends on #6 Thanks, Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fwd: Reminder: please test Xfce 4.12 packages on EL-7
Reminder for those using (or planning to use) Xfce on EL-7. Please test Xfce 4.12 packages in epel-testing. Details are below. In the absence of adverse reports, I will push this to epel repo in next few days. Mukundan. Forwarded Message Subject: Reminder: please test Xfce 4.12 packages on EL-7 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:57:17 -0400 From: Mukundan Ragavan To: EPEL Development List , Fedora Xfce users and developers , centos-de...@centos.org I had written earlier [0] about the availability of Xfce 4.12 packages in EPEL testing repositories. This is a reminder for the same. Link to update - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-262a3f39e1 Some notes from [0] are worth repeating here - - libxfce4ui obsoletes libxfcegui4 (plugins using libxfcegui4 were never built for EL-7) - xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin obsoletes xfce4-mixer and xfce4-volumed (xfce4-volumed is not even in the repos) - xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin uses pavucontrol as sound mixer which is unavailable in EL-7 at the moment. Additionally, if you have any xfce plugin installed that is not from EPEL repo, it is likely that the plugin will conflict with newer libraries provided by the update. This would need to resolved manually. Mukundan. [0] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MMNQALBRN76F4KBXUISEC5ACQLQ7X4J7/ -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Michael Cullen
On 05/02/2016 08:44 PM, Michael Cullen wrote: > Hi! > > I've just submitted a review request here > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344 > > I'm a software developer from the UK currently living and working in > London on Linux-based set top box middleware. I've been a Linux user for > a long time, but never really offered much back. I've tried many > distros, but always seem to keep coming back to Fedora. Anyway, I've > decided it's probably time I offered something back, and packaging seems > like as good an idea as any. > > Why this package? Well it seemed like a fairly easy one to start with > and I used to work on a Qt-based product so I know it well. Also it > plays into my interest in imaging and media. > > My interests outside of software are travel and photography (even if I > do rather more of the latter) and I'm also sometimes found (literally) > hanging around local climbing centres. > > Anyway, let me know if you have any questions about this! > > Thanks, > Michael Hi Michael, Welcome to Fedora Project! I can take up your package for review and sponsor you to the packagers group. I will start commenting on your bug report. Best wishes, Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
package review request - xfce4-calculator-plugin
All, I have submitted a package review request for xfce4-calculator-plugin. It should be a fairly straightforward review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151 I am, of course, open for a review swap. Thanks, Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rstudio
On 04/03/2016 10:03 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:46:12PM -0400, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> >> I would be glad to put this up for review and maintain the package >> assuming there is not someone else who has already started work on this. > > Any progress on this? > > Zbyszek It will probably be this week. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: package review request
On 03/29/2016 11:13 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 27 March 2016 at 05:55, gil wrote: >> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 > > If you're not getting many replies it's because gmail is auto-marking > all your emails as spam: "Why is this message in Spam? It has a from > address in libero.it but has failed libero.it's required tests for > authentication." > > Richard. Yup! Adding the email address to the address book does not seem to change anything. I have a habit of manually checking spam folder periodically and this is when I catch your (gil) emails. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
SuperLU license change
SuperLU license is changed from BSD to BSD and GPLv2+. Some files in the package are licensed under GPLv2+. Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: package review request
On 03/27/2016 12:55 AM, gil wrote: > hi > can you take this for me > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 ? > thanks in advance > .g > Taken. Thanks. Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
package review request
Hello all, I have a compat package that I would like to get reviewed. Here is the link to the review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440 This is a compat package for SuperLU which I updated to v5.1 today. Some of the packages that depend on SuperLU has version specific requires and hence this compat package. I am open to review swaps, of course. Thanks, Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
soname bump for SuperLU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello all, I will be updating SuperLU to the latest upstream release - version 5.1.1. This results in the libsuperlu soname version to be bumped from 4.3 to 5.1. There are only two packages that depend on superlu - armadillo and freefem++. I will rebuild both the packages on koji on the rawhide and F24 branch. I have verfied that they should build without issues on COPR [2] . Mukundan. [1] dnf repoquery output $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires SuperLU --alldeps --arch x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:32:53 ago on Sat Mar 26 09:50:29 2016. SuperLU-devel-0:4.3-14.fc24.x86_64 armadillo-0:6.500.5-1.fc24.x86_64 armadillo-0:6.600.4-1.fc24.x86_64 freefem++-0:3.44-2.fc24.x86_64 [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/SuperLU-soname-bump/b uilds/ - -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW9rhVAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxn6J4P/0qyoQyR5/v4lG5c5l/CXsb0 mtbo65ayqI5GB9O4zCkBtdAAoW9hgrtNn67bIbDDW01zOYlsRx5XmLM+701whAoF TwaO5LwbYIg2KmMLAWvYNis+h9WPbhe4eMIwl9E95J8tFHzTwZ0RZ00Qw8MaVkr2 qHiMFRplhClR/pVd5sQa7dKFARYfz/GTh0tR8gte1nq+CHRurFoN5Qtb4K9Oyp/7 19ep01FsC/WB80ijXe77WCF+kmZlvqF5rEjzLtIGGqYJ45oymvef17biIaDo1Tl7 S6HTwlSXfA9fQNyQ3nnu27BXlDCpBJqSnymHGC8qLiUdwquxzDqFweIcdsMzJLoO 9j9eT1Elkb3if3vNky3QVQi7b5NOhfOO3d1b4iqaiPhrSNsiGcJ81OPTEJR0kO7C Tmk6Wf3tU/oNsxVL3QSihA97bXeFJhHO42hPt6Xf9Os5j3f7/CrX6E5gGDkE2qYg 07Jq3bw+fkVNRe6ThpFto+0qOqrFgKo7CqO32+2wlScCE6+9dRJQhg5zVJhKN6fs 25lyVqjduGQY7yXliW8jxx2WpX+Db6PZ59TO68fqC2P58rZRuJotRwQZ6ZmKzoYL xsx0HxY9qL88Tsx+FxtfZTWloojSwwkFEO6w486ODdTiDuUkHKDZLh0uQclMxvtn K22WSVAkX8mCwPTqdSJ5 =wP7d -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rstudio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/29/2016 05:25 PM, Amit Saha wrote: >> SG> Hello, I like to have everything on my system in a package. >> So, I SG> looked around and found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio. >> >> I actually just use the upstream RPMs, but I unpack and repack >> them to remove some bundled crap and some extraneous Provides:. >> Might not even need to do that these days; I haven't checked >> lately. >> >> But having it in Fedora proper would be really great. At least I >> think it's sufficiently free. > > > And I would gladly include it in Fedora Scientific, right now you > get rkward and could also use Jupyter notebook for it: > http://fedora-scientific.readthedocs.org/en/latest/R_programming.html > > >> I would be glad to put this up for review and maintain the package assuming there is not someone else who has already started work on this. If anyone is already working on this, I can also co-maintain. Please let me know. If I don't see anything here in the next few days, I will submit a review request for RStudio. Mukundan. - -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW7KE6AAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnZtAP/A6/tUabs4n3pDu7IahWUm8V kSvOAoBbDyskdwlz6fd1torQMq8HAwNOYGd5rLx+XXw4rtJ48LcvAJYyR+OIcUKx e+o3+2rB6wcqwgUrxNh0QttDfZ3EJGCZTNw0/JJ/uihCp7GD25qEd4REdsJGjXoO HxESTc5uDd8fbRD/1PVA/apx7NUasdi/hoagGc5P7hMUnsCr27VrprSWrxVYB989 aLkpgSPCLABwvlEKiGcTPza1VXBevhECK6Oci9QTufjzVCmQ6BS7iNVEB5P63ojZ ibyhHjcOe5N5O75yIFPXHI+mzsEmKGCsT6V3cY60O74PVYhurt5UtvNGcKh19iXq bmWAq9qcy8JdmFdNeFo4UcO8j9S1ipdk0NhqKvDCr1vxRUmuHsc7S9ZKoj3F8OIh 59EjS2qNv9pf7CDk1SXB+ANW3Lx6anzDOFqLjVekEYc8yDoc5Fdd8XR6KELrQrFJ aHX5sJI0YDmj0bZ2SW25Po01B8EjzErmm2vT4BKQ/uHKEG5oHYZnY6yecR7QTOe7 t7V42awaT1HQ1a7sDo83G2VoJ60nZcyUtTkTWxHLWiUY16cOt7wLz8PmLQz30Dl8 CutJILbCAIssHiwKDvRhv0CmBj9akRZ9oTfZ+rcDFyJVHWFMwWwFg+0GKAXDMFkp uuzac5uiCHMxkkoG7LV4 =OUHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
package review requests
Hello all, I have submitted two packages for review. I trust both these reviews are fairly straightforward. 1/ python-nmrglue This is a python module for processing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020 2/ xfpanel-switch This is a simple application to manage multiple panel layouts for xfce. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022 I am, of course, open to swap reviews. Thanks, Mukundan. -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 --- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: requesting help on fixing gcc-6 FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/16/2016 11:23 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
>> (abs(point.x()-position.point.x())>20 &&
>> qAbs(point.y()-position.point.y())>20 ) {
>>
>> There is mention about this in gcc 6 porting "guide" -
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/porting_to.html
>>
>> But, I have no idea how to fix this.
>
> May you could try to change abs to fabs (or alternatives)?
> Otherwise, explicit type cast could help. -- devel mailing list
Thanks Dmitrij.
Also, many thanks to Yaakov for tons of help! Much appreciated!
Mukundan.
- --
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWxnEpAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnwOcP/1R5kgcsQO8TtqtleVY+nQuP
lIaPHz26CG9xrIHI+qlFf+T3KUa7J3+EEB0aYE6iRoEdGuGqcaIzMMY8Jmk7fMLc
RXVbd1+Fu1O2yc9AdTj2jsMOvqLByAXOkg7SslXumbMaH6aiH1Kwhpw1pfnYsN0h
il/0OGTaS7p+5Cex6QKq2ybAdBgaXXzCay1A4Yd/ke8pfGahdJZM+nLNyluPxmw9
A83WiTqeebKy+uuhMnSWhNPdvTYF2ggH/OfGEsVdqm4zVIQRthOSBF1Jdaj9+RZE
t1KIB6aJoYfmMwZbo5yegPf9kw5BQ0OgTd2WeKePq+bxb6eGuz/6Uyw98zqjB/Jt
qaALvKniz+Zvo9CJyiGVLUE9/GVAM37r1Gj3FKLAcgPN+gELvv4WhCzFiJHEYiMX
PvciWJWV46FiYdWxU7yQ8u+ZG1C1VLHi9wYtUPkIWxu3wLIEeps7IDOZPUKmrHX2
htTIUqd4GKCCLhsYfQJA7FmgY5v/gYgY6BBRGRYG7HCGo1Z3jWUWoJS3GoBYLlHn
hcW+W/dYdaB0omAZ1MAT9wVcEfN2lldiz1KGbu/GwLLhNLdFmTrBjhqb3988HLiO
nxjPgrRQ4QGzgyWuCAnWYgo3qgt/2jvvz2GdGB4/EHmFtr57yPbo7W1lXvxCjMwT
48SFRd6lXtofFU0wG63g
=aAWe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
requesting help on fixing gcc-6 FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi folks,
After the recent mass builds, I have a few packages that fail to build
from source. I have tried digging through the build logs to see if I
can fix them. Unfortunately, my knowledge of C/C++ is far too basic to
handle these issues.
If folks who know to fix the issues below can help me out, I would
appreciate it very much.
1/ Labplot - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307279
I think the issue is here -
/builddir/build/BUILD/labplot-kf5-2.1.0/src/backend/worksheet/TextLabel.
cpp:538:38:
error: call of overloaded 'abs(qreal)' is ambiguous
if (abs(point.x()-position.point.x())>20 &&
qAbs(point.y()-position.point.y())>20 ) {
There is mention about this in gcc 6 porting "guide" -
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/porting_to.html
But, I have no idea how to fix this.
2/ clustal-omega - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307383
3/ libqalculate - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307731
Unfortunately, for these two, I have no idea where to begin here ... :(
Thanks for any help in advance! Much appreciated.
Muknudan.
- --
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2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=3Tjr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Review swaps (4 R packages)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/08/2016 11:14 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Hi! > > I have 4 R package that I submitted for review. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333 R-highlight > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 R-inline > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305335 R-Rcpp > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305336 R-RInside > > There is a dependency chain: The 3rd depends on the first two, and > the 4th depends on the 3rd. > > Review swaps welcome. > > Mattias > I can take these up for review. Mukundan. - -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWuUk2AAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnSEMQAJhc5VWfvVThfwlU1YnIXjZi XGdTyeJyo7RToXfCiGhaaJajq8ATJNtO0oNiNVHFy3f9ZGqf3XIRnYowPDanRL3l CUcmem1kNJMpPAnMVxT0IrKdXbWo+GsxAdr0uc5Ne4fgAk0rSiX7u0hIuz7rlyrt V0QVUwq0Qeho7OfJEX2LL2Lrpv0yuwr3nc9ODxM1VVhNekcxCPGvDsC0UpAvl3FK WVUKyMB09OKnIjvbxIHTTBAZXC0v4MyD4h+zE3VnOBBryyt8vdD366Ch3vuV7jQs Fj5gHTtx8VGjUczpu7oxmfLhk1O/8w/9DncqyJ5G0GzYjJv6vUTkmsZNXgulk92R aFw37NzriOZQ9YfGRXaEZJy6u07qZMwMzwurAMYfANMK1WfIlfs3vUbl+PmQjm7v 3dHeSdmiAJbbGpkNV+G6OnZp70UqSGxCtl76P10PRlmHLspS4ryi3rACI+yjRVL3 0xiWqDx3Mv6CIk8hhAYXhLVC0fSVHQR+7GLGd1zGtZobgvMmhbjT2jEiuQLHjRnS 609IPV5UOS8bYuPNZTCaie6ORAFY/DSvRBbrvhrk3PClQxs8hnGQbKY7cx4I9iyy XugZ4gUrupb+eayE4ldrHxB5tlaqdNOZETsvBNTzuywhjO87kB/3+d9yF9RvNTj/ XFlVVBv/H+NQAd9iEqxE =erLs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: keepassx 2.0?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/12/2016 03:38 PM, Martin Ueding wrote: > I was rather surprised by this too. When the UI changed I was > already a bit sceptical as KeePassX has not changed in like five > years. When it did not open the old database I knew that I was > served version 2. A short look in the dnf automatic update emails > confirmed that. > > The mid-release break was unexpected. I have converted my database > now and kept the old one. As there is nothing wrong with 2.0 and > most of my devices are the same Fedora 23, I will be able to work > with the new database. > > I have thought that the version 2.0 would come eventually, just > not mid-release. So even if there would be a package for the old > version, I would not go back as the new one seems to work just as > well. +1. My thoughts exactly. Despite the fact that v2 was a surprise, no harm done since I used the import function (messages were clear) and I still have the older file untouched. Having said that, I would not want to go back to the older version either. My two cents .. - -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWlXy1AAoJEHE/1K3lyLxntU0QANXbX7F6N1+wJ9VmpUe9FLHj PsCdywWIik6sLNLV5fesxUiEKv+N5BOaoZJMOEffN9CXczN6nTzpQDk7FC7wNDqZ D9UkbvIXNyjX9itAxBSZhd7yKin5paEMy8zYOp1or5vGMeFhf2Z7HY7Po/yCK032 dtdLLlGb1tzKF2qFajzLKDQRkl5RE0EaMLHhvUCmMmw1QF2v1CvII65BtBff8kW4 Gsrxi6kheNYvfJxeHskDHRIETSph6yHiEtaWoGsy6NTg5qKu6tct5yuNrxYHTed2 T8nua+3NqyTIfVY4zXsSy7/e/Ba3TPlJN4o/jaeeDrpQIZ7g45ktPw3U/XrIZcSk OG92vu81DHMo/fZ/9UFcLuczNGAsQgE8bPACpg9sUFJSJTatcjKOLQ2Sre4xezCj hFc8LHHAJhtHs4oZYQ6gGpjDQ1q+lYsPAhLlViBC9IzGHpYXdBBgGpVQHc8v+k4Q DCGl+m2caqvCR6pdixEtB7EWdsp2Xg7OYAGg+Fsl6mVgFmuceQZEsGnb9rcs8z74 bcvOQTLQTVr3PFsV7lFoodsebCn6m545PrCes4bzYyegpIh49cfI1p2+p4yD18f1 uEWD3quyehNwo17YPD7WY3N7yOvkWE+0eynM0KA3FTBL1YuTCRkoj/bS3I5pXr4M omj/NBUjAmKKJ6sEfw+r =DZH4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/07/2015 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Per this fesco ticket: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3 > > I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point > of contact: > > LabPlot -- Data Analysis and Visualization ( master f23 f22 f21 ) I have taken LabPlot. However, I do not commit permissions or administrator rights. I don't know what I am doing wrong here. I take ownership of the packages but I do not become the admin!! Co-maintainers welcome. Thanks, Mukundan. - -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWFcUXAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnD/0P/jtbfvPwJFky8bEOVEfYpjnR tzqLOp5iapgAkV76wvKgGUi13KooHcuWbCsmjIxiCzJmIctzYmh3pWon7K7+QcVX Uohs+CxI/3eQ9L8iEsqz9SxSKMTBrKl1MlOPoAw5emyvk/4aidjuMlq7P3cl+okJ NL/z8XpYKYk6ShgJ8Y0k6kH74FnV/b0JvO9vy7ltxTZHmRxwIWCKcnsiz1fwOtl3 UmkvzikMJbsN0KpiEXluggQ/wezau6iyDEnqksXTqIHmTYnr0trUkZOOIOVA+3LL NFftdyAL3sU/+cT0eHsBXt9eKLYMYTzcHeTOo3yPm8TIwR3OLwdXvnVL74BdHPgv X2WLuKTOa6seSQjVAIKstUmuQaBYqgqYcpalzU64o+bjmzqwdlm8ob23P4lXKeDO 0WvYexCuhtoagP+oX70EY+u4Bh46hm+w4mnqZHaw0NLtPYTmO+2PCA/MS9oPYR6q /i7ZdRyoNkxwue8JWJITb3Rz1s37kAn7JQuevh8HPE9OKDg33/jQYncFFlvdmcB+ NhEQPXTyGcgwn0rs0u8NodPCnviENN8DzaEDiswS1y1iIaTdMm9AcMkbX/N/mJTd BXQ7fEPv49roH9ibctNSr69MKqqa7GDeHRtv4TsB7c4Ic1SQqiKu7HNbrB3jag8Q HZh3b6YjHVjxt+0KjpE3 =Ua6l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphan Spyder package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/01/2015 03:17 AM, Radek Novacek wrote: > Hi, > > "Spyder is the Scientific PYthon Development EnviRonment" > > I no longer use Spyder, so I'm looking for someone who wants to > take it over. Please, ask for ACLs for it if you would like to > take it over. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/spyder/ > > Radek Novacek > > I will take it. I have started using this very much lately. I will request ACLs right away. Thanks, Mukundan. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWDa9rAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnyd8QAIU8UP6GaH1NIO0WAVtvNoKm ccufOJZ4eV1Kp/Hi1fYdRxXTlbOlPRF8MjsJYT+Nt0x/aeAkrsBN4Ti+NtVZm84P VsKIP19PCzdpX6+uLCMPBhKvQcnjmUONEgtoIul3QWDSOex6GHTEJvgUhZrxz4Wy SXBRAS4FFKuTTD+Wy9xcIUsNu2LJQwSE/+gaPIVPh7nJv0y2D48NWODyLb8rc8X0 hFSNlB6FeQYUIGnjIIDjaeavVsuqNLJmoi27OaVD0RCnkGjjRn+C+p91MuLm+6P4 QbyA+FOjhB/Dqu3fRL82rikfUYeSo9ceBNUJyvaDltfXWUAvqN1z6moYmphjxg4j Adc+DqD1P3kwt10UyZqIE+D5uYThJDRMg09HktGIsu0bxHieMmMKcPRt+SEsZsn7 aNsxIdAkLjuY2aXaOpMgn3XH+vfG0qQ6gO76F0ttRRpUDoT9F5pbj7O+kaK6Odz/ q9J/1TTWf+svI9uxL47u2U0dArxaj7qtsg5y+noP6kVgXxteSC5bHefgBl7BQLCM xhFo8fYg0s5PmgeGVAiXYZbK63BmzxVzMQBCU6dQq/GfdO5dMtmofqKfgZEH2gL4 cSe0LpFZR1Smou9XhEMUITOvdTze8y0EVU0/VlxVwH+UbD4ffsyPVaEPxpbNzj9t 6KYoD0mwAyXMnJg6xRzw =tCmH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/30/2015 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > htop (epel7) htop (f21) htop (f22) htop (f23) htop (master) Taken htop. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWDFqsAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnCwoP/0BPh1OAekkWfY7JV975goJb sMDvgV+UoAGxnveITXaZRb8f30H2lTv+HWqfYj3BvSRhBrmo8gUh8cRPCeoqz1y7 nx6wjcWoOT+NUXTcx3mUtBVhn6Z6u6a03+7YjvufLrMSii+eM4hOTpHwGEOAmv3E XUVEUIxheQvzhWH1/QGKynzFx/Rn9tT30CdpIqAIRGSQsne2tUawG2RXtR/ZY5SX 4uj06uW7L1ZQ81dLzpNaRt9oEgUVfIlAG/Kopmi8cDl+ogGvaJneI0qor92lnMNe AiWVPi2sO1wFOwL0A3cGo5UI/IeeJ6XBAI/yqO8dE/HCHG2uDVFOGi00oYLk6od/ BsbfwC9e3JJ0LBOyEPFpvq7QSJuD/bRtCu7Tw39eivHyzQI33gdUCe4Ao7bpIP1D YkE5AKZakqyCRjMGz7DqFigDMG+TWmG0g2AoHgzsXW7RJxPNSNFu/Omk30t1/oqy cdc0Jrd94F+Ilc+hOBpClH8hzCZkly9kQlTyToZYQ+8PncPJB46YqTXcprYwaTNs jUVrlE5G/zRmCVEW3ooXSGbYePMbIS+pyRoqtG+e0HgvG6bUKJzXXqAO8nyurMS/ 9ZDCHuwG/We3VpH6hYP0fGvUalcpCvfzOHOT8V86zUlUzoctvO3CD02ePy9pyb6e Q3K99RACduxMrc3lm6SZ =eohK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/29/2015 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Mukundan, > can you please decide whether you want to: > > i) patch out the #error and keep building against wxGTK 3 against > upstream's advice ii) revert to building against wxGTK 2 > > and then make the necessary changes and submit builds for the > f23-boost and f24-boost targets (as explained in the first post in > this thread), please? Thanks! > Slowly catching up after vacation - Thanks Adam for the troubleshooting work. I had started work on fityk 1.3.0 before my vacation but could not finish and rebuilds all showed it to be broken. I have not built it against compat- pkgs and f24 and f23 should be good to go. After testing a bit, I will submit it for update. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D "The heights by great men reached and kept were not attainted by sudden flight, but they while their companions slept, were toiling upward in the night" -- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVwYD9AAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN5t8QAKOIdj74N65iy4Zo73MZ5/PZ i12FrLoeQnbnSBlTV04j5D/FQdSz40jUkSbDFWrjozUhpJuxVTpsNIXLPUetwJFI qg76b90DC96c1bkUPa4wev2pOOhqR/GCJWZqVVLukjReiAb6OSQb0/XJp138Hz82 LdSB8y+ZysWTB/hytVPbL9lxe5G1sNk0yXKS087yLUw85uI3vzvdWEfdpv1E0/hM JSw1bIipUqF5gghqLOaH62SgQ69fbLW7GZGAJQ+wZ5CEwHAitMQc0/Y7UqfwvIk7 JukPl+yLhBPmiqOQQ5SkmdkhTqK28cCD1KdfE/ivP6ygdRgfTA/6jSWoPKzrft0q Sl8XyUj5ev9iWwlo7JRMB0cqCLOA3wK8ahqwKh9a5RteokxhQPmgvBZA9iWzI1Ki WzMHMO2uhSC191RbVTj6CzfmI9Q01a8KWT/7WqSTTN+DvBFR4oaaSVjDQXoIhYpk 846X8NEyOqx5bfn0aRBs+3UD00OO9k/S489nHVbTEsSXv/5vZdBnCERsjvqJ1DDp WTLVW6Oq6zSBgEN8gXhPkjacv48aNYqba1yTjyYimfyKXumiz47WlGOhuGvTdEu/ xAjLotcqjvNiUTuF/xbAZQGrOzK+mv8Mys/OFxpaGe85od9PRolqhEwsKs/OZcLP mAqeY67BHNVZNiHbSbGO =qIi+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Changes in copr.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/20/2015 08:36 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > And the conclusion? You should expect less delay. Not being blocked > by other users. And I can finally say, what I wanted to say for > long time: Please use Copr more! You can even set up builds in > Copr after each commit in your project and Copr should handle that. > Hopefully this will allow you to set up Continuous Integration on > your project, or make it even better. > Thanks for the continuous work on COPR! It's awesome! Best wishes, Mukundan. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D "The heights by great men reached and kept were not attainted by sudden flight, but they while their companions slept, were toiling upward in the night" -- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVXnNsAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNt1EP/iBArhu9lWwqtImLr9+xsK62 xPGvZFFiNkcdXdA/bgsCSnenZSpFETd5tXGT9ZYfGdwgtpRmFtcf9+/sEaEZfaik ROEMQVyXC19FMiV6t6dT8g0iCwUwz26qcNJp8VxKm2Fj3rz4tVkcKh2TJmmBrsag BJEs17/803h6FLDgy1Px+PAZ01WXKbtRzuLJwJVX6qqXlyaPfYFeEWxWLsK72+59 d9vJ7BBJI8xb8pbopX31o2wREb/R5jK+Uksf1w0Iqm7B13ifXVSbMi3YrfmFdWUX ab9IPQ8eueP0hSp4kU6mR38eC404fEc9I/VPYGs9VbvIxa9P9EKAf2upegYRiBVE wmjlEaOFNhPuL6bIK77usKXQF5x1WWjJozo9kftujC3tRGXSUl+zEesAOsFUPqOH nTNc8uJ2x7vjk23qSLtyE21oTOao+ex7wuDJvui8crq4z/2vnxqMQuoWMHN/cRzr c+eEs3T/jQIP3tdhBsf1FnPodhmB9OcuSRKYfugDTTHZ9fNWctKHwmIqVORQ2tTc 0Z2HhLVSvphmdkPDEpNU0L83+cZL7mWtAHXLmQ9Hm1LVXCD8RfilAltKjQOkyh1Q cywiaOLyIFSkfZqLVfJwDS3TDPKMxDeXLv4CW+ug0zrhot09owF0sxsKUyZ73afh xkzl5dut4IL0bdPj6Nc6 =uJgt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: sundials updated - bionetgen and ascend depend on it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/29/2015 05:55 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > * bionetgen fails to build from source > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361549 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206950 > False alarm. This builds fine. scratch build - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361834 - -- GPG key: 00E8658D "The heights by great men reached and kept were not attainted by sudden flight, but they while their companions slept, were toiling upward in the night" -- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVGKI2AAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN3+IP/1psYeuuUTa/7pXCUUJM72n2 4QHxPz+DJrRtmClOx1cPJpDaoi+VE9Lz1rCiQHRJHeKngsY/Y+jHHZaCn2vE2TgL QKO6+QfZz65VGkHeXqmczgwWGqv58lZebLazR6/nv46fe3kGh314WAO0RCfZDAbE m2ZJSoTgmUMdNL1rm3Gsgm/1FFmCpgRJDfjIWi+8CjX+QCVnotjFvvtpjacER+Tw RnyDURGWIimY5ZrHRDnv1XYlGsgTs7qU/7INbS3Mno9OFrshJEhHiGLNj3Fr5q1c kopBXGF+Q/Aq82taMfL12BfUg10IcnHd0iUQ7joP5jUF+i6JjQVpQIuwulhs6yTB C6bnY6U8/YojTQFfEB2qvuKaAOIwtULnkMEU7r/szEsrDkaTpB6VS2K7Zalep27/ jE1i65U5COH2aSSeuf6FAc70NIhYe9RRvRQbC8s44AT04R0A7xx+roSAmMh1VF9v 0GVLaf3GaE6uHQEQOqjUwW3hfSBWgTK/yNHTjBYLkjyrvGaffDi5HfGh7Ei4wBOp 2x4zMVfz/DtgsOy7sjzjPWUcW5ATaN7vf19vfzViKUnolLlHIFutV6jg9sIzGcy1 Favnwip7kuhfrSV2UuSwDdGCvjx0gYFNtCjRMxaYuq+sNVjrnmYE81J51H/s+u9c O8MKYR+cDN0zVbGzyFt7 =YqOI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
sundials updated - bionetgen and ascend depend on it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Greetings, I have updated the package sundials to the latest upstream version (2.6.0) on rawhide (only) today. repoquery indicates bionetgen (zbyszek) and ascend (sagitter) depend on sundials. $ repoquery --whatrequires sundials ascend-libs-0:0.9.8-15.20140710svn4695.fc22.i686 ascend-libs-0:0.9.8-15.20140710svn4695.fc22.x86_64 bionetgen-0:2.2.5-2.fc22.x86_64 * ascend builds fine. scratch build here - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361514 I can build this for rawhide if you (sagitter) wish. * bionetgen fails to build from source https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361549 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206950 Thanks, Mukundan. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D "The heights by great men reached and kept were not attainted by sudden flight, but they while their companions slept, were toiling upward in the night" -- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVGILPAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNKBcP/Rtl2dRFXg2/9b0iNF1rLoZn CpjCBjk8DqRhluTgwbF4Vb5k5OAtwFQ6EPqwnPR/Y/XFSthMQvj/3XVdWilUKv27 8M8gAwXn7rgTD1V8GBOTuHBTBZY4amF8Muh+L6cxXjW2dZAspEar4QTI7i1r1OQl 9w6vtZqW7Frswh7Dgeuy/Ova8U2rHy7hlABx56MhyvwFrf346MK8kIApsMgd++G4 A16fq9zNhLm3UOLLm2b9uOUd2g+KJCUIV3TL2U2yYbLkX1GogNuWMijWvA60Xt63 PoeFe8t1c7hjV83wMx3E8mrB3ML4hXj/9EZaCh10ZMg6GZ8V6JJTMEEtLPlLhZ/R SojGr1Q6fYqwNVG65iwMCajSs5DdqeIUNT792qstEhCPHkdv5oEIrndVRISpUBAU QoJs1SBHJ/v+hYxS9KyfMtCo/6XCPdQSiK+9/TPOlKIVA8X6iXmz0jcFjCTvZ0UW ZPZzVMs0Hx55Q80hrAFEPC4U/0/p1727vIRjUAwSrEA8kUwl7Bd93RL4OB4RfIak LCW7yNVrb2Hyr55bxSPHs8vrLhOltasNvizPVV+zLagVkQlqEUxEreh5AWOrs+dL XzltAWlZwV9ED1ImpvutgIEzKSiLNrMy9HT/mF50RQqFm/kQM2lyQEpsDZDob18D GuUETT9gG0sO5ypCZGUq =BX2Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
package review request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, Could someone please review a package I submitted today? xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197520 I would, of course, be willing to do a review in exchange. Thanks, Mukundan. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU86SiAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNKv8P/1tMmbzKEFwZgW8Ww/Ct12oy ciQJq6s1ogK7Xfb5dniaP0Q1IM7WsjOlIBkiWje6VY2bMJn2+9JAoNDutgPiXW/q eo2+UoqY5obbGD8keVQuSBPQzdKY9XWTCTsVmoFcR1GImq+8IkLnnyCj+ju2TS4d yio+r5kccHUYuGaIGzQgCoPWgt33H898gN1W818am8J0p2QlmScBGWQR1kKrVDEE 6iWLC1QgxbJiLLeVBR4eSZLPV1tL7x0MpDZlyVPI6AQodBcRAjZk2sPVrdoAH61v O6/vf/2XobQdeC+vaOFc1mWcF2Lj7BY4zaZj8DrIOK3cU22CDbDmyHY1Fj3UcPaL ZflU1IENPXaW8rSBlAarm1QAyrsZqfgCMJMP2qVvdlywC3s1j4Xs84VEPOERaoTg 7gOGEqjXaUsvyFmhBUxxYUQo9d2KZZ7DLrPfYyGJ1ASAvp35fj2vj8GwrrLWQgtf bJQ9ZAPTwQYgy9U2Emf7v+4ABqj2aALDr7nV1GhKm/UoGEdcoxdwLzLt9/2LFdHy RjjvlLys3hO0li+VlgGTBwxjeuAs7YAee3wcp4ytlWNqws/iUP7Rz1CvJ/DdbFOb C4kXCaPoFb4lBNoL94CBwmveEsGQ587TN8LQL9x3TDkWDIl9QH8IyNFaSQQHsuJZ 1tqAO6XG//qEsnlXyxrP =kXsT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review Request: python-sane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/02/2015 01:10 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > python-pillow split off the sane library into a separate project, > review request for the package is here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191 > > Happy to review in exchange. > > Thanks, Sandro > > I will take this. Mukundan. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUqewrAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNtxMQAJlSrv/k7yMJGnh3U/x3yu6u lV+1Uf+hV2x0Zi/OSi9Ijm/PhL2fdHxXh3Lhy0P7m99CJRENXqbKshKNpDb9MnF4 e2jnVRY9uxGJxI1vZN5Mxiuzv+khZa7H3r3n7u9lRiY0Ksmtt7nNJNEBsEsHyRrY TQQj50Iby8tpZBi1kmnHpUW83bI4PP/RkyGUDqSrW39GjEf/tFLuQsPnytPt1H3T B1poS+jFUPh1C8McQ7IouofZ5lezY0JAO9PNw3XkypwhlFmbVpxwHaxcHk3EOPdx i2NNpwC6Zo9q9B6gWAxnJWjh50a0DDYKwuXsChnxLFoze5diCUECLvDabOOsqBmW d8FU+T4cEuqCOIbBdb3oXVUF7r5CXlrvGom7/nWOBnzCNQQ1VLAUkQM+vdwHOiuS IEyZVlBDUoavGlp6rpe0nLPLS29qFepxxzDRM+D6BSsNnW52Lt8uHvMVuzALJM4f Di3OVo2Y7jomuN8I3S7f1MDeCHfm+4Qze8K1x2K0bgQJWbw8UYJdQVMNKfsxLiPm 7ePC8XAXWc0Eo8pVNlJ8L1Uj9+hAxXdER+sMdccSLP5rUgP+zLLJely4IdudEM/I roJ0iip9wRcci2i62PzCdaPf5bgBH88WFCWVZyagLrvVBvKsSh17/RPdPp6M7m1+ l8rUQJF/KLpc07iyLVpC =WMrR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review swaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/11/2014 08:04 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff: > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell - > Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*] - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173378 - osgearth - > Dynamic map generation toolkit for OpenSceneGraph - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128394 - qcustomplot - > Qt widget for plotting and data visualization [**] - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128393 - qhexedit2 - > Binary Editor for Qt [***] - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375 - sqlitebrowser > - Create, design, and edit SQLite database files > > [*] I need this for the upcoming new release of gImageReader, so > this has highest priority for me. [**] Dependency for > sqlitebrowser [***] Also dependency for sqlitebrowser. This package > actually looks dead upstream, and sqlitebrowser bundles it by > default. Perhaps it would be better to just keep the bundled > version in sqlitebrowser instead of packaging dead software. OTOH > unbundling is trivial. Is there a policy for such cases, what is > preferred? > > > Happy to review in exchange. > > Thanks, Sandro > I can take qtspell and qcustomplot for review. I can do others as well but I do not want to take too many and sit on it. qcustomplot looks very nice! Mukundan. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUilE5AAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNluMP/REwy9yJfm6lK5vKX+FUpeOO EZ7CuHGE892ACQnDBbg+hoO/y01jubnVwEWm/4+Y5qa9v4syDG7iiqXWa0tnMrEu hVY0LCwgD5cmo8kpX1aa17dk+dcQrxazXqcD1l7Td5TEl1NhsOW/alk0DOncIQPh U9NGHF8IODDmS0nc9D43MtyhASi0k+9iPd7M1U2M9xkoB98rlRZ4WZ5Oeu8dLr9o TWfbZUqyQCgQ2OAwaeJiDCa5UHDvDZCQhXK0ulg6S4XRETmf3eJKeHagFYt6jwRn NjqYMqD/3ANNKHoY2eU0ohezG0QT24U58/RBynrIREQB7biKpEdcym4PLczeKGL3 +R3Pu8HzR4hHdCJ4RPEVkGEZ0s6TIJm40f5Ulqmv9VBqOBqVjookSK0VIu23miLQ 2zhnVcseYIm7nire6SnpOCbEehYJslLLykw1a8uN3vketUNjzq9iZLopdum65cC+ pPmbGd4ZBck+l8wNlrN+VXVoprPS99FGHjdlvksOkwq6b/2y4I5eMGXhPlDGr+WZ nYULi+qNfwL0BzRw/BcJylCF9+QChsZLUsLT0/a9pdx5YAqhOzNg4KGEalegQ0i1 EyzaaA2y+tmvX6ivC9hm+8sO1ovMCZhEzfPrUh5/FVK2b8ONulTANnr+k47MzCx5 r0/9xZXh1txZtFYEDP4a =sJhv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora scientific packaging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/24/2014 03:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Zbigniew > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> I have working packages [1] for genesis and moose (both neuron >> simulators). I didn't submit them because genesis is old and >> buggy, and moose a bit unstable, but with the release of v. 3 >> I'll submit it as a Fedora package. I'm now working on pysb and >> bionetgen as a dependency. Apart from some bundling which is >> relatively easy to undo, everything seems nice and simple. > python-pygraphviz [1], bionetgen [2], and python-pysb [3] are now > ready. Reviewers very much welcome, altruistic or barter (swap) > based. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167460 [2] > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167467 [3] > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167478 > > Zbyszek > Well, I can review all these three packages. We have break coming up (from Thursday) and I can review it that day. I am assigning the bugs to myself. If someone wants to go review the packages before I get to it, please go ahead. Mukundan. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUc9l/AAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN4koQAKxW7XuoZTyDvXjcpqRqxMLr TSyOfeQke9+gv93j+4EhZ30gQaHkPRooAo/ItKu9F6YtGdx747XovjJGSe7KPar6 zyoX/T+E71JYR2+edCAJkwsHj7AnoGIYnNI+7UUviC+FvCURSwH5XRhKXL3TvfD/ nvqP+btE+ilEojVb9osNDL2RCDV5FWx25KatOxzumfXqzOviZXQci06Tcfm7ME4G gYHYqZhDbHYHbV+xhCnLqoDlH9W+bYBg9WElHuLGhfAExSiR6Ci6rsKy3QdEgeb5 OCb8gN5yV2L7pdCD/Ci3xgXmyJqY6tjz6zRS6pH38NPSNRlqleI7VBfYWd9Z4LzY 6i7JCPu6oat3q5fsXLtzTxgC9qM8cVPFqhgq7OgJR550xwtFNunE0YdWXf9enTWS 0b2tNGJbxSwO9gsSpxxlsV4wkPSvORzYOTXtC05TVwtE28uWND6A/AfGFSNN+aWu 3VA77Lj/KfdvHYtaumpuuYzK4MZFwMoMeZ3yZ1dU1P0sGsJZdhfuhB0m+SPd0EkS 4rF27WfNnYMcyebv/Wa+09G8O94+fSTX5QRZ1PhAOzpJrd8eooi6rLNyxCei0W09 ECnjc/VmZZVZLVsnrR9FnFzem/Ijxy+WPdructORQCY/a4Ov0YdvJyMQ7YVnZMFC 8dBVDLHleEjr0kKKAEdQ =35E5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: help with review of llvm34
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/09/2014 11:15 PM, Jens Petersen wrote: > Hi, > > Recently llvm was bumped to 3.5 in Rawhide. This breaks ghc on > armv7 so I created a review request for llvm34 for ghc to use for > its llvm backend. > > Can someone please help review the package? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161014 > > Until llvm34 is available no Haskell packages will build in > Rawhide, since they all fail on ARM currently. [1,2] > > Thanks! > > Jens > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161049 [2] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-November/203983.html > > I can review this tomorrow unless someone beats me to it. I will assign this review to myself, but feel free to take it if you can review it earlier than me. Thanks! Mukundan. - -- GPG key: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUYW0WAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN9dQQAIfpPcfdGFUUpnWfaBGyz5nG 8Igkcqu8MYI1bLr3sEKzirjopcCoaQxhn6sgmZsS2HsbX3X0ocOPtcCRE2kdtUFw Q+J52k0WeTyF2pnXUa7YzUX1Lox5uRAEAtfFdf8AS5Oq6MZjM4Q4colNzW2BW1Lu m7jeWqBqCP7u+xufphdkl8vK+/JR7654NC3weJKy3mYVX0d+cve2//jYx82z1cgB eJ0OucLI0ZaQnLVgORAn5I/4DlJ+VJ4sXDG562IepsPx+VuAL8lgXz6RS53KKNgE BR0Cy9mnmvCeiRrJE5ivcRDxP8mUPkrdfXJvh1UCN3EgHyFjfScUXSevje1eNZdQ rGRm5Snz0NoF2xnkOVYccdp+l4mLo76zUiMbyW4qAxzASVaERLjREqQ2d5bFvwyy kmSeYVRR1T/jkdkicFKHLFuYdEHEtRnHgYHiIGZelsG1x9BmbqSGI/ErbC1/IsWn 1uwqBz4VWc2sYG2N0Rh7dmtsIsDzUM5w38djEAgmTb8EO3VrwCUnyyYZjM+OK27n 793Va6HWEo+ZW8qvtFnZcxclrF550vdndeWs3BsToVfV3Dcu7P5RZzq6EoXJnjVk 4EHbZ/Of+5j/kU+GKHh0yFqCqirjAC3W50rDcZBDFeRuN6etUxldEmacnsvfI1OC IQ48zv+aEZr3BFn7x6Zm =pGKF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [EPEL-devel] clarification about updates in EPEL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/12/2014 12:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:41:32 -0500 Mukundan Ragavan > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> I would like some clarification from folks here regarding >> updating gparted on EPEL-5 and EPEL-6. >> >> The version of gparted shipped in EPEl-5 is 0.4.8 and EPEL-6 is >> 0.6.0 while the current upstream version is 0.19.1 (which I >> recently built in EPEL-7). >> >> Mike Fleetwood, who is a gparted developer, has opened a bug >> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133315) suggesting >> that gparted be updated in both EPEL-5 and EPEL-6 since the >> current version fixes lot of major bugs. As I understand it, >> major versions updates are permitted if such an update fixes >> major issues. In this case, the update would fix a big list of >> problem. >> >> I tend to agree with Mike on updating but I would appreciate if >> people on comment on this. > > So, IMHO the big thing to take into account: Is the new version > incompatible with the old one? Will users have to adjust code or > scripts, or are the old arguments, etc still all good? I posed the same question to Mike (upstream devel). He has informed that the user experience will be the same between the versions. I have used in EL-6 and Fedora and have not been "surprised" by anything. But, Mike also confirms that EL-5 should not have any problems either. > > Additionally, Are the bugs things that might cause dataloss or > other severe things? That would also weigh in some. > > kevin > Yup! The newer version fixes many severe issues and that the reason I want to update EL-5 as well. Thanks for the reply! :) Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJURHwhAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNnF4P/20Wzj29aI/J58bxHa7DLwCj Lnhyb8Tx4AM6rYPGbsJECVOJzugYZTTf0Bz42ZQumTANvM8EvRCwh52UkMDwzTdM xVRUWtxn9V+bQBh5Bw0pRs5xhRMga1Vb3Y9YZE34qys73O9BBuerq8ENnbvz5i18 PNGKTxLVzX00mupUKe+EQe+izIWIIlvYlyI1xkJuLkY628/HAwO4PsKFZBOudKMD 2nmkF7Dt4ffFuuycRLOeqWnr+RsJv746E8HB95q55/eqJOBg8lXprFQSBJt0zzar ieHttGLkWWdS9shnc2hL7xj40xIgFpWvFEY0NgCmR37UUFXNThfctqasouXqD0qF AMwoD6Tvmpo1GHUIE0K0wRJxr6VLj1BUMuPs5Nm5VGiGCp1wvklqb9RJFK01XJ4s y3R2pwnWQapRFMXj+SOz2mI4GBqVn2/kpHs7EXA0/vTAne2rXlmsoMNtZPt3o8sV PFS10xVApQESKWu7LfiE/DXamGS6ljfJFq1uPYWuYWp1rxePrXdqTZ4XjToq2xE+ k0O8mdAMaSxzjmOjTMjttdTDmeEF/jYNBOATbnkSWPnnnG63k46lu98tK6QVvh+U +1/XiXhK9B2wJECyE12KPKcTvoZb/85uR7e8TqqnqqS1fTEURHD6XSi7DZtxUEyW FZCv+KJ305VelqtZckzs =mJiM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Compiling with system hunspell - texmaker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi All,
I am trying to update Texmaker from version 4.2 to 4.3 and I have run
into a problem I am unable to solve. Here it is -
The source tarball has a directory hunspell which is removed in %prep
and system hunspell libraries are used instead. This works without any
problems with version 4.2. However, in 4.3, I get
WARNING: Failure to find: hunspell/affentry.cxx
WARNING: Failure to find: hunspell/affixmgr.cxx
WARNING: Failure to find: hunspell/csutil.cxx
WARNING: Failure to find: hunspell/dictmgr.cxx
WARNING: Failure to find: hunspell/hashmgr.cxx
[ ... ] {complete list of files removed}
The compilation happens and fails with the following error -
make: *** No rule to make target 'hunspell/affentry.cxx', needed by
'.obj/affentry.o'. Stop.
qmake is used to compile texmaker by doing
%{_qt5_qmake} -unix texmaker.pro
As for differences in the texmaker.pro file, there is only one
difference -
- --- texmaker-4.2/texmaker.pro 2014-04-24 09:15:57.0 -0500
+++ texmaker-4.3/texmaker.pro 2014-07-28 23:02:06.0 -0500
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
}
CONFIG += qt warn_off release
- -TEXMAKERVERSION=4.2
+TEXMAKERVERSION=4.3
DEFINES += TEXMAKERVERSION=\\\"$${TEXMAKERVERSION}\\\"
DEFINES += HAVE_SPLASH
I have tried adding CONFIG += enable-hunspell, LIBS += -lhunspell,
etc. No use. I am just unable to build with hunspell. :(
BuildRequires: hunspell-devel is present.
Could someone help me out here please?
Thanks!
Mukundan.
- --
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2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=0LtK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I think having a "trivial patch" policy and proven packager route of implementation is a great idea! On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these? > > Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... > have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply? > Isn't it best for the project as a whole to have the bar for proven packager high? :) Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTrIIpAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNTmcQAIGQ+HaTR36pU1gOydNJhTim clypJ8mCmKC81uWUvI8cFjN2y61gAf9vLsrSkbIP4vZoVIVhFODtWSuYrDhgdwaK 82+QZ89wvKqfq/aWSS8mlo1MJJ3vm7OhnI7zH+pbrVnbUmKbOd9tXapePJt6koXC S1Wyz/hBvqmXdafl/wGMFTBwieOe+bDRZTa6NNP4G8CksL1CNlg6L7oP3JWXtI0R 0dF3l9GUDSQGAN1+lQuGkmArTmiCqjr/lXQZR9OKMdcmXQhuEl+9kJd6klcMKI6r o6Qm5/4Pf3VKRixhUec88IA30YUDeqJP4IgNGv64fwI8uJgX65Fipxf7NxDyMJt9 em0EOKNKjQtwnb3R0zr+YDbaWUCFCZVuiTFTHkaG5ojwezWE11+nJ5zaiI9i6WOJ rxl7bbhG29MEBhnJaiDnm4Zdk38IEuCld6zcIe8tM0E7vkNTzLQ2BMyPyS5Jnwx6 UzuCfpzgMgfEMpE/j6r22prsEhbN/XEcd+vGkZpnFH1R/tTQcTFauiAc1UNODjpW A9TqidqHH/1wxCeVuZYupsAh2pYy18cC1MrrbkJ2OZl+qacog2xpz2O11p6gDKi+ dkt31JF6Ftgc7CIuMYuNVU3WmKyUcXFROd6dpmmykN3ouDR14Iq7FWea0OM8Dsjh UHCBmAQitu/csPghf2u7 =FOGa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review requests: netgen-mesher, tcl-togl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/11/2014 07:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > For the ongoing effort to package salome/code-aster, I need these > two dependencies: > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108395 - > netgen-mesher - Somewhat complexish, autotools, mpi subpackages - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108355 - tcl-togl - > Easy review, tcl/tk packaging > > Happy to review in exchange. > > Thanks, Sandro > Hi Sandro, I will review these packages. Best, Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTmblQAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNAjcP/19H8ybsgQ+ZQk/VwxUWJEfx vTz9gdS9G2OKCYB42LBCRbf6/6J9UGatieuykI7upUHnbSIpZR/9mW4s2uqGpgj3 fR2QXYArmbcK0ZQa9bTFw5LAX3/ZWvvVgsgI4yT+BrxzqjI/0zdwmoeuK8Cha085 fCsHTKywxeiBvbiI8Fc0GY5xkob2JYn669xOFf9lZ61h+QzdhuAmynDRyK2/SwpW sSpsZ3Z8I5UNYotn133xE8VtX+yLi3xR0TXCUfifKpP5aWRaUAQNXqS3e7dPFSfb uAB38tiT4rQv6vcnRQ/Zb16lx0TM0Pj6+1A5bFwxIsaypa6JW6nE7XG/slonnm1N hQ07pewsoyB9HVLpI3Ga34BkP/jJ4eEBNLqGcR4eBM97nz244e9Fz3CZr8uakG/M 9ZXZNsG0hV9ENepbA3dZGa9JLMrii6mgYXBptPLBdeVqeIjI7qEA3Vw+wXVPzNOL 5TM9yDsdfGwJchFPmgHm1SP37/NEfTisNrcqahzeURQPi/75F6GqinEhv1LbLsv2 3kragyImJVigVHlFRZlrR6yeWnn4RJYrTdvkJIA/NAF5wjG09fvnwN6wXV5YFclv 6Lwj2dgY0i85pkVvXywtRHiJ7ZXXiU8NnqtM7AjSfwUsnJy2+3f7yNh1h6HQtlsq Dn8ZLKZI9ENhcNJ6KGKC =JekE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
orphaned clementine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 All, I have orphaned clementine. Please feel free to take over. Best, Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTjyEVAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNvx0P/3Nq0UMcJcLHCy/VRBu4xsYK 4tCFwaR21G4SHwo+ivAFu9FiYYUUk5iqP1eYNgVD0pWGLME1NP2YDdJ06cTMJcLk b+ZEjV5Dgofy2DHuWUIJhCvr9ykS+3I6OkelR/6RAnPPn0U3r9yXF9k/CXby3rHE vskzxDmbCDj6fWgRPwe5ty3X1+ltXZJOy11nZN2gTemqHieDMLrizkO1I3Y4giPc o6ukGJeRVWlgaVn/KasaZVPnamvtKbisdrb0FOoNtHn9rp1WdcAHjzHkDs9D+Djp tElQ8xbBMAaDPGJ8YRNXGkveVVC7FwAJ5i6AtrxOpR5/5gM7tAVnlqAWxUWCwKfe mgZUBLMGz11ae2BdLQwQdTgT73Dfa5uimoiKrjf+INHDWIFCQHMyiqMajCl/IPUN dQ8E1AGVHOCqk9YCKhh1xzk/fV1riZKGb2xaPC8enD73UzEQs2VIn5xBpZl9BKBV 5swGN1LF4mgfnUn+H+EaFWstq0Y94owHQGF6McCfKRZMjPDmgEJ9T6mNThzHDVGA 9409VdcwNncR49uHTtDDraIP3bzLEgtv9Q3LQ/V1A7wNBrLCEBKS/9fG6O8j5eXe dIE2l3E2y/bFIYVPpzp+lgW+lDd21MzvM2gf71+tAIBQtLZIa2SJIcKqJEXQM8Xu LB0hI9k8VswAxEcAoq7l =xTIH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning ipe and figtoipe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/19/2014 09:34 AM, Laurent Rineau wrote: > Le Monday 19 May 2014 09:01:25 nonamedotc a écrit : >> I can take ipe. I have used it on and off... > > Please take the ownership. > > What I found difficult with Ipe is that the Otfried Cheong has not > kept the compatibility between Ipe6 and Ipe7: a file created by > ipe6, and even ipe5, cannot be opened by Ipe7. > > In my opinion, Fedora should have packages for the tools ipe5toxml, > and ipe6upgrade, that are made to upgrade old files to newer > formats. > Hi Laurent, Thanks for pointing these issues. I will try to deal with them one by one as time permits. Best wishes, Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTertlAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNgAkP/16jFVjtkb8QCBrEOQRFfm4E sIg6YJBj3ne89lley2li0ZpqFt06npi4PFo9AmuibisKOghIoMGkXAJnlZqRTZI/ rr5GOrikfAMpqoPsSBd/MEtloa/zl+hqPrgmRDtml0ICIP6WaJ7009J3N0fTm5ou j1Oq+mdCL+oS2J8ljI+rQBdD+IsAYqcw6M1X2/Rm0M9Rydd+nXIUbeeoSsa3dx9z GpcApMEc5OlI+UsVJTzGVjkKrOqv2fN2EFzRIKQ+wRQd5w9jNLy/Uo+Y/duxTHC/ DDbEJf5AKfg973BZm3H69O7PidnnYd/t5ui1OEKhYt75GpxQ/35Zqdc+5IypfVff gXI8tv53W3tM5ry8qMnpbXMASDNSapHS67i90AjCF3y/WkAyeuFfMm/8V8PBfS5S dQa/Mn3Ts9QToN/zK9kelfOCcuuGMZ0BEqasn814Lv+F4kaGvqKoujpYrxHw18yK RT4fi3RlHz3QJFsb/2et9M15gCSnUqDcG95xyHJldN9ghjC7CMLCvHaJOfkinEhV sEAAK+PuT3ANIUGi77pVAwuF9tDDI/MObzS+0zYu9wkchv0rkpRTpms23wjAKvty YGdnIN6NRI4Fo55C/Dd958O+RQ/I0yGwt5Wxgx9rLFAA2e/ruCK95zc9ATubIVYF Izl0UiYcQKvN2D/oOzfO =XjpQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Computational chemistry softwares orphaned in F20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/15/2014 11:06 AM, Henrique Junior wrote: > Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very > important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac, > mpqcare... ) marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct? As a > chemist I'm very concerned about that. No luck contacting > carllibpst to ask. > > -- *Henrique C. S. Junior* Química Industrial - UFRRJ Centro de > Processamento de Dados - PMP > > I remember looking at some scientific software once and I remember thinking some of these softwares did not have a very active upstream. Perhaps, that's the reason these are retired/orpahned? Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTdTIhAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNL0sQAL+dQsPTHdhh1sb2VZJtP1eu A6DeJSvLtm+RJHPYmlo44sgcM521CXd6kUfl/0NZg8aab0/Eh5WvMqlG3jXexhI6 UsELvW9ETr3Pw8rk4EKlCghArXM5rXdO2xVdQNEr9lHpN/r8k/dd2Fjq9RoZzFTp oJH/5SXQHJrS8i6pclKwA3leqU7tB4Sfnv8e3pf39Sg56F/K8rJj1WJ4bPwBnxTb NEYOuGOZRipd+fAMr8+eLBLQ6EA01MUbskMpJgbhUX25vo4JO+BBKFXAO/RjopI6 gGISETHGXWCvPgiPLAsUrO0QwCMNabrmN4LjAABG4kyTXQP15pEBg25j95a7y/9w e6ZBe6rC44SWWGXlEDR5Oor2rGR/C0Jt6HMxvfvYe5SELRMhBCso9hcQH0e6nTdW 4hjJwbcXyxv/BRQt12v7G3OTbKgMP9bYy1B+m37IfGi65xqZ0qseIjQVL60q4b71 xfkQzJkjhyqq+iCxJ/yo0Ou7vTDImOXNAW1Iv9x/JXlXy4C1oBGFqmvlO0bHYeOf gXiv08/eGzTPjPkDtb/1swOIueyfDfy3NQp2hpCKk/8uQL+l6NwqsikY3zXRcrjB 2FPuzhP7QzfOWVIvsb47hEnBXQNNnAadOJ54TKu+cYWzAv7FkGCl2S2pysZME8PI yPFacJsy/Th3V3gj8vSa =yR/c -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaned: webcpp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/09/2014 12:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I've orphaned the webcpp package, interested parties are welcome to > take it. > > The previous owner had passed away. :( > > See: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1267 > > Thanks, > > kevin > > > Hi! I have taken ownership of webcpp package. Thanks, Mukundan - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTbUDrAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNqYYQAJiAXOrzGrdo489wvhrkaQzy vdbiEgMbrHyHgjqBDd4X5GhXhbr0RdlJKE0FuGLxRcEyOWnklS1OATfzbD724/Xd OBEAedvg6z0PZLNUWL4sXb9MNU+Vfom9MNDcco91L67q+CLxZeA5DhCWEBYtqOgZ tdpcUfWGbeHmV2yXAXM+RjDezIdTI+xJjJqIIlIEpoebFblVmqXJ3yD76V54iXPs lkZ1SOzktH9eKO1qYUjcnoSZkqm3p0B36Xr8X1PAgbL3A7Gq0r3+50Nz+8xJePRB xDgCkC+/mvk+XxpyIzUItDpg7i4gFcPaqlWJ4VH5FiZ8X1ojibpfnCXlbZbsSCnL aDl3g/N+aFPgx7lhjCjChvDmUz8+kDox8Jb0ik87KUNAb4YSArfJj+dFMcKvagok EMduCY3gA7a2VF1QeDOvw9Ls1SFXkoATcEVwXAE/4mcJI9OjSpLnXc7W0CWMqSiG GUfcOCnVrIIx11jjvRJyznJFSOzbK0a5ueWnVgLvQ7yNn/hewOvrXtcdve5jgCdq YJgKZJfOxl2VW5j/VJRZoO25b0CKeTXuxH969PmgCIs1r1mHH/8xyzARgxebh3hU +nqE4mZIWMmBqANNqH0oIXuJL7ZZrLMG/sBNASPO5K4doNIpxuDs+28sJ0bSQMX8 JLnfTc+GvX4SAifCyXxV =MYfG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Five Things in Fedora This Week (2014-03-18)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Bonus mailing list questions! > > Is it helpful to post this here? If so, is full text important, or > is posting a link to the web site fine? Would it be helpful to > post it to other lists as well or instead? What about repurposing > the defunct "news" mailing list for just this purpose? > Thanks for posting about magazine here! I like the fact that info about Fedora magazine is posted here. While I knew about Fedora magazine, I do not always remember to check it. It would be very nice if links are also included. It would make it easier to go to specific articles. Mukundan. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTKQsiAAoJEGqtW2dEe0yGidgQAJ7HwhpZDOnmFr/2zKRi08NT WKu4ciCPhSHWyZOkTuN7yG5R4/N04MnVzyn6ml/SayP4Oau2qJbJwsWPB6umNdR1 4Zhu+ONnGciw+JHbVN6u691EGmib5T4raR8X9aA+ATzVz+NzqzNV0eJ8O5sEaOOs ng2XFsDLIS5couTHR1wjftP1qiiLtZC2Z7UVIotLf3KK9zofCY5O1zq5Qz5oGhQ0 c7CyhsQ+8uxiVCGrIGmh0uFhwz8lwFQOXkd+mz3mT6ZvpmH6ACmpVx1Rb2lBMUII cPQ+KzHK6BAe37POoKfTUs8gNAxLt25iT5/IhADuJoIt3ffVPoz5gIhLF/iBDVHB 0D/fldwPpzkOwgXHZAnXaH/ZmXWZwAR9Po2SZQCzS4lqMz6kjzJbcd6Ooq4ozd17 GYum/vkxpttupnibPcrbsLkSY6PWfgOx3QsHJ/gu737PkqGwHhH3hvxATkLzMIjM Vj2e2fLP8odi+tUa5jsu6sCbty3ifZ6UIHgzvvogiQHQa9LEK0d9TEy4+EbLVJ42 IoH12Oxvh80/2KArE0bf7DusaWBN15tD+B1QuI/rsfc5N2EIsNLZ0zvAr48bS/VM cavqsgJ0r4qW+iFaa3DODY9zJdmEDrbBXQGXUCceydgL6FV5Kudv28xiLnj8T0G1 is8Bm8T9Zkbp1zJ+pnbu =dOdz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
package review - autodocksuite
Hi All, I have submitted a package for a bioinformatics tool - autodocksuite for review. Can someone please review the package for inclusion in Fedora? Here is the review request - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067041 Thanks. Regards, Mukundan. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ownership of QMforge
Hi all, I would like to take ownership of qmforge which was orphaned in September 2013[1]. If there are objections, please let me know. Thanks. Mukundan. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-September/188773.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
