Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora
On 2011-09-07 12:04:06 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > That was what I thought... Sot it was the first thing I tried (note, > this is F16): > $ sudo yum install glibc-devel.i686 > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit, > remove-with-leaves, rpm-warm-cache, show- > : leaves, versionlock > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * fedora: www.gtlib.gatech.edu > * updates: mirrors.servercentral.net > * updates-testing: mirror.fdcservers.net > Setting up Install Process > No package glibc-devel.i686 available. > Error: Nothing to do Strange - just tried a yum clean all followed by yum install glibc-devel.i686 libgcc.i686 on Kevin's F16 test machine - maybe whatever issue with glibc-devel in the repos has been fixed now? Thanks, Ricky pgpbR5Q3MUw7Q.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora
On 2011-09-07 11:52:58 AM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > "gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me: > /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file > or directory > > If I copy the gnu/stubs-32.h file from the 32bit glibc-devel package > into the right place and run the command above again I get: I don't think you should need to copy files manually like that - just install glibc-devel.i686 and libgcc.i686. Thanks, Ricky pgp2FyVRUwoJp.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Outage: Mediawiki Upgrade - 2011-06-13 18:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2011-06-13 18:00 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2011-06-13 18:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We are updating our mediawiki instance to version 1.16.5. For those that are interested in testing this in advance, we have already updated our staging wiki (https://stg.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:Version). Affected Services: Wiki - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Unaffected Services: BFO - http://boot.fedoraproject.org/ Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ GIT / Source Control DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Docs - http://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Email system Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora Insight - https://insight.fedoraproject.org/ Fedora People - http://fedorapeople.org/ Fedora Talk - http://talk.fedoraproject.org/ Main Website - http://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ Smolt - http://smolts.org/ Spins - http://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - http://start.fedoraproject.org/ Torrent - http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Translation Services - http://translate.fedoraproject.org/ Ticket Link: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2563 Contact Information: Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. pgpD1V8DxbNhk.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: build system hung?
On 2011-06-01 07:03:55 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > koji watch-task 3103524 > Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... > 3103524 build (dist-rawhide, > /mercurial:cd1aebcad31e13ea42fdf0d51be65eb7230ffc66): free > nothing happening... There was an unplanned outage for this yesterday and today: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-June/000803.html It's currently waiting on newRepo tasks before builds will go through again. Thanks, Ricky pgptjZ0upNNds.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: What to do if a package needs a modified SELinux policy?
On 2011-05-30 02:52:57 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote: > I'm experimenting with a package that needs to have rsyslog write to a > named fifo pipe (so log data can be handed off from rsyslog to an > external program). As I see it the options are: > > 1) apologize to the user and tell them to disable SELinux (no thanks) > 2) get Fedora SELinux policy to add an exception (best case scenario I think) > 3) tell the user how to manually modify policy and update it (which > might then break the next SELinux policy gets updated/etc.). This sounds like a good thing to have as an SELinux boolean, so you can probably get that added to selinux-policy and then tell users of your package to turn the boolean on. Thanks, Ricky pgpU6PQjc0F7P.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: orphaning getmail-4 package
On 2011-04-25 04:28:56 PM, Dean Mander wrote: > I'm looking for someone to take ownership of the getmail package. > > It's a small but very stable python application with barely any need for > interaction. > Nevertheless I can't find the time for it anymore, and if nobody is interested > to take over, it will be orphaned. Hi, I use this packge, so I'd be interested in maintaining it. I've requested ACLs in pkgdb. Thanks for maintaining it for all this time! Ricky pgpO89HbNVtNx.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Preteen pics, lolita bbs, sexy girls, nude art
On 2011-04-13 10:03:22 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 08:44:00AM +0400, Aurora Oaks wrote: > > > > As well as making it to the list, the subject line of this email is > currently appearing on http://start.fedoraproject.org/ This is probably > not a good thing. Hi, this shoud be fixed now - start.fp.o has been switched to show messages from devel-announce, so posts will have to pass moderation before they're shown on the website now. Thanks, Ricky pgpIvixJV5KdD.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Security incident on Fedora infrastructure on 23 Jan 2011
On 2011-01-25 10:50:48 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Did he really not have write access to the Fedora wiki or the different > trac instances (wiki, ticket system) on fedorahosted? I am not sure how > it is handled, but he also might have had push access to the comps repo > on fedorahosted. Sorry, these are omissions on our part. All packagers have edit access to the Fedora wiki, push access to comps on fedorahosted, and all Fedora Accounts are able to login to fedorahosted trac instances (with no special privileges by default). We found no unverifed Fedora wiki edits or pushes to comps from the account in question. > Additionally it would be nice to investigate whether the account was > used to access the test machine resources for package maintainers: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers Good point. We don't run those machines, and all packagers have sudo there , so Fedora packagers should consider it unsafe to forward their SSH agent or enter any sensitive information on those machines. We'll get in touch with Kevin about checking those machines though. Thanks, Ricky pgpRWyk3BZ73c.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Outage: blogs.fedoraproject.org - 2010-12-21 00:00 UTC
On 2010-12-21 07:29:14 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: > Outage: blogs.fedoraproject.org - 2010-12-21 00:00 UTC Sorry, I missed up the date here, it should have been 2010-12-22. Also, the outage is now over. The database logs confirm that apart from our testing, the vulnerability was never exploited on our wordpress instance. Thanks, Ricky pgpo4Ztc9LPMe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Outage: blogs.fedoraproject.org - 2010-12-21 00:00 UTC
Outage: blogs.fedoraproject.org - 2010-12-21 00:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2010-12-21 00:00 UTC. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2010-12-21 00:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We are preemptively taking Fedora Blogs down due to known security issues in our current version of wordpress, but there is no evidence that it has has actually been exploited. Affected Services: Fedora Blogs - http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/ Unaffected Services: BFO - http://boot.fedoraproject.org/ Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ CVS / Source Control DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Docs - http://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Email system Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora People - http://fedorapeople.org/ Fedora Talk - http://talk.fedoraproject.org/ Main Website - http://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ Smolt - http://smolts.org/ Spins - http://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - http://start.fedoraproject.org/ Torrent - http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Translation Services - http://translate.fedoraproject.org/ Wiki - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Ticket Link: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2527 Contact Information: Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to track the status of this outage. pgpFbqSPjF0Mu.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: using anonymous git
On 2010-12-05 04:56:36 PM, Curtis Doty wrote: > But the equivalent 'git pull' doesn't work as I'd expect. It appears the > clone -B option above sets the wrong non-anonymous url inside each branch. > Am I missing something? Nope, looks like you found a bug. Here's a patch that should fix it. http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/fedpkg/0001-Handle-anonymous-clones-in-clone_with_dirs.patch Thanks, Ricky pgp6pTO2dbS99.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GNU Parallel
On 2010-11-12 09:02:40 PM, nodata wrote: > On 12/11/10 20:18, Neal Becker wrote: > > nodata wrote: > > > >> I've searched with yum, through bugzilla, and using koji. I can't find it. > >> > >> Is GNU Parallel not in Fedora? > >>http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ > >> > >> I can't find a review request. > >> > >> nd > > > > Isn't it part of moreutils? I think the version in moreutils is different from the GNU one, which looks like we've just found ourselves another pathname conflict :-) Thanks, Ricky pgpdcWUkY1xn5.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Yubikeys are now supported
On 2010-10-08 10:57:16 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Maxim Burgerhout wrote: > > If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of > > Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler. It might > > Fixing the pam module to not crash might be good. :) > > Have you considerd packaging up the server-side software? dgilmore and mmcgrath have already started on this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637212 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637213 Thanks, Ricky pgpkSXakWuHqk.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Yubikeys are now supported
On 2010-10-07 07:25:47 PM, Mike McLean wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > I have one and I've played with it in fedora. There is however an important > > catch. The server and the yubikey share the same AES symmetric key. This > > means > > that if the yubikey is used for multiple sites by one user, that user is > > sharing > > is his "private key" over various external sites. > > > > So if fedoraproject would accept it, and the same user uses this yubikey for > > another site, and that other site gets hacked, then fedoraproject could be > > hacked as well. > > > > I guess in a way it is like using the same password, but people might not be > > thinking of that when they have a "device" on them that they use. > > Wow, that's a serious weakness. Are we sure about this? In order for this to happen, the user would have to explicitly take down the generated AES key while it is being written to the key and then submit it to the other site. I don't think this is really something we need to worry about. Thanks, Ricky pgpwcmJdIFobI.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: popularity package context on fedora
On 2010-05-03 09:25:06 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > Wouldn't it be easier to let MirrorManager do that? > This way each mirror can save a counter per package and publish them > statically on the server side. To get a total amount of the data, all > counter files from all servers needs to be collected and that's it. > > Maybe a bit less data, than collecting anything like in smolt... > > Of course, this does not say 'how many computers out there have package > X'. Maybe it fails and one needs to download a package twice and so on. > But I think this would be a first great approximation. I don't think yum requests packages specifically from mirrormanager. It gets a mirror URL from mirrormanager, then downloads everything else directly from the mirror that it gets back. Thanks, Ricky pgpcK9aBqeHiI.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Test Email
Apologies for the noise, this is a test email that should make it to de...@lists.fp.o :-) Thanks, Ricky pgpApacHwp6ai.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode
On 2010-01-21 12:21:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > By far, the simplest fix is to run something that starts a shell > via a 'normal' login-ish mechanism. Hence, the attached patch > that switches to sulogin for single user mode. > > However, this changes behavior that has existed since the dawn > of time in Red Hat/Fedora systems; with this change, single-user > mode would now require the root password. This is both when > booting with 'linux single/linux S', or going to runlevel 1 > with 'telinit 1'. I'm not crazy about this change. A lot of people are probably used to using single user mode with forgotten root passwords, and documentation, etc. would need to be switched to use init=/bin/sh instead. Are there alternative simple fixes, like maybe running su --login or something like that? Thanks, Ricky pgp4K1168i5nO.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: My git security experiences
On 2010-01-20 10:20:33 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > base on a post in the last year on fedora-devel I have > make the following test the the kernel package repository: > > $ git clone ssh://s450...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/kernel > $ cd kernel > > ... Add a Changelog entry in kernel.spec > > $git commit -m ... > $git push > > I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to > get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a > ordinary provenpackager without any additional access > to the kernel package. From https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/kernel, it looks like kernel actually has provenpackager commits on, so this should be normal. I thought it was one of the exceptions, but apparently not. Thanks, Ricky pgpKs80nlzE7O.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
