Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: thomasvs
For future reference, mail works great. I've been behind due to travel and personal issues. While I think this was a little quick to make a decision personally, I'm fine with someone else stepping in and taking over. Thomas On 06/23/2018 07:37 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589079 Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MTQSER5FRX6MQ355JFJPN4V2KWLPO7H2/
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
Hi, > Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number > of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect > breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? Twisted in general is really good about keeping API, but they do deprecate stuff. When they do so they typically make it clear with DeprecationWarning's. I think it's mostly just a matter of testing the applications using it by someone who knows the application. Just to be clear, we want to do this for F-13 only, right ? Or are you thinking about upgrading F-12 too ? > I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, > and check if they work at all. Do you have newly built twisted packages ? > Then, I think it would be a good idea to > bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the > packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: > desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch I didn't know this was in already; I'm going to assume they're based on my packages from a few months ago but I'll check. > elisa-base-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch > elisa-plugins-bad-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch > elisa-plugins-ugly-0:0.5.35-1.fc11.noarch I can check these. > flumotion-0:0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64 This is mine, I'll take this. > python-desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch Same as desktopcouch above. > python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch nevow is another library - not sure if anything else depends on nevow. Thomas -- You either earn your keep or you don't get kept. -- Moovida - future TV today ! http://www.moovida.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 20:10 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Dear all, > > it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking > about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by > a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th > of March. None of the queries met any response. Should I initiate the > non-responsive maintainer process? Hi Julian, I'm still around, but a direct mail to me is the easiest way to get my attention (as I suspect is the case for most developers). I saw you did two weeks ago asking about an update, but that's a different beast then marking me as unresponsive :) I think in general it would be good that when people want to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process, they first of all mail the person involved saying so. For practical reasons contacting me over IRC doesn't always work since I'm on three different machines regularly, and I only check bugzilla stuff once a month relying on getting a mail or poke if something is critical. As for the issue at hand, Twisted is a complex beast to upgrade and validate, so I sure could use help there! I see in the bug report you made a list of current dependendants, we could divide them up and verify them ? Thomas -- I'm alive. I can tell because of the pain. -- GStreamer - bringing multimedia to your desktop http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
