Re: [389-devel] Please Review: Fix parsing of start-slapd scripts

2010-04-01 Thread Rich Megginson
Nathan Kinder wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 10:04 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
>> On 03/31/2010 09:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
>>   
>>> - "Nathan Kinder"   wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>> The admin server CGIs parse the start-slapd scripts to determine the
>> DS instance names.  A recent format change to start-slapd caused 
>> this
>> parsing to break.  These patches make the instance name easier to
>> parse from the script.  One patch is for DS itself and one is for 
>> the
>> Admin Server.
>>
>>
>>
> ack - much better
>
>
>  
 Thanks, but I need to nak my own patch since it's imcomplete.

 This isn't going to work well when upgrading an instance.  We don't
 regenerate the start-slapd script when running 'setup-ds.pl -u'.  This
 means that an upgraded instance will not work properly with any of the
 admin server CGIs that need to parse the instance name from
 start-slapd.  This issue is already a problem not related to this 
 patch,
 but it seems we should fix it along with this issue.

 I suppose the right thing to do is to make 'setup-ds.pl -u' generate a
 new start-slapd script for the existing instances as well as a new
 instance specific initconfig script if one doesn't exist.  I think we
 need to avoid wiping out an existing instance specific sysconfig 
 script
 since it may have been modified by an admin to add other stuff to it
 (like KRB5_KTNAME for Kerberos).  Do you see any problems with this
 approach?

> I've attached a new set of patches that implements the solution 
> outlined above.
>
> -NGK


>>> Sorry that my changes caused this problem. Peace... :)
>>>
>>>  
>> Actually, a previous change of mine actually broke the upgrade case.
>> You just broke the admin server parsing code. :)
>>   
>>> Would it be better to have a pure configuration file (not script) in 
>>> the
>>> instance directory that contains things like instance name, etc.? The
>>> start-dirsrv is a script, and parsing a script without a proper 
>>> parser is
>>> risky. Same thing with the sysconfig scripts. Even a slight change 
>>> in that
>>> file could break some regular expressions in the Perl modules. What 
>>> do you
>>> think?
>>>
>>>  
>> My previous change that breaks the upgrade case is trying to accomplish
>> this.  We previously had all sorts of paths in the start-slapd scripts
>> which were parsed in various places.  I created the instance specific
>> config files in /etc/sysconfig that now contain the paths and other
>> things needed to start an instance in an easily parsed format.  The one
>> wrinkle is that we need to know the instance name to know which
>> sysconfig file to read since the file name is "dirsrv-".  The
>> admin server tries to get the instance name from the start script to
>> find the sysconfig file so we can determine other things, such as the
>> pid file location.  The only other way I can think of to get the
>> instance name would be to parse it out of the instance path that we use
>> to locate the start-slapd script.  This is usually something like
>> "/usr/lib/dirsrv/slapd-".  I think that my proposed change to
>> the start-slapd format is less error prone since there is no complex
>> parsing needed.
>>
>> -NGK
ack
>>   
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Endi S. Dewata
>>> -- 
>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>> 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>
>>>  
>> -- 
>> 389-devel mailing list
>> 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>
>
> 
>
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel


Re: [389-devel] Please Review: Fix parsing of start-slapd scripts

2010-04-01 Thread Noriko Hosoi

On 04/01/2010 11:18 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:

On 03/31/2010 10:04 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:

On 03/31/2010 09:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:

- "Nathan Kinder"   wrote:



The admin server CGIs parse the start-slapd scripts to determine the
DS instance names.  A recent format change to start-slapd caused 
this

parsing to break.  These patches make the instance name easier to
parse from the script.  One patch is for DS itself and one is for 
the

Admin Server.



ack - much better



Thanks, but I need to nak my own patch since it's imcomplete.

This isn't going to work well when upgrading an instance.  We don't
regenerate the start-slapd script when running 'setup-ds.pl -u'.  This
means that an upgraded instance will not work properly with any of the
admin server CGIs that need to parse the instance name from
start-slapd.  This issue is already a problem not related to this 
patch,

but it seems we should fix it along with this issue.

I suppose the right thing to do is to make 'setup-ds.pl -u' generate a
new start-slapd script for the existing instances as well as a new
instance specific initconfig script if one doesn't exist.  I think we
need to avoid wiping out an existing instance specific sysconfig 
script

since it may have been modified by an admin to add other stuff to it
(like KRB5_KTNAME for Kerberos).  Do you see any problems with this
approach?
I've attached a new set of patches that implements the solution 
outlined above.

ack.
--noriko



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] Please Review: Fix parsing of start-slapd scripts

2010-04-01 Thread Nathan Kinder

On 03/31/2010 10:04 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:

On 03/31/2010 09:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
   

- "Nathan Kinder"   wrote:


 

The admin server CGIs parse the start-slapd scripts to determine the
DS instance names.  A recent format change to start-slapd caused this
parsing to break.  These patches make the instance name easier to
parse from the script.  One patch is for DS itself and one is for the
Admin Server.


   

ack - much better


 

Thanks, but I need to nak my own patch since it's imcomplete.

This isn't going to work well when upgrading an instance.  We don't
regenerate the start-slapd script when running 'setup-ds.pl -u'.  This
means that an upgraded instance will not work properly with any of the
admin server CGIs that need to parse the instance name from
start-slapd.  This issue is already a problem not related to this patch,
but it seems we should fix it along with this issue.

I suppose the right thing to do is to make 'setup-ds.pl -u' generate a
new start-slapd script for the existing instances as well as a new
instance specific initconfig script if one doesn't exist.  I think we
need to avoid wiping out an existing instance specific sysconfig script
since it may have been modified by an admin to add other stuff to it
(like KRB5_KTNAME for Kerberos).  Do you see any problems with this
approach?
   
I've attached a new set of patches that implements the solution outlined 
above.


-NGK


   

Sorry that my changes caused this problem. Peace... :)

 

Actually, a previous change of mine actually broke the upgrade case.
You just broke the admin server parsing code. :)
   

Would it be better to have a pure configuration file (not script) in the
instance directory that contains things like instance name, etc.? The
start-dirsrv is a script, and parsing a script without a proper parser is
risky. Same thing with the sysconfig scripts. Even a slight change in that
file could break some regular expressions in the Perl modules. What do you
think?

 

My previous change that breaks the upgrade case is trying to accomplish
this.  We previously had all sorts of paths in the start-slapd scripts
which were parsed in various places.  I created the instance specific
config files in /etc/sysconfig that now contain the paths and other
things needed to start an instance in an easily parsed format.  The one
wrinkle is that we need to know the instance name to know which
sysconfig file to read since the file name is "dirsrv-".  The
admin server tries to get the instance name from the start script to
find the sysconfig file so we can determine other things, such as the
pid file location.  The only other way I can think of to get the
instance name would be to parse it out of the instance path that we use
to locate the start-slapd script.  This is usually something like
"/usr/lib/dirsrv/slapd-".  I think that my proposed change to
the start-slapd format is less error prone since there is no complex
parsing needed.

-NGK
   

Thanks.

--
Endi S. Dewata
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

 

--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
   


>From 46b7eccd0859e7968f68fa7fc7dc55a1d19fb25f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder 
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:12:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Allow instance name to be parsed from start-slapd

The admin server CGIs need to be able to easily parse the
instance name from the start-slapd script.  Recent format
changes have caused the existing parsing to break, so this
patch makes the parsing of the instance name easier.

To deal with the change in start-slapd format for an upgraded
instance, I have changed the setup code to regenerate all of
the instance scripts during an upgrade instead of simply adding
missing scripts.  This is needed for any bug fix that modifies
a script template to work for an upgraded instance.  I also
added code to write the instance sysconfig script during upgrade
if it doesn't exist already.  We don't want to overwrite this
file if it already exists since it's designed for local changes
to be made to it.
---
 ldap/admin/src/scripts/DSCreate.pm.in  |   57 ++--
 ldap/admin/src/scripts/DSUpdate.pm.in  |9 +++-
 ldap/admin/src/scripts/template-start-slapd.in |3 +-
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ldap/admin/src/scripts/DSCreate.pm.in 
b/ldap/admin/src/scripts/DSCreate.pm.in
index 06b2d1f..09b7cd1 100644
--- a/ldap/admin/src/scripts/DSCreate.pm.in
+++ b/ldap/admin/src/scripts/DSCreate.pm.in
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ use Mozilla::LDAP::LDIF;
 
 use Exporter;
 @ISA   = qw(Exporter);
-...@export= qw(createDSInstance removeDSInstance setDefaults 
createInstanceScripts installSchema);
-...@export_ok = qw(createDSInstance removeDSInstance setDefaults 
createInstanceScripts installSch