Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On 08/21/2013 03:09 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: I'll fill a bug against plplot. By the way, plplotd.pc lists quite a few things in its Libs: line -- without having a deeper look I think chances are that at least some of them should be moved to Libs.private to avoid unnecessary linkage bloat when dependent packages aren't built with ld --as-needed. If that's correct, this is something to report upstream (plplot maintainer Cc'd). Yeah, they shouldn't be there. I've removed them in plplot-5.9.9-20.svn12479.fc21, building now. Please give that a try. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: > I'll fill a bug against plplot. By the way, plplotd.pc lists quite a few things in its Libs: line -- without having a deeper look I think chances are that at least some of them should be moved to Libs.private to avoid unnecessary linkage bloat when dependent packages aren't built with ld --as-needed. If that's correct, this is something to report upstream (plplot maintainer Cc'd). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 16:11 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > In this case (and usually IME) it's the latter. -lshp was added to > plplotd.pc in plplot-devel-5.9.9-18.svn12474.fc20 but the > corresponding shapelib-devel package dep wasn't. I just discovered the same thing. Here is the diff of the config.log that Florian requested: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/33439/13770043/ The "old" one is with plplot-5.9.9-16.svn12281.fc20, which doesn't require shapelib, and the "new" one is with plplot-5.9.9-19.svn12479.fc20.x86_64, which requires shapelib. I'll fill a bug against plplot. Thanks for helping me resolve the issue! Tadej -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On 08/20/2013 03:11 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 08/20/2013 01:15 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: Inspecting the log files, I discovered that some BuildRequires pulled in the shapelib package, which then caused the build to fail with: "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lshp" since shapelib-devel was missing. Who should I blame: - the techne package which detected shapelib and tried to build against it, or - the package which introduced this dependency and/or did not also put in a Requires on shapelib-devel? Probably the former. In this case (and usually IME) it's the latter. -lshp was added to plplotd.pc in plplot-devel-5.9.9-18.svn12474.fc20 but the corresponding shapelib-devel package dep wasn't. Ah, okay, you are right. So techne did not actually detect shapelib support. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/20/2013 01:15 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: >> >> Inspecting the log files, I discovered that some BuildRequires pulled in >> the shapelib package, which then caused the build to fail with: >> "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lshp" since shapelib-devel was missing. >> >> Who should I blame: >> - the techne package which detected shapelib and tried to build against >> it, or >> - the package which introduced this dependency and/or did not also put >> in a Requires on shapelib-devel? > > Probably the former. In this case (and usually IME) it's the latter. -lshp was added to plplotd.pc in plplot-devel-5.9.9-18.svn12474.fc20 but the corresponding shapelib-devel package dep wasn't. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:01 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Could you diff config.log instead, please? I'll have to get hold of a rawhide machine to do that, previously I just diffed the build logs from koji. > Do you link something statically, by chance? This would be above my knowledge. How should I do that? Tadej -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On 08/20/2013 01:58 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:22 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Probably the former. How does it detect shapelib support if linking to its library fails? It uses autoconf to check for dependencies, however, I couldn't find an explicit check for shapelib in configure.ac. Comparing the output of ./configure of both builds (failed and successful one) revealed no differences. Could you diff config.log instead, please? Do you link something statically, by chance? -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:22 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Probably the former. How does it detect shapelib support if linking to > its library fails? It uses autoconf to check for dependencies, however, I couldn't find an explicit check for shapelib in configure.ac. Comparing the output of ./configure of both builds (failed and successful one) revealed no differences. Regards, Tadej -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
在 2013-8-20 PM7:15，"Tadej Janež" 写道： was missing. > Who should I blame: > - the techne package which detected shapelib and tried to build against > it, or > - the package which introduced this dependency and/or did not also put > in a Requires on shapelib-devel? If it can be built on f19, I think it's the latter. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
On 08/20/2013 01:15 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: Hi! The techne package FTBFS during the recent F20 mass rebuild, which I fixed and pushed a new build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=455280 The same package failed to build yesterday: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5830172 Inspecting the log files, I discovered that some BuildRequires pulled in the shapelib package, which then caused the build to fail with: "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lshp" since shapelib-devel was missing. Who should I blame: - the techne package which detected shapelib and tried to build against it, or - the package which introduced this dependency and/or did not also put in a Requires on shapelib-devel? Probably the former. How does it detect shapelib support if linking to its library fails? -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?
Hi! The techne package FTBFS during the recent F20 mass rebuild, which I fixed and pushed a new build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=455280 The same package failed to build yesterday: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5830172 Inspecting the log files, I discovered that some BuildRequires pulled in the shapelib package, which then caused the build to fail with: "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lshp" since shapelib-devel was missing. Who should I blame: - the techne package which detected shapelib and tried to build against it, or - the package which introduced this dependency and/or did not also put in a Requires on shapelib-devel? Regards, Tadej -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
