Re: Adopting fedora-jam-kde-theme and fedora-jam-backgrounds

2020-02-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 07:03:16 -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> 
> 
> I have had a few people looking at my reviews. After I made corrections and 
> posted that info, I have had zero responses on my bugs:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803945
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804307

I just had a look. People are working on all three, and @salimma has
agreed to sponsor you there also. So it should all be done soon.

If there's anything else the community can help with, please let us
know.

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Adopting fedora-jam-kde-theme and fedora-jam-backgrounds

2020-02-22 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi Ankur,

On Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:34:40 AM PST Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 17:40:53 -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> If Brendan is non-responsive you can follow the non-responsive
> maintainer policy to take over the packages:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_
> maintainers/

Done. :)

> A proven packager can help in the meantime:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/
> 
> > I understand that I still need to be sponsored into the packager
> > group, and I still have 3 other packages undergoing review (all of
> > which I have corrected per comments).
> 
> I'm sure you'll be sponsored soon, so that isn't a problem. Is a sponsor
> already looking at your reviews?

I have had a few people looking at my reviews. After I made corrections and 
posted that info, I have had zero responses on my bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803945
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804307

All three packages are building and test well, and I have a copr opened at 
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eeickmeyer/Jam-Incoming/packages/ for 
packages I intend to include in Jam eventually. I'm not sure if there's 
anything further I need to do, but perhaps you have more info.

Thanks,
Erich

Erich Eickmeyer
Fedora Jam

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Adopting fedora-jam-kde-theme and fedora-jam-backgrounds

2020-02-22 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 17:40:53 -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi Erich,

> 
> While working on getting Fedora Jam a bit more modernized for F33 (the
> backgrounds and themes haven't been touched since 2013!), I found that my
> predecessor (Brendan Jones) still has fedora-jam-kde-theme and
> fedora-jam-backgrounds. I think it's safe to say that since he abandoned Jam
> that these two packages are now orphaned.

Well, they're still being built, and they're not technically orphaned:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=14400
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-jam-backgrounds

> I have already moved the sources of both packages to pagure since they were
> formerly on his fedorahosted page. Additionally, I have simplified both
> packages into separate sources (used to be one git source) so I believe it's
> safe to say the .sh files from both srpms can be dropped. I just now opened a
> PR, but it appears as though Brendan is the owner and would have to accept 
> that
> PR. Unfortunately, I believe that's not going to happen as he was unresponsive
> with Ben Cotton's keepalive request for Jam, which is why I stepped-in.


> With that, I'd li ke to adopt both of these packages. 


If Brendan is non-responsive you can follow the non-responsive
maintainer policy to take over the packages:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/

A proven packager can help in the meantime:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/

> I understand that I still need to be sponsored into the packager
> group, and I still have 3 other packages undergoing review (all of
> which I have corrected per comments).

I'm sure you'll be sponsored soon, so that isn't a problem. Is a sponsor
already looking at your reviews?

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Adopting fedora-jam-kde-theme and fedora-jam-backgrounds

2020-02-21 Thread Erich Eickmeyer

Hi all,

While working on getting Fedora Jam a bit more modernized for F33 (the 
backgrounds and themes haven't been touched since 2013!), I found that 
my predecessor (Brendan Jones) still has fedora-jam-kde-theme and 
fedora-jam-backgrounds. I think it's safe to say that since he 
abandoned Jam that these two packages are now orphaned.


I have already moved the sources of both packages to pagure since they 
were formerly on his fedorahosted page. Additionally, I have simplified 
both packages into separate sources (used to be one git source) so I 
believe it's safe to say the .sh files from both srpms can be dropped. 
I just now opened a PR, but it appears as though Brendan is the owner 
and would have to accept that PR. Unfortunately, I believe that's not 
going to happen as he was unresponsive with Ben Cotton's keepalive 
request for Jam, which is why I stepped-in.


With that, I'd like to adopt both of these packages. I understand that 
I still need to be sponsored into the packager group, and I still have 
3 other packages undergoing review (all of which I have corrected per 
comments).


Thank you,
Erich

Erich Eickmeyer
Fedora Jam
Ubuntu Studio

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org