Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 12:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after Alpha is go. The maintainer can push the f20 package to stable if they want. The AutoQA adjustment won't prevent that. It's just a safety to require a manual check of the situation. It would probably be reasonable to FE it into F21 too, but F20 doesn't need to wait for that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
On 09/08/2014 08:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 12:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after Alpha is go. The maintainer can push the f20 package to stable if they want. The AutoQA adjustment won't prevent that. It's just a safety to require a manual check of the situation. It would probably be reasonable to FE it into F21 too, but F20 doesn't need to wait for that. Submitted to stable, sorry for that. ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
There are currently 208 Pending Updates https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F20/pending On the left column it shows 112 pending updates. I have never seen it go down to zero? On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:24:58 +0200 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: there must be something wrong in the infrastructure * the update has more than enough karma * it's even not visible in updates-testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide maybe but somebody should take action, these are security relevant updates deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora There's several issues here: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to testing, so it's not gone into testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after Alpha is go that's a Fedora 20 update and not relevant for F21 Alpha freeze Indeed. I misread. ;) But the reason for the autoqa failure was that the f21 update wasn't pushed due to freeze. In any case, the maintainer can submit to stable or testing as they like. kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
Kevin Fenzi wrote: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to testing, so it's not gone into testing. I think in the case of these 2 happening at the same time, I'd argue bodhi can handle this better: * go ahead and push it to -testing, better than waiting not getting pushed anywhere * possible policy change: require all updates to get pushed to -testing initially, regardless of karma -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu writes: * go ahead and push it to -testing, better than waiting not getting pushed anywhere +1 * possible policy change: require all updates to get pushed to -testing initially, regardless of karma If something needs urgent testing to get pushed to stable ASAP, this would get in the way. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
there must be something wrong in the infrastructure * the update has more than enough karma * it's even not visible in updates-testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: there must be something wrong in the infrastructure * the update has more than enough karma * it's even not visible in updates-testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 Automatic push to stable based on karma has been disabled for this update due to failure of an AutoQA test. Update submitter, please check the AutoQA test result and see if there is a valid problem to be fixed here, and fix it if so. If the failure is a mistake on AutoQA's part, you can re-enable the automatic push feature for this update if you like, or push it stable manually once it reaches the requirements under the Updates Policy. So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: there must be something wrong in the infrastructure * the update has more than enough karma * it's even not visible in updates-testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 Automatic push to stable based on karma has been disabled for this update due to failure of an AutoQA test. Update submitter, please check the AutoQA test result and see if there is a valid problem to be fixed here, and fix it if so. If the failure is a mistake on AutoQA's part, you can re-enable the automatic push feature for this update if you like, or push it stable manually once it reaches the requirements under the Updates Policy. So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide maybe but somebody should take action, these are security relevant updates deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: there must be something wrong in the infrastructure * the update has more than enough karma * it's even not visible in updates-testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 Automatic push to stable based on karma has been disabled for this update due to failure of an AutoQA test. Update submitter, please check the AutoQA test result and see if there is a valid problem to be fixed here, and fix it if so. If the failure is a mistake on AutoQA's part, you can re-enable the automatic push feature for this update if you like, or push it stable manually once it reaches the requirements under the Updates Policy. So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide maybe but somebody should take action, these are security relevant updates deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora There's several issues here: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to testing, so it's not gone into testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after Alpha is go. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: there must be something wrong in the infrastructure * the update has more than enough karma * it's even not visible in updates-testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide maybe but somebody should take action, these are security relevant updates deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora There's several issues here: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to testing, so it's not gone into testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after Alpha is go that's a Fedora 20 update and not relevant for F21 Alpha freeze signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bodhi-Problem? - Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:24:58 +0200 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: there must be something wrong in the infrastructure * the update has more than enough karma * it's even not visible in updates-testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide maybe but somebody should take action, these are security relevant updates deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora There's several issues here: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to testing, so it's not gone into testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after Alpha is go that's a Fedora 20 update and not relevant for F21 Alpha freeze Indeed. I misread. ;) But the reason for the autoqa failure was that the f21 update wasn't pushed due to freeze. In any case, the maintainer can submit to stable or testing as they like. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
