Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 16:13 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> I've installed Bodhi 4 from Rawhide but fedpkg doesn't seem to be
> compatible 
> with it yet:
> 
> Could not execute update: This system has bodhi v4, which is
> unsupported.

https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/330


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 18:47:51 CEST Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 11:58 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Could you make a container image based on F30 that can be run on
> > F29/EPEL 7/8?  That offers users a way to use the new tool on the OS
> > of their choice and avoids you having to write new code or bring back
> > a bunch of dependencies to the Fedora release itself.
> 
> Yeah anyone could easily do this (just a FROM line [note: it's in
> Rawhide, not F30] and a RUN dnf install line), but there are also
> dependencies on bodhi-client in EPEL 7 and F29/30 so it wouldn't fully
> address the issue. Any end user who wants to work around it could do
> this though, and I have also provided a Copr[0] that has the new Bodhi
> client that you can use too.
> 
> I also considered modularity, but there's currently a stay on adding
> new packages to the default stream since RPMs can't currently depend on
> modules (and things do depend on Bodhi).
> 
> Miro and I have proposed on the FESCo ticket to create a bodhi3-client
> package and upgrade F29/30 to Bodhi 4.
> 
> 
> [0] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bowlofeggs/bodhi

I've installed Bodhi 4 from Rawhide but fedpkg doesn't seem to be compatible 
with it yet:

Could not execute update: This system has bodhi v4, which is unsupported.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 20:29 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I just noticed one other thing: fedora-easy-karma is now broken,
> because the REST API doesn't return the "anonymous" field on comments
> anymore, which the tool checks for.

See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2137


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Fabio Valentini]

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:27 PM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2019, 18:52 Randy Barlow  wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 17:51 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> > If you're already working on fixing bugs - searching in the web
>> > interface also seems to be broken.
>> > Entries on an autocompleted result in the "package" section link to a
>> > (usually non-existent) user page.
>>
>> That's surprising, and sounds like this issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3040
>
>
> Yep, that's exactly what happened.
>
> However, after deleting the browser cache for the bodhi site and trying 
> again, it now works as expected. Thanks!
>
> I guess there was some stale JavaScript in the cache that didn't get reloaded.
>
> Fabio

I just noticed one other thing: fedora-easy-karma is now broken,
because the REST API doesn't return the "anonymous" field on comments
anymore, which the tool checks for.

Fabio

>>
>>
>> However, when I try this myself in Firefox on production it does seem
>> to work as I expect. For example, if I search "kernel" and then click
>> or use the keyboard to navigate and hit enter on "kernel", I am taken
>> to this URL:
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel
>>
>> Can you describe in more detail what you are doing and seeing?
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Fabio Valentini]

On Wed, May 29, 2019, 18:52 Randy Barlow 
wrote:

> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 17:51 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > If you're already working on fixing bugs - searching in the web
> > interface also seems to be broken.
> > Entries on an autocompleted result in the "package" section link to a
> > (usually non-existent) user page.
>
> That's surprising, and sounds like this issue:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3040


Yep, that's exactly what happened.

However, after deleting the browser cache for the bodhi site and trying
again, it now works as expected. Thanks!

I guess there was some stale JavaScript in the cache that didn't get
reloaded.

Fabio


>
> However, when I try this myself in Firefox on production it does seem
> to work as I expect. For example, if I search "kernel" and then click
> or use the keyboard to navigate and hit enter on "kernel", I am taken
> to this URL:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel
>
> Can you describe in more detail what you are doing and seeing?
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 17:51 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> If you're already working on fixing bugs - searching in the web
> interface also seems to be broken.
> Entries on an autocompleted result in the "package" section link to a
> (usually non-existent) user page.

That's surprising, and sounds like this issue:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3040

However, when I try this myself in Firefox on production it does seem
to work as I expect. For example, if I search "kernel" and then click
or use the keyboard to navigate and hit enter on "kernel", I am taken
to this URL:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel

Can you describe in more detail what you are doing and seeing?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 11:58 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Could you make a container image based on F30 that can be run on
> F29/EPEL 7/8?  That offers users a way to use the new tool on the OS
> of their choice and avoids you having to write new code or bring back
> a bunch of dependencies to the Fedora release itself.

Yeah anyone could easily do this (just a FROM line [note: it's in
Rawhide, not F30] and a RUN dnf install line), but there are also
dependencies on bodhi-client in EPEL 7 and F29/30 so it wouldn't fully
address the issue. Any end user who wants to work around it could do
this though, and I have also provided a Copr[0] that has the new Bodhi
client that you can use too.

I also considered modularity, but there's currently a stay on adding
new packages to the default stream since RPMs can't currently depend on
modules (and things do depend on Bodhi).

Miro and I have proposed on the FESCo ticket to create a bodhi3-client
package and upgrade F29/30 to Bodhi 4.


[0] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bowlofeggs/bodhi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:39 AM Randy Barlow
 wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 17:41 -0400, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > I just tried to submit an update via `fedpkg update` but got a
> > failure
> > via the cli:
> > $ fedpkg update
> > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request:
> > 'anonymous'
> > A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
> >
> > Nevertheless the update got submitted and is available on Bodhi (it's
> > this one:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-16433c312e).
>
> Hi Dan!
>
> I presume you are using a Bodhi 2 or 3 client there? This is a known
> compatibility issue between the Bodhi 3 client and the Bodhi 4 server:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714950
>
> There's a FESCo ticket where we are discussing what to do about it. I'm
> kind of undecided between putting Bodhi 4 into Fedora 29+ (and maybe
> even EPEL 7, which may be tricky due to dependencies) and making a
> Bodhi 3.15 that can talk to Bodhi 4 server (downside is that this will
> require more effort on my part, and I have a lot on my plate ☹). Feel
> free to voice your opinions on the FESCo ticket!

Could you make a container image based on F30 that can be run on
F29/EPEL 7/8?  That offers users a way to use the new tool on the OS
of their choice and avoids you having to write new code or bring back
a bunch of dependencies to the Fedora release itself.

josh
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Fabio Valentini]

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:40 PM Randy Barlow
 wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 20:22 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Perhaps this is the source of:
> >
> > # /etc/cron.hourly/0yum-hourly.cron
> > Updateinfo file is not valid XML:  > '/var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/epel/92f2e15cad66d79ea1ad327e2af7af89d98e4d1
> > 53d7a3e27ff41946f476af5b4-updateinfo.xml.zck',
> > mode 'rt' at 0x7fa11cc331e0>
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8392
>
> I am working on a bodhi-4.0.1 release today to address this particular
> issue.

If you're already working on fixing bugs - searching in the web
interface also seems to be broken.
Entries on an autocompleted result in the "package" section link to a
(usually non-existent) user page.

Fabio

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 20:22 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Perhaps this is the source of:
> 
> # /etc/cron.hourly/0yum-hourly.cron
> Updateinfo file is not valid XML:  '/var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/epel/92f2e15cad66d79ea1ad327e2af7af89d98e4d1
> 53d7a3e27ff41946f476af5b4-updateinfo.xml.zck', 
> mode 'rt' at 0x7fa11cc331e0>
> 
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8392

I am working on a bodhi-4.0.1 release today to address this particular
issue.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 17:41 -0400, Dan Čermák wrote:
> I just tried to submit an update via `fedpkg update` but got a
> failure
> via the cli:
> $ fedpkg update
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request:
> 'anonymous'
> A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
> 
> Nevertheless the update got submitted and is available on Bodhi (it's
> this one:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-16433c312e).

Hi Dan!

I presume you are using a Bodhi 2 or 3 client there? This is a known
compatibility issue between the Bodhi 3 client and the Bodhi 4 server:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714950

There's a FESCo ticket where we are discussing what to do about it. I'm
kind of undecided between putting Bodhi 4 into Fedora 29+ (and maybe
even EPEL 7, which may be tricky due to dependencies) and making a
Bodhi 3.15 that can talk to Bodhi 4 server (downside is that this will
require more effort on my part, and I have a lot on my plate ☹). Feel
free to voice your opinions on the FESCo ticket!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Petr Pisar]

On 2019-05-28, Dan Čermák  wrote:
> I just tried to submit an update via `fedpkg update` but got a failure
> via the cli:
> $ fedpkg update
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: 'anonymous'
> A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
>
Similar to "bodhi update query" dying with "KeyError: 'anonymous'"
.

-- Petr
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 20:22 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Perhaps this is the source of:
> 
> # /etc/cron.hourly/0yum-hourly.cron
> Updateinfo file is not valid XML:  '/var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/epel/92f2e15cad66d79ea1ad327e2af7af89d98e4d1
> 53d7a3e27ff41946f476af5b4-updateinfo.xml.zck', 
> mode 'rt' at 0x7fa11cc331e0>
> 
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8392

Yeah, that's a possibility since this version of Bodhi introduced
zchunked updateinfo files. Maybe jdieter can shed some light on it for
us in the ticket.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Orion Poplawski]

On 5/28/19 11:04 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:

Greetings!

I have just deployed Bodhi 4.0.0 to production:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/docs/user/release_notes.html

One known issue has been found[0] so far: after creating an update,
your browser will be redirected to a URL that does not exist. The
update was created, however, and you should receive an e-mail with the
URL to it (and can also see it on your user page in Bodhi).

Let me know if you find any other problems!


[0] https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3248



Perhaps this is the source of:

# /etc/cron.hourly/0yum-hourly.cron
Updateinfo file is not valid XML: '/var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/epel/92f2e15cad66d79ea1ad327e2af7af89d98e4d153d7a3e27ff41946f476af5b4-updateinfo.xml.zck', 
mode 'rt' at 0x7fa11cc331e0>


https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8392

?


--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems  720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Dan Čermák]

Hi,

I just tried to submit an update via `fedpkg update` but got a failure
via the cli:
$ fedpkg update
Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: 'anonymous'
A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last

Nevertheless the update got submitted and is available on Bodhi (it's
this one:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-16433c312e).


Cheers,

Dan

Randy Barlow  writes:

> Greetings!
>
> I have just deployed Bodhi 4.0.0 to production:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/docs/user/release_notes.html
>
> One known issue has been found[0] so far: after creating an update,
> your browser will be redirected to a URL that does not exist. The
> update was created, however, and you should receive an e-mail with the
> URL to it (and can also see it on your user page in Bodhi).
>
> Let me know if you find any other problems!
>
>
> [0] https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3248
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Bodhi 4.0.0 deployed, one known issue so far

[Randy Barlow]

Greetings!

I have just deployed Bodhi 4.0.0 to production:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/docs/user/release_notes.html

One known issue has been found[0] so far: after creating an update,
your browser will be redirected to a URL that does not exist. The
update was created, however, and you should receive an e-mail with the
URL to it (and can also see it on your user page in Bodhi).

Let me know if you find any other problems!


[0] https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3248


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org