Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:02:57 +0200 Kalev Lember wrote: > On 03/22/2012 04:24 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote: > >>> I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) > >>> thing is that the F17 mails stopped after the update was in > >>> testing, only rawhide continues and I have no idea why. > >> > >> Are you sure about that? > >> > >> parcellite is still listed in the "F-17 Branched report" broken > >> deps, but not in the "rawhide report". > >> > >> The Branched report covers F17 + updates, but not updates-testing. > > > > Last mail I got for rawhide was Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:52:55 + > > (UTC) Last mail for F17 is date Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:00:01. > > My guess would be that the broken deps mail you got for rawhide was > actually for the F17 tree. Someone must have just messed up the > script that mails out broken deps, and it says "rawhide" instead of > "F17 Branched". > yes, i rewrote the script this week so that it can be used for both primary and secondary arches. and i missed that bit its been fixed now and will say f17 from tomorrow Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9rXKcACgkQkSxm47BaWfdmMACgh7WYX1pRXVhbkYAdOeLooK7S AMQAmgPrHCERdRI2GYtHff46xaAFc95D =VnpG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite
On 03/22/2012 04:24 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote: >>> I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing >>> is that the F17 mails stopped after the update was in testing, only >>> rawhide continues and I have no idea why. >> >> Are you sure about that? >> >> parcellite is still listed in the "F-17 Branched report" broken deps, >> but not in the "rawhide report". >> >> The Branched report covers F17 + updates, but not updates-testing. > > Last mail I got for rawhide was Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:52:55 + (UTC) > Last mail for F17 is date Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:00:01. My guess would be that the broken deps mail you got for rawhide was actually for the F17 tree. Someone must have just messed up the script that mails out broken deps, and it says "rawhide" instead of "F17 Branched". -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert > > > wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb buildsys: > > > >> > > > >> parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > > >> On i386: > > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > > >> libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) > > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > > >> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > > >> libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > > >> libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > > >> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > > >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) > > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libX11.so.6()(64bit) > > > >> Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > > > > > > > I resolved this on March 10th with 1.0.2-0.2.rc5 > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=306351 > > > > but still I keep getting these mails. Why? And why is the script > > > > complaining about the F17 package when there is a F18 one in rawhide? > > > > > > Looks like the script looks for fc17, but says it's rawhide... > > > > Yeah, except that I get another mail for F17. > > > > > (There are still broken deps in fc17, because your update is not yet > > > stable: > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3933/parcellite-1.0.2-0.2.rc5.fc17 > > > ) > > > > I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing > > is that the F17 mails stopped after the update was in testing, only > > rawhide continues and I have no idea why. > > Are you sure about that? > > parcellite is still listed in the "F-17 Branched report" broken deps, > but not in the "rawhide report". > > The Branched report covers F17 + updates, but not updates-testing. Last mail I got for rawhide was Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:52:55 + (UTC) Last mail for F17 is date Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:00:01. Kind regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert > > wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb buildsys: > > >> > > >> parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > >> On i386: > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > >> libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > >> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > >> libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > >> libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > >> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > > >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) > > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libX11.so.6()(64bit) > > >> Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > > > > > I resolved this on March 10th with 1.0.2-0.2.rc5 > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=306351 > > > but still I keep getting these mails. Why? And why is the script > > > complaining about the F17 package when there is a F18 one in rawhide? > > > > Looks like the script looks for fc17, but says it's rawhide... > > Yeah, except that I get another mail for F17. > > > (There are still broken deps in fc17, because your update is not yet stable: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3933/parcellite-1.0.2-0.2.rc5.fc17 > > ) > > I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing > is that the F17 mails stopped after the update was in testing, only > rawhide continues and I have no idea why. Are you sure about that? parcellite is still listed in the "F-17 Branched report" broken deps, but not in the "rawhide report". The Branched report covers F17 + updates, but not updates-testing. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite
Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert > wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb > > build...@fedoraproject.org: > >> > >> parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > >> On i386: > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > >> libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > >> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > >> libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > >> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) > >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libX11.so.6()(64bit) > >> Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > > > I resolved this on March 10th with 1.0.2-0.2.rc5 > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=306351 > > but still I keep getting these mails. Why? And why is the script > > complaining about the F17 package when there is a F18 one in rawhide? > > Looks like the script looks for fc17, but says it's rawhide... Yeah, except that I get another mail for F17. > (There are still broken deps in fc17, because your update is not yet stable: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3933/parcellite-1.0.2-0.2.rc5.fc17 > ) I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing is that the F17 mails stopped after the update was in testing, only rawhide continues and I have no idea why. Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb > build...@fedoraproject.org: >> >> parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: >> On i386: >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires >> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires >> libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires >> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) >> parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libX11.so.6()(64bit) >> Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > I resolved this on March 10th with 1.0.2-0.2.rc5 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=306351 > but still I keep getting these mails. Why? And why is the script > complaining about the F17 package when there is a F18 one in rawhide? Looks like the script looks for fc17, but says it's rawhide... (There are still broken deps in fc17, because your update is not yet stable: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3933/parcellite-1.0.2-0.2.rc5.fc17 ) Greetings, Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: parcellite
Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb build...@fedoraproject.org: > > parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On i386: > parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) > parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) > parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libX11.so.6()(64bit) > Please resolve this as soon as possible. I resolved this on March 10th with 1.0.2-0.2.rc5 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=306351 but still I keep getting these mails. Why? And why is the script complaining about the F17 package when there is a F18 one in rawhide? Kind regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
