Re: Discrepancy between koji build and repository content

2019-12-20 Thread alciregi
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 14:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> It's not a library, so it definitely won't be in the 64-bit repo.
> The 32-bit repos have been discontinued, so the only way to get it 

Whoops.
It makes sense.

Thanks.
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Discrepancy between koji build and repository content

2019-12-20 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 12/20/19 12:54 PM, alcir...@gmail.com wrote:

Looking at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1423008 I can see
that, for instance,  samba-winbind-clients was successfully built for
every architecture, in particular x86_64 and i686.

But dnf reports that only the x86_64 package is available, and indeed,
looking inside
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/31/Everything/x86_64/Packages/s/
there is not the i686 RPM.


It's not a library, so it definitely won't be in the 64-bit repo.
The 32-bit repos have been discontinued, so the only way to get it now 
is from koji.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Discrepancy between koji build and repository content

2019-12-20 Thread alciregi
Hello.
Looking at 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1423008 I can see
that, for instance,  samba-winbind-clients was successfully built for
every architecture, in particular x86_64 and i686.

But dnf reports that only the x86_64 package is available, and indeed,
looking inside 
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/31/Everything/x86_64/Packages/s/
there is not the i686 RPM.

There is a specific reason or there is some kind of bug?

Thanks,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org