Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 26. 03. 20 11:13, Dan Horák wrote:
results from my upgrade attempt today
Chyba:
Problém 1: problem with installed package hgview-1.13.0-1.fc31.noarch
- hgview-1.13.0-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- nothing provides python3-qscintilla needed by hgview-1.13.1-1.fc32.noarch
This seem like a problem in hgview. It has broken deps:
$ mock -r fedora-32-x86_64 install hgview
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides python3-qscintilla needed by hgview-1.13.1-1.fc32.noarch
Please report this as a bug to hgview.
Problém 3: package python2-qpid-proton-0.30.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires
qpid-proton-c(x86-64) = 0.30.0-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be
installed
- qpid-proton-c-0.30.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package python2-qpid-proton-0.30.0-1.fc31.x86_64
The version needs to be updated in fedora-obsolete-packages:
$ repoquery --repo={fedora,updates{,-testing}} --releasever 32 --latest=1
--obsoletes fedora-obsolete-packages | grep python2-qpid-proton
python2-qpid-proton < 0.29.0-2
I will do that.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
results from my upgrade attempt today Chyba: Problém 1: problem with installed package hgview-1.13.0-1.fc31.noarch - hgview-1.13.0-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3-qscintilla needed by hgview-1.13.1-1.fc32.noarch Problém 3: package python2-qpid-proton-0.30.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires qpid-proton-c(x86-64) = 0.30.0-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - qpid-proton-c-0.30.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-qpid-proton-0.30.0-1.fc31.x86_64 Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 3/19/20 6:59 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: I nuked python2-matplotlib and python2-matplotlib-tk, and it was able to proceed. One thing that looked odd is that it's downgrading a bunch of packages, including the kernel: kernel-toolsx86_64 5.5.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc32 fedora 190 k kernel-tools-libs x86_64 5.5.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc32 fedora21 k kernel-tools-libs-devel x86_64 5.5.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc32 fedora14 k I wonder if I'm hitting an out-of-date mirror? The other system I just updated had a 5.6.0-0.rc kernel out of the gate.. Downgrading is pretty common as the new release is frozen so new updates only go to the old releases. Although, if the other system you're referring to was an update to F32 beta and not an F31 update, then it probably was an out of date mirror. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:33:02PM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > * Workstation 3 (a frankenstein beast and a lot of modular errors) > > With 'dnf module reset' this is a lot cleaner. dispcalGUI was snagged > from OBS, so not a fedora problem. Tried to upgrade this workstation from F31 to F32 beta. The old errors did not show up, but now I'm getting these new ones: Error: Problem 1: package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-backports-functools_lru_cache, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2.7dist(backports.functools-lru-cache), but none of the providers can be installed - python2-backports-functools_lru_cache-1.5-6.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-cycler >= 0.10.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2.7dist(cycler) >= 0.10, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-matplotlib-tk-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-matplotlib(x86-64) = 2.2.5-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-cycler-0.10.0-10.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-matplotlib-tk-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 I nuked python2-matplotlib and python2-matplotlib-tk, and it was able to proceed. One thing that looked odd is that it's downgrading a bunch of packages, including the kernel: kernel-toolsx86_64 5.5.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc32 fedora 190 k kernel-tools-libs x86_64 5.5.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc32 fedora21 k kernel-tools-libs-devel x86_64 5.5.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc32 fedora14 k I wonder if I'm hitting an out-of-date mirror? The other system I just updated had a 5.6.0-0.rc kernel out of the gate.. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org High Springs, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:48 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 3/18/20 5:14 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > Error: Transaction test error: > > There appears to be a packaging change causing this problem. > > >file /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts/DejaVu from install of > > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > > widelands-0-0.72.build20.fc31.x86_64 > > In the F31 version, /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts/DejaVu is a link to > the system fonts directory. In the F32 version, somehow it has become a > real directory with font files in it. This looks like a bug in the dejavu-fonts package. Please either chime in in the bug about the incompatible packaging changes [0] or open a new one. [0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272 Fabio > >file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf conflicts between > > attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and > > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 > >file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf conflicts > > between attempted installs of > > compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and > > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 > >file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf conflicts between > > attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and > > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 > > Since rpm can't replace the symlink, it's now trying to install the > included files into the system fonts directory instead of in the > widelands one. > > > ...Why is the 'widelands' package bundling fonts? > > Given that they're in an i18n directory, I assume it's trying make sure > it has sufficient font coverage for different languages. Also, the > widelands special font is in there as well. I don't see why they > couldn't be split out though. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 3/18/20 5:14 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: Error: Transaction test error: There appears to be a packaging change causing this problem. file /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts/DejaVu from install of widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package widelands-0-0.72.build20.fc31.x86_64 In the F31 version, /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts/DejaVu is a link to the system fonts directory. In the F32 version, somehow it has become a real directory with font files in it. file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 Since rpm can't replace the symlink, it's now trying to install the included files into the system fonts directory instead of in the widelands one. ...Why is the 'widelands' package bundling fonts? Given that they're in an i18n directory, I assume it's trying make sure it has sufficient font coverage for different languages. Also, the widelands special font is in there as well. I don't see why they couldn't be split out though. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Trying to do a F31->F32 beta upgrade on my primary laptop: [...] Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts/DejaVu from install of widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package widelands-0-0.72.build20.fc31.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 [...and many many more font conflicts] ...Why is the 'widelands' package bundling fonts? - Solomon - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org High Springs, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y Adobe Systems Incorporated 7.0 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 Fedora 32 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 4.8 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 26 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates 28 kB/s | 22 kB 00:00 Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates 28 kB/s | 22 kB 00:00 Fedora 32 - x86_64 68 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00 Copr repo for gnome-shell-extensions owned by jbertozzi 1.4 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:02 RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree - Updates 29 kB/s | 9.3 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree 34 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00 teams 12 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 Error: Problem 1: package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld-1.3-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libpulsecore-13.0.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - pulseaudio-13.0-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld-1.3-1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package rpmfusion-free-release-31-1.noarch requires system-release(31), but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-release-31-2.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-31-1.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:37 PM wrote: > I'm on Fedora 32 Beta now: > > 1. Took a few hours > 2. Some Error message packed from Modular Repo > 3. Other Packed Problem > > About it these steps before with the following command: > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 --skip-broken --best > --allowerasing > > All working now > > See my first post: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UGFOXANDCRCL3DHPOK7P6CEAIUSZXYGI/ > > Regards and as usual _Nice Works_ again thx > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
I'm on Fedora 32 Beta now: 1. Took a few hours 2. Some Error message packed from Modular Repo 3. Other Packed Problem About it these steps before with the following command: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 --skip-broken --best --allowerasing All working now See my first post: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UGFOXANDCRCL3DHPOK7P6CEAIUSZXYGI/ Regards and as usual _Nice Works_ again thx ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wednesday, 04 March 2020 at 17:23, Artur Iwicki wrote: > On my second machine: > > Problem with installed package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 > - package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires > libcmark.so.0.28.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - cmark-lib-0.28.3-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository This is due to cmark bumping SONAME. I'm on it. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module libgit2:0.27:3120190407181414:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-backports-functools_lru_cache, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2.7dist(backports.functools-lru-cache), but none of the providers can be installed - python2-backports-functools_lru_cache-1.5-6.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package python3-getdevinfo-1.0.5-1.1.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-getdevinfo-1.0.5-1.1.noarch Problem 3: package rhsm-api-client-1.0-1.fc29.noarch requires python-futures, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-futures-3.3.0-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rhsm-api-client-1.0-1.fc29.noarch Problem 4: package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f32+6980+20383b7e.x86_64 requires libmypaint-1.3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 - libmypaint-1.4.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 5: package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-cycler >= 0.10.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2.7dist(cycler) >= 0.10, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-matplotlib-tk-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-matplotlib(x86-64) = 2.2.5-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-cycler-0.10.0-10.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-matplotlib-tk-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 6: package python3-getdevinfo-1.0.5-1.1.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - package python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.6-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - package ddrescue-gui-2.0.2-1.1.noarch requires python3-getdevinfo, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-libs-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package ddrescue-gui-2.0.2-1.1.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:22:45AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, 12 March 2020 09.03.38 WET Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote: > > Error: > > Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64 > > requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed > > - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > - problem with installed package That's not a Fedora package... You might need to remove it temporarily. > Problem 2: package > > blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch requires > > pybluez, but none of the providers can be installed > > - pybluez-0.22-14.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > - problem with installed package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch I added blueproximity to fedora-obsolete-packages now for F32 and rawhide. > > Problem 3: problem with installed package > > gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 > > - package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f32+6980+20383b7e.x86_64 requires > > libmypaint-1.3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > installed > > - libmypaint-1.4.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository - gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 does not > > belong to a distupgrade repository > > > > Not entirely sure on how to file the bugs > > Did you reset the modules? > > sudo dnf module reset '*' Yeah, that should solve the gimp problem. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Thursday, 12 March 2020 09.03.38 WET Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64 > requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed > - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64 Problem 2: package > blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch requires > pybluez, but none of the providers can be installed > - pybluez-0.22-14.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch > Problem 3: problem with installed package > gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 > - package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f32+6980+20383b7e.x86_64 requires > libmypaint-1.3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - libmypaint-1.4.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository - gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 does not > belong to a distupgrade repository > > Not entirely sure on how to file the bugs Did you reset the modules? sudo dnf module reset '*' I am asking because I forgot the first time I ran the command. :-) -- José Abílio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 15:26, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > 3 errors Error: Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64 Problem 2: package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch requires pybluez, but none of the providers can be installed - pybluez-0.22-14.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 - package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f32+6980+20383b7e.x86_64 requires libmypaint-1.3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libmypaint-1.4.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Not entirely sure on how to file the bugs Cheers, Carlos -- "Never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.'' Winston Churchill https://stackoverflow.com/users/3670118/casep ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Hi, So, I went ahead and actually did the upgrade on three different systems: two workstation installs and a server install. I'm happy to report that the upgrade went through without any issues. On F32, I seem to be hitting a qt-webengine bug, though. Abrt reported it here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812482 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 09:47 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some > > issues on my desktop. > > On my laptop, from fc32 running: > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > did solve the modules warnings. > > > > > > On my desktop: > > > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid" wasn't and still isn't populated with soft raid > > volumes, I had to change fstab to point to /dev/mdXXXpX to mount my > > home and other needed folders. From cockpit it also says "Unrecognized > > Data" for all my mdraid partitions. > > > > I didn't have time to investigate more, so I jump into this mail to ask > > against which package should I report a bug? I have no idea who fills > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid". > > systemd (well, udev, which is part of systemd these days). It should be > done by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules , which is > part of systemd-udev. I wonder if it's possibly an issue that that runs > before /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-md-incremental.rules , but I'm just > guessing there... Aha, I think I found your bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809117 that's probably what you're hitting. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
BTW my local servlet, which is on F33, lost automounting of lvm on mdraid home Makes systemd unit crazy, it forgets about user units, and refuses to acknowledge them even after /home is remounted manually. (this may or may not be the same thing, F32 & 33 have not diverged too far yet) -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 10:53 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:48 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > > > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some > > > issues on my desktop. > > > On my laptop, from fc32 running: > > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 > > > \ > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing- > > > modular \ > > > distro-sync > > > did solve the modules warnings. > > > > > > > > > On my desktop: > > > > > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid" wasn't and still isn't populated with soft > > > raid > > > volumes, I had to change fstab to point to /dev/mdXXXpX to mount > > > my > > > home and other needed folders. From cockpit it also says > > > "Unrecognized > > > Data" for all my mdraid partitions. > > > > > > I didn't have time to investigate more, so I jump into this mail > > > to ask > > > against which package should I report a bug? I have no idea who > > > fills > > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid". > > > > systemd (well, udev, which is part of systemd these days). It > > should be > > done by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules , which > > is > > part of systemd-udev. I wonder if it's possibly an issue that that > > runs > > before /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-md-incremental.rules , but I'm just > > guessing there... Thank you, I made a bug repport. > > Maybe related? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809117 Yes, thank you. > > -- > Chris Murphy > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:48 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some > > issues on my desktop. > > On my laptop, from fc32 running: > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > did solve the modules warnings. > > > > > > On my desktop: > > > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid" wasn't and still isn't populated with soft raid > > volumes, I had to change fstab to point to /dev/mdXXXpX to mount my > > home and other needed folders. From cockpit it also says "Unrecognized > > Data" for all my mdraid partitions. > > > > I didn't have time to investigate more, so I jump into this mail to ask > > against which package should I report a bug? I have no idea who fills > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid". > > systemd (well, udev, which is part of systemd these days). It should be > done by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules , which is > part of systemd-udev. I wonder if it's possibly an issue that that runs > before /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-md-incremental.rules , but I'm just > guessing there... Maybe related? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809117 -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > Hello, > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some > issues on my desktop. > On my laptop, from fc32 running: > sudo dnf module reset '*' > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > did solve the modules warnings. > > > On my desktop: > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid" wasn't and still isn't populated with soft raid > volumes, I had to change fstab to point to /dev/mdXXXpX to mount my > home and other needed folders. From cockpit it also says "Unrecognized > Data" for all my mdraid partitions. > > I didn't have time to investigate more, so I jump into this mail to ask > against which package should I report a bug? I have no idea who fills > "/dev/disk/by-uuid". systemd (well, udev, which is part of systemd these days). It should be done by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules , which is part of systemd-udev. I wonder if it's possibly an issue that that runs before /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-md-incremental.rules , but I'm just guessing there... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Hello, I did an upgrade last week, with: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some issues on my desktop. On my laptop, from fc32 running: sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync did solve the modules warnings. On my desktop: "/dev/disk/by-uuid" wasn't and still isn't populated with soft raid volumes, I had to change fstab to point to /dev/mdXXXpX to mount my home and other needed folders. From cockpit it also says "Unrecognized Data" for all my mdraid partitions. I didn't have time to investigate more, so I jump into this mail to ask against which package should I report a bug? I have no idea who fills "/dev/disk/by-uuid". Best regards, Alexis. On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular > \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will > reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual > upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 32. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 17:25:39 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 15:09:05 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Problem 3: problem with installed package > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch > > - python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > > - nothing provides python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) >= 0.6 needed by > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-3.fc32.noarch > > > I think it's "fls" vs "fsl" in python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) Ugh :'(! Fixed, built, update pushed: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e92552ccc3 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 15:09:05 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Problem 3: problem with installed package > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch > > - python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > > - nothing provides python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) >= 0.6 needed by > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-3.fc32.noarch > I think it's "fls" vs "fsl" in python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 15:09:05 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Problem 3: problem with installed package > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch > - python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - nothing provides python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) >= 0.6 needed by > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-3.fc32.noarch > Problem 9: problem with installed package > python3-fsleyes-0.32.2-1.fc31.noarch > - package python3-fsleyes-0.32.2-1.fc32.noarch requires > python3.8dist(fsleyes-props) >= 1.6.7, but none of the providers can be > installed > - python3-fsleyes-0.32.2-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) >= 0.6 needed by > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-3.fc32.noarch Hrm. We have: - python3-fsleyes-0.32.2-1: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1468660 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-51bf8fc796 - python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-3: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1462642 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4316570264 - python3-fsleyes-widgets-0.8.4-1: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1405509 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4316570264 in Fedora 32. What's wrong here? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Have many dupes which was already reported there, so selectively: Problem 4: problem with installed package minetest-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 - package minetest-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - minetest-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 6: package python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.6-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - package ulauncher-5.6.1-4.fc31.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-libs-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package ulauncher-5.6.1-4.fc31.noarch Problem 7: package cheese-2:3.34.0-3.fc32.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-3.35.91-1.fc32.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package cheese-2:3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 - package gnome-panel-3.34.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.18()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cheese-2:3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-panel-3.34.1-3.fc31.x86_64 Problem 8: cannot install both gnome-desktop3-3.35.91-1.fc32.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64 - package evince-3.35.92-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-panel-3.34.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.18()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package evince-3.34.2-1.fc31.x86_64 - package gnome-applets-1:3.34.0-2.fc31.x86_64 requires gnome-panel >= 3.24.1, but none of the providers can be installed - evince-3.34.2-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-applets-1:3.34.0-2.fc31.x86_64 Problem 9: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - package vtk-8.2.0-12.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package minetest-server-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package vtk-8.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package minetest-server-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 - vtk-8.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - minetest-server-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Filed a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811103 BTW already upgraded successfully form F31 to F32. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:07 AM José Abílio Matos wrote: > Problem 7: package mp-3.1.0-26.20200215git71c21a5.fc32.x86_64 requires jacop, > but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package mp-3.1.0-23.20161124git1f39801.fc31.x86_64 > - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- > compiler), but none of the providers can be installed > - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- > library), but none of the providers can be installed > - mp-3.1.0-23.20161124git1f39801.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - package scala-2.10.6-17.fc32.noarch is filtered out by modular filtering > Problem 8: package coin-or-Cbc-2.10.4-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libasl.so.3() > (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package mp-3.1.0-26.20200215git71c21a5.fc32.x86_64 requires jacop, but > none of the providers can be installed > - package mp-3.1.0-23.20161124git1f39801.fc31.x86_64 requires libgsl.so.23() > (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package coin-or-Cbc-2.10.3-2.fc31.x86_64 > - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- > compiler), but none of the providers can be installed > - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- > library), but none of the providers can be installed > - gsl-2.5-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - coin-or-Cbc-2.10.3-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - package scala-2.10.6-17.fc32.noarch is filtered out by modular filtering This looks like yet another problem with modules. With no modules involved, this update works just fine. You can install scala, jacop, mp, and the coin-or packages in an F32 mock chroot, for example. But somehow modules are preventing scala from being installed or updated. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:09:05PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Problem 4: package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 requires > atomic-registries >= 1.19.1-6, but none of the providers can be installed > - atomic-registries-1.22.1-28.gitb507039.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 > Hmmm. Oh, I see that this is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804305. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.12.beta.6.fc31.noarch - rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.12.beta.6.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (rubygem(treetop) >= 1.5.0 with rubygem(treetop) < 1.6) needed by rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.11.beta.6.fc32.noarch Problem 2: problem with installed package python3-oletools-0.54.2-2.fc31.noarch - python3-oletools-0.54.2-2.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(pcodedmp) >= 1.2.5 needed by python3-oletools-0.55-2.fc32.noarch I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811089 for that. Problem 3: problem with installed package python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch - python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) >= 0.6 needed by python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-3.fc32.noarch Problem 4: package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 requires atomic-registries >= 1.19.1-6, but none of the providers can be installed - atomic-registries-1.22.1-28.gitb507039.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 Hmmm. Problem 5: package python2-qt5-devel-5.13.2-3.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-qt5(x86-64) = 5.13.2-3.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-qt5-5.13.2-3.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-qt5-devel-5.13.2-3.fc31.x86_64 Problem 6: package python3-pypdf2-1.26.0-13.fc32.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.i686 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-pypdf2-1.26.0-13.fc32.noarch Problem 7: problem with installed package minetest-0.4.17.1-5.fc31.x86_64 - package minetest-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - minetest-0.4.17.1-5.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 8: problem with installed package pdf-stapler-0.3.3-15.fc31.noarch - package pdf-stapler-1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32.noarch requires python3-staplelib = 1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - pdf-stapler-0.3.3-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.8dist(more-itertools) >= 2.2 with python3.8dist(more-itertools) < 6) needed by python3-staplelib-1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32.noarch Maybe some issue with autogenerated requires? python3-more-itertools-0:7.2.0-4.fc32.noarch is available in F32. Problem 9: problem with installed package python3-fsleyes-0.32.2-1.fc31.noarch - package python3-fsleyes-0.32.2-1.fc32.noarch requires python3.8dist(fsleyes-props) >= 1.6.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-fsleyes-0.32.2-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(flseyes-widgets) >= 0.6 needed by python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-3.fc32.noarch Problem 10: problem with installed package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 11: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - package minetest-server-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cmake-3.16.4-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package minetest-server-0.4.17.1-5.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package cmake-3.16.4-1.fc31.x86_64 - minetest-server-0.4.17.1-5.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - cmake-3.16.4-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 06. 03. 20 14:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:25:15PM -0700, stan via devel wrote:
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch
- python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- nothing provides python3.8dist(jsonfield) needed by
python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-6.fc32.noarch
That is strange: python3-django-jsonfield-2.0.2-9.fc32.noarch.rpm has
Provides: python3dist(jsonfield) = 2.0.2, python3.8dist(jsonfield) = 2.0.2.
$ repoquery --repo={fedora,updates{,-testing}} --releasever 32 --latest=1
--obsoletes fedora-obsolete-packages | grep jsonfield
python2-django-jsonfield < 1.0.3-6
python3-django-jsonfield < 2.0.2-9
But python3-django-post_office is not retired, it just has broken deps:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770825
See also https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9287
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:25:15PM -0700, stan via devel wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package > python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch > - python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - nothing provides python3.8dist(jsonfield) needed by > python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-6.fc32.noarch That is strange: python3-django-jsonfield-2.0.2-9.fc32.noarch.rpm has Provides: python3dist(jsonfield) = 2.0.2, python3.8dist(jsonfield) = 2.0.2. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 06. 03. 20 13:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Yes, it's been retired [1]. Both should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/c/a539b99a0294220a7ec99317078128beb9a41e3b?branch=f32 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 09:19:03AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > > Fedora 32. Please check existing reports first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > > [gnat@iridium ~]$ sudo dnf --releasever=32 -- > setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 --enablerepo=updates-testing > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync > Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:26 ago on Wed 04 Mar 2020 09:13:44 > AM MST. > Error: > Problem: package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0-18.fc31.noarch requires > python2-newt, but none of the providers can be installed > - python2-newt-0.52.21-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0- > 18.fc31.noarch > > > If I'm reading that correctly system-config-keyboard is requiring a > python2 package. Is system-config-keyboard supposed to be obsolete? > Seems like probably not but I'm not sure what to do here. Yes, it's been retired [1]. Both should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/system-config-keyboard/c/01411c1da57bf87610d766e3c00e9242d2c6fb96?branch=master Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
> Problem 3: problem with installed package > texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch > - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires > stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed > - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806271 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Miroslav Suchý writes: > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual > upgrade. Ran into some issues with zypper: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package zypper-1.14.33-1.fc31.x86_64 - zypper-1.14.33-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libzypp.so.1712()(64bit) needed by zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 - nothing provides libzypp.so.1712(ZYPP_plain)(64bit) needed by zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package zypper-log-1.14.33-1.fc31.noarch - package zypper-log-1.14.32-1.fc32.noarch requires zypper = 1.14.32-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - zypper-log-1.14.33-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libzypp.so.1712()(64bit) needed by zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 - nothing provides libzypp.so.1712(ZYPP_plain)(64bit) needed by zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 Reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810320 Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 04. 03. 20 23:01, Fabio Valentini wrote: python2-setuptools noarch 41.2.0-2.fc32 This is also a downgrade, without an update on fedora 32. But probably unfixable since newer versions of setuptools don't support python2, I think. I have updated python-setuptools (both py2 and py3) in F31. If you care, we can update python2-setuptools in F32 as well (I don't care enough). It is fixable (to ~0 benefit). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 04. 03. 20 20:41, Ankur Sinha wrote: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch - docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(dockerpty) >= 0.4.1 needed by docker-compose-1.24.1-3.fc32.noarch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794272 Problem 2: package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 requires atomic-registries >= 1.19.1-6, but none of the providers can be installed - atomic-registries-1.22.1-28.gitb507039.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804305 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:25 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 32. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you I have modular repos disabled on my systems, so I'm not getting any upgrade issues related to that. But there are a few package downgrades that are actual issues: Downgrading: firefox x86_64 72.0.2-3.fc32 firefox 73.0.1 indeed is missing from f32+, but I think this is a known issue. java-1.8.0-openjdk x86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b06-0.0.ea.fc32 java-1.8.0-openjdk-develx86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b06-0.0.ea.fc32 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless x86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b06-0.0.ea.fc32 This OpenJDK update seems to be missing from f32+ as well ... libarchive x86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32 This seems to be fixed by an update in updates-testing. openblasx86_64 0.3.7-2.fc32 openblas-Rblas x86_64 0.3.7-2.fc32 openblas-threadsx86_64 0.3.7-2.fc32 This is also fixed by an update in updates-testing. pciutilsx86_64 3.6.3-2.fc32 pciutils-libs x86_64 3.6.3-2.fc32 This is missing an update for fedora 32 - 3.6.4 was built for f31+, but no update for f32 was created. See: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-875081b2ba#comment-1265859 python2-setuptools noarch 41.2.0-2.fc32 This is also a downgrade, without an update on fedora 32. But probably unfixable since newer versions of setuptools don't support python2, I think. Fabio > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 14:25 -0700, stan via devel wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:22:12 -0700 > stan via devel wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:58 +0100 > > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > > > please report it against the appropriate package. Or against > > > fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > > > 32. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > > > I hit 124 issues. I have attached the dnf output. That's a lot of > > bugzillas to open; is there a better way? > > When I looked at them, there were a lot of python2 problems. Since it > is going away in F32, I just deleted them as problems. Those are exactly the 'problems' we're trying to detect, though. Python 2 packages don't just go away by magic, unless you pass --allow-erasing , which can potentially lead to things being removed you didn't actually want to be removed. They ought to be obsoleted properly. The reason Miroslav is asking people to run these commands is to identify packages - including Python 2 packages - which *should* be properly obsoleted but are not, among other issues. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:22:12 -0700 stan via devel wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:58 +0100 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > > please report it against the appropriate package. Or against > > fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > > 32. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > I hit 124 issues. I have attached the dnf output. That's a lot of > bugzillas to open; is there a better way? When I looked at them, there were a lot of python2 problems. Since it is going away in F32, I just deleted them as problems. That leaves only 36 issues. Much more manageable. Attached. Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch - python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(jsonfield) needed by python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-6.fc32.noarch Problem 2: package PyQt4-devel-4.12.3-7.fc31.x86_64 requires PyQt4(x86-64) = 4.12.3-7.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - PyQt4-4.12.3-7.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package PyQt4-devel-4.12.3-7.fc31.x86_64 Problem 5: package blenderplayer-1:2.79b-17.fc31.x86_64 requires libOpenImageIO.so.2.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - OpenImageIO-2.0.13-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package blenderplayer-1:2.79b-17.fc31.x86_64 Problem 6: package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch requires pybluez, but none of the providers can be installed - pybluez-0.22-14.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch Problem 8: package cegui-devel-doc-0.8.7-15.fc31.noarch requires cegui = 0.8.7-15.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - cegui-0.8.7-15.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package cegui-devel-doc-0.8.7-15.fc31.noarch Problem 10: package comedilib-devel-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 requires libcomedi.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package comedilib-devel-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 requires comedilib(x86-64) = 0.11.0-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - comedilib-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package comedilib-devel-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 Problem 17: package gcc-python-plugin-c-api-0.17-4.fc31.x86_64 requires (gcc >= 9 with gcc < 10), but none of the providers can be installed - gcc-9.2.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gcc-python-plugin-c-api-0.17-4.fc31.x86_64 Problem 22: package gnomebaker-0.6.4-32.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstreamer-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gstreamer-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnomebaker-0.6.4-32.fc31.x86_64 Problem 23: package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstrtp-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstrtsp-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstsdp-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstapp-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 Problem 24: package gxine-mozplugin-0.5.910-5.fc31.x86_64 requires gxine = 0.5.910-5.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - gxine-0.5.910-5.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gxine-mozplugin-0.5.910-5.fc31.x86_64 Problem 25: package hibernate-search-5.5.4-2.fc26.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.lucene:lucene-facet), but none of the providers can be installed - lucene-facet-7.7.0-2.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package hibernate-search-5.5.4-2.fc26.noarch Problem 26: package k3d-devel-0.8.0.6-24.fc31.x86_64 requires libk3d-solar-solpos.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package k3d-devel-0.8.0.6-24.fc31.x86_64 requires libk3dsdk-expression.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package k3d-devel-0.8.0.6-24.fc31.x86_64 requires libk3dsdk-half.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package k3d-devel-0.8.0.6-24.fc31.x86_64 requires libk3dsdk-ngui.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package k3d-devel-0.8.0.6-24.fc31.x86_64 r
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Thanks. Bugs filed for Exaile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810253 wxPython-devel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810248 On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:12 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 11:09 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 18:19 +, Ian McInerney wrote: > > > What is supposed to happen with any packages that depend on python2 > that > > > are currently installed on the system? I know that the actual packages > have > > > been retired since python2 is retired now, but currently DNF is > blocking > > > the upgrade of the system (not just marking them for removal). > > > > Something should obsolete them. Depending on circumstances and packager > > preferences that could be the python3 package or fedora-obsolete- > > packages, but all retired packages (including all script-retired > > python2 packages) need to be obsoleted by *something*. > > Er, sorry, to be clear here I mean that python3-foo can obsolete > python2-foo. Not that python3 can obsolete python2-foo. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 20:19:39 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 20:04 Ankur Sinha napsal(a): > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > bat:latest:3120190813194409:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 > > Problem 2: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > libgit2:0.28:3120190812145959:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > > Problem 3: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > meson:latest:3120191009081836:dc56099c-0.x86_64 > > Problem 4: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > newsboat:latest:3120190728140405:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 > > Problem 5: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > ninja:latest:3120190304180949:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > > This should be solved by > dnf module reset '*' > did you run this command? It was mentioned in the first email. Ah, missed that! Sorry! Now I have: Ignoring repositories: copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:flatcap:neomutt Last metadata expiration check: 0:43:02 ago on Wed 04 Mar 2020 18:56:03 GMT. Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch - docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(dockerpty) >= 0.4.1 needed by docker-compose-1.24.1-3.fc32.noarch Problem 2: package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 requires atomic-registries >= 1.19.1-6, but none of the providers can be installed - atomic-registries-1.22.1-28.gitb507039.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 Problem 3: problem with installed package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:00:18PM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > * A third server with F30 went kaboom quite spectactularly, > mostly due to python2 stuffs: After a dnf module reset, it went from 29 problems to 27, again mostly python2 related. > * Workstation 1 (which I believe was set up with F31 from the get-go) After a dnf module reset, this now upgrades cleanly. > * Workstation 2 (laptop first set up in 2013) > (The python3-nikola package is one I built/mangled myself FWIW) After dnf module reset, it's a lot cleaner. python3-PyRSS2Gen is the only real problem here: Error: Problem 1: package python3-nikola-7.8.15-0.1.fc31.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-nikola-7.8.15-0.1.fc31.noarch Problem 2: package python3-nikola-7.8.15-0.1.fc31.noarch requires python3.7dist(pyrss2gen) >= 1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - package python3-nikola-extras-7.8.15-0.1.fc31.noarch requires python3-nikola = 7.8.15, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-PyRSS2Gen-1.1-21.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-nikola-extras-7.8.15-0.1.fc31.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > * Workstation 3 (a frankenstein beast and a lot of modular errors) With 'dnf module reset' this is a lot cleaner. dispcalGUI was snagged from OBS, so not a fedora problem. Error: Problem 1: package dispcalGUI-2.5.0.0-163.1.x86_64 requires wxPython >= 2.8.6, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-wxpython-3.0.2.0-26.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package dispcalGUI-2.5.0.0-163.1.x86_64 Problem 2: package gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-38.fc31.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-canvas >= 2.10.0, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-canvas-2.28.1-30.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-38.fc31.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org High Springs, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 16.05.14 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > OK, I have just 15 problems. Now with module reset and removing (retext from F29): Error: Problem 1: package python2-pytest-cov-2.8.1-5.fc31.noarch requires python2.7dist(coverage) >= 4.4, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-coverage-4.5.4-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-pytest-cov-2.8.1-5.fc31.noarch Problem 2: problem with installed package pdf-stapler-0.3.3-15.fc31.noarch - package pdf-stapler-1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32.noarch requires python3-staplelib = 1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - pdf-stapler-0.3.3-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.8dist(more-itertools) >= 2.2 with python3.8dist(more-itertools) < 6) needed by python3- staplelib-1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32.noarch Problem 3: package ktp-common-internals-19.12.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libtelepathy-qt5-service.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package ktp-common-internals-19.12.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - telepathy-qt5-0.9.7-9.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - ktp-common-internals-19.12.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 4: package texlive-collection-fontsextra-9:svn51763-18.fc32.noarch requires texlive-stix, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package texlive-collection- fontsextra-9:svn51763-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - texlive-collection-fontsextra-9:svn51763-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 5: problem with installed package python3-codacy- coverage-1.3.11-1.fc30.noarch - package python3-codacy-coverage-1.3.11-1.fc30.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 6: problem with installed package texlive- stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - package stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch requires stix-fonts = 1.1.0-15.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - stix-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- José Abílio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Dne 04. 03. 20 v 20:04 Ankur Sinha napsal(a): > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > bat:latest:3120190813194409:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 > Problem 2: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > libgit2:0.28:3120190812145959:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > Problem 3: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > meson:latest:3120191009081836:dc56099c-0.x86_64 > Problem 4: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > newsboat:latest:3120190728140405:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 > Problem 5: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > ninja:latest:3120190304180949:f636be4b-0.x86_64 This should be solved by dnf module reset '*' did you run this command? It was mentioned in the first email. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 11:09 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 18:19 +, Ian McInerney wrote: > > What is supposed to happen with any packages that depend on python2 that > > are currently installed on the system? I know that the actual packages have > > been retired since python2 is retired now, but currently DNF is blocking > > the upgrade of the system (not just marking them for removal). > > Something should obsolete them. Depending on circumstances and packager > preferences that could be the python3 package or fedora-obsolete- > packages, but all retired packages (including all script-retired > python2 packages) need to be obsoleted by *something*. Er, sorry, to be clear here I mean that python3-foo can obsolete python2-foo. Not that python3 can obsolete python2-foo. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 18:19 +, Ian McInerney wrote: > What is supposed to happen with any packages that depend on python2 that > are currently installed on the system? I know that the actual packages have > been retired since python2 is retired now, but currently DNF is blocking > the upgrade of the system (not just marking them for removal). Something should obsolete them. Depending on circumstances and packager preferences that could be the python3 package or fedora-obsolete- packages, but all retired packages (including all script-retired python2 packages) need to be obsoleted by *something*. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 19:14 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 04.03.2020 o 16:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze: > > W dniu 04.03.2020 o 16:24, Miroslav Suchý pisze: > > > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > > and try to run: > > > > > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > > > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > > > again > > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > > distro-sync > > > > > > > Problem: package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 requires > > libgstbase-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 requires > > libgstreamer-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - gstreamer-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - problem with installed package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 > > > > Removed moodbar and next try was fine. > > Looked closer - there are six downgrades: > > Instalowanie poprzedniej wersji: > firefox x86_64 72.0.2-3.fc32fedora 98 M > java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless >x86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b06-0.0.ea.fc32 >fedora 32 M > kf5-kirigami2 x86_64 5.67.0-1.fc32fedora 248 k > libarchivex86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32 fedora 388 k > libarchive-devel x86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32 fedora 124 k > qqc2-desktop-stylex86_64 5.67.0-1.fc32fedora 100 k This is fairly common during freezes; if someone submits an update to F30/F31/F32 it can go stable for F30 and F31 but not for F32 due to the freeze. So it's not unusual for things to get 'ahead' in the stable releases while the branched release is frozen. Since upgrades use distro-sync these days it's not really something to worry about. (Additionally, for Firefox, F32 and F33 builds have been failing for several days, but a successful F32 build just happened today. There is a proposed FE for getting it into the Beta.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
This is what I got: Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module bat:latest:3120190813194409:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module libgit2:0.28:3120190812145959:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Problem 3: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module meson:latest:3120191009081836:dc56099c-0.x86_64 Problem 4: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module newsboat:latest:3120190728140405:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 5: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module ninja:latest:3120190304180949:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch - docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(dockerpty) >= 0.4.1 needed by docker-compose-1.24.1-3.fc32.noarch Problem 2: package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 requires atomic-registries >= 1.19.1-6, but none of the providers can be installed - atomic-registries-1.22.1-28.gitb507039.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 Problem 3: problem with installed package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 4: package maven-doxia-1.9-4.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-metadata), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package maven-doxia-module-fo-1.7-11.fc31.noarch - package plexus-containers-component-metadata-2.1.0-2.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-annotations) = 2.1.0, but none of the providers can be installed - maven-doxia-module-fo-1.7-11.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package plexus-containers-component-annotations-2.1.0-2.fc32.noarch is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 5: package maven-doxia-1.9-4.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-metadata), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package maven-doxia-module-markdown-1.7-11.fc31.noarch - package plexus-containers-component-metadata-2.1.0-2.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-annotations) = 2.1.0, but none of the providers can be installed - maven-doxia-module-markdown-1.7-11.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package plexus-containers-component-annotations-2.1.0-2.fc32.noarch is filtered out by modular filtering (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) The stix-fonts package got rid of the stix-math-fonts package at some point. So, a texlive rebuild would probably fix the dep error unless it's an explicit Requires which will require a spec tweak? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stix-fonts/c/b60f676a2a5df7e5af9b3230bc90cba30c395d61 Dunno about the other maven and modular bits. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
I just tried six different systems: * Two servers did the F31-F32 test upgrade cleanly. * A third server with F30 went kaboom quite spectactularly, mostly due to python2 stuffs: Modular dependency problem: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module fish:3:3020190301191132:602da195-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package cvs2git-2.3.0-0.11.r5319svn.fc23.noarch requires cvs2commons, but none of the providers can be installed - cvs2commons-2.3.0-0.11.r5319svn.fc23.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package cvs2git-2.3.0-0.11.r5319svn.fc23.noarch Problem 2: package geome-2.0-12.fc29.noarch requires python2-dbus, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-dbus-1.2.8-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package geome-2.0-12.fc29.noarch Problem 3: package mailgraph-1.14-34.fc29.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-441.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mailgraph-1.14-34.fc29.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8059+8a5cccba.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8111+66b92dcd.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 4: package python2-PyDrive-1.3.1-7.fc30.noarch requires python2-oauth2client >= 4.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-PyDrive-1.3.1-7.fc30.noarch requires python2.7dist(oauth2client) >= 4.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-oauth2client-4.1.3-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-PyDrive-1.3.1-7.fc30.noarch Problem 5: package python2-carddav-0.7.0-12.fc30.noarch requires python2-dateutil, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-dateutil-1:2.8.0-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-carddav-0.7.0-12.fc30.noarch Problem 6: package python2-cliapp-1.20180121-1.fc30.noarch requires python2-pyyaml, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-pyyaml-5.1-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-cliapp-1.20180121-1.fc30.noarch Problem 7: package python2-cracklib-2.9.6-19.fc30.x86_64 requires cracklib = 2.9.6-19.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - cracklib-2.9.6-19.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-cracklib-2.9.6-19.fc30.x86_64 Problem 8: package python2-deltarpm-3.6-29.fc30.x86_64 requires deltarpm(x86-64) = 3.6-29.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - deltarpm-3.6-29.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-deltarpm-3.6-29.fc30.x86_64 Problem 9: package python2-dropbox-9.4.0-1.fc30.noarch requires python2-requests, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-dropbox-9.4.0-1.fc30.noarch requires python2.7dist(requests) >= 2.16.2, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-requests-2.22.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-dropbox-9.4.0-1.fc30.noarch Problem 10: package python2-gamin-0.1.10-33.fc30.x86_64 requires gamin(x86-64) = 0.1.10-33.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - gamin-0.1.10-33.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-gamin-0.1.10-33.fc30.x86_64 Problem 11: package python2-gitdb-2.0.3-5.fc30.noarch requires python2-smmap >= 2.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-gitdb-2.0.3-5.fc30.noarch requires python2.7dist(smmap2) >= 2.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-smmap-2.0.3-5.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-gitdb-2.0.3-5.fc30.noarch Problem 12: package python2-google-api-client-1:1.6.7-6.fc30.noarch requires python2-uritemplate >= 3.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-google-api-client-1:1.6.7-6.fc30.noarch requires python2.7dist(uritemplate) >= 3.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-google-api-client-1:1.6.7-6.fc30.noarch requires python2.7dist(uritemplate) < 4dev, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-uritemplate-3.0.0-5.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-google-api-client-1:1.6.7-6.fc30.noarch Problem 13: package python2-gpg-1.12.0-1.fc30.x86_64 requires gpgme(x86-64) = 1.12.0-1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - gpgme-1.12.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-g
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module bat:latest:3120190813194409:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-38.fc31.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-canvas >= 2.10.0, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-canvas-2.28.1-30.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-38.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package pgadmin4-python3-flask-compress-1.4.0-1.f31.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pgadmin4-python3-flask-compress-1.4.0-1.f31.noarch Problem 3: package python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.6-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - package pgadmin4-python3-flask-htmlmin-1.5.0-1.f31.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-libs-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pgadmin4-python3-flask-htmlmin-1.5.0-1.f31.noarch Problem 4: problem with installed package timescaledb-1.5.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - package timescaledb-1.5.1-2.fc32.x86_64 requires postgresql-server(:MODULE_COMPAT_11), but none of the providers can be installed - timescaledb-1.5.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - postgresql-server-11.7-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package postgresql-server-11.7-1.module_f32+8176+957a8c69.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 5: problem with installed package python3-devel-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - package python3-devel-3.8.2-2.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.8.2-2.fc32 provided by python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - package python3-devel-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32 provided by python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - package pgadmin4-python3-flask-migrate-2.4.0-1.f31.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-devel-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pgadmin4-python3-flask-migrate-2.4.0-1.f31.noarch Problem 6: problem with installed package python38-3.8.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install both python3-3.8.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install both python3-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.x86_64 and python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - package pgadmin4-python3-psutil-5.5.1-1.f31.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python38-3.8.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pgadmin4-python3-psutil-5.5.1-1.f31.x86_64 Problem 7: package python3-dasbus-0.2-2.fc32.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.8, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.8.2-2.fc32.i686 has inferior architecture - python3-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.i686 has inferior architecture - package anaconda-core-32.24.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires python3-dasbus >= 0.2, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both python3-3.8.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install both python3-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.x86_64 and python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package anaconda-core-31.22.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - package pgadmin4-python3-six-1.12.0-3.f31.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - anaconda-core-31.22.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pgadmin4-python3-six-1.12.0-3.f31.noarch Problem 8: package python3-dasbus-0.2-2.fc32.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.8, but none of the providers can be installed - package python3-3.8.2-2.fc32.i686 obsoletes python38 provided by python38-3.8.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - package python3-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.i686 requires python3-libs(x86-32) = 3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - package boost-python3-1.69.0-14.fc32.x86_64 requires libpython3.8.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-libs-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.i686 has inferior architecture - package anaconda-core-32.24.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires python3-dasbus >= 0.2, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both python3-libs-3.8.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and python3-libs-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install both python3-libs-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.x86_64 and python3-libs-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - package anaconda-32.24.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires anaconda-core = 32.24.2-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - package python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.6-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both python3-3.8.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install both python3-3.8.2~rc2-1.fc32.x86_64 and pyth
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
What is supposed to happen with any packages that depend on python2 that are currently installed on the system? I know that the actual packages have been retired since python2 is retired now, but currently DNF is blocking the upgrade of the system (not just marking them for removal). Here are the three errors I get: Problem 2: package exaile-4.0.0-3.fc31.noarch requires python2-dbus, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-dbus-1.2.8-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package exaile-4.0.0-3.fc31.noarch Problem 3: package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0-18.fc31.noarch requires python2-newt, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-newt-0.52.21-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0-18.fc31.noarch Problem 5: package wxPython-devel-3.0.2.0-26.fc31.noarch requires python2-wxpython = 3.0.2.0-26.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-wxpython-3.0.2.0-26.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package wxPython-devel-3.0.2.0-26.fc31.noarch -Ian On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 3:26 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 32. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
W dniu 04.03.2020 o 16:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze: > W dniu 04.03.2020 o 16:24, Miroslav Suchý pisze: >> Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and >> try to run: >> >> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules >> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again >> sudo dnf module reset '*' >> >> sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ >> --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ >> distro-sync >> > > Problem: package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 requires > libgstbase-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 requires > libgstreamer-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - gstreamer-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 > > Removed moodbar and next try was fine. Looked closer - there are six downgrades: Instalowanie poprzedniej wersji: firefox x86_64 72.0.2-3.fc32fedora 98 M java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless x86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b06-0.0.ea.fc32 fedora 32 M kf5-kirigami2 x86_64 5.67.0-1.fc32fedora 248 k libarchivex86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32 fedora 388 k libarchive-devel x86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32 fedora 124 k qqc2-desktop-stylex86_64 5.67.0-1.fc32fedora 100 k ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
❯ LANG=C sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Copr repo for neomutt owned by flatcap454 B/s | 341 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'flatcap-neomutt': - Status code: 404 for https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/flatcap/neomutt/fedora-32-x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 34.227.76.72) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'flatcap-neomutt': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried keybase19 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:00 Ignoring repositories: flatcap-neomutt Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module bat:latest:3120190813194409:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module dutree:rolling:3120190926112243:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 3: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module exa:latest:3120190813195051:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 4: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module ffsend:latest:3120190812145625:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 5: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module fish:3:3120190219150858:6045e57d-0.x86_64 Problem 6: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module libgit2:0.27:3120190407181414:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Problem 7: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module lsd:rolling:3120190803124134:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 8: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module meson:latest:3120191009081836:dc56099c-0.x86_64 Problem 9: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module ninja:latest:3120190304180949:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Problem 10: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module ripgrep:latest:3120190803131619:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Problem 11: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module skim:rolling:3120190921123929:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.12.beta.6.fc31.noarch - rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.12.beta.6.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (rubygem(treetop) >= 1.5.0 with rubygem(treetop) < 1.6) needed by rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.11.beta.6.fc32.noarch Problem 2: problem with installed package docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch - docker-compose-1.25.4-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(dockerpty) >= 0.4.1 needed by docker-compose-1.24.1-3.fc32.noarch Problem 3: package mysql-connector-python-8.0.19-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2.7dist(protobuf) = 3.6.1, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-protobuf-3.6.1-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mysql-connector-python-8.0.19-1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 4: problem with installed package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 - package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires libcmark.so.0.28.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - cmark-lib-0.28.3-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 5: package texlive-collection-fontsextra-9:svn51763-18.fc32.noarch requires texlive-stix, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package texlive-collection-fontsextra-9:svn51763-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - texlive-collection-fontsextra-9:svn51763-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 6: problem with installed package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 - package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f32+6980+20383b7e.x86_64 requires libmypaint-1.3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libmypaint-1.4.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 7: problem with installed package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be in
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 17:23:48 CET Artur Iwicki wrote: > On my second machine: > > Problem with installed package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 > - package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires > libcmark.so.0.28.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - > mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository - cmark-lib-0.28.3-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository Got only this one. I filled a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810191 CC Rathann ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 04/03/2020 16:24, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > Error: Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.2_135662_fedora31-1.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.2_135662_fedora31-1.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 - package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f32+6980+20383b7e.x86_64 requires libmypaint-1.3.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libmypaint-1.4.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Filed gimp bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810173. VirtualBox left without any actions... Cheers! --alec ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On my second machine: Problem with installed package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 - package mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires libcmark.so.0.28.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - mkvtoolnix-gui-41.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - cmark-lib-0.28.3-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:58 +0100 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or against > fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 32. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu I hit 124 issues. I have attached the dnf output. That's a lot of bugzillas to open; is there a better way? Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch - python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.8dist(jsonfield) needed by python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-6.fc32.noarch Problem 2: package PyQt4-devel-4.12.3-7.fc31.x86_64 requires PyQt4(x86-64) = 4.12.3-7.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - PyQt4-4.12.3-7.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package PyQt4-devel-4.12.3-7.fc31.x86_64 Problem 3: package audio-convert-mod-3.46.0b-18.fc31.noarch requires python2-mutagen, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-mutagen-1.42.0-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package audio-convert-mod-3.46.0b-18.fc31.noarch Problem 4: package audit-viewer-0.7.4-17.fc31.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-gnome, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-gnome-2.28.1-27.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package audit-viewer-0.7.4-17.fc31.x86_64 Problem 5: package blenderplayer-1:2.79b-17.fc31.x86_64 requires libOpenImageIO.so.2.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - OpenImageIO-2.0.13-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package blenderplayer-1:2.79b-17.fc31.x86_64 Problem 6: package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch requires pybluez, but none of the providers can be installed - pybluez-0.22-14.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package blueproximity-1.2.5-20.fc29.noarch Problem 7: package bubbros-1.6.2-8.fc30.x86_64 requires pygame, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-pygame-1.9.6-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package bubbros-1.6.2-8.fc30.x86_64 Problem 8: package cegui-devel-doc-0.8.7-15.fc31.noarch requires cegui = 0.8.7-15.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - cegui-0.8.7-15.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package cegui-devel-doc-0.8.7-15.fc31.noarch Problem 9: package chameleon-0.2-15.fc29.noarch requires python2-ply, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-ply-3.11-3.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package chameleon-0.2-15.fc29.noarch Problem 10: package comedilib-devel-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 requires libcomedi.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package comedilib-devel-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 requires comedilib(x86-64) = 0.11.0-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - comedilib-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package comedilib-devel-0.11.0-2.fc31.x86_64 Problem 11: package decibel-audio-player-1.08-20.fc31.noarch requires gnome-python2-gnomekeyring, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-gnomekeyring-2.32.0-38.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package decibel-audio-player-1.08-20.fc31.noarch Problem 12: package exaile-4.0.0-3.fc31.noarch requires python2-dbus, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-dbus-1.2.8-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package exaile-4.0.0-3.fc31.noarch Problem 13: package expendable-0.0.10-10.fc29.noarch requires gnome-python2-gconf, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-gconf-2.28.1-27.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package expendable-0.0.10-10.fc29.noarch Problem 14: package firmware-tools-2.1.15-5.fc29.noarch requires python2-rpm, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-rpm-4.15.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package firmware-tools-2.1.15-5.fc29.noarch Problem 15: package fwbackups-1.43.7-6.fc29.noarch requires python2-notify, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-notify-0.1.1-42.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package fwbackups-1.43.7-6.fc29.noarch Problem 16: package fwfstab-0.04-0.16.rc1.fc28.noarch requires python2-pyparted, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-pyparted-1:3.11.2-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 32. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > [gnat@iridium ~]$ sudo dnf --releasever=32 -- setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:26 ago on Wed 04 Mar 2020 09:13:44 AM MST. Error: Problem: package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0-18.fc31.noarch requires python2-newt, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-newt-0.52.21-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0- 18.fc31.noarch If I'm reading that correctly system-config-keyboard is requiring a python2 package. Is system-config-keyboard supposed to be obsolete? Seems like probably not but I'm not sure what to do here. -- Nathanael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 15.24.58 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this > command. Take 2 on another machine (now with 44, not independent, problems): Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module fish: 3:3120190219150858:6045e57d-0.x86_64 Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module libgit2:0.28:3120190812145959:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package R-maanova-1.50.0-4.fc31.x86_64 requires libRlapack.so() (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - R-core-3.6.2-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package R-maanova-1.50.0-4.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package clutter-gst-1.6.0-20.fc28.x86_64 requires libgstbase-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package clutter-gst-1.6.0-20.fc28.x86_64 requires libgstreamer-0.10.so.0() (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gstreamer-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package clutter-gst-1.6.0-20.fc28.x86_64 Problem 3: package compat-libmpc-1.1.0-4.fc31.x86_64 requires libmpfr.so.4() (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - mpfr-3.1.6-5.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package compat-libmpc-1.1.0-4.fc31.x86_64 Problem 4: package gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-38.fc31.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-canvas >= 2.10.0, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-canvas-2.28.1-30.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-38.fc31.x86_64 Problem 5: package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstapp-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstrtp-0.10.so. 0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstrtsp-0.10.so. 0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 requires libgstsdp-0.10.so. 0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.8-25.fc31.x86_64 Problem 6: package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2- backports-functools_lru_cache, but none of the providers can be installed - package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2.7dist(backports.functools-lru-cache), but none of the providers can be installed - python2-backports-functools_lru_cache-1.5-6.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 7: package system-config-firewall-tui-1.2.29-21.fc29.noarch requires python2-newt, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-newt-0.52.21-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package system-config-firewall- tui-1.2.29-21.fc29.noarch Problem 8: package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0-18.fc31.noarch requires system-config-keyboard-base = 1.4.0-18.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - system-config-keyboard-base-1.4.0-18.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package system-config-keyboard-1.4.0-18.fc31.noarch Problem 9: package texlive-collection- plainextra-6:svn37156.0-52.20160520.fc28.noarch requires tex-texinfo, but none of the providers can be installed - texlive-texinfo-9:svn51312-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package texlive-collection- plainextra-6:svn37156.0-52.20160520.fc28.noarch Problem 10: problem with installed package grpc-1.20.1-2.fc31.x86_64 - package grpc-1.26.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - grpc-1.20.1-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package protobuf-3.11.2-2.fc32.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 11: package gstreamer-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 requires gstreamer-tools >= 0.10.36, but none of the providers can be installed - package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 15.24.58 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this > command. OK, I have just 15 problems. :-) Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module libgit2:0.27:3120190407181414:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package python2-pytest-cov-2.8.1-5.fc31.noarch requires python2.7dist(coverage) >= 4.4, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-coverage-4.5.4-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-pytest-cov-2.8.1-5.fc31.noarch Problem 2: package python3-markups-2.0.0-10.fc29.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-markups-2.0.0-10.fc29.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package pdf-stapler-0.3.3-15.fc31.noarch - package pdf-stapler-1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32.noarch requires python3-staplelib = 1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - pdf-stapler-0.3.3-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.8dist(more-itertools) >= 2.2 with python3.8dist(more-itertools) < 6) needed by python3- staplelib-1.0.0-0.3.20191215git8753251.fc32.noarch Problem 4: package python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.6-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - package retext-7.0.3-3.fc29.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-libs-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package retext-7.0.3-3.fc29.noarch Problem 5: package ktp-common-internals-19.12.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libtelepathy-qt5-service.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package ktp-common-internals-19.12.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - telepathy-qt5-0.9.7-9.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - ktp-common-internals-19.12.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 6: package texlive-collection-fontsextra-9:svn51763-18.fc32.noarch requires texlive-stix, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package texlive-collection- fontsextra-9:svn51763-15.fc31.noarch - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - texlive-collection-fontsextra-9:svn51763-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 7: package mp-3.1.0-26.20200215git71c21a5.fc32.x86_64 requires jacop, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package mp-3.1.0-23.20161124git1f39801.fc31.x86_64 - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- compiler), but none of the providers can be installed - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- library), but none of the providers can be installed - mp-3.1.0-23.20161124git1f39801.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package scala-2.10.6-17.fc32.noarch is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 8: package coin-or-Cbc-2.10.4-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libasl.so.3() (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package mp-3.1.0-26.20200215git71c21a5.fc32.x86_64 requires jacop, but none of the providers can be installed - package mp-3.1.0-23.20161124git1f39801.fc31.x86_64 requires libgsl.so.23() (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package coin-or-Cbc-2.10.3-2.fc31.x86_64 - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- compiler), but none of the providers can be installed - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.scala-lang:scala- library), but none of the providers can be installed - gsl-2.5-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - coin-or-Cbc-2.10.3-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package scala-2.10.6-17.fc32.noarch is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 9: problem with installed package gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f31+6993+669d73be.x86_64 - package gimp-
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Problem with installed package mumble-1.2.19-15.fc31.x86_64 - package mumble-1.2.19-15.fc31.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.17()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - protobuf-3.6.1-5.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package protobuf-3.6.1-6.module_f32+6163+c0e6dcb2.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:25 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 32. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > I did not get any errors (stopped before letting it do the update), but I would like to know why it does it want to downgrade two packages: [root@localhost ~]# sudo dnf module reset '*' Last metadata expiration check: 1:35:23 ago on Wed 04 Mar 2020 09:09:41 AM EST. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! [root@localhost ~]# sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platf orm:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 1.8 MB/s | 4.9 MB 00:02 Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates599 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Test Updates 350 kB/s | 472 kB 00:01 Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.8 MB/s | 4.8 MB 00:02 Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates336 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 32 - x86_64 6.4 MB/s | 68 MB 00:10 Dependencies resolved. Package Arch Version Repository Size Installing: kernelx86_64 5.6.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc32 fedora 18 k kernel-core x86_64 5.6.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc32 fedora 32 M kernel-modulesx86_64 5.6.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc32 fedora 29 M [...] Removing: kernelx86_64 5.3.7-301.fc31 @anaconda 0 kernel-core x86_64 5.3.7-301.fc31 @anaconda67 M kernel-modulesx86_64 5.3.7-301.fc31 @anaconda28 M Downgrading: bsdtarx86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32fedora 65 k libarchivex86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32fedora 388 k Transaction Summary Install 16 Packages Upgrade463 Packages Remove 3 Packages Downgrade2 Packages Total download size: 425 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. [root@localhost ~]# > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
On 04. 03. 20 16:24, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 32. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu There is also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804305 moby-engine does not obsolete proper version of docker, upgrading to Fedora 32 is blocked And of course internal Red Hat tools (like rhpkg) blow up as always. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
W dniu 04.03.2020 o 16:24, Miroslav Suchý pisze: > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > Problem: package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 requires libgstbase-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 requires libgstreamer-0.10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gstreamer-0.10.36-24.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 Removed moodbar and next try was fine. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 32. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu Thank you -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
