Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)
rpm -q -conflicts kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm kicad-doc < 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 ... When I add the '--best --allowerasing' flags, then I get the desired result: # dnf update kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm --best --allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:43:04 ago on Mon 31 Jan 2022 05:06:19 PM EST. Dependencies resolved. Package Architecture Version Repository Size Upgrading: kicad x86_64 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 @commandline 90 M Removing dependent packages: kicad-doc noarch 1:5.1.12-1.fc35 @updates 111 M Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry for flogging this fine stallion, but I believe that 'dnf update kicad kicad-doc' would have worked (I did check that updating kicad-doc followed by updating kicad works). Isn't there some combination of Required/Obsoletes/Conflicts/??? to coax dnf to upgrade both packages instead of deleting kicad-doc? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)
On 01. 02. 22 18:01, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: rpm -q -conflicts kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm kicad-doc < 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 ... When I add the '--best --allowerasing' flags, then I get the desired result: # dnf update kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm --best --allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:43:04 ago on Mon 31 Jan 2022 05:06:19 PM EST. Dependencies resolved. Package Architecture Version Repository Size Upgrading: kicad x86_64 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 @commandline 90 M Removing dependent packages: kicad-doc noarch 1:5.1.12-1.fc35 @updates 111 M Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry for flogging this fine stallion, but I believe that 'dnf update kicad kicad-doc' would have worked (I did check that updating kicad-doc followed by updating kicad works). Isn't there some combination of Required/Obsoletes/Conflicts/??? to coax dnf to upgrade both packages instead of deleting kicad-doc? This should work without --allowerasing once the packages are actually in a repository. "dnf update kicad" will see the newer version of kicad-doc and it will update both at the same time. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)
On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry for flogging this fine stallion, but I believe that 'dnf update kicad kicad-doc' would have worked (I did check that updating kicad-doc followed by updating kicad works). Isn't there some combination of Required/Obsoletes/Conflicts/??? to coax dnf to upgrade both packages instead of deleting kicad-doc? This should work without --allowerasing once the packages are actually in a repository. "dnf update kicad" will see the newer version of kicad-doc and it will update both at the same time. This is after enabling Steven's COPR copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_kicad:kicad , which contains kicad, kicad-doc and kicad-packages3d. Are you saying that it would make a difference when they are in the main Fedora - Updates repo?___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)
On 2/1/22 12:54 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 01. 02. 22 18:01, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: rpm -q -conflicts kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm kicad-doc < 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 ... When I add the '--best --allowerasing' flags, then I get the desired result: # dnf update kicad-6.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm --best --allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:43:04 ago on Mon 31 Jan 2022 05:06:19 PM EST. Dependencies resolved. Package Architecture Version Repository Size Upgrading: kicad x86_64 1:6.0.1-4.fc35 @commandline 90 M Removing dependent packages: kicad-doc noarch 1:5.1.12-1.fc35 @updates 111 M Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry for flogging this fine stallion, but I believe that 'dnf update kicad kicad-doc' would have worked (I did check that updating kicad-doc followed by updating kicad works). Isn't there some combination of Required/Obsoletes/Conflicts/??? to coax dnf to upgrade both packages instead of deleting kicad-doc? This should work without --allowerasing once the packages are actually in a repository. "dnf update kicad" will see the newer version of kicad-doc and it will update both at the same time. That is correct. The --allowerasing only happened because I was testing from a local mock build, and deliberately only supplied the main package as part of my testing. You won't have that problem in normal use, once I get Copr to complete the build. However, Copr is being difficult at the moment. For some reason, the ppc64le builders all failed after an hour with: Connection timed out during banner exchange Connection to 140.211.168.28 port 22 timed out Sigh. The build normally takes over 5 hours. I'll have to restart it yet again. (Aside: the koji build of KiCad for rawhide went fine, but because KiCad just went through a major version change, I have to use Copr for F34/F35.) Steve ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)
On 2/1/22 01:45 PM, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry for flogging this fine stallion, but I believe that 'dnf update kicad kicad-doc' would have worked (I did check that updating kicad-doc followed by updating kicad works). Isn't there some combination of Required/Obsoletes/Conflicts/??? to coax dnf to upgrade both packages instead of deleting kicad-doc? This should work without --allowerasing once the packages are actually in a repository. "dnf update kicad" will see the newer version of kicad-doc and it will update both at the same time. This is after enabling Steven's COPR copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_kicad:kicad , which contains kicad, kicad-doc and kicad-packages3d. Are you saying that it would make a difference when they are in the main Fedora - Updates repo? It is not in Copr yet, as I just pointed out in my previous email. Steve ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)
On 01. 02. 22 19:45, przemek klosowski wrote: On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry for flogging this fine stallion, but I believe that 'dnf update kicad kicad-doc' would have worked (I did check that updating kicad-doc followed by updating kicad works). Isn't there some combination of Required/Obsoletes/Conflicts/??? to coax dnf to upgrade both packages instead of deleting kicad-doc? This should work without --allowerasing once the packages are actually in a repository. "dnf update kicad" will see the newer version of kicad-doc and it will update both at the same time. This is after enabling Steven's COPR copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_kicad:kicad , which contains kicad, kicad-doc and kicad-packages3d. Are you saying that it would make a difference when they are in the main Fedora - Updates repo? Nah, having the copr enabled should solve this: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 init $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 install kicad kicad-doc $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --addrepo='https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@kicad/kicad/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/' --update kicad ... Dependencies resolved. Package Arch VersionRepositorySize Upgrading: kicad x86_64 1:6.0.1-4.fc36 downloadcoprfedorainfracloudorg_results_kicad_kicad_fedorarawhidebasearch_ 72 M kicad-doc noarch 1:6.0.1-4.fc36 downloadcoprfedorainfracloudorg_results_kicad_kicad_fedorarawhidebasearch_ 128 M Transaction Summary Upgrade 2 Packages ... -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)
On 2/2/22 05:19 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 01. 02. 22 19:45, przemek klosowski wrote: On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future, I am curious if there's another way. Sorry for flogging this fine stallion, but I believe that 'dnf update kicad kicad-doc' would have worked (I did check that updating kicad-doc followed by updating kicad works). Isn't there some combination of Required/Obsoletes/Conflicts/??? to coax dnf to upgrade both packages instead of deleting kicad-doc? This should work without --allowerasing once the packages are actually in a repository. "dnf update kicad" will see the newer version of kicad-doc and it will update both at the same time. This is after enabling Steven's COPR copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_kicad:kicad , which contains kicad, kicad-doc and kicad-packages3d. Are you saying that it would make a difference when they are in the main Fedora - Updates repo? Nah, having the copr enabled should solve this: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 init $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 install kicad kicad-doc $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --addrepo='https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@kicad/kicad/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/' --update kicad ... Dependencies resolved. Package Arch Version Repository Size Upgrading: kicad x86_64 1:6.0.1-4.fc36 downloadcoprfedorainfracloudorg_results_kicad_kicad_fedorarawhidebasearch_ 72 M kicad-doc noarch 1:6.0.1-4.fc36 downloadcoprfedorainfracloudorg_results_kicad_kicad_fedorarawhidebasearch_ 128 M Transaction Summary Upgrade 2 Packages ... Thanks for running that test, Miro. The -4 builds finished around 2:13 UTC, so everything in Copr now has the fix, and once we get a successful rawhide compose, they will land in the Rawhide Updates repo too. Steve ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
