Re: Incomplete work of fedora-review
sön 2015-11-22 klockan 22:21 +0100 skrev Christian Dersch: > Hi all, > > I can confirm the behaviour Jens reports, there are already two bugs > open @RHBZ: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275275 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279538 > > Greetings, > Christian The "Install command returned error code 30" is a different bug than "it is slow". This bug is however also already reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264803 Mattias > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 22:11 +0100, Jens Lody wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2015, 21:11 +0100 schrieb Antonio Trande: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > today i'm not able to review any package because of 'fedora- > > > review'. > > > Pratically, always appears an info like "Install command returned > > > error code 30" > > > > > > > fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -b ... INFO: Processing > > > > bugzilla bug: ... INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : ... > > > > INFO: --> SRPM url: http://src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: > > > > http://spec INFO: Using review directory: > > > > /home/sagitter/... > > > > INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files ... ... INFO: Running > > > > checks and generating report INFO: Results and/or logs in: > > > > /home/sagitter/.../results INFO: Build completed INFO: > > > > Installing > > > > built package(s) INFO: Install command returned error code 30 > > > > < INFO: Active plugins: Generic, > > > > Shell-api, C/C++ > > > > > > and, above all, 'htop' shows a > > > > > > > python3 dnf .. -resolve 'something' python3 dnf .. -resolve > > > > 'something else' > > > > > > (where 'something' are the BuildRequires packages) that runs over > > > and > > > over again. > > > > > > The result directory of fedora-review contains an empty > > > 'review.txt' > > > file but package is built correctly. > > > > > > Has anyone else this problem? > > > > > I don't get the "error code 30" messages, but the review is > > extremly > > slow. > > I takes over 3 hours for a package that needs 3 minutes to build on > > copr (from upload to finish). > > The most time is spent for "dnf repoquery -q -C --requires -- > > resolve > > x", it took nearly 3 hours to do 72 repoqueries, many of them > > are > > repeated. There are just 30 different packages to resolve. > > > > Between the messages there are several lines of this type (in > > german): > > "11-22 19:05 root DEBUGRunning: dnf repoquery -q -C -- > > requires --resolve Die letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten > > wurde > > vor 0:12:50 auf Sun Nov 22 16:03:37 2015 ausgeführt" > > > > It tells me that the last metadata check is 0:12:50 ago and was > > done > > at > > 16:03:37, the message has a timestamp of 19:05. > > The timestamp is correct, the time for the metadata-check is most > > likely also correct, but the time span is obviously wrong. > > > > The repoqueries from cache need about 2:45 minutes, as normal user > > and > > as root, with a refresh the need a little more than 3 minutes. > > The command eats up 100% of one of my cpu's with 3.2 GHz. Memory > > can > > not be a problem, it needs 0.3 % of my 32GB Ram. > > > > Jens > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Incomplete work of fedora-review
Hi all, I can confirm the behaviour Jens reports, there are already two bugs open @RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275275 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279538 Greetings, Christian On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 22:11 +0100, Jens Lody wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2015, 21:11 +0100 schrieb Antonio Trande: > > Hi all, > > > > today i'm not able to review any package because of 'fedora- > > review'. > > Pratically, always appears an info like "Install command returned > > error code 30" > > > > > fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -b ... INFO: Processing > > > bugzilla bug: ... INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : ... > > > INFO: --> SRPM url: http://src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: > > > http://spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/sagitter/... > > > INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files ... ... INFO: Running > > > checks and generating report INFO: Results and/or logs in: > > > /home/sagitter/.../results INFO: Build completed INFO: Installing > > > built package(s) INFO: Install command returned error code 30 > > > < INFO: Active plugins: Generic, > > > Shell-api, C/C++ > > > > and, above all, 'htop' shows a > > > > > python3 dnf .. -resolve 'something' python3 dnf .. -resolve > > > 'something else' > > > > (where 'something' are the BuildRequires packages) that runs over > > and > > over again. > > > > The result directory of fedora-review contains an empty > > 'review.txt' > > file but package is built correctly. > > > > Has anyone else this problem? > > > I don't get the "error code 30" messages, but the review is extremly > slow. > I takes over 3 hours for a package that needs 3 minutes to build on > copr (from upload to finish). > The most time is spent for "dnf repoquery -q -C --requires --resolve > x", it took nearly 3 hours to do 72 repoqueries, many of them are > repeated. There are just 30 different packages to resolve. > > Between the messages there are several lines of this type (in > german): > "11-22 19:05 root DEBUGRunning: dnf repoquery -q -C -- > requires --resolve Die letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten wurde > vor 0:12:50 auf Sun Nov 22 16:03:37 2015 ausgeführt" > > It tells me that the last metadata check is 0:12:50 ago and was done > at > 16:03:37, the message has a timestamp of 19:05. > The timestamp is correct, the time for the metadata-check is most > likely also correct, but the time span is obviously wrong. > > The repoqueries from cache need about 2:45 minutes, as normal user > and > as root, with a refresh the need a little more than 3 minutes. > The command eats up 100% of one of my cpu's with 3.2 GHz. Memory can > not be a problem, it needs 0.3 % of my 32GB Ram. > > Jens > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Incomplete work of fedora-review
Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2015, 21:11 +0100 schrieb Antonio Trande: > Hi all, > > today i'm not able to review any package because of 'fedora-review'. > Pratically, always appears an info like "Install command returned > error code 30" > > > fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -b ... INFO: Processing > > bugzilla bug: ... INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : ... > > INFO: --> SRPM url: http://src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: > > http://spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/sagitter/... > > INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files ... ... INFO: Running > > checks and generating report INFO: Results and/or logs in: > > /home/sagitter/.../results INFO: Build completed INFO: Installing > > built package(s) INFO: Install command returned error code 30 > > < INFO: Active plugins: Generic, > > Shell-api, C/C++ > > and, above all, 'htop' shows a > > > python3 dnf .. -resolve 'something' python3 dnf .. -resolve > > 'something else' > > (where 'something' are the BuildRequires packages) that runs over and > over again. > > The result directory of fedora-review contains an empty 'review.txt' > file but package is built correctly. > > Has anyone else this problem? > I don't get the "error code 30" messages, but the review is extremly slow. I takes over 3 hours for a package that needs 3 minutes to build on copr (from upload to finish). The most time is spent for "dnf repoquery -q -C --requires --resolve x", it took nearly 3 hours to do 72 repoqueries, many of them are repeated. There are just 30 different packages to resolve. Between the messages there are several lines of this type (in german): "11-22 19:05 root DEBUGRunning: dnf repoquery -q -C -- requires --resolve Die letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten wurde vor 0:12:50 auf Sun Nov 22 16:03:37 2015 ausgeführt" It tells me that the last metadata check is 0:12:50 ago and was done at 16:03:37, the message has a timestamp of 19:05. The timestamp is correct, the time for the metadata-check is most likely also correct, but the time span is obviously wrong. The repoqueries from cache need about 2:45 minutes, as normal user and as root, with a refresh the need a little more than 3 minutes. The command eats up 100% of one of my cpu's with 3.2 GHz. Memory can not be a problem, it needs 0.3 % of my 32GB Ram. Jens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Incomplete work of fedora-review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, today i'm not able to review any package because of 'fedora-review'. Pratically, always appears an info like "Install command returned error code 30" > fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -b ... INFO: Processing > bugzilla bug: ... INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : ... > INFO: --> SRPM url: http://src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: > http://spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/sagitter/... > INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files ... ... INFO: Running > checks and generating report INFO: Results and/or logs in: > /home/sagitter/.../results INFO: Build completed INFO: Installing > built package(s) INFO: Install command returned error code 30 > < INFO: Active plugins: Generic, > Shell-api, C/C++ and, above all, 'htop' shows a > python3 dnf .. -resolve 'something' python3 dnf .. -resolve > 'something else' (where 'something' are the BuildRequires packages) that runs over and over again. The result directory of fedora-review contains an empty 'review.txt' file but package is built correctly. Has anyone else this problem? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWUiFYAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8kbcH/iDOYqsUFbJ6rOo3tsS5KtW1 0plI9BTJusmIOfbszefPwPY7XQZcwg/5vpjalL//h6ggSpBYHC1RpFUtXTQnTqh/ 1heMSsQ2uBuSTr/C+79afn+SAh16IFVjWm9tywpJju6o4PjMPOpGng1DFoPtYjkL +/063gU3DpFkA4dGVxX9htXW7NOqMUaBrxm/3i09d0/MGUMyIBaQxV8kSlEobBA9 BPaewEm6jnzX72f6Pd9ZpnOOLWXKIFGrWGQ3sWGYeuKs/LptrvQ+qcNdBHJsxy2/ v9IwsTqtp5wwCpR9KTGv2f/S2H07ehN2idqNB6gWUB1QWW18wQFP1NYgsFuNWJQ= =KURn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
