Re: Installing alsa-ucm by default in F25?
FWIW, this was done in: commit 07106ddaa4f45aa188019d497a6a042bd7b58750 Author: Peter RobinsonDate: Sat Apr 2 10:24:17 2016 +0100 add alsa-ucm For F24 and F25. Thanks! - Original Message - > > alsa-ucm contains routing information to setup sound codecs > > on some machines, usually SoC-based. It contains configuration > > that's mostly relevant to ARM devices, but also a few Atom (CherryTrail and > > Broadwell) related SoCs on Intel. > > > > Could we install alsa-ucm by default? As it is necessary for PulseAudio to > > be able to use those devices, should we get it dragged in as a PA > > dependency? > > I think pulling it in by default is fine, it's tiny in size and has no > extra deps, I'd add it to comps as opposed to a hard dep on pulseaudio > though. > > Peter > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installing alsa-ucm by default in F25?
Rex Dieter wrote: > Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> alsa-ucm contains routing information to setup sound codecs >>> on some machines, usually SoC-based. It contains configuration >>> that's mostly relevant to ARM devices, but also a few Atom (CherryTrail >>> and Broadwell) related SoCs on Intel. >>> >>> Could we install alsa-ucm by default? As it is necessary for PulseAudio >>> to be able to use those devices, should we get it dragged in as a PA >>> dependency? >> >> I think pulling it in by default is fine, it's tiny in size and has no >> extra deps, I'd add it to comps as opposed to a hard dep on pulseaudio >> though. > > Won't doing only that mean that folks upgrading from fedora => fedora+1 > won't get it? Or dnf's groups-as-objects feature could be fixed to behave like yum did (mentioning only for completeness, this has previously been marked as a WONTFIX issue). -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installing alsa-ucm by default in F25?
Peter Robinson wrote: >> alsa-ucm contains routing information to setup sound codecs >> on some machines, usually SoC-based. It contains configuration >> that's mostly relevant to ARM devices, but also a few Atom (CherryTrail >> and Broadwell) related SoCs on Intel. >> >> Could we install alsa-ucm by default? As it is necessary for PulseAudio >> to be able to use those devices, should we get it dragged in as a PA >> dependency? > > I think pulling it in by default is fine, it's tiny in size and has no > extra deps, I'd add it to comps as opposed to a hard dep on pulseaudio > though. Won't doing only that mean that folks upgrading from fedora => fedora+1 won't get it? -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installing alsa-ucm by default in F25?
> alsa-ucm contains routing information to setup sound codecs > on some machines, usually SoC-based. It contains configuration > that's mostly relevant to ARM devices, but also a few Atom (CherryTrail and > Broadwell) related SoCs on Intel. > > Could we install alsa-ucm by default? As it is necessary for PulseAudio to > be able to use those devices, should we get it dragged in as a PA > dependency? I think pulling it in by default is fine, it's tiny in size and has no extra deps, I'd add it to comps as opposed to a hard dep on pulseaudio though. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Installing alsa-ucm by default in F25?
Hey, alsa-ucm contains routing information to setup sound codecs on some machines, usually SoC-based. It contains configuration that's mostly relevant to ARM devices, but also a few Atom (CherryTrail and Broadwell) related SoCs on Intel. Could we install alsa-ucm by default? As it is necessary for PulseAudio to be able to use those devices, should we get it dragged in as a PA dependency? Cheers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org