Re: Mass rebuilds update
On 10/24/2017 11:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 24.10.2017 um 02:43 schrieb Xose Vazquez Perez:
>> They are not tagged for fedora 27
> but FTBFS is not true and so this list is worthless when it is that
> long and contains also packages which where built sucessfully but
> some metadata in the infrastructure is wrong and they never got
> pushed
It's a mix. Some packages are really broken, and others were untagged
for latest Fedora release. It can be checked with:
$ koji list-tag-history --tag=f28 > f28h
$ koji latest-pkg --all f28 > f28p
$ egrep -vi "fc27|fc28|^Fedora-" f28p | awk '{print $1}'
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
A few I've just tried to build chosen pretty much at random from the above list: > boinc-client builds fine - there was a FTBFS months ago (#1251482) referring to openssl but it's fine now > activemq-cpp Already tracked by #1423204 - upstream have, slightly strangely, included the fix in a comment but not their source repo I've attached a working patch to the ticket. (I forked in Pagure but it seems it won't let me push right now - I guess it needs longer to sync than I expected or can be bothered to wait!) > dvb-apps Was about to say this was fine until I built for rawhide and saw the problem. https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/43705/ removed the IOCTL it uses with the comment that nothing uses it! not sure quite what to say about this one. It's old and seems to have a few bugs reported against it - https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git contains replacements for some of them, using the dvbv5 API rather than the dvbv3 API these apps use. Easiest thing might be to remove the function the IOCTL is for from dst-utils. In future we should probably consider encouraging users to move to newer utils though. Michael On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, at 10:24 AM, Michael Cullen wrote: > A few I've just tried to build chosen pretty much at random from the > above list: > > > boinc-client > builds fine - there was a FTBFS months ago (#1251482) referring to > openssl but it's fine now > > > activemq-cpp > Already tracked by #1423204 - upstream have, slightly strangely, > included the fix in a comment but not their source repo > I've attached a working patch to the ticket. (I forked in Pagure but it > seems it won't let me push right now - I guess it needs longer to sync > than I expected or can be bothered to wait!) > > > dvb-apps > Was about to say this was fine until I built for rawhide and saw the > problem. > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/43705/ removed the IOCTL it uses > with the comment that nothing uses it! not sure quite what to say about > this one. It's old and seems to have a few bugs reported against it - > https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git contains replacements for some of > them, using the dvbv5 API rather than the dvbv3 API these apps use. > Easiest thing might be to remove the function the IOCTL is for from > dst-utils. > In future we should probably consider encouraging users to move to newer > utils though. > > Michael > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, at 12:53 AM, Ben Rosser wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez > > wrote: > > > On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > >> Mat Booth wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > >>> > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html > > > > >>> > > >>> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there > > >>> were "0 failed builds" :-) > > >> Current status? > > > > > > Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems. > > > Some of them since fedora 20/21: > > > > > > > > quasselc-0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b | fc26 > > > quassel-irssi-0-4.20170119git7b034e3 | fc26 > > > > Where is this list sourced from? I maintain both of these packages, > > and to my knowledge, they're building fine. (And no FTBFS bugs have > > been filed against them). > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23320 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23342 > > > > This makes me slightly dubious about the rest of the list. > > > > Ben Rosser > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > They are not tagged for fedora 27. > > # hostnamectl | egrep "Operating|CPE" > Operating System: Fedora 27 (Workstation Edition) >CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:27 > > # dnf install quasselc quassel-irssi > Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:44 ago on Tue 24 Oct 2017 02:35:19 AM > CEST. > Dependencies resolved. > === > Package Arch > Version > Repository Size > === > Installing: > quassel-irssi x86_64 > 0-4.20170119git7b034e3.fc26 fedora > 38 k > Installing dependencies: > irssi x86_64 > 1.0.4-3.fc27fedora > 758 k > quasselc x86_64 > 0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b.fc26 fedora > 23 k > > Transaction Summary > === > Install 3 Packages > > Total download size: 819 k > Installed size: 2.4 M > Is this ok [y/N]: Well, that's... interesting. It's not clear to me why; as far as I knew, they both passed the mass rebuild. Or, rather, the binutils mass rebuild: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild. I haven't touched the packages since then. I'd be interested to know if this has happened to any of the other packages on the list... Ben Rosser ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
Ben Rosser wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez > wrote: >> quasselc-0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b | fc26 >> quassel-irssi-0-4.20170119git7b034e3 | fc26 > Where is this list sourced from? I did get it directly from koji: koji latest-pkg --all f27 > I maintain both of these packages, > and to my knowledge, they're building fine. (And no FTBFS bugs have > been filed against them). > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23320 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23342 > > This makes me slightly dubious about the rest of the list. They are not tagged for fedora 27. # hostnamectl | egrep "Operating|CPE" Operating System: Fedora 27 (Workstation Edition) CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:27 # dnf install quasselc quassel-irssi Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:44 ago on Tue 24 Oct 2017 02:35:19 AM CEST. Dependencies resolved. === Package Arch Version Repository Size === Installing: quassel-irssi x86_64 0-4.20170119git7b034e3.fc26 fedora 38 k Installing dependencies: irssi x86_64 1.0.4-3.fc27fedora 758 k quasselc x86_64 0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b.fc26 fedora 23 k Transaction Summary === Install 3 Packages Total download size: 819 k Installed size: 2.4 M Is this ok [y/N]: ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> Mat Booth wrote: >> >>> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html >>> >>> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there >>> were "0 failed builds" :-) >> Current status? > > Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems. > Some of them since fedora 20/21: > > quasselc-0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b | fc26 > quassel-irssi-0-4.20170119git7b034e3 | fc26 Where is this list sourced from? I maintain both of these packages, and to my knowledge, they're building fine. (And no FTBFS bugs have been filed against them). https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23320 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23342 This makes me slightly dubious about the rest of the list. Ben Rosser ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
I have a PR up for edb - if i get chance I might take a look at a couple of others on that list. In in the case of edb it’s looking a lot like the maintainer is unresponsive - probably like for many of the package on that list. Thanks, Michael On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, at 08:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 15:49 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > > Mat Booth wrote: > > > > > > > On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failure> > > > > > > > > > s.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe > > > > that there > > > > were "0 failed builds" :-) > > > > > > Current status? > > > > Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building > > problems.> > Some of them since fedora 20/21: > > maybe more , we got some bug trackers like : > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423041 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239338 > > > > compat-gcc-296-2.96-146.1 > > fedora-package-config-apt-16.00-10 > > ivtv-firmware-20080701-32 > > reinteract-0.5.9-16 > > shim-signed-13-0.7 > > xml2dict-0-0.12.2008.6.1 > > rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.3-6 | fc20 > > dia-gnomeDIAicons-0.1-5 | fc21 > > diveintopython-5.4-27 | fc21 > > jam-control-1.03-4 | fc21 > > libverto-jsonrpc-0.1.0-9 | fc21 > > NearTree-3.1.1-8 | fc21 > > OpenStego-0.5.2-14 | fc21 > > publican-fedora-4.0-2 | fc21 > > python-pylons-1.0.1-3 | fc21 > > ratbox-services-1.2.1-11 | fc21 > > R-BSgenome-1.32.0-1 | fc21 > > R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.3.19-5 | fc21 > > R-GenomicFeatures-1.14.2-2 | fc21 > > rubygem-arrayfields-4.7.4-10 | fc21 > > rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-14 | fc21 > > rubygem-chunky_png-1.2.7-3 | fc21 > > rubygem-climate_control-0.0.3-5 | fc21 > > rubygem-coercible-1.0.0-3 | fc21 > > rubygem-dotenv-0.8.0-3 | fc21 > > rubygem-facets-2.8.0-9 | fc21 > > rubygem-git-1.2.5-9 | fc21 > > rubygem-gruff-0.3.6-8 | fc21 > > rubygem-hawler-0.3-13 | fc21 > > rubygem-hydra-0.24.0-6 | fc21 > > rubygem-kwalify-0.7.2-10 | fc21 > > rubygem-markaby-0.5-12 | fc21 > > rubygem-mixlib-authentication-1.3.0-6 | fc21 > > rubygem-mixlib-log-1.6.0-3 | fc21 > > rubygem-orm_adapter-0.5.0-2 | fc21 > > rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-13 | fc21 > > rubygem-picnic-0.8.1-10 | fc21 > > rubygem-rails_autolink-1.1.6-1 | fc21 > > rubygem-resque-1.25.2-4 | fc21 > > rubygem-restr-0.5.0-10 | fc21 > > rubygem-reststop-0.4.0-10 | fc21 > > rubygem-rmail-1.0.0-11 | fc21 > > rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-4 | fc21 > > rubygem-rufus-scheduler-2.0.4-9 | fc21 > > rubygem-systemu-2.6.4-2 | fc21 > > rubygem-xmpp4r-0.5-11 | fc21 > > rubygem-xmpp4r-simple-0.8.8-11 | fc21 > > R-xtable-1.7.1-4 | fc21 > > umit-1.0-3 | fc21 > > eurephia-1.1.0-9 | fc22 > > gitstats-0-0.7.20141209gitc2310a8 | fc22 > > hail-0.8-0.16.gf9c5b967 | fc22 > > hive-0.12.0-5 | fc22 > > intrace-1.5-6 | fc22 > > ircd-ratbox-2.2.9-3 | fc22 > > kde-plasma-activitymanager-0.5-8 | fc22 > > kguitar-0.5.1-19.926svn | fc22 > > libkdtree++-0.7.0-8 | fc22 > > monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.8.8.4-6 | fc22 > > oscap-anaconda-addon-0.7-1 | fc22 > > pam_radius-1.4.0-2 | fc22 > > pdfresurrect-0.12-5 | fc22 > > prozilla-2.0.4-18 | fc22 > > python-djvulibre-0.3.9-4 | fc22 > > python-pyblock-0.53-8 | fc22 > > rubygem-authlogic-3.4.2-1 | fc22 > > rubygem-cookiejar-0.3.2-5 | fc22 > > rubygem-facade-1.0.5-3 | fc22 > > rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-4 | fc22 > > rubygem-mono_logger-1.1.0-3 | fc22 > > rubygem-taskjuggler-3.5.0-1 | fc22 > > rubygem-text-format-1.0.0-13 | fc22 > > shim-0.8-1 | fc22 > > sslogger-0.96-13 | fc22 > > steadyflow-0.2.0-4 | fc22 > > telepathy-haze-0.8.0-3 | fc22 > > udev-browse-0.3-5 | fc22 > > auriferous-1.0.1-20 | fc23 > > brewtarget-2.1.0-3 | fc23 > > centerim-4.22.10-19 | fc23 > > cuneiform-1.1.0-20 | fc23 > > escape-200912250-12 | fc23 > > facter-2.4.3-1 | fc23 > > fbdesk-1.4.1-19 | fc23 > > fbreader-0.12.10-18 | fc23 > > fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-10 | fc23 > > fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-12 | fc23 > > freehdl-0.0.8-12 | fc23 > > gnue-common-0.6.9-16 | fc23 > > golang-github-influxdb-gomdb-0-0.2.git29fe330 | fc23 > > gtkmathview-0.8.0-19 | fc23 > > horst-3.0-6 | fc23 > > ibus-unikey-0.6.1-9 | fc23 > > kawa-2.0-2 | fc23 > > klatexformula-3.2.10-5 | fc23 > > kmplayer-0.11.3c-10 | fc23 > > libexplain-1.4-4 | fc23 > > libmimedir-0.4-14 | fc23 > > libtaginfo-0.2.0-5 | fc23 > > loki-lib-0.1.7-13 | fc23 > > manaplus-1.3.10.27.2-8 | fc23 > > mod_ruid2-0.9.8-3 | fc23 > > opal-3.10.10-9 | fc23 > > ortp-0.23.0-2 | fc23 > > pikdev-0.9.2-21 | fc23 > > piklab-0.16.1-12 | fc23 > > pyrrd-0.1.0-8 | fc23 > > python-jabberbot-0.15-4 | fc23 > > python-kiwi-1.9.38-5 | fc23 > > python-pottymouth-2.2.1-7 | fc23 > > python-subvertpy-0.9.1-6 | fc23 > > qdevelop-0.29-5 | fc23 > > qtoctave-0.10.1-19 | fc23 > > qutim-0.3.2-5.git.6f3a98a | fc23 > > rapidsvn-0.12.1-7 | fc23 > > R-car
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 15:49 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > Mat Booth wrote: > > > > > On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore > > > wrote: > > > > > > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failure > > > > s.html > > > > > > > > > > This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe > > > that there > > > were "0 failed builds" :-) > > > > Current status? > > Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems. > Some of them since fedora 20/21: maybe more , we got some bug trackers like : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423041 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239338 > compat-gcc-296-2.96-146.1 > fedora-package-config-apt-16.00-10 > ivtv-firmware-20080701-32 > reinteract-0.5.9-16 > shim-signed-13-0.7 > xml2dict-0-0.12.2008.6.1 > rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.3-6 | fc20 > dia-gnomeDIAicons-0.1-5 | fc21 > diveintopython-5.4-27 | fc21 > jam-control-1.03-4 | fc21 > libverto-jsonrpc-0.1.0-9 | fc21 > NearTree-3.1.1-8 | fc21 > OpenStego-0.5.2-14 | fc21 > publican-fedora-4.0-2 | fc21 > python-pylons-1.0.1-3 | fc21 > ratbox-services-1.2.1-11 | fc21 > R-BSgenome-1.32.0-1 | fc21 > R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.3.19-5 | fc21 > R-GenomicFeatures-1.14.2-2 | fc21 > rubygem-arrayfields-4.7.4-10 | fc21 > rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-14 | fc21 > rubygem-chunky_png-1.2.7-3 | fc21 > rubygem-climate_control-0.0.3-5 | fc21 > rubygem-coercible-1.0.0-3 | fc21 > rubygem-dotenv-0.8.0-3 | fc21 > rubygem-facets-2.8.0-9 | fc21 > rubygem-git-1.2.5-9 | fc21 > rubygem-gruff-0.3.6-8 | fc21 > rubygem-hawler-0.3-13 | fc21 > rubygem-hydra-0.24.0-6 | fc21 > rubygem-kwalify-0.7.2-10 | fc21 > rubygem-markaby-0.5-12 | fc21 > rubygem-mixlib-authentication-1.3.0-6 | fc21 > rubygem-mixlib-log-1.6.0-3 | fc21 > rubygem-orm_adapter-0.5.0-2 | fc21 > rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-13 | fc21 > rubygem-picnic-0.8.1-10 | fc21 > rubygem-rails_autolink-1.1.6-1 | fc21 > rubygem-resque-1.25.2-4 | fc21 > rubygem-restr-0.5.0-10 | fc21 > rubygem-reststop-0.4.0-10 | fc21 > rubygem-rmail-1.0.0-11 | fc21 > rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-4 | fc21 > rubygem-rufus-scheduler-2.0.4-9 | fc21 > rubygem-systemu-2.6.4-2 | fc21 > rubygem-xmpp4r-0.5-11 | fc21 > rubygem-xmpp4r-simple-0.8.8-11 | fc21 > R-xtable-1.7.1-4 | fc21 > umit-1.0-3 | fc21 > eurephia-1.1.0-9 | fc22 > gitstats-0-0.7.20141209gitc2310a8 | fc22 > hail-0.8-0.16.gf9c5b967 | fc22 > hive-0.12.0-5 | fc22 > intrace-1.5-6 | fc22 > ircd-ratbox-2.2.9-3 | fc22 > kde-plasma-activitymanager-0.5-8 | fc22 > kguitar-0.5.1-19.926svn | fc22 > libkdtree++-0.7.0-8 | fc22 > monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.8.8.4-6 | fc22 > oscap-anaconda-addon-0.7-1 | fc22 > pam_radius-1.4.0-2 | fc22 > pdfresurrect-0.12-5 | fc22 > prozilla-2.0.4-18 | fc22 > python-djvulibre-0.3.9-4 | fc22 > python-pyblock-0.53-8 | fc22 > rubygem-authlogic-3.4.2-1 | fc22 > rubygem-cookiejar-0.3.2-5 | fc22 > rubygem-facade-1.0.5-3 | fc22 > rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-4 | fc22 > rubygem-mono_logger-1.1.0-3 | fc22 > rubygem-taskjuggler-3.5.0-1 | fc22 > rubygem-text-format-1.0.0-13 | fc22 > shim-0.8-1 | fc22 > sslogger-0.96-13 | fc22 > steadyflow-0.2.0-4 | fc22 > telepathy-haze-0.8.0-3 | fc22 > udev-browse-0.3-5 | fc22 > auriferous-1.0.1-20 | fc23 > brewtarget-2.1.0-3 | fc23 > centerim-4.22.10-19 | fc23 > cuneiform-1.1.0-20 | fc23 > escape-200912250-12 | fc23 > facter-2.4.3-1 | fc23 > fbdesk-1.4.1-19 | fc23 > fbreader-0.12.10-18 | fc23 > fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-10 | fc23 > fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-12 | fc23 > freehdl-0.0.8-12 | fc23 > gnue-common-0.6.9-16 | fc23 > golang-github-influxdb-gomdb-0-0.2.git29fe330 | fc23 > gtkmathview-0.8.0-19 | fc23 > horst-3.0-6 | fc23 > ibus-unikey-0.6.1-9 | fc23 > kawa-2.0-2 | fc23 > klatexformula-3.2.10-5 | fc23 > kmplayer-0.11.3c-10 | fc23 > libexplain-1.4-4 | fc23 > libmimedir-0.4-14 | fc23 > libtaginfo-0.2.0-5 | fc23 > loki-lib-0.1.7-13 | fc23 > manaplus-1.3.10.27.2-8 | fc23 > mod_ruid2-0.9.8-3 | fc23 > opal-3.10.10-9 | fc23 > ortp-0.23.0-2 | fc23 > pikdev-0.9.2-21 | fc23 > piklab-0.16.1-12 | fc23 > pyrrd-0.1.0-8 | fc23 > python-jabberbot-0.15-4 | fc23 > python-kiwi-1.9.38-5 | fc23 > python-pottymouth-2.2.1-7 | fc23 > python-subvertpy-0.9.1-6 | fc23 > qdevelop-0.29-5 | fc23 > qtoctave-0.10.1-19 | fc23 > qutim-0.3.2-5.git.6f3a98a | fc23 > rapidsvn-0.12.1-7 | fc23 > R-car-2.0.19-3 | fc23 > R-GeneR-2.24.0-11 | fc23 > R-TH-data-1.0.3-3 | fc23 > rubygem-bunny-0.7.9-7 | fc23 > rubygem-hipchat-1.4.0-2 | fc23 > rubygem-net-ssh-multi-1.2.0-4 | fc23 > rubygem-openstack-quantum-client-0.1.5-9 | fc23 > rubygem-pathname2-1.7.3-3 | fc23 > rubygem-puppet-lint-1.1.0-2 | fc23 > rubygem-sanitize-2.1.0-5 | fc23 > rubygem-virtus-1.0.5-1 | fc23 > svnkit-1.8.5-3 | fc23 > synaptic-0.57.2-38 | fc23 > taskjuggler-2.4.3-22 | fc23 > tboot-1.8.2-3 | fc23 > teal-1_40b-14 | fc23 > activemq-cpp-3.8.4-4 | fc24 > apanov-edrip-fonts-20100430-11 | fc24 > arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.6.2-4
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On 10/23/2017 04:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> rbldnsd-0.998-3 | fc26 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3720 > > 1 through 46 of 46 > NVR Built by Finished descending sort State > rbldnsd-0.998-4.fc27 releng 2017-07-29 15:10:37 complete > rbldnsd-0.998-3.fc26 releng 2017-02-12 07:20:00 complete > rbldnsd-0.998-2.fc24 releng 2016-02-05 04:28:54 complete rbldnsd-0.998-4.fc27 is not tagged for fedora 27. # hostnamectl | egrep "Operating|CPE" Operating System: Fedora 27 (Workstation Edition) CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:27 # dnf install rbldnsd Last metadata expiration check: 1:31:34 ago on Mon 23 Oct 2017 03:13:25 PM CEST. Dependencies resolved. === Package ArchVersion Repository Size === Installing: rbldnsd x86_64 0.998-3.fc26 fedora 115 k Transaction Summary === Install 1 Package Total download size: 115 k Installed size: 213 k Is this ok [y/N]: ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Mat Booth wrote: > >> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> >>> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html >>> >> >> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there >> were "0 failed builds" :-) > Current status? Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems. Some of them since fedora 20/21: compat-gcc-296-2.96-146.1 fedora-package-config-apt-16.00-10 ivtv-firmware-20080701-32 reinteract-0.5.9-16 shim-signed-13-0.7 xml2dict-0-0.12.2008.6.1 rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.3-6 | fc20 dia-gnomeDIAicons-0.1-5 | fc21 diveintopython-5.4-27 | fc21 jam-control-1.03-4 | fc21 libverto-jsonrpc-0.1.0-9 | fc21 NearTree-3.1.1-8 | fc21 OpenStego-0.5.2-14 | fc21 publican-fedora-4.0-2 | fc21 python-pylons-1.0.1-3 | fc21 ratbox-services-1.2.1-11 | fc21 R-BSgenome-1.32.0-1 | fc21 R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.3.19-5 | fc21 R-GenomicFeatures-1.14.2-2 | fc21 rubygem-arrayfields-4.7.4-10 | fc21 rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-14 | fc21 rubygem-chunky_png-1.2.7-3 | fc21 rubygem-climate_control-0.0.3-5 | fc21 rubygem-coercible-1.0.0-3 | fc21 rubygem-dotenv-0.8.0-3 | fc21 rubygem-facets-2.8.0-9 | fc21 rubygem-git-1.2.5-9 | fc21 rubygem-gruff-0.3.6-8 | fc21 rubygem-hawler-0.3-13 | fc21 rubygem-hydra-0.24.0-6 | fc21 rubygem-kwalify-0.7.2-10 | fc21 rubygem-markaby-0.5-12 | fc21 rubygem-mixlib-authentication-1.3.0-6 | fc21 rubygem-mixlib-log-1.6.0-3 | fc21 rubygem-orm_adapter-0.5.0-2 | fc21 rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-13 | fc21 rubygem-picnic-0.8.1-10 | fc21 rubygem-rails_autolink-1.1.6-1 | fc21 rubygem-resque-1.25.2-4 | fc21 rubygem-restr-0.5.0-10 | fc21 rubygem-reststop-0.4.0-10 | fc21 rubygem-rmail-1.0.0-11 | fc21 rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-4 | fc21 rubygem-rufus-scheduler-2.0.4-9 | fc21 rubygem-systemu-2.6.4-2 | fc21 rubygem-xmpp4r-0.5-11 | fc21 rubygem-xmpp4r-simple-0.8.8-11 | fc21 R-xtable-1.7.1-4 | fc21 umit-1.0-3 | fc21 eurephia-1.1.0-9 | fc22 gitstats-0-0.7.20141209gitc2310a8 | fc22 hail-0.8-0.16.gf9c5b967 | fc22 hive-0.12.0-5 | fc22 intrace-1.5-6 | fc22 ircd-ratbox-2.2.9-3 | fc22 kde-plasma-activitymanager-0.5-8 | fc22 kguitar-0.5.1-19.926svn | fc22 libkdtree++-0.7.0-8 | fc22 monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.8.8.4-6 | fc22 oscap-anaconda-addon-0.7-1 | fc22 pam_radius-1.4.0-2 | fc22 pdfresurrect-0.12-5 | fc22 prozilla-2.0.4-18 | fc22 python-djvulibre-0.3.9-4 | fc22 python-pyblock-0.53-8 | fc22 rubygem-authlogic-3.4.2-1 | fc22 rubygem-cookiejar-0.3.2-5 | fc22 rubygem-facade-1.0.5-3 | fc22 rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-4 | fc22 rubygem-mono_logger-1.1.0-3 | fc22 rubygem-taskjuggler-3.5.0-1 | fc22 rubygem-text-format-1.0.0-13 | fc22 shim-0.8-1 | fc22 sslogger-0.96-13 | fc22 steadyflow-0.2.0-4 | fc22 telepathy-haze-0.8.0-3 | fc22 udev-browse-0.3-5 | fc22 auriferous-1.0.1-20 | fc23 brewtarget-2.1.0-3 | fc23 centerim-4.22.10-19 | fc23 cuneiform-1.1.0-20 | fc23 escape-200912250-12 | fc23 facter-2.4.3-1 | fc23 fbdesk-1.4.1-19 | fc23 fbreader-0.12.10-18 | fc23 fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-10 | fc23 fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-12 | fc23 freehdl-0.0.8-12 | fc23 gnue-common-0.6.9-16 | fc23 golang-github-influxdb-gomdb-0-0.2.git29fe330 | fc23 gtkmathview-0.8.0-19 | fc23 horst-3.0-6 | fc23 ibus-unikey-0.6.1-9 | fc23 kawa-2.0-2 | fc23 klatexformula-3.2.10-5 | fc23 kmplayer-0.11.3c-10 | fc23 libexplain-1.4-4 | fc23 libmimedir-0.4-14 | fc23 libtaginfo-0.2.0-5 | fc23 loki-lib-0.1.7-13 | fc23 manaplus-1.3.10.27.2-8 | fc23 mod_ruid2-0.9.8-3 | fc23 opal-3.10.10-9 | fc23 ortp-0.23.0-2 | fc23 pikdev-0.9.2-21 | fc23 piklab-0.16.1-12 | fc23 pyrrd-0.1.0-8 | fc23 python-jabberbot-0.15-4 | fc23 python-kiwi-1.9.38-5 | fc23 python-pottymouth-2.2.1-7 | fc23 python-subvertpy-0.9.1-6 | fc23 qdevelop-0.29-5 | fc23 qtoctave-0.10.1-19 | fc23 qutim-0.3.2-5.git.6f3a98a | fc23 rapidsvn-0.12.1-7 | fc23 R-car-2.0.19-3 | fc23 R-GeneR-2.24.0-11 | fc23 R-TH-data-1.0.3-3 | fc23 rubygem-bunny-0.7.9-7 | fc23 rubygem-hipchat-1.4.0-2 | fc23 rubygem-net-ssh-multi-1.2.0-4 | fc23 rubygem-openstack-quantum-client-0.1.5-9 | fc23 rubygem-pathname2-1.7.3-3 | fc23 rubygem-puppet-lint-1.1.0-2 | fc23 rubygem-sanitize-2.1.0-5 | fc23 rubygem-virtus-1.0.5-1 | fc23 svnkit-1.8.5-3 | fc23 synaptic-0.57.2-38 | fc23 taskjuggler-2.4.3-22 | fc23 tboot-1.8.2-3 | fc23 teal-1_40b-14 | fc23 activemq-cpp-3.8.4-4 | fc24 apanov-edrip-fonts-20100430-11 | fc24 arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.6.2-4 | fc24 avr-gdb-7.1-13 | fc24 ayttm-0.6.3-14 | fc24 blitz-0.10-10 | fc24 blobby-1.0-11.svn1541 | fc24 blobwars-1.19-13 | fc24 buildbot-0.8.12-2 | fc24 bwm-ng-0.6.1-2 | fc24 claws-mail-plugins-3.13.1-1 | fc24 clojure-1.7.0-1 | fc24 conserver-8.2.1-3 | fc24 dcmtk-3.6.1-4 | fc24 deo-0.5.1-2 | fc24 dumbster-1.6-20 | fc24 edb-0.9.18-17 | fc24 elasticsearch-1.7.1-3 | fc24 emacs-auctex-11.89-3 | fc24 emacs-evil-1.2.9-1 | fc24 emacs-php-mode-1.17.0-6 | fc24 ExchangeIR-0.0.8.2-4 | fc24 fes-0.1-9 | fc24 festival-1.96-32 | fc24 font-manager-0.7.2-4 | fc24 forbidden-apis-1.7-3 | fc24 fped-0-0.15.r6006 | fc
Re: Mass rebuilds update
Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html >> > > This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there > were "0 failed builds" :-) Current status? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html > This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there were "0 failed builds" :-) -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:46:34AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 16:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > escribió: > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.ht > > > ml > > > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-fa > > > ilur > > > es.html > > > > Will the up-to-date status be tracked somehow? > > > The script that updates them is being run in screen in a while true > loop sleeping for 600 seconds between runs. so yes, they will be > updated. Oh, great. I just fixed all my packages, so I'll be happy to see the next iteration ;) Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 16:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek escribió: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.ht > > ml > > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-fa > > ilur > > es.html > > Will the up-to-date status be tracked somehow? > The script that updates them is being run in screen in a while true loop sleeping for 600 seconds between runs. so yes, they will be updated. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-failur > es.html Will the up-to-date status be tracked somehow? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On 08/07/2017 08:14 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/07/2017 04:35 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the >> scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one >> was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The >> failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] > > Have the builds from the second mass rebuild been tagged into the > rawhide buildroot? I don't see them there. They are slowly being added as they are signed... look at: koji list-tagged f27-pending and koji list-tag-history --tag=f27 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The > failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] > > Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has us > branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi on August > the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week from > now. > > Many Thanks > > Dennis > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-failur > es.html > [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/Schedule There's a bunch of failures because of texlive: DEBUG util.py:439: Error: nothing provides libpoppler.so.67()(64bit) needed by texlive-xetex-bin-6:svn41091-35.20160520.fc27.1.x86_64. DEBUG util.py:439: nothing provides libpoppler.so.67()(64bit) needed by texlive-pdftex-bin-6:svn40987-35.20160520.fc27.1.x86_64 Would it be possible to somehow grep the build logs for that error and fire off automatic rebuilds of affected packages? It might trim the queue of failed builds quite a bit. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On 08/07/2017 04:35 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The > failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] Have the builds from the second mass rebuild been tagged into the rawhide buildroot? I don't see them there. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 10:50 -0400, Matthew Miller escribió: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second > > one > > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The > > failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and > > here[4] > > How should we read these two lists? Do we need to check both, or does > one supercede the other? If your package is a noarch only package, you should read the first list, if your package is archful you should look for it in the second list. It is all a tad messy. Dennis > > Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has > > us > > branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi on > > August > > the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week > > from > > now. > > Cool! > > -- > Matthew Miller > > Fedora Project Leader > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass rebuilds update
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The > failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] How should we read these two lists? Do we need to check both, or does one supercede the other? > Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has us > branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi on August > the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week from > now. Cool! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Mass rebuilds update
Hi All, We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has us branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi on August the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week from now. Many Thanks Dennis [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-failur es.html [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/Schedule signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
