None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package
Hello, We have an open bug [1] becouse the primary mantainer of the scala package shows no response for open bugs. Unfortunately, the original bug reporter seems to lost the inerest to finish the none-responsive maintainer process. So I would like to ask, if it ok to reassign the bug to myself without start the whole none-responsive process at the beginnning. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt [1} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017400 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package
Sorry for any confusion, Jochen. The next step in the process is notifying fedora-devel, which it appears we're doing now. Jochen, would your preferred resolution be to be the primary maintainer (with one or more co-maintainers)? best, wb - Original Message - From: Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 6:32:01 AM Subject: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package Hello, We have an open bug [1] becouse the primary mantainer of the scala package shows no response for open bugs. Unfortunately, the original bug reporter seems to lost the inerest to finish the none-responsive maintainer process. So I would like to ask, if it ok to reassign the bug to myself without start the whole none-responsive process at the beginnning. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt [1} orry fo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:56:47AM -0500, Will Benton wrote: Sorry for any confusion, Jochen. The next step in the process is notifying fedora-devel, which it appears we're doing now. Jochen, would your preferred resolution be to be the primary maintainer (with one or more co-maintainers)? No, I was confused because I saw no action and I have tried to contact you via mail. But I'm assume that this mail was going into your spam filter. If you are going forward in the process, I will prefered the role of a co-maintainer of the scala package. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
