Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2020-04-27.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. Package (co)maintainers Status Change CPUFreqUtilityorphan 2 weeks ago GConf2alexl, caillon, caolanm, 2 weeks ago gnome-sig, johnp, mbarnes, orphan, rhughes, ssp, walters GREYCstorationorphan 2 weeks ago abcm2ps orphan 2 weeks ago adapta-gtk-theme orphan 2 weeks ago antlr4gil, jkastner, lef, mizdebsk,2 weeks ago orphan apache-commons-dbutilsmizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago apache-commons-email mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago apache-commons-jcijjelen, orphan 2 weeks ago apache-commons-jcscquad, jjelen, orphan4 weeks ago apanov-edrip-fontsfrixxon, orphan 2 weeks ago apbs orphan, rathann 2 weeks ago artha orphan 2 weeks ago avalon-framework jerboaa, jjelen, mizdebsk, 4 weeks ago orphan avr-gdb giallu, orphan, trondd 2 weeks ago biboumi orphan 4 weeks ago bmake orphan 0 weeks ago bval jjelen, orphan 2 weeks ago bygfoot orphan 2 weeks ago cassandra-java-driver hhorak, jjanco, orphan 2 weeks ago castorlef, orphan 2 weeks ago catimgorphan 2 weeks ago cdpr orphan 2 weeks ago ckermit orphan 2 weeks ago cmyktool orphan 2 weeks ago cog orphan 2 weeks ago containersorphan 5 weeks ago coriander dajt, orphan 2 weeks ago dateshift orphan 2 weeks ago dibbler orphan 2 weeks ago docco nodejs-sig, orphan, patches 2 weeks ago drbd orphan 2 weeks ago driftnet orphan, pwouters 1 weeks ago dsi orphan 2 weeks ago echoping orphan 2 weeks ago eclipse-avr orphan 2 weeks ago eclipse-egit-github eclipse-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago eclipse-m2e-core eclipse-sig, galileo,2 weeks ago mizdebsk, orphan eclipse-mylyn arobinso, eclipse-sig, 2 weeks ago jjohnstn, kdaniel, orphan, rgrunber eclipse-photran akurtakov, eclipse-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago eclipse-ptp eclipse-sig, jjohnstn, 2 weeks ago kdaniel, orphan eclipse-remoteeclipse-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago eclipse-subclipse eclipse-sig, kdaniel, orphan 2 weeks ago eclipse-testngeclipse-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago eclipse-webtools eclipse-sig, galileo, orphan 2 weeks ago emacs-mmm
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ckermit orphan 2 weeks ago I took ownership of this one and have fixed it in rawhide. If anyone really wants to own this one, just let me know. I have no problems turning it over to someone else, but if that's no one then I will just maintain it. I would like ckermit to still be available and usable in Fedora. Thanks, -- David Cantrell Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
I would be happy to maintain it -and it looks like it needs an epel8 build. (FAS: mhjacks) Thanks, Marty On 4/27/20 2:13 PM, David Cantrell wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ckermit orphan 2 weeks ago I took ownership of this one and have fixed it in rawhide. If anyone really wants to own this one, just let me know. I have no problems turning it over to someone else, but if that's no one then I will just maintain it. I would like ckermit to still be available and usable in Fedora. Thanks, ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:40 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life [snip] > antlr4gil, jkastner, lef, mizdebsk,2 weeks ago >orphan This one has been replaced by antlr4-project, so I retired it with a note saying so. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > GConf2 GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
Sérgio Basto writes: > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> GConf2 > > GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? GConf2 has been deprecated for well over a decade and afaik unmaintained for nearly half a decade. Thus: please just remove it from your dependencies and use gsettings instead (the upstream replacement). Many packages might actually not require it at all: emacs was pulling it in, but it works just fine without it and with gsettings instead. Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 08:01:31AM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: > Sérgio Basto writes: > > > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> GConf2 > > > > GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? > > GConf2 has been deprecated for well over a decade and afaik unmaintained > for nearly half a decade. Thus: please just remove it from your > dependencies and use gsettings instead (the upstream replacement). > > Many packages might actually not require it at all: emacs was pulling it > in, but it works just fine without it and with gsettings instead. Yeah, I am happy to let GConf2 go into the night... thunar-vfs depends on it, but thats just the old vfs layer Thunar used to use kept around for compatibility. It should go also. I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry which we use in the Xfce spin. Leigh: You fixed the keybinder3 FTBFS, do you want to take ownership too? I guess I can take it if no one else wants to... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 at 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: [...] > I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry > which we use in the Xfce spin. I care about blueberry as well, even though I use MATE. > Leigh: You fixed the keybinder3 FTBFS, do you want to take ownership > too? > > I guess I can take it if no one else wants to... ... but I really wouldn't like to take on another package, I have too much on my plate maintaining what I have already. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 at 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > [...] > > I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry > > which we use in the Xfce spin. > > I care about blueberry as well, even though I use MATE. > > > Leigh: You fixed the keybinder3 FTBFS, do you want to take ownership > > too? > > > > I guess I can take it if no one else wants to... > > ... but I really wouldn't like to take on another package, I have too > much on my plate maintaining what I have already. ok. I went ahead and took it. Co-maintainers welcome kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
Hello, On 2020-04-27 12:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > drbd orphan 2 > weeks ago I'll take a look at this one. Sincerely Peter signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On 4/28/20 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 08:01:31AM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: Sérgio Basto writes: On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: GConf2 GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? GConf2 has been deprecated for well over a decade and afaik unmaintained for nearly half a decade. Thus: please just remove it from your dependencies and use gsettings instead (the upstream replacement). Many packages might actually not require it at all: emacs was pulling it in, but it works just fine without it and with gsettings instead. Yeah, I am happy to let GConf2 go into the night... thunar-vfs depends on it, but thats just the old vfs layer Thunar used to use kept around for compatibility. It should go also. I agree; it's time to let GConf2 and the rest of the GNOME 2 libraries go. If anyone disagrees and should pick it up, please only keep it for F33 and then retire it in F34, so that we don't keep the old baggage in the distro forever. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:47:33AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 4/28/20 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 08:01:31AM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: > > > Sérgio Basto writes: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > GConf2 > > > > > > > > GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? > > > > > > GConf2 has been deprecated for well over a decade and afaik unmaintained > > > for nearly half a decade. Thus: please just remove it from your > > > dependencies and use gsettings instead (the upstream replacement). > > > > > > Many packages might actually not require it at all: emacs was pulling it > > > in, but it works just fine without it and with gsettings instead. > > > > Yeah, I am happy to let GConf2 go into the night... thunar-vfs depends > > on it, but thats just the old vfs layer Thunar used to use kept around > > for compatibility. It should go also. > > I agree; it's time to let GConf2 and the rest of the GNOME 2 libraries go. > If anyone disagrees and should pick it up, please only keep it for F33 and > then retire it in F34, so that we don't keep the old baggage in the distro > forever. ...if we're talking old baggage, we've not even got rid of the even older GTK 1.2.x packages yet :-( Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On 29. 04. 20 11:47, Kalev Lember wrote: GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? GConf2 has been deprecated for well over a decade and afaik unmaintained for nearly half a decade. Thus: please just remove it from your dependencies and use gsettings instead (the upstream replacement). Many packages might actually not require it at all: emacs was pulling it in, but it works just fine without it and with gsettings instead. Yeah, I am happy to let GConf2 go into the night... thunar-vfs depends on it, but thats just the old vfs layer Thunar used to use kept around for compatibility. It should go also. I agree; it's time to let GConf2 and the rest of the GNOME 2 libraries go. If anyone disagrees and should pick it up, please only keep it for F33 and then retire it in F34, so that we don't keep the old baggage in the distro forever. I am afraid that just orphaning the old baggage won't ever get us rid of it. Here is what I think will happen: - people panic, some dependencies are removed - people wait 5 weeks hoping somebody picks it up - somebody unorphans or unretires it, not being aware of this discussion - nothing changes In couple months, the package FTBFS, the maintainer doesn't have time or interest any more, orphans it again. - people panic, some dependencies are removed - ... It can take years before eventually, the remaining dependents are not interesting to anybody and the package stays retired. It is a vicious circle. When we want to remove stuff that is still highly dependent on, somebody must drive it. I've been there, done that. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Fenzi" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 12:26:46 AM > Subject: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also > affected) > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 at 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > [...] > > > I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry > > > which we use in the Xfce spin. > > > > I care about blueberry as well, even though I use MATE. > > > > > Leigh: You fixed the keybinder3 FTBFS, do you want to take ownership > > > too? > > > > > > I guess I can take it if no one else wants to... > > > > ... but I really wouldn't like to take on another package, I have too > > much on my plate maintaining what I have already. > > ok. I went ahead and took it. Thanks a lot! :) > > Co-maintainers welcome You can add me as a co-maintainer. (If there is a way to add myself in the distgit UI I have not found it. :P) > > kevin > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
I did an epel8 build yesterday. I've added you to the list of maintainers. Thanks! On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 03:26:49PM -0500, Martin Jackson wrote: I would be happy to maintain it -and it looks like it needs an epel8 build. (FAS: mhjacks) Thanks, Marty On 4/27/20 2:13 PM, David Cantrell wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ckermit orphan 2 weeks ago I took ownership of this one and have fixed it in rawhide. If anyone really wants to own this one, just let me know. I have no problems turning it over to someone else, but if that's no one then I will just maintain it. I would like ckermit to still be available and usable in Fedora. Thanks, ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- David Cantrell Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:02:15AM -0400, Martin Kolman wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Fenzi" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 12:26:46 AM > > Subject: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also > > affected) > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 at 22:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > [...] > > > > I'm a bit more concerned with keybinder3. That's needed by blueberry > > > > which we use in the Xfce spin. > > > > > > I care about blueberry as well, even though I use MATE. > > > > > > > Leigh: You fixed the keybinder3 FTBFS, do you want to take ownership > > > > too? > > > > > > > > I guess I can take it if no one else wants to... > > > > > > ... but I really wouldn't like to take on another package, I have too > > > much on my plate maintaining what I have already. > > > > ok. I went ahead and took it. > Thanks a lot! :) > > > > Co-maintainers welcome > You can add me as a co-maintainer. Done. > (If there is a way to add myself in the distgit UI I have not found it. :P) Nope. ;( kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:47 am, Kalev Lember wrote: I agree; it's time to let GConf2 and the rest of the GNOME 2 libraries go. If anyone disagrees and should pick it up, please only keep it for F33 and then retire it in F34, so that we don't keep the old baggage in the distro forever. Well gconf isn't really causing any serious problems. It's not a security risk or anything. Applications *should* stop using it, but if someone else wants to take ownership of it, I think that's OK. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On 4/27/20 1:39 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > > maven-release jcapik, orphan 2 > weeks ago Hi, I took maven-release as my package depends on it. Seems like updated dependencies broke the build, I'll see if that can be fixed I'll see if I can take some other java packages as well to prevent them all being retired. Best wishes, Markku ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:35 AM Markku Korkeala wrote: > > On 4/27/20 1:39 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for sure > > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > > reason: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > > > > maven-release jcapik, orphan 2 > > weeks ago > > Hi, > > I took maven-release as my package depends on it. Seems like > updated dependencies broke the build, I'll see if that can be fixed Hi Markku, I'm almost 100% certain that your RPM package doesn't actually need maven-release. I suspect the dependency can just be removed when using `%pom_remove_dep :maven-release-plugin` in %prep, or with something similar. If you tell me which package you're talking about, I can even send you a PR ... Fabio > I'll see if I can take some other java packages as well to prevent > them all being retired. > > > Best wishes, > Markku > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
On 4/30/20 3:12 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:35 AM Markku Korkeala > wrote: >> >> On 4/27/20 1:39 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know >>> for sure >>> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper >>> reason: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life >>> >>> maven-release jcapik, orphan 2 >>> weeks ago >> >> Hi, >> >> I took maven-release as my package depends on it. Seems like >> updated dependencies broke the build, I'll see if that can be fixed > > Hi Markku, > > I'm almost 100% certain that your RPM package doesn't actually need > maven-release. > I suspect the dependency can just be removed when using > `%pom_remove_dep :maven-release-plugin` in %prep, or with something > similar. > If you tell me which package you're talking about, I can even send you a PR > ... Hi Fabio, thanks, I'll try that this weekend! My package is clojure-maven-plugin, which adds support building clojure programs with maven. Other idea was to prevent more java-packages to disappear from non-modular Fedora, but perhaps its more wise to channel that work to other java-packages. BR, Markku > Fabio > >> I'll see if I can take some other java packages as well to prevent >> them all being retired. >> >> >> Best wishes, >> Markku >> >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
