Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

2013-10-25 Thread Sandro Mani 


On 25.10.2013 03:00, Haïkel Guémar wrote:

Le 25/10/2013 01:53, Adam Williamson a écrit :

On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:

Hi,

Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. 
SRPM

of sogo plus deps are here:

FWIW, OwnCloud works great as a CalDAV server (doesn't emulate Exchange,
though, I don't think) and is already packaged. It's the thing that's
finally given me a viable personal calendar/contacts server after years
of failed attempts with other groupware things.


There's also radicale [1] in Packages Collection, which should a more 
entreprisey (and lightweight solution) than both of them.

Upstream maintainers may be insane but they did a great job :o)

Thanks both. I didn't find radicale during my internet search, looks 
like a neat solution. However from what I can see it does not offer mail 
integration. I must say that I've got to really like SOGo, so once I've 
finished the -selinux subpackage, I'll post it for review.


Sandro

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

2013-10-24 Thread Haïkel Guémar 

Le 25/10/2013 01:53, Adam Williamson a écrit :

On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:

Hi,

Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. SRPM
of sogo plus deps are here:

FWIW, OwnCloud works great as a CalDAV server (doesn't emulate Exchange,
though, I don't think) and is already packaged. It's the thing that's
finally given me a viable personal calendar/contacts server after years
of failed attempts with other groupware things.


There's also radicale [1] in Packages Collection, which should a more 
entreprisey (and lightweight solution) than both of them.

Upstream maintainers may be insane but they did a great job :o)

best regards,
H.

[1] http://radicale.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

2013-10-24 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the 
> groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. SRPM 
> of sogo plus deps are here:

FWIW, OwnCloud works great as a CalDAV server (doesn't emulate Exchange,
though, I don't think) and is already packaged. It's the thing that's
finally given me a viable personal calendar/contacts server after years
of failed attempts with other groupware things.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

2013-10-16 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust 
Ludovic, could you please comment on the status here? Can we build SOGo
and all it's dependencies from upstream gnustep, SOPE, etc.. or are
there special "SOGo"-versions of these we'll need? And what is the
relationship between SOPE 2.0.7 from 
http://www.sogo.nu/files/downloads/SOGo/Sources/ 
and SOPE from http://sope.opengroupware.org/ ? Which one should Fedora
provide?

Ref:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190217.html
for start of thread.


  -jf
 
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:22:41PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 16.10.2013 18:13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> >I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
> >for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
> >because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
> >sope or something like that. Is that not the case?
> The only change I needed for GNUStep was applied to Fedora [1]. Now,
> everything works fine from what I see (though my current setup is
> not terribly complex). Obviously, more testing is more than welcome
> :)
> >For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from SOGo's own repository, not the
> >2.0.7 version you have packaged.. And what's the real upstream for SOPE?
> >sogo.nu or http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/source/index.html ?
> That also confused me. Ultimately I ended up looking at the release
> dates (SOPE-2.0.7 from [2] was released 23 Jul 2013, sope-4.7.1 from
> opengroupware was released 01 Jul 2007). Plus, I also had a look at
> what debian did, and they packaged 2.0.7 from sogo.
> 
> 
> Sandro
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005328
> [2] http://www.sogo.nu/files/downloads/SOGo/Sources/
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

2013-10-16 Thread Sandro Mani 

On 16.10.2013 18:13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:

I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
sope or something like that. Is that not the case?
The only change I needed for GNUStep was applied to Fedora [1]. Now, 
everything works fine from what I see (though my current setup is not 
terribly complex). Obviously, more testing is more than welcome :)

For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from SOGo's own repository, not the
2.0.7 version you have packaged.. And what's the real upstream for SOPE?
sogo.nu or http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/source/index.html ?
That also confused me. Ultimately I ended up looking at the release 
dates (SOPE-2.0.7 from [2] was released 23 Jul 2013, sope-4.7.1 from 
opengroupware was released 01 Jul 2007). Plus, I also had a look at what 
debian did, and they packaged 2.0.7 from sogo.



Sandro

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005328
[2] http://www.sogo.nu/files/downloads/SOGo/Sources/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

2013-10-16 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust 
I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job 
because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
sope or something like that. Is that not the case?

For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from SOGo's own repository, not the 
2.0.7 version you have packaged.. And what's the real upstream for SOPE?
sogo.nu or http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/source/index.html ?


  -jf
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

2013-10-15 Thread Frankie Onuonga 
Hi,

sounds amazing.
I could take it up but I can not promise to do so soon.
I have some things on my hands that will need about a month to finish up.

thanks,




On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Sandro Mani  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
> groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. SRPM of
> sogo plus deps are here:
>
> http://smani.fedorapeople.org/**review/sogo-2.0.7-1.fc21.src.**rpm
> http://smani.fedorapeople.org/**review/sope-2.0.7-1.fc21.src.**rpm
> http://smani.fedorapeople.org/**review/lasso-2.3.6-1.fc21.src.**rpm
>
> I think the packages are pretty decent and fit for inclusion into Fedora,
> and they might well be of interest to other people. However, I am hestitant
> to post them for review since Objective-C and GNUStep are not really known
> territory for me, and I'm also rather unexperienced with stuff like LDAP.
>
> So, anyone who would like to see these in Fedora and is willing to help
> out if things go wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Sandro
>
>
> [1] http://www.sogo.nu/
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> http://fedoraproject.org/code-**of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct