Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
I'm getting: Error: Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) It looks like it has been built for f36 but it has no tags: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1859708 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
> Does adding --allowerasing work? > > kevin Yes that worked, thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
There is a workaround - I ran into this due to running the RPM version of steam. I removed the i686 lilv (which removed steam) and allowed me to complete the upgrade. After the upgrade completed I reinstalled steam. All my games etc were still there; the f36 version of the rpm does not require the 32 bit lilv and runs fine without it. Marty > On Apr 12, 2022, at 3:21 PM, Tom Seewald wrote: > > It's been ~1 month and I am still unable to upgrade to F36 due to the same > issue with lilv: > > Error: > Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture > - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 > > Are there plans to fix this and/or is there a known workaround? > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 08:21:11PM -, Tom Seewald wrote: > It's been ~1 month and I am still unable to upgrade to F36 due to the same > issue with lilv: > > Error: > Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture > - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 > > Are there plans to fix this and/or is there a known workaround? Does adding --allowerasing work? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
It's been ~1 month and I am still unable to upgrade to F36 due to the same issue with lilv: Error: Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 Are there plans to fix this and/or is there a known workaround? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Friday, 11 March 2022 at 18:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. I tried dnf system-upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --releasever=36 (I have no modular packages installed and modular repos are disabled) The upgrade goes smoothly with only three downgrades: Downgrading: python3-cffix86_64 1.15.0-2.fc36 fedora 244 k thunderbird x86_64 91.4.0-1.fc36 fedora 96 M thunderbird-librnp-rnp x86_64 91.4.0-1.fc36 fedora 1.0 M ... Transaction Summary == Install 61 Packages Upgrade1681 Packages Remove3 Packages Downgrade 3 Packages Some unnecessary weak dependencies get installed, but that's a personal preference. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 15/03/2022 23:29, Ian Laurie wrote: Maybe the NVIDIA drivers were never working as such before, but somehow it was gracefully "falling back" to default drivers with the old kernel but not the new one? Enabled Secure Boot prevents the Linux kernel from loading all unsigned kernel modules such as NVIDIA drivers. You can check old logs with journalctl --list-boots. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/16/22 01:13, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 15/03/2022 01:25, Ian Laurie wrote: Sadly it's not able to boot graphically, but I think the issue is with my RPMFusion NVIDIA drivers. I can login fine to a virtual console however, and lightdm is running, just not working. The startx command also fails. 1. You need to disable UEFI Secure Boot or configure akmods to automatically sign all built kmods (no documentation available yet). 2. On 470xx drivers branch you must disable Wayland on GDM (Fedora 36 system-wide change). NVIDIA support Wayland only on 495.xx branch or newer. As an 470.xx NVIDIA drivers maintainer, I think I should disable Wayland support on our side during the package installation. Thanks for that info. I'm running Xfce so I have lightdm not gdm. In my case it was UEFI enabled in the BIOS, but this would have been the case with fc35 as well so I'm a bit perplexed why previously with Fedora 35 it "appeared" to work but failed miserably in Fedora 36. Also after the upgrade to 36, I was able to get graphics by booting the last 35 kernel. Maybe the NVIDIA drivers were never working as such before, but somehow it was gracefully "falling back" to default drivers with the old kernel but not the new one? No idea what was happening. -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 15/03/2022 01:25, Ian Laurie wrote: Sadly it's not able to boot graphically, but I think the issue is with my RPMFusion NVIDIA drivers. I can login fine to a virtual console however, and lightdm is running, just not working. The startx command also fails. 1. You need to disable UEFI Secure Boot or configure akmods to automatically sign all built kmods (no documentation available yet). 2. On 470xx drivers branch you must disable Wayland on GDM (Fedora 36 system-wide change). NVIDIA support Wayland only on 495.xx branch or newer. As an 470.xx NVIDIA drivers maintainer, I think I should disable Wayland support on our side during the package installation. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/12/22 04:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: I've done 2 upgrades from 35 -> 36 (real, not tests) on native systems. On one, as explained earlier in this thread , I had to migrate VirtualBox from the Oracle version to the RPM Fusion version, and also ditch the RPM Fusion NVIDIA drivers which were preventing a boot to a graphical greeter (and also breaking the startx command), presumably because of a comparability issue with the 5.17 kernel. On the second system it just worked without fiddling. The systems were as follows: [1] Dell Precision T5610 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v2 @ 1.80GHz (8 cores total) NVIDIA Corporation GK104 [GeForce GTX 760] (rev a1) [2] Dell Optiplex 3040 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-6100T CPU @ 3.20GHz Intel Corporation HD Graphics 530 (rev 06) Both systems are relatively legacy unfortunately, but still looking good here. -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/15/22 11:25, Ian Laurie wrote: On 3/14/22 20:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote: Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for on-time kernel support. Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be automatically signed after the build to support UEFI Secure Boot. I decided to go for it on my server/workstation at work and upgrade to 36 (after moving to RPMFusion's VirtualBox). Sadly it's not able to boot graphically, but I think the issue is with my RPMFusion NVIDIA drivers. I can login fine to a virtual console however, and lightdm is running, just not working. The startx command also fails. If I boot my last fc35 kernel-5.16.14-200.fc35.x86_64 everything works with the GUI.. Getting rid of the NVIDIA stuff has fixed things for now, I can boot graphically with the fc36 kernel. -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/14/22 20:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote: Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for on-time kernel support. Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be automatically signed after the build to support UEFI Secure Boot. I decided to go for it on my server/workstation at work and upgrade to 36 (after moving to RPMFusion's VirtualBox). Sadly it's not able to boot graphically, but I think the issue is with my RPMFusion NVIDIA drivers. I can login fine to a virtual console however, and lightdm is running, just not working. The startx command also fails. If I boot my last fc35 kernel-5.16.14-200.fc35.x86_64 everything works with the GUI.. Welcome to zuke Running Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six) kernel-5.16.14-200.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Mar 11 20:31:18 UTC 2022 zuke$ rpm -qa | grep nvidia kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.16.10-200.fc35.x86_64-470.103.01-1.fc35.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.16.11-200.fc35.x86_64-470.103.01-1.fc35.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.16.12-200.fc35.x86_64-470.103.01-1.fc35.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.16.13-200.fc35.x86_64-470.103.01-1.fc35.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-kmodsrc-470.103.01-3.fc36.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-libs-470.103.01-3.fc36.x86_64 akmod-nvidia-470xx-470.103.01-2.fc36.x86_64 nvidia-settings-470xx-470.103.01-2.fc36.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-470.103.01-3.fc36.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.17.0-0.rc7.116.fc36.x86_64-470.103.01-2.fc36.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.16.14-200.fc35.x86_64-470.103.01-2.fc36.x86_64 zuke$ -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
Works widely fine with me. But some downgrades in dnf: Downgrading: python3-cffi x86_64 1.15.0-2.fc36 fedora 244 k thunderbird x86_64 91*.4*.0-1.fc36 fedora 96 M thunderbird-librnp-rnp x86_64 91*.4*.0-1.fc36 fedora 1.0 M In Fedora 35, thunderbird & thunderbird-librnp-rnp are currently at 91*.6*.2-1.fc35. So this would be really a downgrade. I assume this is not intended. python3-cffi is just another build of the same version (1.15.0-2.fc36 <-> 1.15.0-4.fc35). On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 17:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On my F35 machine, there are no transaction errors, but the following packages get downgraded: - binutils-x86_64-linux-gnu and cross-binutils-common - from 2.37-3.fc35 to 2.37-2.fc36 (same version, release downgrade) - thunderbird and thunderbird-librnp-rnp - from 91.5.0-1.fc35 to 91.4.0-1.fc36 (version downgrade) On my second machine that's still running F34, I got the following transaction error: Problem 1: package python3-argh-0.26.1-19.fc34.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.9, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.9.10-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-argh-0.26.1-19.fc34.noarch Problem 2: package tepl-6.00.0-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.67()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package tepl-6.00.0-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.67()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libicu-67.1-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package tepl-6.00.0-1.fc34.x86_64 A.FI. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:43 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > I didn't run and upgrade/update first but I don't think it would affect this problem: Error: Problem 1: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 Problem 2: package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64 The first problem is related to steam from RPM Fusion. Second problem, looks like openrgb needs to be rebuilt? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 17:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > > > Looks good to me $ sudo dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Docker CE Stable - x86_64 787 B/s | 384 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'docker-ce-stable': - Status code: 404 for https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/36/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 13.227.150.66) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'docker-ce-stable': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried Fedora 36 - x86_64 4.1 MB/s | 80 MB 00:19 Fedora 36 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 4.3 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 2.1 MB/s | 2.3 MB 00:01 Fedora 36 - x86_64 - Updates 536 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 - Updates 896 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 36 - x86_64 - Test Updates 3.6 MB/s | 8.6 MB 00:02 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 - Test Updates 354 kB/s | 319 kB 00:00 Hashicorp Stable - x86_64 1.5 kB/s | 378 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'hashicorp': - Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/36/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 151.101.62.49) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'hashicorp': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Free 2.0 MB/s | 949 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Free - Updates 1.0 kB/s | 257 B 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree 525 kB/s | 249 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree - Updates 1.3 kB/s | 257 B 00:00 Ignoring repositories: docker-ce-stable, hashicorp Dependencies resolved. === Package Architecture Version Repository Size === Installing: ... pam-libs x86_64 1.5.2-12.fc36 updates-testing59 k Installing weak dependencies: rsyslog-logrotate x86_64 8.2102.0-10.fc36 fedora 9.9 k vmaf-models noarch 2.3.0-3.fc36 fedora 225 k zstd x86_64 1.5.2-1.fc36 fedora 449 k Removing: kernel x86_64 5.16.11-200.fc35 @updates 0 kernel-core x86_64 5.16.11-200.fc35 @updates 87 M kernel-devel x86_64 5.16.11-200.fc35 @updates 62 M kernel-modu
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
Upgrade tested from fedora 34 test system: Error: Problem 1: package python3-argh-0.26.1-19.fc34.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.9, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.9.10-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-argh-0.26.1-19.fc34.noarch Problem 2: package python3-pipreqs-0.4.10-2.fc34.noarch requires python3.9dist(docopt), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-docopt-0.6.2-19.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-pipreqs-0.4.10-2.fc34.noarch Problem 3: package python3-plette-0.2.3-1.fc34.noarch requires python3.9dist(six), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-six-1.15.0-5.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-plette-0.2.3-1.fc34.noarch Problem 4: package python3-yarg-0.1.9-14.fc34.noarch requires python3.9dist(requests), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-requests-2.25.1-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-yarg-0.1.9-14.fc34.noarch Problem 5: package tepl-6.00.0-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.67()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package tepl-6.00.0-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.67()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libicu-67.1-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package tepl-6.00.0-1.fc34.x86_64 Problem 6: package python3-3.9.10-1.fc34.x86_64 requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.9.10-1.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - package python3-first-2.0.2-2.fc34.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.9, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-libs-3.9.10-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-first-2.0.2-2.fc34.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systementwickler / systems engineer Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 4-6 32339 Espelkamp Tel.: 05772 / 293-900 Fax: 05772 / 293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer, Florian Jürgens St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen Informationen zur Datenverarbeitung im Rahmen unserer Geschäftstätigkeit gemäß Art. 13-14 DSGVO sind unter www.mittwald.de/ds abrufbar. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/14/22 20:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote: Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for on-time kernel support. Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be automatically signed after the build to support UEFI Secure Boot. Yup. Consider it done. -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 14/03/2022 10:49, Ian Laurie wrote: Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for on-time kernel support. Also, since Fedora 36 the NVIDIA and VirtualBox kmods can be automatically signed after the build to support UEFI Secure Boot. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/14/22 19:15, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 14/03/2022 04:39, Ian Laurie wrote: Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed Use VirtualBox from the RPM Fusion repository. Yeah I'm thinking I should, and not just because of this. Mainly for on-time kernel support. -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
Hey! Have a hospital visit and some other stuff in 14 minutes, but will help to do some testing when i get back home or later during the week On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:43 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the > actual upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the > appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 36. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F36FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1992487&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=12486533 > > Thank you > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 14/03/2022 04:39, Ian Laurie wrote: Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed Use VirtualBox from the RPM Fusion repository. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
I have the following errors: Error: Problem 1: package avogadro-libs-1.2.0-35.fc35.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libGLEW-2.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package avogadro-libs-1.2.0-35.fc35.x86_64 Problem 2: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On 14/03/2022 5:39, Ian Laurie wrote: On 3/12/22 04:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync For me the only error I received was: Error: Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/12/22 04:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync For me the only error I received was: Error: Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- Ian Laurie ilau...@bigpond.net.au ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
| # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules | # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again | sudo dnf module reset '*' | | dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ | --enablerepo=updates-testing \ | $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ | --assumeno distro-sync I ran it on mine and had no issues. Transaction Summary == Install 47 Packages Upgrade2806 Packages Remove7 Packages Downgrade 6 Packages Total download size: 2.9 G Operation aborted. Excellent work! Harish -- Harish Pillay 9v1hp hpil...@redhat.com +65.9636.9253 gpg id: 0x746809E3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
I just tried it myself, the only dependency errors I got was from VS Code (Dotnet package dependency errors, I use MS's repos so I'd prolly have to upgrade it or remove it temporarily) and OpenRGB (Which I don't really use). So pretty much good on my end! Le ven. 11 mars 2022, à 12 h 43, Miroslav Suchý a écrit : > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the > actual upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the > appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 36. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F36FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1992487&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=12486533 > > Thank you > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/11/22 12:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual > upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate > package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 36. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F36FailsToInstall) > reports: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1992487&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=12486533 > > Thank you > > Miroslav It tries to downgrade Thunderbird, which is a bad idea for obvious security reasons. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Saturday, March 12, 2022 3:31:23 AM CST Tomasz Torcz wrote: > The other one with obs/x264 from RPMFusion. I came across this same issue. Has anyone reported this issue to them? For the record, here is the error message: ``` Error: Problem: package obs-studio-27.2.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires x264, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package obs-studio-27.2.1-1.fc35.x86_64 - package x264-0.163-5.20210613git5db6aa6.fc36.x86_64 requires libgpac.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - x264-0.163-2.20210613git5db6aa6.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - obs-studio-27.2.1-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gpac-libs-1.0.1-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository ``` -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/Him signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Saturday, 12 March 2022 15.35.02 WET Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > Why are you suggesting reporting it to fedora-obsolete-packages? The Julia > package is not obsolete, and the maintainers are acutely aware of the > install > problem and are tracking it in the appropriate FTBFS/FTI bugzilla entries > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045732, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044284), but they need upstream > input on the fixes in order to get it working. Considering this an obsolete > package just because it has this install error right now is in my opinion > very short-sighted. > > -Ian Ian, I think that it was my message that induced Miroslav into mistake. I can see how it can be read that way. What I should have said is that the version available in F35 is newer than that available in F36+. Mea culpa. :-) -- José Abílio___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 3:20 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 12. 03. 22 v 15:15 José Abílio Matos napsal(a): > > On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > Error: > > > Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires > > > libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - > > > package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), > but > > > none of the providers can be installed - package > julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > > > requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > > installed - problem with installed package julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 > > > - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > > - julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > Replying to myself julia 1.7.2 is not available in Fedora 36+ only in > Fedora 35. > > This is an excelent example of package and issue which should be reported > to > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/ > > Can you please report it there? > Why are you suggesting reporting it to fedora-obsolete-packages? The Julia package is not obsolete, and the maintainers are acutely aware of the install problem and are tracking it in the appropriate FTBFS/FTI bugzilla entries (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045732, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044284), but they need upstream input on the fixes in order to get it working. Considering this an obsolete package just because it has this install error right now is in my opinion very short-sighted. -Ian > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
Dne 12. 03. 22 v 15:15 José Abílio Matos napsal(a): On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > Error: > Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires > libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - > package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but > none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed - problem with installed package julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 > - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Replying to myself julia 1.7.2 is not available in Fedora 36+ only in Fedora 35. This is an excelent example of package and issue which should be reported to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/ Can you please report it there? Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > Error: > Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires > libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - > package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but > none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed - problem with installed package julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 > - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Replying to myself julia 1.7.2 is not available in Fedora 36+ only in Fedora 35. Downgrading julia (that does back to 1.7.0beta4-1 the update still fails with: Error: Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedcrypto.so.3() (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package julia-1.7.0beta4-1.fc35.x86_64 - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - julia-1.7.0beta4-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Finally removing julia it works: ... Transaction Summary == Install 74 Packages Upgrade8143 Packages Remove4 Packages Downgrade 9 Packages Total download size: 7.5 G Operation aborted. Interestingly one of the packages that will be downgraded is tellico, that I have built, and where only F36 has the previous package while F34, F35 and F37 (rawhide) have the same version. So I failed to notice the branching of F36. :-( Fortunately the solution, in this case, is simple. :-) -- José Abílio___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Friday, 11 March 2022 17.43.01 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual > upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate > package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 36. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F36FailsToInstall) > reports: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi? bug_id=1992487&bug_id_type=anddependso > n&format=tvp&list_id=12486533 > > Thank you > > Miroslav This is what I get: Error: Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedcrypto.so.3() (64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository -- José Abílio___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
There are some issues with Open Babel's dependencies: Error: Problem 1: package expo-1.18.11-1.fc28.x86_64 requires libopenbabel.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - openbabel-libs-2.4.1-37.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package expo-1.18.11-1.fc28.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package IQmol-2.15.0-5.fc35.x86_64 - package IQmol-2.15.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libopenbabel.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both openbabel-libs-3.1.1-6.fc36.x86_64 and openbabel-libs-2.4.1-37.fc35.x86_64 - package ghemical-3.0.0-19.fc36.x86_64 requires libopenbabel.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package ghemical-3.0.0-17.fc35.x86_64 - ghemical-3.0.0-17.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync Didn't get any issues on my F35 installations. 👏 as always good work. Thanks, Regards -- Héctor Louzao "hhlp" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:hhlp Time zone: Europe/Madrid___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 06:43:01PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate > package. > Two problems, one with lilv: Error: Problem 1: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 Already reported at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052588 The other one with obs/x264 from RPMFusion. In general, great work! -- Tomasz Torcz “God, root, what's the difference?” to...@pipebreaker.pl “God is more forgiving.” ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
> Am 11.03.2022 um 18:43 schrieb Miroslav Suchý : > > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > Just for the records: no issue found with Fedora 35 Server Edition in its default configuration including virtualisation ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 18:43:01 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo= > updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync Didn't get any issues on my 3 F35 installations. 👏 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 2022-03-11 09:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync sudo dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync [sudo] password for luya: Fedora 36 - x86_64 9.8 kB/s | 10 kB 00:01 Fedora 36 - x86_64 2.9 MB/s | 80 MB 00:27 Fedora 36 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 537 B/s | 989 B 00:01 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 8.1 kB/s | 10 kB 00:01 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 609 kB/s | 2.3 MB 00:03 Fedora 36 - x86_64 - Updates 144 kB/s | 13 kB 00:00 Fedora 36 - x86_64 - Updates 125 B/s | 257 B 00:02 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 - Updates 823 B/s | 13 kB 00:16 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 - Updates 145 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora 36 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 8.0 MB 00:05 Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 - Test Updates 76 kB/s | 318 kB 00:04 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Free 21 kB/s | 5.3 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Free 1.2 MB/s | 949 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Free - Updates 21 kB/s | 5.2 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Free - Updates 589 B/s | 257 B 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree 22 kB/s | 5.5 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree 432 kB/s | 249 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree - Steam 21 kB/s | 5.4 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree - Steam 4.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree - Updates 20 kB/s | 5.1 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 36 - Nonfree - Updates 613 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Dependencies resolved. Package Arch Version Repository Size Installing: kernel x86_64 5.17.0-0.rc7.116.fc36 fedora 157 k kernel-modules x86_64 5.17.0-0.rc7.116.fc36 fedora 53 M kernel-modules-extra x86_64 5.17.0-0.rc7.116.fc36 fedora 3.4 M Upgrading: [..snip...] Installing group/module packages: qgnomeplatform-qt5 x86_64 0.8.4-5.fc36 updates-testing 178 k replacing qgnomeplatform.x86_64 0.8.4-4.fc35 rit-meera-new-fonts noarch 1.2.1-2.fc36 fedora 171 k replacing smc-meera-fonts.noarch 7.0.3-4.fc35 Installing dependencies: Lmod x86_64 8.6.11-1.fc36 fedora 228 k MUMPS x86_64 5.4.1-2.fc36 fedora 1.9 M MUMPS-common noarch 5.4.1-2.fc36 fedora 805 k NetworkManager-initscripts-updown noarch 1:1.36.0-0.11.fc36 fedora 14 k adwaita-qt6 x86_64 1.4.1-3.fc36 updates-testing 101 k byte-buddy noarch 1.12.0-3.fc36 fedora 2.9 M byte-buddy-agent noarch 1.12.0-3.fc36 fedora 61 k cgnslib x86_64 4.2.0-6.fc36 fedora 694 k cgnslib-common noarch 4.2.0-6.fc36 fedora 105 k cliquer-libs x86_64 1.22-3.fc36 fedora 38 k coin-or-Cbc x86_64 2.10.5-8.fc36 fedora 828 k coin-or-Cgl x86_64 0.60.3-6.fc36 fedora 429 k coin-or-Clp x86_64 1.17.6-7.fc36 fedora 931 k coin-or-CoinUtils x86_64 2.11.4-6.fc36 fedora 479 k coin-or-Osi x86_64 0.108.6-5.fc36 fedora 319 k colord-gtk4 x86_64 0.3.0-1.fc36 fedora 19 k f36-backgrounds-base noarch 36.0.1-2.fc36 updates-testing 22 M f36-backgrounds-gnome noarch 36.0.1-2.fc36 updates-testing 7.5 k gecode x86_64 6.2.0-8.fc35 fedora 3.1 M glpk x86_64 5.0-4.fc36 fedora 385 k gnome-desktop4 x86_64 42~beta-3.fc36 fedora 148 k google-noto-sans-vf-fonts noarch 20201206-9.fc36 updates-testing 492 k gtksourceview5 x86_64 5.3.2-3.fc36 fedora 994 k initscripts-rename-device x86_64 10.16-2.fc36 updates-testing 18 k jacop noarch 4.8-7.fc36 fedora 1.7 M java-17-op
