Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On 06/09/2014 09:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> Another source of Java build failures may be that the
>> javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
>> dep fragments should live; see
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919.
>
> I believe that this is a documentation bug, not a defect in
> javapackages-tools code. I'll make sure that this is cleared up ASAP.
It turned out that our release script wasn't uploading the documentation
due to a problem with group permissions at fedorahosted.org [1], which
has just been fixed.
I have uploaded the new documentation. It contains a section [2]
describing migration from the legacy %{_mavendepmapfragdir} directory.
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4410
[2]
https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_add_maven_depmap_macro_2
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
* Adam Jackson [2014-06-09 12:01]: > In the xorg-x11-docs case it's explicitly BuildRequires: > java-1.7.0-openjdk; Okay. Please don't do that. Use java-devel. Otherwise, this will break on future updates to Java 8, 9 an later ones. > changing it to plain java-devel actually fixes the > build, presumably because either 1.7.0 no longer provides that or yum > just decides it likes 1.8.0 better. java-1.8.0-openjdk provides the highest-versioned 'java-devel' (1:1.8.0, compared with java-1.7.0's 1:1.7.0). Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
* Peter Robinson [2014-06-09 11:35]: > That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide > java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so > it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages): > > # repoquery --whatprovides java-devel > java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.60-2.5.0.22.pre04.fc21.x86_64 > java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.8.0.5-9.b13.fc21.x86_64 > > I'm sure it should likely only be provided by one or the other. No. JPackage/Fedora guidelines require all Java implementations to provide 'java-devel = version-of-java-implementation'. In practice, that means that all Java packages should require java-devel. The problem is the bytecode level. The Java compiler by default produces bytecode that is only compatible with itself or a higher version of Java. Older Java implementations error out when they see it. This is kind of opposite of what we want as a distribution, where all java bytecode should correspond with the lowest version of Java implementation that we ship. Anyway, this whole point should become moot. java-1.7.0-openjdk will be deprecated and removed from the distribution before Change Freeze. Only java-1.8.0-openjdk will be left. Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:49:05 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100 > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html > > > > > > Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ? > > > > Not sure what exactly you are trying to ask, > > Since yesterday "need rebuild script" says that have 1052 packages > that need rebuilding, now says 1050 other script says 907 failed > builds. > > the automatic mass rebuild has finished or not ? Yes it is finished, it was finished when i sent the email saying it was finished and merged back into rawhide. the difference in numbers will be due to packages that fail to create a srpm. they do not get as far as actually making a srpm to create a build in koji, they do not show up as failures because they failed too early. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTmJfdAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRIQ0P/1DBch1YrT6+F3kcLrbuA+Mz d3SxR81s2w8NH+kSW0Gckh3EPbNG/EqFl/PjR/KdGvz1PUluWy0avamkzEXCIKyl F2IRJTNTy7O7a/rMpizu32T6TUq2txtf4J07fQdP5nLtZhr0BjMSkXJzc7LlTI4p XfDo43c0VO70oDAys/o1GkHcIOfdDfL4p+MSPR3HTUrkY/RzH30Aame3bqgS2iy0 F9WRO/jy6o6Q9pRNj91Ja9v6i5qKL9N0R1mBZwNCY1c26haCHnbdF/ZCpFEap6qw tPO6SNZtMK90oa1b6mvX1jneNLPSOA08U3RJNjIJQgShHrTXdI30oLa+w0CddjYP zgnFfk6pcfccYqVewojCl/7VQ8aI6WKdKOoh5W1jJpotN5O2LT8qsda3C1k5m2U3 ROXAa+4QGqmlzGPu/9ftb85aratLPeWhDYP9tIRxnWagPnC49fkz8pdYaMYHbCD8 5zqqN8Umq8GfiBn5qJ5bkOuWSRSdI3nQ5lvbO96kmyWOhk+PlyPp6IVH0er2SzR5 Zrsc1M2tCmdhhYT9MOOrVfNGFjE/7xf7GxczzcHelemEV5kUbkXX3v9mC1DtimFM /h5SMJTgZ4WT/ysyKiQv2Lan1tkYv3j14jtYJw6wNsuSN4QxwkipfyY26q2j+MXv lPkChvqWIIS0T8UIoFv4 =XBcP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100 >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> > > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html >> > >> > Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ? >> >> Not sure what exactly you are trying to ask, > > Since yesterday "need rebuild script" says that have 1052 packages that > need rebuilding, now says 1050 other script says 907 failed builds. > > the automatic mass rebuild has finished or not ? It's finished, the packages in that list are broken and failed during the mass rebuild and need manual intervention to be fixed. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html > > > > Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ? > > Not sure what exactly you are trying to ask, Since yesterday "need rebuild script" says that have 1052 packages that need rebuilding, now says 1050 other script says 907 failed builds. the automatic mass rebuild has finished or not ? > but that is the list of > packages that needs to be built. it includes packages that have been > submitted but failed to build. > > Dennis -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html > > Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ? Not sure what exactly you are trying to ask, but that is the list of packages that needs to be built. it includes packages that have been submitted but failed to build. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTl4leAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRGG4QAJS/mQjwnqWRcaWQ1AVyV8v+ wuLbxbpRpPwBBJ6CNoKvrTFr+/UBEaq5JqfU6XEya2L7JCJnx4/Tnbvhw9+U5C+n 1ZKe8fcf9uOwCqgZPxRlAamAen0utNM6tYbRPKosjsfrPQshQPcAtLLP6z1bzOM1 6moc1wcB0LhTk5c08HZ/4qKkTlAPK7HprAWECNYRAaNOnZ5k/WkZcZ9g4qlGv1jH PqQM0RW07lgCKM0nvokR+FZfxReLXP9xCeUxfuDJntrFlwty2+myMA3OE7nPpGbr A/ioc3cxLJTJhzZkVyWRbHhC16dJRDLAepzARVTYxtha4AQ+4bndLGdgqxCUnG9y IaLEP5EUlJCt6PZXp1xJEa4+pbPYyuUimRM2zJhWqxRP9FQpS1htc/kjYhf2sL/4 eagoDRDJJa4R0q9sqT7CZZy7PdCzEtx271zS3KHMKJLeIMfpgmK6Ob5qsXBAH8Sp gMHthkT6l8cEb+RNHLtVxYqxSWDAVrbjNUN+QLWF8clho8msR9btQOcQkC8+/Vgb 58QXC2IzTh52uu+alwIKK6pvi0+TsuXfti9gEm3/h91ZZwZ8C6kluX+lhEN2cYMm wfY1ti2aZi4HjyYjfi8Qct0g460bEpMh/J4mPWCRDhLI8lTmRiodHYyhwPGPXcJq qub4bHphKmbZ+HZVPU2A =hwqJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
Hi, On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ? -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote: > Another source of Java build failures may be that the > javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven > dep fragments should live; see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919. I believe that this is a documentation bug, not a defect in javapackages-tools code. I'll make sure that this is cleared up ASAP. -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly > wrong in java land: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException : > Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6851/7016851/build.log Another source of Java build failures may be that the javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven dep fragments should live; see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:34:51AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400 > Neil Horman wrote: > > > > > > > Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon. > > If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS, > > or is it too late to remove the package from F21? > > > > Neil > > > > It is not too late to remove from F21, and if you retire it it will > clear it. > Will do, thanks! Neil > Dennis > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTlanwAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRtEYQAM1jWHOxBZd1XzhZtVzuJWd+ > YAEw1UUmtZo0Wr+eX3jaebcmcFjP6W86X/0sOhuAPVY5khoUZZjYtrjyBuFTEc/f > JLtilaMqMbEIfgT/plv+L/J88qOz98PgvamYWhYtcbr+cIRmColJC7uSP62FxBdx > /ZU93llFqA7rQKwaRWDaW61MrMFPGnGw7CJ4n/fRpiImC4YSTXkJFr9rDLmrKxdX > S7ZHG3KeGLDZliuVksexVOLM+VyVV/uOlKZjbTPZ0QFyDjTv7aq2bDpMAd0ofODa > qg1BA/1H52DRy1jJ7Uer/F+wVcwl/sqvIWNvUHh6o8JqKEtf+CLI3X+0Haphj5o7 > 6OWDgGBCx/CDAFoVQs9w7yLfkVXxzob6NcT+ns8ggb6xop5btQlbZHOlweIhtY2B > hOqf/vE1e/DX0fS71YKn8Afw/S3Y6kYq/QxBpC2IeW4yseExs8jhAVkegeIV3h8n > /swbxfPsET6+CF8YrcN2G20hMRzpTqA0x1RUzBptOM+yxf4jLf605YFtFV+i9NE1 > U54wTAZFILHgPudM9Ph5aroBQke4PIcrGcoqsLlnaVPsZ/7F2Ao99h0GdazN+/4A > qLA0VM/0ntqWi2mJeAKoTyJ9vw9k37HJRp4+XhTvpBzBozOfxeekvum7WMm5iIGB > yLMIsbRKgArBSPnYkAM9 > =cU5k > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:35 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide > java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so > it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages): > > # repoquery --whatprovides java-devel > java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.60-2.5.0.22.pre04.fc21.x86_64 > java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.8.0.5-9.b13.fc21.x86_64 > > I'm sure it should likely only be provided by one or the other. In the xorg-x11-docs case it's explicitly BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk; changing it to plain java-devel actually fixes the build, presumably because either 1.7.0 no longer provides that or yum just decides it likes 1.8.0 better. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Adam Jackson" >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM >> Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update >> >> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the >> > mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. >> >> xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly >> wrong in java land: >> >> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: >> org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException : >> Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 >> >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6851/7016851/build.log >> >> Anyone who can translate that to English? > > Some of the jars used is compiled with Java 8 and thus generated bytecode > can't be read from Java 7 (which is used in your build). Bump the BR to java > 1.8. That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages): # repoquery --whatprovides java-devel java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.60-2.5.0.22.pre04.fc21.x86_64 java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.8.0.5-9.b13.fc21.x86_64 I'm sure it should likely only be provided by one or the other. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
- Original Message - > From: "Adam Jackson" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update > > On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the > > mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. > > xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly > wrong in java land: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException : > Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6851/7016851/build.log > > Anyone who can translate that to English? Some of the jars used is compiled with Java 8 and thus generated bytecode can't be read from Java 7 (which is used in your build). Bump the BR to java 1.8. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team > > - ajax > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi all, > > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the > mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly wrong in java land: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException : Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6851/7016851/build.log Anyone who can translate that to English? - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400 Neil Horman wrote: > > > Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon. > If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS, > or is it too late to remove the package from F21? > > Neil > It is not too late to remove from F21, and if you retire it it will clear it. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTlanwAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRtEYQAM1jWHOxBZd1XzhZtVzuJWd+ YAEw1UUmtZo0Wr+eX3jaebcmcFjP6W86X/0sOhuAPVY5khoUZZjYtrjyBuFTEc/f JLtilaMqMbEIfgT/plv+L/J88qOz98PgvamYWhYtcbr+cIRmColJC7uSP62FxBdx /ZU93llFqA7rQKwaRWDaW61MrMFPGnGw7CJ4n/fRpiImC4YSTXkJFr9rDLmrKxdX S7ZHG3KeGLDZliuVksexVOLM+VyVV/uOlKZjbTPZ0QFyDjTv7aq2bDpMAd0ofODa qg1BA/1H52DRy1jJ7Uer/F+wVcwl/sqvIWNvUHh6o8JqKEtf+CLI3X+0Haphj5o7 6OWDgGBCx/CDAFoVQs9w7yLfkVXxzob6NcT+ns8ggb6xop5btQlbZHOlweIhtY2B hOqf/vE1e/DX0fS71YKn8Afw/S3Y6kYq/QxBpC2IeW4yseExs8jhAVkegeIV3h8n /swbxfPsET6+CF8YrcN2G20hMRzpTqA0x1RUzBptOM+yxf4jLf605YFtFV+i9NE1 U54wTAZFILHgPudM9Ph5aroBQke4PIcrGcoqsLlnaVPsZ/7F2Ao99h0GdazN+/4A qLA0VM/0ntqWi2mJeAKoTyJ9vw9k37HJRp4+XhTvpBzBozOfxeekvum7WMm5iIGB yLMIsbRKgArBSPnYkAM9 =cU5k -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the > mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. > > You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2]. > Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run > though we will file bugs for all FTBFS. Please be sure to get on top of > FTBFS quickly as they need to be done before the Alpha Change deadline > of 2014-07-22. > > Dennis > > [1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTkxjPAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRUbcQANL/twn90/M69kMVCI+ZUcj/ > MRh9aamT8Dsv0vliP6fikmvNEstWV0x+sKUMNK2DRcmobQAiM6hNtgQEc1uPXdGj > z+AszNLjJVeV1ZeQ7yORFjU9rmGPYCyxEC8BqLJy8BnUXZOcWbryEb06/8mYJaz3 > QMpE2s1A6H4gbZlkL0VaIadfH0QQH6cjENyIofMOEvaDe0MAkUiC2dobubgkf7Zq > yYcl0k391BKoEdZ4HZoqxAspVz0FTdIsX1E9EnuiVr1TxiWxKZOT1S7uz1lyjali > gOLndnBhYvPSZU1IdrIjEbJczfRnjmnpX3Mda9UqQoBqajlsTjWwZgt2sIq5KQoO > lyDwDjufz2KZ6JlDucgV/GrVh1C/LCPpFOyVJ3ZoDfSVAnAK1ZermxX/oTe4Emwz > 6+bBvWplDR+nyGty7pmtgeENXJigm6RrxPIeXclFAYV98bQxdA3efTALW/1iwaBx > 6WORl7cjmQipGtQLh2ixY5R+ELYG2eRIK7sqU4eswLqOEl0Ws0ASW7JPtHyCEd2u > 3QFC3hw+pgpemvFEXLM/cfRMpY8hv52X7teerISKhu6QUcKX2CZbf+7QKOH8OpXH > qFGiw5LqJBHN4BfbjFR3VOjD5Vxuc4T1MP1jXyOM0zUEWoHPjxaRZL7O7t7Ivjiq > zielPS7idFpdNuoK0UPV > =MtQO > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon. If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS, or is it too late to remove the package from F21? Neil -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
Dne 8.6.2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to compose, and sync out to the mirrors The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a very large number of failures[1]. There seems to be a very large number of java and ruby This was expected. I checked a few random packages, and I met always just test suite failures duet to minitest update: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2014-March/001522.html There are probably few others, which were already broken before mass rebuild due to Ruby rebase. Vít failures. so people interested in those stacks please get onto them and fix them quickly Regards, Dennis [1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 08:51:06 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2]. Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run though we will file bugs for all FTBFS. Please be sure to get on top of FTBFS quickly as they need to be done before the Alpha Change deadline of 2014-07-22. Dennis [1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTlKKCAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRTTQP/i4LYQRFeidi0Rr4zsU5Dy9A s7AOJIFlrSFjbVvl7XzQX4yi8LsztsYohiz4sGKw29SeGwymEdPQYZ9n0Rsjfg+F OmyZ98CKf1FPsfDLD0tojfLO59qmeGqUNWred4Ov8dcJqUb0il1A4gEQeivrVNIO 6wHmVxsEYACpEs2nrNqLZcRv22j6LNBa2kBRqrF1tYPpAnszmUiSuJJTe91yy/a1 nLONrLCp5ZG8Xw/o+kHvtXMWNTnofbHYZTebxx2kLSfu4ZcxypfJdbJXrZGK0vKV J1Wv3l56S+janjtTCqOXiijWAiSFOj5kLnQ6pmVhLym4KNMSoy5uaVuwXJ3wkwwP kc2PTNqr8XUJlpZCyYzUuuiWv5wgZTxmAmc1UR3tKxbYSrkv/bsR1BmwNwcgM6N9 Efj6n4Lk+FJ9F5zRcKXpxyJamKyeaApr1t1u3JunbKGpo7iwgCT4J+RwUif0XFdc Oeh93heGsSQfcbko3gVVd2e9rsr6nhiRKc1C1sMWJvZnD+a6TZeaoyQW+RxPUX0L VbppEZHkWLMCzZ+5ADUXsF17PFnhLfZBpECK0aHpvYHhoiRjFLTwxSaK7xksU1wR ENQioVUzfW8UCYd1VuquPOQfTVz9AwbAPGbclqzc139aU4B4TVYlo2xS+FUHWIrE vxZ+w8ao4UapyOz626QT =bMTV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
The srpm buildroot was still broken, this time by rpkg. There was a rpkg build 2014-03-24 10:05:16 with a upstream version bump, but it was untagged before going out in a rawhide compose and wasn't ever fixed. Then the mass rebuild built it and landed it in the buildroot. If you commit things to rawhide, please do make sure things are usable/buildable, don't leave something for months later. ;) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 12:37:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> lvm2's spec isn't very friendly to the rpmdev-bumpspec script that the
> mass rebuild uses, so it is a bit messed up. They seem to redefine
> 'release' for every subpackage and the bumpspec script tries to
> increment all of them and the versions then don't match up.
Current upstream version [1] would handle it, if %release were defined
like this:
%global release 4%{?dist}
Release: %{release}
Then the script doesn't touch the subpackage Release tags anymore,
because it considers this (and %baserelease found in very old Fedora spec
files) a special case.
Redefining %release in subpackage Release tags using the %release macro
makes no sense and is error-prone, too, because if it defined a different
release value actually, that would change the value of %release for the rest
of the spec file and bears of a risk of referring to the wrong value in
manual Requires, Provides, …
There are only a very few spec files at Fedora that do things like that
or apply macro-madness.
[1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/rpmdevtools.git/plain/rpmdev-bumpspec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:20:32 +0200
"punto...@libero.it" wrote:
> hi
> thanks for your work!
>
> now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
>
> DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum',
> '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/',
> 'groupinstall', 'srpm-build', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env
> {'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash',
> 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'echo -n ""',
> 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'HOME': '/builddir',
> 'HOSTNAME': 'mock'} DEBUG util.py:281: There is no installed groups
> file. DEBUG util.py:281: Maybe run: yum groups mark convert (see man
> yum) DEBUG util.py:281: Error: Package:
> device-mapper-libs-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1.i686 (build) DEBUG
> util.py:281: Requires: device-mapper =
> 1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1 DEBUG util.py:281: Available:
> device-mapper-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.i686 (build) DEBUG
> util.py:281: device-mapper = 1.02.85-4.fc21.1 DEBUG
> util.py:281: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
> problem DEBUG util.py:281: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles
> --nodigest DEBUG util.py:371: Child return code was: 1
>
> Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7022888
lvm2's spec isn't very friendly to the rpmdev-bumpspec script that the
mass rebuild uses, so it is a bit messed up. They seem to redefine
'release' for every subpackage and the bumpspec script tries to
increment all of them and the versions then don't match up.
I've untagged it for now... when this finishes:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7022907
it should hopefully be back to normal.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
>> in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
>> compose, and sync out to the mirrors
>>
>> The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a
>> very large number of failures[1]. There seems to be a very large number
>> of java and ruby failures. so people interested in those stacks please
>> get onto them and fix them quickly
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dennis
>>
>> [1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
>>
>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 08:51:06 -0500
>> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> hi
> thanks for your work!
>
> now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
>
> DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot',
> '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/', 'groupinstall',
> 'srpm-build', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'LANG':
> 'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C',
> 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'echo -n ""', 'PATH':
> '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock'}
> DEBUG util.py:281: There is no installed groups file.
> DEBUG util.py:281: Maybe run: yum groups mark convert (see man yum)
> DEBUG util.py:281: Error: Package:
> device-mapper-libs-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1.i686 (build)
> DEBUG util.py:281: Requires: device-mapper =
> 1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1
> DEBUG util.py:281: Available:
> device-mapper-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.i686 (build)
> DEBUG util.py:281: device-mapper = 1.02.85-4.fc21.1
> DEBUG util.py:281: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
> problem
> DEBUG util.py:281: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> DEBUG util.py:371: Child return code was: 1
>
> Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7022888
I suggest giving koji and hour or so to settle out as there will be a
bit of a churn as it sorts out the repos with the mass package tagging
into f-21.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
Il 08/06/2014 20:20, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a
very large number of failures[1]. There seems to be a very large number
of java and ruby failures. so people interested in those stacks please
get onto them and fix them quickly
Regards,
Dennis
[1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 08:51:06 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
hi
thanks for your work!
now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum',
'--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/',
'groupinstall', 'srpm-build', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env
{'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash',
'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'echo -n ""',
'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'HOME': '/builddir',
'HOSTNAME': 'mock'}
DEBUG util.py:281: There is no installed groups file.
DEBUG util.py:281: Maybe run: yum groups mark convert (see man yum)
DEBUG util.py:281: Error: Package:
device-mapper-libs-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1.i686 (build)
DEBUG util.py:281: Requires: device-mapper =
1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1
DEBUG util.py:281: Available:
device-mapper-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.i686 (build)
DEBUG util.py:281: device-mapper = 1.02.85-4.fc21.1
DEBUG util.py:281: You could try using --skip-broken to work around
the problem
DEBUG util.py:281: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
DEBUG util.py:371: Child return code was: 1
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7022888
regards
gil
also on arm builder
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7022890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run
though we will file bugs for all FTBFS. Please be sure to get on top
of FTBFS quickly as they need to be done before the Alpha Change
deadline of 2014-07-22.
Dennis
[1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=bMTV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
<>--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a
very large number of failures[1]. There seems to be a very large number
of java and ruby failures. so people interested in those stacks please
get onto them and fix them quickly
Regards,
Dennis
[1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 08:51:06 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
hi
thanks for your work!
now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot',
'/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/', 'groupinstall', 'srpm-build',
'--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL':
'/bin/bash', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'echo -n ""',
'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock'}
DEBUG util.py:281: There is no installed groups file.
DEBUG util.py:281: Maybe run: yum groups mark convert (see man yum)
DEBUG util.py:281: Error: Package:
device-mapper-libs-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1.i686 (build)
DEBUG util.py:281: Requires: device-mapper = 1.02.85-4.fc21.1.1.1
DEBUG util.py:281: Available: device-mapper-1.02.85-4.fc21.1.i686
(build)
DEBUG util.py:281: device-mapper = 1.02.85-4.fc21.1
DEBUG util.py:281: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
problem
DEBUG util.py:281: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
DEBUG util.py:371: Child return code was: 1
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7022888
regards
gil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run
though we will file bugs for all FTBFS. Please be sure to get on top
of FTBFS quickly as they need to be done before the Alpha Change
deadline of 2014-07-22.
Dennis
[1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=bMTV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
<>--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to compose, and sync out to the mirrors The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a very large number of failures[1]. There seems to be a very large number of java and ruby failures. so people interested in those stacks please get onto them and fix them quickly Regards, Dennis [1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 08:51:06 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the > mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. > > You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2]. > Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run > though we will file bugs for all FTBFS. Please be sure to get on top > of FTBFS quickly as they need to be done before the Alpha Change > deadline of 2014-07-22. > > Dennis > > [1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTlKKCAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRTTQP/i4LYQRFeidi0Rr4zsU5Dy9A s7AOJIFlrSFjbVvl7XzQX4yi8LsztsYohiz4sGKw29SeGwymEdPQYZ9n0Rsjfg+F OmyZ98CKf1FPsfDLD0tojfLO59qmeGqUNWred4Ov8dcJqUb0il1A4gEQeivrVNIO 6wHmVxsEYACpEs2nrNqLZcRv22j6LNBa2kBRqrF1tYPpAnszmUiSuJJTe91yy/a1 nLONrLCp5ZG8Xw/o+kHvtXMWNTnofbHYZTebxx2kLSfu4ZcxypfJdbJXrZGK0vKV J1Wv3l56S+janjtTCqOXiijWAiSFOj5kLnQ6pmVhLym4KNMSoy5uaVuwXJ3wkwwP kc2PTNqr8XUJlpZCyYzUuuiWv5wgZTxmAmc1UR3tKxbYSrkv/bsR1BmwNwcgM6N9 Efj6n4Lk+FJ9F5zRcKXpxyJamKyeaApr1t1u3JunbKGpo7iwgCT4J+RwUif0XFdc Oeh93heGsSQfcbko3gVVd2e9rsr6nhiRKc1C1sMWJvZnD+a6TZeaoyQW+RxPUX0L VbppEZHkWLMCzZ+5ADUXsF17PFnhLfZBpECK0aHpvYHhoiRjFLTwxSaK7xksU1wR ENQioVUzfW8UCYd1VuquPOQfTVz9AwbAPGbclqzc139aU4B4TVYlo2xS+FUHWIrE vxZ+w8ao4UapyOz626QT =bMTV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
