Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
14.03.2013 12:17, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-magickwand Upstream 1.0.9-2 (yes with a -) includes the fix (and the php54 patch) Thanks. It built too - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5134893 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Patch incorporated, thanks again. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5134433 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
17.03.2013 16:40, Rex Dieter пишет: Pavel Alexeev wrote: 17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the way to go on Linux. OK, first-draft patch sent upstream and applied to cmake-2.8.11-0.3.rc1.fc20 As far as I could tell, only one package in fedora is affected, converseen, and confirmed it builds ok now. Thank you very much! Then I push ImageMagick into rawhide. Could you please provide upstream bug url for that to monitor status? The one orion gave earlier in the thread, http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 Sorry. Thank you. Meantime ImageMagick landed in rawhide - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5132168 -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Pavel Alexeev wrote: > 17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue >>> with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the >>> platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the way to go >>> on Linux. >> OK, first-draft patch sent upstream and applied to >> cmake-2.8.11-0.3.rc1.fc20 >> >> As far as I could tell, only one package in fedora is affected, >> converseen, and confirmed it builds ok now. > Thank you very much! Then I push ImageMagick into rawhide. > > Could you please provide upstream bug url for that to monitor status? The one orion gave earlier in the thread, http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix... I've a little experience adding pkg-config hints to cmake, I'll help look into it. As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the way to go on Linux. OK, first-draft patch sent upstream and applied to cmake-2.8.11-0.3.rc1.fc20 As far as I could tell, only one package in fedora is affected, converseen, and confirmed it builds ok now. Thank you very much! Then I push ImageMagick into rawhide. Could you please provide upstream bug url for that to monitor status? -- rex -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. >>> >>> Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of >>> ImageMagick >>> sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix... >> >> I've a little experience adding pkg-config hints to cmake, I'll help look >> into it. > > As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue > with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the > platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the way to go > on Linux. OK, first-draft patch sent upstream and applied to cmake-2.8.11-0.3.rc1.fc20 As far as I could tell, only one package in fedora is affected, converseen, and confirmed it builds ok now. -- rex -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix... I've a little experience adding pkg-config hints to cmake, I'll help look into it. As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the way to go on Linux. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >> Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide >> ASAP. >> > > Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick > sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix... I've a little experience adding pkg-config hints to cmake, I'll help look into it. -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
14.03.2013 20:04, Orion Poplawski пишет: On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix... Could you do that? I think then I should wait until that happened before IM landed to rawhide, is not? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Thanks for pointing. Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix... -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 03/14/2013 09:30 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/14/2013 02:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side tag to work out all the kinks. If consumer correctly use pkg-config information, there should not have any problem... Remi. Agreed. But it appears that unfortunately cmake does not do this. This will need to get addressed. Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 03/14/2013 02:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side tag to work out all the kinks. If consumer correctly use pkg-config information, there should not have any problem... Remi. Agreed. But it appears that unfortunately cmake does not do this. This will need to get addressed. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 14/03/13 02:49 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 14/03/2013 10:30, Adam Williamson a écrit : On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side tag to work out all the kinks. If consumer correctly use pkg-config information, there should not have any problem... Would that be the pkgconfig file whose name changed as part of this change? :) No, as both names are provided. %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand-6.Q16.pc And the -config commands are unchanged. %{_bindir}/Magick-config %{_bindir}/MagickWand-config %{_bindir}/Wand-config $ pkg-config MagickWand --cflags --libs -fopenmp -DMAGICKCORE_HDRI_ENABLE=0 -DMAGICKCORE_QUANTUM_DEPTH=16 -I/usr/include/ImageMagick-6 -lMagickWand-6.Q16 -lm -lMagickCore-6.Q16 Ah, I missed that it was just an addition. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Le 14/03/2013 10:30, Adam Williamson a écrit : > On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: >> Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : >> >>> In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to >>> do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming >>> scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side >>> tag to work out all the kinks. >> >> If consumer correctly use pkg-config information, there should not have >> any problem... > > Would that be the pkgconfig file whose name changed as part of this > change? :) No, as both names are provided. %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand-6.Q16.pc And the -config commands are unchanged. %{_bindir}/Magick-config %{_bindir}/MagickWand-config %{_bindir}/Wand-config $ pkg-config MagickWand --cflags --libs -fopenmp -DMAGICKCORE_HDRI_ENABLE=0 -DMAGICKCORE_QUANTUM_DEPTH=16 -I/usr/include/ImageMagick-6 -lMagickWand-6.Q16 -lm -lMagickCore-6.Q16 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side tag to work out all the kinks. If consumer correctly use pkg-config information, there should not have any problem... Would that be the pkgconfig file whose name changed as part of this change? :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : > In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to > do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming > scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side > tag to work out all the kinks. If consumer correctly use pkg-config information, there should not have any problem... Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : >> php-magickwand Upstream 1.0.9-2 (yes with a -) includes the fix (and the php54 patch) Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 03/13/2013 04:41 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/13/2013 10:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Good day. By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split off ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 version. There many changes including so-name bump and version scheme change from upstream: libMagickCore.so.5 became libMagickCore-6.Q16.so I plan push it in rawhide 14-17 March if no one will argue. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5117303 Also changed some directories. Major differences in layout: %files devel --%{_libdir}/libMagickCore.so --%{_libdir}/libMagickWand.so ++%{_libdir}/libMagickCore-6.Q16.so ++%{_libdir}/libMagickWand-6.Q16.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand-6.Q16.pc %files c++-devel --%{_libdir}/libMagick++.so ++%{_libdir}/libMagick++-6.Q16.so This renaming is going to break a *lot* of things (including cmake finding ImageMagick). Why was it done? There is some discussion here: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=22932&sid=94067bc9bfe15d538f61865a7346a497 In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side tag to work out all the kinks. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On 03/13/2013 10:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Good day. By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split off ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 version. There many changes including so-name bump and version scheme change from upstream: libMagickCore.so.5 became libMagickCore-6.Q16.so I plan push it in rawhide 14-17 March if no one will argue. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5117303 Also changed some directories. Major differences in layout: %files devel --%{_libdir}/libMagickCore.so --%{_libdir}/libMagickWand.so ++%{_libdir}/libMagickCore-6.Q16.so ++%{_libdir}/libMagickWand-6.Q16.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick-6.Q16.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand.pc ++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand-6.Q16.pc %files c++-devel --%{_libdir}/libMagick++.so ++%{_libdir}/libMagick++-6.Q16.so This renaming is going to break a *lot* of things (including cmake finding ImageMagick). Why was it done? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : >> php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
Le 13/03/2013 17:03, Pavel Alexeev a écrit : > I plan push it in rawhide 14-17 March if no one will argue. Sounds good. > Dependency rebuild required. > php-magickwand > php-pecl-imagick This 2 packages requires some patches to build with latest ImageMagick. I already have them ready. So ping me as soon as available in rawhide, I will take care of updating those ones. Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Good day. > > By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split > off ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 > version. > There many changes including so-name bump and version scheme change from > upstream: > libMagickCore.so.5 became libMagickCore-6.Q16.so > > I plan push it in rawhide 14-17 March if no one will argue. By rawhide you mean F-20 rawhide right? Or do you plan to land this in F-19 too? Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel