Re: Naming convention
> Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71? Yes, but in the case of autoconf2.71, I am wondering how to deal with an update since this package should be the latest version. Creating package autoconf2.72 in the future doesn't make sense to me. My thought was to use autoconf2.7 and in case of a new release update this package. Another option could be autoconf2.7.x. Thanks Filip čt 23. 9. 2021 v 13:48 odesílatel Florian Weimer napsal: > * Dominik Mierzejewski: > > > On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I > need to > >> add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a > >> different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, > and > >> autoconf268. The latest version is 2.71 so I have few options in my > mind: > >> > >>- compat-autoconf > >>- compat-autoconf27 > >>- autoconf27 > >> > >> What do you think? > > > > The last one is almost the currently recommended convention. The correct > > name would be "autoconf2.7": > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple > > Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71? > > Thanks, > Florian > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Naming convention
* Dominik Mierzejewski: > On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to >> add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a >> different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, and >> autoconf268. The latest version is 2.71 so I have few options in my mind: >> >>- compat-autoconf >>- compat-autoconf27 >>- autoconf27 >> >> What do you think? > > The last one is almost the currently recommended convention. The correct > name would be "autoconf2.7": > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71? Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Naming convention
On 23. 09. 21 12:51, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote: Hi all, I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, and autoconf268. The latest version is 2.71 so I have few options in my mind: - compat-autoconf - compat-autoconf27 - autoconf27 What do you think? The last one is almost the currently recommended convention. The correct name would be "autoconf2.7": https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple Also, the autoconf2.7 EPEL package would need to be created in a way that would not conflict wit the RHEL's autoconf package, due to the EPEL policy that forbids conflicts with RHEL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Policy_for_Conflicting_Packages -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Naming convention
On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote: > Hi all, > I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to > add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a > different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, and > autoconf268. The latest version is 2.71 so I have few options in my mind: > >- compat-autoconf >- compat-autoconf27 >- autoconf27 > > What do you think? The last one is almost the currently recommended convention. The correct name would be "autoconf2.7": https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
