Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-30 Thread Mattias Ellert
fre 2010-08-27 klockan 08:31 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating:
> 
> "Mattias Ellert"  wrote:
> 
> >tor 2010-08-26 klockan 13:27 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating:
> >> 
> >> "Matej Cepl"  wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700:
> >> >> I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for
> >> >> rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build.  Here is a summary from the rpm:
> >> >
> >> >EL6?
> >> 
> >> A build, and a later build, was done for el6.
> >
> >And el4?
> >
> >
> 
> El4 is too old for proper fedpkg. For el4 we just have a stub that handles 
> the "sources" command used in koji. 

I am aware of that - it is just that this stub is broken if the sources
file contains more than one file:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622605

(There is an updated stub attached to the bugzilla report.)

Mattias



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-27 Thread Jesse Keating


"Mattias Ellert"  wrote:

>tor 2010-08-26 klockan 13:27 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating:
>> 
>> "Matej Cepl"  wrote:
>> 
>> >Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700:
>> >> I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for
>> >> rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build.  Here is a summary from the rpm:
>> >
>> >EL6?
>> 
>> A build, and a later build, was done for el6.
>
>And el4?
>
>

El4 is too old for proper fedpkg. For el4 we just have a stub that handles the 
"sources" command used in koji. 
-- 
Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-27 Thread Mattias Ellert
tor 2010-08-26 klockan 13:27 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating:
> 
> "Matej Cepl"  wrote:
> 
> >Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700:
> >> I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for
> >> rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build.  Here is a summary from the rpm:
> >
> >EL6?
> 
> A build, and a later build, was done for el6.

And el4?

Mattias



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-26 Thread Jesse Keating


"Matej Cepl"  wrote:

>Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700:
>> I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for
>> rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build.  Here is a summary from the rpm:
>
>EL6?
>
>-- 
>

A build, and a later build, was done for el6.
-- 
Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-26 Thread Matej Cepl
Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700:
> I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for
> rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build.  Here is a summary from the rpm:

EL6?

-- 
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mceplceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
 
See, when the GOVERNMENT spends money, it creates jobs; whereas
when the money is left in the hands of TAXPAYERS, God only knows
what they do with it. Bake it into pies, probably. Anything to
avoid creating jobs.
-- Dave Barry


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 8/24/10 2:10 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> Thanks, but I have following problem:
> 
> $ fedpkg co -B xterm
> Cloning into bare repository /home/yarda/git-fedora/xterm/fedpkg.git...
> remote: Counting objects: 657, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (333/333), done.
> remote: Total 657 (delta 274), reused 657 (delta 274)
> Receiving objects: 100% (657/657), 81.09 KiB | 81 KiB/s, done.
> Resolving deltas: 100% (274/274), done.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 1086, in 
> args.command(args)
>   File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 425, in clone
> pyfedpkg.clone_with_dirs(args.module[0], args.user)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py", line 413, in 
> clone_with_dirs
> clone(module, user, top_path, bare_dir=repo_path)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py", line 385, in 
> clone
> repo = git.Repo(module)
> 
> The fedpkg-0.5.1.2-2.fc13 is working fine:
> $ fedpkg co -B xterm
> Cloning into bare repository 
> /home/yarda/git-fedora/NetworkManager/xterm/fedpkg.git...
> remote: Counting objects: 657, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (333/333), done.
> remote: Total 657 (delta 274), reused 657 (delta 274)
> Receiving objects: 100% (657/657), 81.09 KiB | 85 KiB/s, done.
> Resolving deltas: 100% (274/274), done.
> 
> Bug? Or my wrong setup/use case? Thanks
> 
> Jaroslav

It's a bug.  This got introduced with a patch to add push.default =
tracking when doing a clone, apparently it didn't get tested with clone
- -B.  Fix pushed and will be in the next build.

BTW if anybody wants to help write up a test suite for fedpkg, I'd
really really love you!

- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkx0ECwACgkQ4v2HLvE71NV/LwCfVmbPjtKw92bkCkxYTu/JPsWp
6c4AoLQCr6157GXOiKBLWt9FURh6bFk8
=nsX+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-24 Thread Jaroslav Skarvada
Thanks, but I have following problem:

$ fedpkg co -B xterm
Cloning into bare repository /home/yarda/git-fedora/xterm/fedpkg.git...
remote: Counting objects: 657, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (333/333), done.
remote: Total 657 (delta 274), reused 657 (delta 274)
Receiving objects: 100% (657/657), 81.09 KiB | 81 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (274/274), done.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 1086, in 
args.command(args)
  File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 425, in clone
pyfedpkg.clone_with_dirs(args.module[0], args.user)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py", line 413, in 
clone_with_dirs
clone(module, user, top_path, bare_dir=repo_path)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py", line 385, in 
clone
repo = git.Repo(module)

The fedpkg-0.5.1.2-2.fc13 is working fine:
$ fedpkg co -B xterm
Cloning into bare repository 
/home/yarda/git-fedora/NetworkManager/xterm/fedpkg.git...
remote: Counting objects: 657, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (333/333), done.
remote: Total 657 (delta 274), reused 657 (delta 274)
Receiving objects: 100% (657/657), 81.09 KiB | 85 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (274/274), done.

Bug? Or my wrong setup/use case? Thanks

Jaroslav
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel