Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-07)
On 10/08/2015 07:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 10/08/2015 07:11 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:53PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: >>> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the >>> affected >>> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected >>> package or >>> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise >>> your >>> package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. >> >>> >>> iipsrv (maintained by: trasher) >>> iipsrv-1.0.0-4.0.git2431b45.fc23.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon >>> >>> ipsilon (maintained by: puiterwijk, simo) >>> ipsilon-base-1.1.0-1.fc24.noarch requires /usr/sbin/restorecon >>> >>> ladvd (maintained by: ixs, ttorcz) >>> ladvd-selinux-1.1.0-4.fc24.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon, >>> /usr/sbin/semodule >>> >>> ocp (maintained by: cra) >>> ocp-0.1.22-0.6.20150224gita07bf5d.fc23.i686 requires >>> /sbin/restorecon >>> >>> ocsinventory (maintained by: remi, xavierb) >>> ocsinventory-reports-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires >>> /sbin/restorecon >>> ocsinventory-server-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires >>> /sbin/restorecon >> >>So what is correct requires nowadays? /usr/sbin/restorecon? >> Something else? > Both should work. > > /usr/sbin/restorecon is a file-provides of the policycoreutils package > and > /sbin/restorecon is an explicit provides of the policycoreutils package > > # rpm -qlp policycoreutils-2.4-13.fc24.x86_64.rpm \ > | grep sbin/restorecon > ... > /usr/sbin/restorecon > > # rpm -q --provides -p policycoreutils-2.4-13.fc24.x86_64.rpm \ > | grep sbin/restorecon > ... > /sbin/restorecon > > => Likely, something is broken with the depchecker used to generated the > reports above. > policycoreutils depends on lzma which was in the orphaned packages list. But according to pkgdb it's owned again. I'd consider this as already fixed and next run of depchecker should confirm it. Petr -- Petr Lautrbach -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-07)
On 10/08/2015 07:11 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:53PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. iipsrv (maintained by: trasher) iipsrv-1.0.0-4.0.git2431b45.fc23.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon ipsilon (maintained by: puiterwijk, simo) ipsilon-base-1.1.0-1.fc24.noarch requires /usr/sbin/restorecon ladvd (maintained by: ixs, ttorcz) ladvd-selinux-1.1.0-4.fc24.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon, /usr/sbin/semodule ocp (maintained by: cra) ocp-0.1.22-0.6.20150224gita07bf5d.fc23.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon ocsinventory (maintained by: remi, xavierb) ocsinventory-reports-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires /sbin/restorecon ocsinventory-server-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires /sbin/restorecon So what is correct requires nowadays? /usr/sbin/restorecon? Something else? Both should work. /usr/sbin/restorecon is a file-provides of the policycoreutils package and /sbin/restorecon is an explicit provides of the policycoreutils package # rpm -qlp policycoreutils-2.4-13.fc24.x86_64.rpm \ | grep sbin/restorecon ... /usr/sbin/restorecon # rpm -q --provides -p policycoreutils-2.4-13.fc24.x86_64.rpm \ | grep sbin/restorecon ... /sbin/restorecon => Likely, something is broken with the depchecker used to generated the reports above. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-07)
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:53PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected > packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package > or > retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your > package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. > > iipsrv (maintained by: trasher) > iipsrv-1.0.0-4.0.git2431b45.fc23.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon > > ipsilon (maintained by: puiterwijk, simo) > ipsilon-base-1.1.0-1.fc24.noarch requires /usr/sbin/restorecon > > ladvd (maintained by: ixs, ttorcz) > ladvd-selinux-1.1.0-4.fc24.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon, > /usr/sbin/semodule > > ocp (maintained by: cra) > ocp-0.1.22-0.6.20150224gita07bf5d.fc23.i686 requires > /sbin/restorecon > > ocsinventory (maintained by: remi, xavierb) > ocsinventory-reports-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires > /sbin/restorecon > ocsinventory-server-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires > /sbin/restorecon So what is correct requires nowadays? /usr/sbin/restorecon? Something else? > Affected (co)maintainers > ttorcz: lzma Is there a way to see full dep chain? I have no idea why I'm here. -- Tomasz TorczOnce you've read the dictionary, xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl every other book is just a remix. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
