Re: Review swap

[Vít Ondruch]

Isn't the wasi-sdk just umbrella project? Is it really needed? We have 
llvm / clang, we have wasi-libc, what else do you need?



Vít


Dne 06. 03. 24 v 11:08 Jan Horak napsal(a):

Hi,
if anyone is willing to make a review for wasi-sdk - build require for 
the Firefox rlbox sandboxing of the used c/c++ libraries, please have 
a look and let me know about your package:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267683



--
Jan Horak
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat

--
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap Bottles dependencies

[Sandro]

On 22-04-2023 14:36, Sandro wrote:

Hi,

I'm looking for a review for a couple of Bottles dependencies.

1. python-fvs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061
2. vkbasalt-cli https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653

Both are Python packages and I'll be happy to do reviews in return, with 
Python having my preference.


I'm still looking for a review of python-vkbasalt-cli [1]. It's the last 
roadblock preventing Bottles from being updated. The package is rather 
simple and the review shouldn't take much time.


My offer to do a review in return still stands.

Meanwhile python-fvs has been reviewed and pushed. Thanks @gotmax23!

[1]: Based on input I received, I decided to rename the package to 
python-vkbasalt-cli.


-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: review swap

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:40:13PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:36 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189633
> >   Review Request: mkosi-initrd - Generator for initrd images using distro 
> > packages
> > The packaging is trivial, there isn't even a %build section.
> > This is for https://github.com/systemd/mkosi-initrd.
> > I'll also submit a Change for F39 using this.
> >
> > Happy to review stuff in exchange.
> >
> 
> I grabbed it, will probably poke you later for a review.

Thanks!

That went so well, I have on more ;)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121902
Review Request: pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output
This package provides a line profiler similar to cProfile, but based on
statistical sampling instead, and with a nicer and more colorful output.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: review swap

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:36 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189633
>   Review Request: mkosi-initrd - Generator for initrd images using distro 
> packages
> The packaging is trivial, there isn't even a %build section.
> This is for https://github.com/systemd/mkosi-initrd.
> I'll also submit a Change for F39 using this.
>
> Happy to review stuff in exchange.
>

I grabbed it, will probably poke you later for a review.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:45:08PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
> >>
> >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
> >>
> >> This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!)
> >> on the review already.  We are pretty sure it is in good shape now.
> >> As it is a "C library" that is actually written in Rust it's a bit
> >> unusual because it has to obey the Rust / Cargo guidelines.
> > 
> > And I was going to add: It does work.  I wrote a whole program against
> > the API, developed entirely using the locally installed libblkio &
> > libblkio-devel RPMs.
> > 
> > Rich.
> > 
> Taken.

Thanks for the offer.  Neal took it so I think we're OK now.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

[Benson Muite]

On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
>>
>> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
>>
>> This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!)
>> on the review already.  We are pretty sure it is in good shape now.
>> As it is a "C library" that is actually written in Rust it's a bit
>> unusual because it has to obey the Rust / Cargo guidelines.
> 
> And I was going to add: It does work.  I wrote a whole program against
> the API, developed entirely using the locally installed libblkio &
> libblkio-devel RPMs.
> 
> Rich.
> 
Taken.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

[Neal Gompa]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:42 AM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
> >
> > I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
> >
> > This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!)
> > on the review already.  We are pretty sure it is in good shape now.
> > As it is a "C library" that is actually written in Rust it's a bit
> > unusual because it has to obey the Rust / Cargo guidelines.
>
> And I was going to add: It does work.  I wrote a whole program against
> the API, developed entirely using the locally installed libblkio &
> libblkio-devel RPMs.
>

I've grabbed it. I may hit you up in a bit for a package review once I
have something ready.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
> 
> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
> 
> This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!)
> on the review already.  We are pretty sure it is in good shape now.
> As it is a "C library" that is actually written in Rust it's a bit
> unusual because it has to obey the Rust / Cargo guidelines.

And I was going to add: It does work.  I wrote a whole program against
the API, developed entirely using the locally installed libblkio &
libblkio-devel RPMs.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap

[Benson Muite]

On 12/29/22 22:32, TI_Eugene wrote:
> Can review something against my new package - QCustomPlot/PyQt
> binding: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156080
> 
> Qt and/or python packages are preferable, but not exactly.
> 
> ___
Taken

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap for python-plotnine and dependencies

[Sandro]

On 17-10-2022 18:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 17. 10. 22 15:15, Sandro wrote:

Hi,

I have submitted reviews for python-plotnine and its dependencies:

python-plotnine
    python-scikit-misc
    python-adjustText
    pythn-mizani
    python-palettable



Could you please share the links?


Sure.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133439
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133438
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130030 (done)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130026
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130025 (done)

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap for python-plotnine and dependencies

[Miro Hrončok]

On 17. 10. 22 15:15, Sandro wrote:

Hi,

I have submitted reviews for python-plotnine and its dependencies:

python-plotnine
   python-scikit-misc
   python-adjustText
   pythn-mizani
   python-palettable



Could you please share the links?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap for pf-bb-config

[Neal Gompa]

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 5:08 PM Timothy Redaelli  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for reviews or review swap for pf-bb-config:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101769
>
> The spec file is straightforward, so it should be
> trivial to review it.
>
> I'd be happy to review packages in exchange.
>

I've grabbed this package for review.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap : blueprint-compiler

[Lyes Saadi]

Thanks! Happy to do it :)!

Le 21/08/2022 à 19:56, Jonathan Wright via devel a écrit :
I'm happy to trade for 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118887 



On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:03 PM Lyes Saadi > wrote:


Hello devel!

I have new dependency I need to update dialect to 2.0. It's been
waiting
since july, so I'm proposing a review swap. It's the python/meson
guidelines.

blueprint-compiler :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106919


Regards,
Lyes Saadi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap : blueprint-compiler

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

I'm happy to trade for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118887

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:03 PM Lyes Saadi 
wrote:

> Hello devel!
>
> I have new dependency I need to update dialect to 2.0. It's been waiting
> since july, so I'm proposing a review swap. It's the python/meson
> guidelines.
>
> blueprint-compiler : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106919
>
> Regards,
> Lyes Saadi
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swap - python-specfile

[Nikola Forró]

On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 13:46 -0500, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Your email made me look at this upstream
> (https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder
> if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me of
> https://github.com/containerbuildsystem/dockerfile-parse .
> 

Thanks, yes, I hope it could be useful for other projects.
pyrpkg doesn't interact with spec files, does it?

Regards,
Nikola


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap - python-specfile

[Ken Dreyer]

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:09 AM Nikola Forró  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there anybody willing to review python-specfile [1]?

Your email made me look at this upstream
(https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder
if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me of
https://github.com/containerbuildsystem/dockerfile-parse .

I'm looking forward to playing around with this API.

- Ken
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap

[Sandro Mani]

I can take this

Can you take 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2041042 in exchange?


Thanks
Sandro

On 15.01.22 14:25, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:

Is anyone available for a review swap?

I've got https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038675 waiting in
the queue, I can offer a review in return (possibly not rust-* or
golang-* stuff, where I have little or no knowledge about).

Thanks
Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap

[Sandro Mani]

On 17.12.21 15:31, Jarek Prokop wrote:

Hi,

I have a few rubygem packages that need a (re-)review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010263
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010313
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010350


I'll take these. Could you please review some of these in exchange?

python-flask-paranoid - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033803
python-flask-principal - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033802
python-flask-security-too - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033801
python-flask-sphinx-themes - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033799
python-flask-wtf - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033798
python-httpagentparser - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033797
python-ua-parser - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033796
python-user-agents - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033795


Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap

[Sandro Mani]

On 02.10.21 19:40, Jerry James wrote:

The python-pydata-sphinx-theme package has a new dependency.  I need a
review for this simple python package:

python-sphinx-sitemap:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009987

Who would like to swap reviews?


I'll take it. I've currently got up for review these to add to the mingw 
Qt6 stack:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214 - 
mingw-qt6-qtlocation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009215 - 
mingw-qt6-qtsensors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009217 - 
mingw-qt6-qtserialport
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221 - 
mingw-qt6-qtshadertools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009223 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009268 - 
mingw-qt6-qtmultimedia (depends on mingw-qt6-qtshadertools)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009269 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebchannel (depends on mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets)


Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [NeuroFedora-bugs] Re: Review swap: python-pathos (required to update python-SALib)

[Ankur Sinha]

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 09:38:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos
> > reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest release
> > (and fix its FTI/FTBFS).
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000598
> 
> Done.

Awesome! Thanks very much :)

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap: python-pathos (required to update python-SALib)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos
> reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest release
> (and fix its FTI/FTBFS).
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000598

Done.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap request: python-xds-protos

[Major Hayden]

On 7/23/21 2:35 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
I’d like to get python-xds-protos 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041) reviewed so I can 
update grpc to version 1.39.0 in Rawhide in time for Fedora 35.


This is a new dependency for grpc—a weirdly circular one that’s 
ultimately generated from sources inside grpc, but is separately 
versioned and separately distributed (generated sources only) on PyPI, 
so I am treating it as a separate package.


I have some of the python-opencensus stuff already, so I'll take a look 
at this one for you. 


--
Major Hayden


OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap: fluent-bit

[Benjamin Kircher]

On Fri, 2021-07-09 at 08:04 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:54 AM Benjamin Kircher 
> wrote:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723
> > 
> > Fluent Bit is a high performance and multi-platform log forwarder:
> > https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit. It is written in C++ and uses
> > CMake as build system.
> > 
> > Happy to do reviews for other packages of similar complexity
> > (Python,
> > Go, C++, Rust, meson/C).
> > 
> 
> I'll take the review, though I don't have anything of similar
> complexity right now to review swap.

Many thanks!

BK

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap: fluent-bit

[Neal Gompa]

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:54 AM Benjamin Kircher  wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723
>
> Fluent Bit is a high performance and multi-platform log forwarder:
> https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit. It is written in C++ and uses
> CMake as build system.
>
> Happy to do reviews for other packages of similar complexity (Python,
> Go, C++, Rust, meson/C).
>

I'll take the review, though I don't have anything of similar
complexity right now to review swap.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap: newsboat rust dependencies

[Jan Staněk]

Hi,

Jerry James  wrote:
> I took them all.

Thanks! Your OCaml packages should now be also reviewed,
althoug Dan has beaten me to #1927441 :)
-- 
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com   irc: jstanek



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap: newsboat rust dependencies

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:44 AM Jan Staněk  wrote:
> I maintain newsboat [1], which in the latest version(s) grew new rust
> dependencies. I have prepared a review request for all of them,
> and I'm willing to review other packages in return.
>
> The reviews are the following bugs:
> 1927183, 1927210, 1927248, 1927353,
> 1927362, 1927385, 1927763, 1927790

I took them all.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swap: voikko-fi (for Finnish spell-checking)

[Ville-Pekka Vainio]

Hi all,

This work is finally done and the packages are in Rawhide, in good
time before the beta. Thank you Miro and Zbyszek!
I think I found a fedpkg import bug while importing voikko-fi from
SRPM, I'll make a new thread about that.

-Ville-Pekka
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: voikko-fi (for Finnish spell-checking)

[Miro Hrončok]

On 24. 01. 21 19:43, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:

Hi,

This is a re-review for a rename and going from arch-specific to
noarch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919688

The arch-noarch stuff was discussed here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JSEYB5XU24HEX7BR2QVJ732MR5P52YJ6/

Voikko 4.3, which is needed to build this, is not yet in Rawhide. I'll
push it as soon as someone commits to working on this review. Pushing
Voikko 4.3 to Rawhide will break Finnish spell-checking until this
package is in Rawhide as well.


Please, avoid even a temporary breakage. Let's push the update and the renamed 
package together? You can get a review of voikko-fi just based on the copr repo 
you already have. I can take a look, but not sooner than tomorrow.


Adding some initial comments now.


The best packages for me to review would probably be autotools-based
C/C++ stuff and Python stuff. I usually have time for Fedora work only
during weekends.


Don't worry about it.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:40 AM Jared K. Smith  wrote:
> I'll review it.  I don't need any reviews done in return at this moment.

Thank you, Jared!  Please let me know when you do need a review.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Jared K. Smith]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:13 AM Jerry James  wrote:

> MuseScore 3.6 is out, and adds a dependency on another font.  Who
> would like to swap reviews?  I need this one:
>

I'll review it.  I don't need any reviews done in return at this moment.

-Jared
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Friday, 06 November 2020 at 00:06, Jerry James wrote:
> Have you ever thought, "I wish Fedora had a command line utility where
> I could type in an ASCII representation of the state of a Rubiks cube
> and have it print an equally hard to read ASCII representation of the
> moves needed to solve the cube"?  Have I got a package for you!
> 
> Sagemath 9.2 is out.  It unbundles the rubiks package (currently
> sagemath-rubiks), so we now need a separate package.  Review request
> here:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895150
> 
> This package has no upstream.  Rather, it has 3 upstreams, all dead.
> The sagemath developers now manage the code.  They keep some patches
> for this code, as do various other Linux distributions.  I've
> collected several such patches for Fedora.
> 
> I'm happy to review something for you in exchange.

Reviewed. I don't have anything pending review, so feel free to review
someone else's package instead. ;)

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: wlr-sunclock - Show the sun's shadows on earth (for wayland)

[Bob Hepple]

Thanks Carson,

I'm up for that ...

See you in bugzilla ...


Cheers


Bob

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 13:01, Carson Black  wrote:
>
> Ello,
>
> The review process is documented on the wiki here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> In short, set the fedora-review flag on the bug to ? when you're
> reviewing a package. When you approve a package, change the flag to +.
>
> I'll take this review swap. In return, I'd appreciate it if you
> reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869128, which is
> also a fairly straightforward package using meson.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Carson Black [ jan Pontajosi ]
>
>
> Am So., 16. Aug. 2020 um 21:16 Uhr schrieb Bob Hepple :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm still not 100% sure that I'm able to approve a package - I have
> > "Fedora Packager GIT Commit Group (packager)", I've been through
> > sponsorship and I've had packages approved and released. If someone
> > can point out the doco on this point, I'd be grateful as my searches
> > haven't come up with anything yet.
> >
> > I'm willing to try a review swap for a simple package - I'm still new to 
> > this.
> >
> > This one has been open for 10 days, It's a simple meson package but
> > rather fun for the desktop:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867267
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Bob
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: wlr-sunclock - Show the sun's shadows on earth (for wayland)

[Carson Black]

Ello,

The review process is documented on the wiki here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
In short, set the fedora-review flag on the bug to ? when you're
reviewing a package. When you approve a package, change the flag to +.

I'll take this review swap. In return, I'd appreciate it if you
reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869128, which is
also a fairly straightforward package using meson.

Thanks,

-- Carson Black [ jan Pontajosi ]


Am So., 16. Aug. 2020 um 21:16 Uhr schrieb Bob Hepple :
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm still not 100% sure that I'm able to approve a package - I have
> "Fedora Packager GIT Commit Group (packager)", I've been through
> sponsorship and I've had packages approved and released. If someone
> can point out the doco on this point, I'd be grateful as my searches
> haven't come up with anything yet.
>
> I'm willing to try a review swap for a simple package - I'm still new to this.
>
> This one has been open for 10 days, It's a simple meson package but
> rather fun for the desktop:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867267
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Bob
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On Saturday, 4 July 2020 15:09:06 CEST Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could anyone please review the package python-json?
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853829
> 
> Thanks!
> 

A few minor things to fix and you're good to go.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin  wrote:
> Done, no swap needed for now.

Thank you!  Let me know if I can do anything for you in the future.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On Friday, 19 June 2020 18:28:43 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> Alt-ergo 2.2.0 has been released under a public license.  It has a new
> dependency, however.  Would someone like to swap reviews?  I need this
> one:
> 
> ocaml-psmt2-frontend: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847772
> 
> Thanks!


Done, no swap needed for now.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap - antimicroX

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello Greg,

I'll take it.
Could you please review this in return?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643

I'll start working on it in a few hours.

Best regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

NeuroFedora (re)review swap: un-retiring maven-jaxb2-plugin

[Ankur Sinha]

Hello,

I need the maven-jaxb2-plugin package to build a NeuroFedora package.
So, I'd like to unretire it. Could someone (re)review it please? Always
happy to swap reviews if anyone is looking for a reviewer too.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maven-jaxb2-plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836626

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: psi-notify

[Dan Čermák]

Michel Alexandre Salim  writes:

> Would anyone like to swap a review?
>
> psi-notify - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832623

Looks simple enough, I'll try to review it today. If I don't manage to,
anyone else can take the review.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap: bowtie2 - A read aligner for genome sequencing

[David Schwörer]

On 4/22/20 9:55 PM, Jun Aruga wrote:

Hi,

Could anyone swap the review?

Review Request: bowtie2 - A read aligner for genome sequencing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824348


I can take it.


bowtie2 [1] is C++ software for genome analysis.It can be also used
for COVID-19 analysis [2].

Thanks.
Jun

[1] https://github.com/BenLangmead/bowtie2
[2] https://nf-co.re/viralrecon


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: freeopcua

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Here's mine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826326

I have to run a quick errand and afterwards I'll pick up the review
for freeopcua.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: freeopcua

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello Till,

I've taken it, and a have a simple gnome-shell extension I would like
reviewed in return.
I'm currently working with upstream on a bug, once that's solved I'll
work on the freeopuca review.

Best regards,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Jerry James]

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:39 AM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
> I can look at it later today. I'll also check if I have a pending package 
> review for you :)

Thank you, Fabio!  This will help me finally get rid of all the broken
deps reports for the coq stack.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Fabio Valentini]

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 15:32 Jerry James  wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> > I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody.  This is
> > one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack.
> > The other is already under review.  Who needs a review?
> >
> > ocaml-ppx-deriving-yojson:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
>
> I'm still in need of a reviewer.  If you haven't got a review to swap
> with me, ask me to help you fix a bug.
>

I can look at it later today. I'll also check if I have a pending package
review for you :)

Fabio

-- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody.  This is
> one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack.
> The other is already under review.  Who needs a review?
>
> ocaml-ppx-deriving-yojson: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421

I'm still in need of a reviewer.  If you haven't got a review to swap
with me, ask me to help you fix a bug.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Jerry James]

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jos de Kloe  wrote:
> I hope someone is interested to swap reviews?
> I would like to package the python3 bindings to the eccodes package that
> I maintain, which has been split to a separate repository by upstream.
> See my review request here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808878

I can take this review.  I've got a new dependency of sagemath that
needs a review.  Can you review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813713
in exchange?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap

[Yongkui Han (yonhan) via devel]

Hi Mattia,

Sure. That is fine. 

I will fix all the comments from Artur on my review request.

Thanks!

Yongkui

On 3/14/20, 12:39 PM, "Mattia Verga via devel"  
wrote:

Il 14/03/20 15:13, Yongkui Han (yonhan) ha scritto:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora 
packager, not sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging 
guidelines:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
>
> Anyway, here is my Fedora package review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yongkui
>
Hi Yongkui,

I'm sorry, but currently I'm not a sponsor and I can't help with your 
review. However I'll take a look at your ticket to see if everything is 
correct.

I see there is already a comment from another user, you should start 
correcting your package basing on those suggestions.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap

[Yongkui Han (yonhan) via devel]

Hi Mattia,

I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora packager, not 
sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/

Anyway, here is my Fedora package review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961


Thanks,
Yongkui

On 3/14/20, 9:51 AM, "Mattia Verga via devel"  
wrote:

Hi,

does anyone want to swap a review?
I need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813563 in order to 
upgrade libpasastro.

Thanks
Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 14/03/20 15:13, Yongkui Han (yonhan) ha scritto:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora packager, 
> not sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging 
> guidelines:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
>
> Anyway, here is my Fedora package review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yongkui
>
Hi Yongkui,

I'm sorry, but currently I'm not a sponsor and I can't help with your 
review. However I'll take a look at your ticket to see if everything is 
correct.

I see there is already a comment from another user, you should start 
correcting your package basing on those suggestions.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap

[Nikola Forró]

On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 09:46 -0500, Breno Brand Fernandes wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Would you want to swap reviews?
> This was generated with go2rpm.
> It should be easy to review.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219

Hi,

I will take it. Can you review dsp [1] in return?

Thanks,
Nikola

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808351
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 16:00 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:57 PM Sérgio Basto 
> wrote:
> > As it seems to be easy one , I take it and swap with
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268
> > 
> > nodejs-p-try
> > 
> > OK ?
> 
> Sorry, Sérgio, I grabbed Ankur's review just as you were sending
> this.

No problem  , no worries 


> But see my reply to him.  I've got 6 reviews on my list.  Would you
> like to swap one of mine for nodejs-p-try?



> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 22:57:06 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 22:51 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get
> > mediawiki-lastmodified[1] packaged so we can use it with our wiki. It
> > adds a "Last updated ..." text to wiki pages so we know how current
> > or
> > outdated they may be.
> > 
> > The review is here (should hopefully be a simple one):
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801464
> > 
> > [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LastModified
> 
> 
> As it seems to be easy one , I take it and swap with 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268 

Jerry already took it, but I can review this for you anyway. No worries :)


-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

[Jerry James]

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:57 PM Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> As it seems to be easy one , I take it and swap with
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268
>
> nodejs-p-try
>
> OK ?

Sorry, Sérgio, I grabbed Ankur's review just as you were sending this.
But see my reply to him.  I've got 6 reviews on my list.  Would you
like to swap one of mine for nodejs-p-try?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

[Jerry James]

Hi Ankur,

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:52 PM Ankur Sinha  wrote:
> Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get
> mediawiki-lastmodified[1] packaged so we can use it with our wiki. It
> adds a "Last updated ..." text to wiki pages so we know how current or
> outdated they may be.

I just asked for swaps a couple of hours ago:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/FWZMAL6DEPLEQKQG5V4AOFBRZDMSH7Z3/

If you could take one of those, please, I will take this review.  Thanks!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 22:51 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get
> mediawiki-lastmodified[1] packaged so we can use it with our wiki. It
> adds a "Last updated ..." text to wiki pages so we know how current
> or
> outdated they may be.
> 
> The review is here (should hopefully be a simple one):
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801464
> 
> [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LastModified


As it seems to be easy one , I take it and swap with 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268 

nodejs-p-try

OK ? 


> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap

[Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón]

Hello,

I'll be happy to swap a review against this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524

El lun., 3 feb. 2020 a las 17:57, Breno Brand Fernandes ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> Would someone mind swapping reviews?
> I am building puppet 6 for EPEL 8 and this one[1] is the very first
> dependency.
>
> 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794229
>
> Thank you!!
>
> - B
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 18:57 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/01/2020 18:53, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tom , IIRC you can add me nodejs-multimatch , please
> > my fasuser: sergiomb
> 
> If you wan to maintain nodejs stuff then the best thing to do is to
> join the SIG rather than asking for ACLs on individual packages.
> 
> If you're planning to update multimatch then it looks like the latest
> version, which I notice already seems to be required in rawhide,
> looks
> like it has some tricky dependencies.
> 
> Maybe the nodejs list would be a better place to discuss details
> of what you're up to though?

ATM I need permissions for nodejs-multimatch and 
nodejs-p-limit 

and review nodejs-p-try . 


> Tom
> 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

[Tom Hughes]

On 30/01/2020 18:53, Sérgio Basto wrote:


Hi Tom , IIRC you can add me nodejs-multimatch , please
my fasuser: sergiomb


If you wan to maintain nodejs stuff then the best thing to do is to
join the SIG rather than asking for ACLs on individual packages.

If you're planning to update multimatch then it looks like the latest
version, which I notice already seems to be required in rawhide, looks
like it has some tricky dependencies.

Maybe the nodejs list would be a better place to discuss details
of what you're up to though?

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 18:42 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/01/2020 18:22, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:09 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I took  js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query
> > > 
> > > Great and thx. If you want by a chance to maintain also js-
> > > jquery{,1,2},
> > > I would not mind to have co-maintainers or even better to hand it
> > > over
> > > to somebody O:-)
> > 
> > js-p-limit
> > 
> > I want co-maintain (be added)  nodejs-p-limit , nodejs-
> > multimatch  and
> > nodejs-lodash
> 
> nodejs-lodash is long since retired and replaced by lodash.
> 
> Tom

Hi Tom , IIRC you can add me nodejs-multimatch , please 
my fasuser: sergiomb 


Thanks


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

[Tom Hughes]

On 30/01/2020 18:22, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:09 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:

Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):

Hi,

I took  js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query


Great and thx. If you want by a chance to maintain also js-
jquery{,1,2},
I would not mind to have co-maintainers or even better to hand it
over
to somebody O:-)



I want that someone review nodejs-p-try to update  nodejs-p-limit

I want co-maintain (be added)  nodejs-p-limit , nodejs-multimatch  and
nodejs-lodash


nodejs-lodash is long since retired and replaced by lodash.

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:09 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > I took  js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query
> 
> Great and thx. If you want by a chance to maintain also js-
> jquery{,1,2},
> I would not mind to have co-maintainers or even better to hand it
> over
> to somebody O:-)


I want that someone review nodejs-p-try to update  nodejs-p-limit 

I want co-maintain (be added)  nodejs-p-limit , nodejs-multimatch  and
nodejs-lodash 

my fas user is sergiomb 

I'm testing builds on copr [1] 

not updating these packages are breaking buildroot on rawhide for js-
query . 

[1]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/nodejs/builds/

> Vít
> 
> 
> >  , I updated [1]
> > but we still need update nodejs-multimatch [2], nodejs-p-limit [3]
> > and
> > nodejs-lodash [4] at least !
> > 
> > To update nodejs-p-limit, we need nodejs-p-try which isn't in
> > Fedora,
> > here is the package review request [5]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [1] 
> > rpms/nodejs-dateformat
> > rpms/nodejs-find-up
> > rpms/nodejs-load-grunt-tasks
> > rpms/nodejs-locate-path
> > rpms/nodejs-pkg-up
> > rpms/nodejs-p-locate 
> > 
> > [2]
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531018
> > [3]
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701835
> > [4]
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297999
> > [5]
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268
> > 
> > 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> Hi, 
>
> I took  js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query


Great and thx. If you want by a chance to maintain also js-jquery{,1,2},
I would not mind to have co-maintainers or even better to hand it over
to somebody O:-)


Vít


>  , I updated [1]
> but we still need update nodejs-multimatch [2], nodejs-p-limit [3] and
> nodejs-lodash [4] at least !
>
> To update nodejs-p-limit, we need nodejs-p-try which isn't in Fedora,
> here is the package review request [5]
>
>
>
> [1] 
> rpms/nodejs-dateformat
> rpms/nodejs-find-up
> rpms/nodejs-load-grunt-tasks
> rpms/nodejs-locate-path
> rpms/nodejs-pkg-up
> rpms/nodejs-p-locate 
>
> [2]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531018
> [3]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701835
> [4]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297999
> [5]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap Request

[Tobias Girstmair]

Looks like python-userpath exists already, albeit for rawhide only.

I'd like to review pipx (this will be my first review). If you could in 
turn review mopidy-mpd, that  would be greatly appreciated.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1792086
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Vascom]

I can review it without swap.

пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 03:03, Jerry James :
>
> One of my upstreams picked up a new documentation dependency.  Who would like 
> to swap reviews?  This one should be quick and easy.
>
> python-sphinx-copybutton: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780426
>
> Thank you,
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: virt-v2v

[Kashyap Chamarthy]

- Original Message -
> 
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774713
>   Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM
> 
> This is actually more of a package split.  This program was part of
> libguestfs, but has been split out into a separate upstream project:
> 
> https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/85c99edec19ac7afb38fa6003e35f51db143922c
> https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v
> 
> and removed from the Fedora libguestfs package:
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs/c/85c51621ab836847051f59cc4c943025b4bd8f89?branch=master

(Happened to notice this the first thing after I opened  
'fedora-devel' in a while.) 

I'll take it; it's been a while since I reviewed a Fedora 
package, would be a good, quick refresher.

[...]

--
/kashyap
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap?

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:17 PM Tom Callaway  wrote:
>
> I could use a quick review for a new R package: R-Rhtslib
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767062
>
> Can do a review or other packaging/legal/license favors in trade.

I'll swap you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766771
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap for vcglib

[J. Scheurich]

Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

I also cannot find the "muftii" FAS account you listed in this bug ...


Sorry, typo: it should be "mufti11" 8-(


I'm available for any review in exchange.

My initial target is wdune (white_dune), but it also requires OpenSubdiv.
There is a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv and a review request
for OpenSubdiv. Just wait for a fedora 31 Opensubdiv package ?

What do you mean, there's a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv?


Strange: there is a "BuildRequires: opensubdiv-devel" in the wdune spec
file, and  it looks like, it do not fail under fedora 30


And what do you mean by "just wait for a fedora 31 package"?


The review-request for OpenSubdiv is from 16.10.2019,  so i hope OpenSubdiv
there will be something i can use as

BuildRequires: opensubdiv-devel

in the wdune .spec file for fedora 31 in the near future

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap for vcglib

[Fabio Valentini]

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:15 PM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

I also cannot find the "muftii" FAS account you listed in this bug ...

> It's usually enough to ask the original reviewer to unset and set the
> "fedora-review: +" flag if the package hasn't changed in the meantime.
> No need for a completely fresh review.
>
> > I'm available for any review in exchange.
> >
> > My initial target is wdune (white_dune), but it also requires OpenSubdiv.
> > There is a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv and a review request
> > for OpenSubdiv. Just wait for a fedora 31 Opensubdiv package ?
>
> What do you mean, there's a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv? I can't
> find it in fedora at all.
> And what do you mean by "just wait for a fedora 31 package"?
>
> Fabio
>
> > so long
> > MUFTI
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap for vcglib

[Fabio Valentini]

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

It's usually enough to ask the original reviewer to unset and set the
"fedora-review: +" flag if the package hasn't changed in the meantime.
No need for a completely fresh review.

> I'm available for any review in exchange.
>
> My initial target is wdune (white_dune), but it also requires OpenSubdiv.
> There is a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv and a review request
> for OpenSubdiv. Just wait for a fedora 31 Opensubdiv package ?

What do you mean, there's a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv? I can't
find it in fedora at all.
And what do you mean by "just wait for a fedora 31 package"?

Fabio

> so long
> MUFTI
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: python-graph-tool (Was: Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build)

[Ben Cotton]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 03:32 Ankur Sinha  wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
>
I'll trade you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap (htslib)

[Jun Aruga]

Hi Zbigniew and Kevin

Many thanks for your explanation.
I clearly understand the htslib's situation now.

-- 
Jun | He - His - Him
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap (htslib)

[Kevin Kofler]

Jun Aruga wrote:
> Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new
> package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid?
> "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version).

This can happen with non-autotools, non-libtool projects. libtool enforces 
some strict rules where the full version must be of the form 
major.minor.revision and the major version just major. (Actually, libtool 
doesn't even let you specify major and minor directly, but LT_CURRENT and 
LT_AGE, and it computes major=LT_CURRENT-LT_AGE and minor=LT_AGE for you.) 
Other build systems such as CMake allow you to set arbitrary strings as the 
major version and the full version, and the major version need not 
necessarily be a prefix of the full version. So they will let you get away 
with 1.9 as the full version and 2 as the major version.

There is nothing wrong with arbitrary versions if the build system used by 
upstream allows them. The Fedora packages should NOT change the upstream 
versioning scheme because it would make the packages incompatible with 
upstream.

So, to sum it up, yes, /usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9 and /usr/lib64/libhts.so.2 
is a valid combination. Unusual, but valid.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap (htslib)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:03:26PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote:
> Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new
> package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid?
> "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version).

The patterns used in filenames of so objects aren't really well defined.
In particular, the numbers typically used like libfoo.so.MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
are only informative.

The libhts convention is: libhts.so.SO_VERSION → libhts.so.PROJECT_VERSION.
Upstream correctly says that there's no chance of conflict because 
PROJECT_VERSION
always includes a dot and SO_VERSION doesn't. The compiler doesn't care.

I'd say that this is a bit misleading, but not wrong. Not worth deviating
from upstream.

FTR:
In [34]: d = os.scandir('/usr/lib64') 
...: for e in d: 
...: if e.is_symlink() and '.so.' in e.name and not 
e.name.startswith('.'): 
...:  t = os.readlink(e.path) 
...:  if e.name not in t and '.so.' in t: 
...:  print(e.name, t) 
...:

libgcalc-1.so.0.0.0 libgcalc-1.so.0
libosgFX.so.131 libosgFX.so.3.4.1
libcrypto.so.10 libcrypto.so.1.0.2o
libzzip-0.so.12 libzzip-0.so.13
libosgManipulator.so.131 libosgManipulator.so.3.4.1
libosgUtil.so.131 libosgUtil.so.3.4.1
libXaw.so.7 libXaw7.so.7
libexiv2.so.27 libexiv2.so.0.27.2
libOpenThreads.so.20 libOpenThreads.so.3.3.0
libosgWidget.so.131 libosgWidget.so.3.4.1
libosgParticle.so.131 libosgParticle.so.3.4.1
libgcr-3.so.1 libgcr-ui-3.so.1.0.0
libosgText.so.131 libosgText.so.3.4.1
libzzipfseeko-0.so.12 libzzipfseeko-0.so.13
libclucene-contribs-lib.so.1 libclucene-contribs-lib.so.2.3.3.4
libjsoncpp.so.21 libjsoncpp.so.1.9.1
libgit2.so.28 libgit2.so.0.28.3
libkbookmarkmodel_private.so.6 libkbookmarkmodel_private.so.5.97.0
libosgVolume.so.131 libosgVolume.so.3.4.1
libssl.so.10 libssl.so.1.0.2o
libosgViewer.so.131 libosgViewer.so.3.4.1
libmono-2.0.so.1.0.0 libmonosgen-2.0.so.1.0.0
libosgDB.so.131 libosgDB.so.3.4.1
libzzipmmapped-0.so.10 libzzipmmapped-0.so.13
libssh_threads.so.4.8.1 libssh.so.4.8.1
libzzip-0.so.11 libzzip-0.so.13
libzzipmmapped-0.so.11 libzzipmmapped-0.so.13
libosgSim.so.131 libosgSim.so.3.4.1
libosgTerrain.so.131 libosgTerrain.so.3.4.1
libv8_libbase.so.7 /usr/lib64/libnode.so.72
libKF5KExiv2.so.15.0.0 libKF5KExiv2.so.5.0.0
libzzip-0.so.10 libzzip-0.so.13
libminizip.so.2.5 libminizip.so.2.8.9
libosgAnimation.so.131 libosgAnimation.so.3.4.1
libGLX_system.so.0 /usr/lib64/libGLX_mesa.so.0
libutempter.so.0 libutempter.so.1.1.6
libzzipfseeko-0.so.10 libzzipfseeko-0.so.13
libv8.so.7 /usr/lib64/libnode.so.72
libclucene-shared.so.1 libclucene-shared.so.2.3.3.4
libv8_libplatform.so.7 /usr/lib64/libnode.so.72
libzzipfseeko-0.so.11 libzzipfseeko-0.so.13
libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s-9-20190827.so.1
libclucene-core.so.1 libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4
libosgShadow.so.131 libosgShadow.so.3.4.1
libopencc.so.2 libopencc.so.1.0.0
libssh_threads.so.4 libssh.so.4.8.1
libosgUI.so.131 libosgUI.so.3.4.1
libclutter-glx-1.0.so.0 libclutter-1.0.so.0.2600.2
libosgPresentation.so.131 libosgPresentation.so.3.4.1
libosgGA.so.131 libosgGA.so.3.4.1
libosg.so.131 libosg.so.3.4.1
libfbclient.so.2 libfbclient.so.3.0.4
libmono-2.0.so.1 libmonosgen-2.0.so.1
libgit2.so.27 libgit2.so.0.27.8
libzzipmmapped-0.so.12 libzzipmmapped-0.so.13
libgcr-3.so.1.0.0 libgcr-ui-3.so.1.0.0
libopenjp2.so.7 libopenjp2.so.2.3.1

... so yeah, this happens quite a bit.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap (htslib)

[Jun Aruga]

Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new
package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid?
"1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version).

```
 sh-5.0# ls -l /usr/lib64/libhts.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct  2 23:50 /usr/lib64/libhts.so -> libhts.so.1.9
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 759680 Oct  2 23:50 /usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct  2 23:50 /usr/lib64/libhts.so.2 ->
libhts.so.1.9
```

I thought it was valid, because we see many examples like following libraries.
But there is an objection for that on the ticket.
I think if the htslib pattern is wrong, we need to update the guideline.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/

```
$ ls -l /usr/lib64/libz.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Aug 15 09:30 /usr/lib64/libz.so -> libz.so.1.2.11*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Aug 15 09:30 /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 ->
libz.so.1.2.11*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 128904 Aug 15 09:30 /usr/lib64/libz.so.1.2.11*
```

```
$ find /usr/lib64 -name "lib*.so.*" -a -type f
/usr/lib64/libKF5SyntaxHighlighting.so.5.59.0
/usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1.1.0
/usr/lib64/liburcu-common.so.6.0.0
...

$ find /usr/lib64 -name "lib*.so.*" -a -type f | wc -l
2082
```

Could you comment here or on below ticket?
Someone, could you be an sponsor of the reporter of the ticket?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504#c42

Thanks.

-- 
Jun | He - His - Him
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap - zeal

[Vascom]

I can review it without swap.

вт, 28 мая 2019 г. в 13:55, Lumir Balhar :
>
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to claim ownership of retired package zeal, which is currently
> in weird state not available in F30.
>
> Original bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701666
> Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711898
>
> Will take a review in exchange for something of similar complexity.
>
> Lumír
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: newsboat

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:04 AM J. Scheurich  wrote:
> I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora
> account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review))
> in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring...

Mufti, don't despair!  We're getting there.  Let's keep working on
that white_dune review and we'll take the sponsoring step when the
time is ripe.  It's just around the corner.

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: newsboat

[Jan Staněk]

On 15. 02. 19 17:01, J. Scheurich wrote:> I would review it (unclear, if
i have the rights (i have a fedora
> account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review))
> in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring...
I'm not able to sponsor new packagers, sorry.

In the meantime, the review was done by ignatenkobrain -- thanks.

-- 
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: newsboat

[Fabio Valentini]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:04 PM J. Scheurich  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I
> > would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any
> > volunteers?
>
> I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora
> account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review))

No, it's not. You need to be a member of the "packager" group to do
official reviews.
However, comments and suggestions for improvements are welcome either
way in most cases.

> in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring...

Just so you know, not every member of the "packager" group can sponsor
new members.

Fabio

> so long
> MUFTI
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: newsboat

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,


I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I
would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any
volunteers?


I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora
account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review))
in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring...

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap - netatalk and dymo-cups-drivers

[Andrew Bauer]

Thanks! I'll get on it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap - netatalk and dymo-cups-drivers

[Nikola Forró]

On Sat, 2019-01-05 at 14:35 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> I've got a couple of review requests in need of a reviewer:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659709

Hello,

I'll review dymo-cups-drivers, could you review qt5-qtpbfimageformat
[1] in return?

Thanks,
Nikola

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663492
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: python-libNeuroML

[Miro Hrončok]

On 25.10.2018 21:17, Ankur Sinha wrote:

Hello,

Would someone like to swap reviews please? I have a simple python
package that needs reviewing:

python-libNeuroML: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266


I've taken it. No need for any review in return.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: easy Python module

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 21:15:14 CEST Gwyn Ciesla wrote:

I'd like a swap with:

android-file-transfer - Reliable MTP client with minimalistic UI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633317

Best regards,

Robert-André

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap, Perl flavored

[José Abílio Matos]

On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 23.12.22 WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 
> Today is my first year anniversary of contributing to Fedora, yay us!

Congratulations for all your (hard) work Robert-André. :-)

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2EQLXUDDBLO23YQGCZHIGM633VEMNFMQ/

Re: Review swap request

[Eamon Walsh]

On 6/2/2018 1:34 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp
> package and upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it.
>
> To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in
> Fedora while the client tool, miniupnpc, is packaged.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585365
>

I'll take it. Can you review termy-server:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582983

Thanks,

-- 
Eamon Walsh
https://termysequence.io
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/M7FHLCDJVQ4ZOGAWYTRJAY4CNHF7G24I/

Re: Review Swap

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Michal Novotny  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to do rename of rpkg-client
> (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-client) to rpkg-util and also I
> would like to go the package again through a review process because the spec
> might deserve some care: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184
>
> Can I possibly swap reviews with somebody?
> clime
>

Taken this review.

If you would, please review this in exchange:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563189


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Björn 'besser82' Esser]

Am Sonntag, den 03.12.2017, 19:36 +0100 schrieb Robert-André Mauchin:
> On dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:24:38 CET Björn 'besser82' Esser
> wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> > 
> > I have a few simple gnome-shell-extension packages to offer for
> > review
> > and will review swap a complicated package or few other easy to
> > review
> > packages.
> > 
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520149
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520150
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520151
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520152
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520153
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >   Björn
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have a few Golang packages to review but there are not immediately 
> reviewable because some deps need to ge through first. Can I ask for
> your help 
> later this week?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Robert-André


Hello Robert-André,

just let me know, when you think they are ready and point me to the
links in RHBZ.  I'll do the reviews then asap.

Cheers,
  Björn

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:24:38 CET Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Hello folks,
> 
> I have a few simple gnome-shell-extension packages to offer for review
> and will review swap a complicated package or few other easy to review
> packages.
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520149
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520150
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520151
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520152
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520153
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>   Björn

Hello,

I have a few Golang packages to review but there are not immediately 
reviewable because some deps need to ge through first. Can I ask for your help 
later this week?

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Jared K. Smith]

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Robert-André Mauchin 
wrote:

> Is anyone interested by a review swap? I'd like my package rclone [1] to be
> reviewed (it's written in Golang). Except php and Java with which I'm not
> familiar, I think I can handle anything else.
>

You've done a lot of reviews for me lately, so I went ahead and took this
review earlier today.  Please let me know if you have others that you need
reviewed!

--
Jared Smith
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Volerk,

Hello Andrea!
>
> Please add it to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS
>

Added!!

Bye,

Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Volker Fröhlich]

Am 2017-08-23 um 12:16 schrieb Andrea Musuruane:

Hi!
 I'm looking for a reviewer for

osmctools - Tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464777

Maybe some other OSM mapper is interested?

I'm happy to exchange reviews.

Thanks in advance.

Bye,

Andrea



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org



Hello Andrea!

Please add it to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS

Greetings,

Volker
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Andrea,
>
> I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment,
> they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour.
>
> I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I think I might have
> one by next week.
>

No problem at all.

Let me know when your package will be ready.

Bye,

Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello Andrea,

I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment,
they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour.

I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I think I might have
one by next week.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap

[Robin Lee]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

> I'm looking for a reviewer for
>
> Bug 1478231 – Review Request: conda - Cross-platform, Python-agnostic
> binary package manager
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1478231

Taken.
You helped a lot to deepin packaging.

-robin

>
>
> I can review stuff in return.
>
> Zbyszek
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap: gimp-luminosity-masks

[Alexander Ploumistos]

I've taken it, though I don't have anything ready for review right now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Gwyn Ciesla]

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton 
wrote:

> Hi Gwyn,
>
> I'll take this in exchange for wordgrinder:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460246
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gwyn Ciesla  wrote:
> > I just submitted python-slackclient:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467995
> >
> > Willing to do one of yours.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -G
> >
> > --
> > http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
> > 
> > in your fear, seek only peace
> > in your fear, seek only love
> >
> > -d. bowie
> >
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
>
> Excellent, thank you!
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Ben Cotton]

Hi Gwyn,

I'll take this in exchange for wordgrinder:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460246

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gwyn Ciesla  wrote:
> I just submitted python-slackclient:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467995
>
> Willing to do one of yours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -G
>
> --
> http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
> 
> in your fear, seek only peace
> in your fear, seek only love
>
> -d. bowie
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
Ben Cotton
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap request for package cvechecker

[Zamir SUN]

On 07/04/2017 12:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:11:33PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Recently I want to continue the package review request of cvechecker[1]
>> with mine since it has been quiet for a long time.
>>
>> So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update
>> till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas
>> suggest me to ask for a review swap request.
> 
> Zamir,
> 
> open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of the new one.
> Package review bugs are always tied to the name of the original
> reporter.
> 
Thanks Zbyszek, I'll file a new one later today.


-- 
Ziqian SUN (Zamir)
z...@fedoraproject.org
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap request for package cvechecker

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:11:33PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Recently I want to continue the package review request of cvechecker[1]
> with mine since it has been quiet for a long time.
> 
> So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update
> till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas
> suggest me to ask for a review swap request.

Zamir,

open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of the new one.
Package review bugs are always tied to the name of the original
reporter.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

[Björn 'besser82' Esser]

Am 15.06.2017 um 11:46 schrieb Michal Novotny:

Hello,

I have implemented a set of macros specific for module development. I 
would be happy to review your package if you can review mine: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461769


clime


Just assigned.  It would be great, if you could take this one [1] in 
exchange.


Björn


[1]  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=128
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org