Re: Seamonkey status
On 08/24/2011 05:05 PM, Kai Engert wrote: > > I would appreciate contributions, reviews, specific proposals. > I did note some of the prominent ones in my first mail https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155758.html https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
On 24.08.2011 12:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/22/2011 03:01 AM, Kai Engert wrote: >> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb he would be welcome. Chris and Kai, am I right? >>> I dont know what "community" means in this context. Everything is in >>> the hands of the community in Fedora but the question is who is >>> maintaining it? Apparently, noone is keeping it updated. If so, >>> orphan it properly >> I worked on it during the weekend. > Thanks. Can you fix the spec to follow the packaging guidelines? Add > comments when there is a necessity to deviate I would appreciate contributions, reviews, specific proposals. Thanks Kai -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
On 08/22/2011 03:01 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >>> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of >>> community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb >>> he would be welcome. >>> >>> Chris and Kai, am I right? >> I dont know what "community" means in this context. Everything is in >> the hands of the community in Fedora but the question is who is >> maintaining it? Apparently, noone is keeping it updated. If so, >> orphan it properly > > I worked on it during the weekend. Thanks. Can you fix the spec to follow the packaging guidelines? Add comments when there is a necessity to deviate Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
Am 22.08.2011 22:48, schrieb Kai Engert: > On 21.08.2011 23:53, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert: >>> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but > I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of > community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb > he would be welcome. > > Chris and Kai, am I right? I dont know what "community" means in this context. Everything is in the hands of the community in Fedora but the question is who is maintaining it? Apparently, noone is keeping it updated. If so, orphan it properly >>> I worked on it during the weekend. >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3290353 >>> >> I don't know if it's an upstream bug or not but I can't set mozilla sync >> to override local data. But except of this thing it seems to work fine. > > Would you be able to test an official build from > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.3/ > and test if it's an upstream bug? > > I'm currently not actively using SeaMonkey, and haven't ever used Sync > with SM, so I would appreciate your testing! > > Also, could you please give karma to > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.3-1.fc15 > if it works for you? > > Given this is a major upgrade, and given I had to apply some hacks to > make it package correctly, I would appreciate more testing before > pushing it to stable. > > Thanks a lot > Kai > Okay, it seems to be an upstream bug because I could reproduce it with the official binaries. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
On 21.08.2011 23:53, Heiko Adams wrote: > Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert: >> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb he would be welcome. Chris and Kai, am I right? >>> I dont know what "community" means in this context. Everything is in >>> the hands of the community in Fedora but the question is who is >>> maintaining it? Apparently, noone is keeping it updated. If so, >>> orphan it properly >> I worked on it during the weekend. >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3290353 >> > I don't know if it's an upstream bug or not but I can't set mozilla sync > to override local data. But except of this thing it seems to work fine. Would you be able to test an official build from http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.3/ and test if it's an upstream bug? I'm currently not actively using SeaMonkey, and haven't ever used Sync with SM, so I would appreciate your testing! Also, could you please give karma to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.3-1.fc15 if it works for you? Given this is a major upgrade, and given I had to apply some hacks to make it package correctly, I would appreciate more testing before pushing it to stable. Thanks a lot Kai -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert: > On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >>> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of >>> community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb >>> he would be welcome. >>> >>> Chris and Kai, am I right? >> I dont know what "community" means in this context. Everything is in >> the hands of the community in Fedora but the question is who is >> maintaining it? Apparently, noone is keeping it updated. If so, >> orphan it properly > > I worked on it during the weekend. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3290353 > I don't know if it's an upstream bug or not but I can't set mozilla sync to override local data. But except of this thing it seems to work fine. -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of >> community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb >> he would be welcome. >> >> Chris and Kai, am I right? > I dont know what "community" means in this context. Everything is in > the hands of the community in Fedora but the question is who is > maintaining it? Apparently, noone is keeping it updated. If so, > orphan it properly I worked on it during the weekend. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3290353 Does this work for you? Kai -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > > Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but > I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of > community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb > he would be welcome. > > Chris and Kai, am I right? I dont know what "community" means in this context. Everything is in the hands of the community in Fedora but the question is who is maintaining it? Apparently, noone is keeping it updated. If so, orphan it properly Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seamonkey status
Dne 20.8.2011 12:09, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a): Seamonkey hasn't been updated in a long time. Someone recently mentioned it in identi.ca and filed a bug report to update it. I was looking into it and the spec doesn't seem to be following the packaging guidelines. Source tarball seems to have created locally and doesn't point to a URL. No instructions on regenerating it. Has interesting things like %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 and %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0. Patches don't have comments in the spec etc.Anyone know the current status? Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb he would be welcome. Chris and Kai, am I right? Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mceplceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC Those to whom evil is done \\ Do evil in return. -- W. H. Auden, September 1, 1939 http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15545 smime.p7s Description: Elektronický podpis S/MIME -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
