Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

2015-10-05 Thread Till Maas 
Hi,

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:16:57PM -0400, Omair Majid wrote:
> * Kalev Lember  [2015-10-05 09:02]:
> > Here's another look at F23 broken dependencies.
> >
> > Based on today's Branched report [1], the following packages have
> > remaining broken dependencies (package maintainers BCC'd to this email):
> > 
> >Package(co)maintainers
> > 
> > netbeans-platform moceap, dbhole, omajid
> 
> The list of maintainers doesn't look right. I have no commit access to
> this package for F23 (or Rawhide) [1]. I am being BCC'ed when I can't do
> anything :(

you can do enough: you can write a patch and send it here or ask for
maintainership/commit access.

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

2015-10-05 Thread Kalev Lember 
On 10/05/2015 05:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 5.10.2015 v 17:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
>> On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
>>> Hi Kalev,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> i am the packager of the package vdr-live  (martinkg).
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
>>> On x86_64:
>>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires
>>> libtntnet.so.12()(64bit)
>>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires
>>> libcxxtools.so.9()(64bit)
>>> On i386:
>>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libtntnet.so.12
>>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libcxxtools.so.9
>>> On armhfp:
>>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libtntnet.so.12
>>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libcxxtools.so.9
>>> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> vdr-live depends on the 2 packages
>>>
>>> tntnet-2.3rc1-1.fc23
>>> 
>>>
>>> cxxtools-2.3rc1-1.fc23
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> can you please delete this 2 packages, because there is no vdr-live
>>> package available that compiles against the new tntnet/cxxtools-2.3 version,
>>>
>>> but vdr-live compiles fine against tntnet/cxxtools-2.2.
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> It's actually self-service if you want to do it yourself before the cut
>> off date:
>>
>> fedpkg retire "Reasons for retirement here"
>>
>> ... and repeat it on both f23 and master branches.
>>
> 
> I don't think he want's to retire the packages, but revert from 2.3rc1
> back to 2.2  this is possible but it will need epoch bump ... but I
> might be wrong in interpretation :)

Ahh yes, right you are. I totally misunderstood the question.

Martin (added you back to CC as you don't seem to be subscribed to the
devel list) -- if you want to avoid retiring vdr-live, epoch bumping
tntnet and cxxtools back to 2.2 sounds about right to me too, especially
given that they only appear to be used by vdr-live.

Bumping the Epoch tag to 1 in a spec file would make rpm consider 2.2
newer than 2.3rc1, so that you can submit the "newer" 1:2.2 as a F23
update that correctly replaces the "older" 0:2.3rc1 build.


-- 
Kalev
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

2015-10-05 Thread Omair Majid 
* Kalev Lember  [2015-10-05 09:02]:
> Here's another look at F23 broken dependencies.
>
> Based on today's Branched report [1], the following packages have
> remaining broken dependencies (package maintainers BCC'd to this email):
> 
>Package(co)maintainers
> 
> netbeans-platform moceap, dbhole, omajid

The list of maintainers doesn't look right. I have no commit access to
this package for F23 (or Rawhide) [1]. I am being BCC'ed when I can't do
anything :(

Thanks,
Omair

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/netbeans-platform/

-- 
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95  0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

2015-10-05 Thread Kalev Lember 
Hi all,

Here's another look at F23 broken dependencies. A number of packages
have been fixed last week, but there's also a new broken dependency,
CableSwig, due to gccxml retirement.

The goal is to ship Fedora releases with repos where all packages are
installable. On 2015-10-12, any packages that have remaining broken
dependencies are going to get automatically retired by Fedora release
engineering so that we can enter the Final Freeze with clean
repositories.

Based on today's Branched report [1], the following packages have
remaining broken dependencies (package maintainers BCC'd to this email):

   Package(co)maintainers

CableSwig mrceresa
apache-scout  goldmann
hbase rrati, coolsvap, moceap
moon-buggyrobert
netbeans-platform moceap, dbhole, omajid
nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy ralph
oat   gwei3
oozie rrati, coolsvap, moceap
openstack-heat-gbprkukura
openstack-neutron-gbp rkukura
openstack-swift   zaitcev, apevec, derekh, hguemar, itamarjp, jsteffan, 
ke4qqq, mmagr, russellb
pure  salimma, cicku
pyjigdo   kanarip, jsteffan
python-django-horizon-gbp rkukura
python-fiat   fab
spark willb
vdr-live  martinkg
vfrnavsailer


Impacted dependant packages that would get retired together with the
packages above:

Depending on: apache-scout (2)
wildfly (maintained by: goldmann)
wildfly-8.1.0-3.fc22.src requires apache-scout = 1.2.6-11.fc21

eclipse-jbosstools (maintained by: galileo, goldmann, 
group::eclipse-sig)
eclipse-jbosstools-4.2.2-1.fc22.src requires wildfly = 
8.1.0-3.fc22
eclipse-jbosstools-as-4.2.2-1.fc22.noarch requires wildfly = 
8.1.0-3.fc22


Depending on: hbase (2)
pig (maintained by: pmackinn, coolsvap, java-sig, moceap)
pig-0.13.0-1.fc21.noarch requires hbase = 0.98.3-4.fc22
pig-0.13.0-1.fc21.src requires hbase = 0.98.3-4.fc22

hive (maintained by: pmackinn, coolsvap, java-sig, moceap)
hive-0.12.0-5.fc22.src requires pig = 0.13.0-1.fc21


Depending on: openstack-swift (1)
openstack-swift-plugin-swift3 (maintained by: zaitcev, apevec, itamarjp)

openstack-swift-plugin-swift3-1.7-6.20150601git69f94393.fc23.noarch requires 
openstack-swift = 2.3.0-2.fc23


Depending on: pure (1)
pure-glpk (maintained by: cicku)
pure-glpk-0.5-1.fc23.i686 requires libpure.so.8
pure-glpk-0.5-1.fc23.src requires pure-devel = 0.62-2.fc22

[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-October/215350.html

--
Kalev
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

2015-10-05 Thread Kalev Lember 
On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi Kalev,
> 
>  
> 
> i am the packager of the package vdr-live  (martinkg).
> 
>  
> 
> vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
> On x86_64:
> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires
> libtntnet.so.12()(64bit)
> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires
> libcxxtools.so.9()(64bit)
> On i386:
> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libtntnet.so.12
> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libcxxtools.so.9
> On armhfp:
> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libtntnet.so.12
> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libcxxtools.so.9
> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> 
>  
> 
> vdr-live depends on the 2 packages
> 
> tntnet-2.3rc1-1.fc23
> 
> 
> cxxtools-2.3rc1-1.fc23
> 
> 
>  
> 
> can you please delete this 2 packages, because there is no vdr-live
> package available that compiles against the new tntnet/cxxtools-2.3 version,
> 
> but vdr-live compiles fine against tntnet/cxxtools-2.2.

Hi Martin,

It's actually self-service if you want to do it yourself before the cut
off date:

fedpkg retire "Reasons for retirement here"

... and repeat it on both f23 and master branches.

-- 
Hope this helps,
Kalev
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

2015-10-05 Thread Vít Ondruch 
Dne 5.10.2015 v 17:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
>> Hi Kalev,
>>
>>  
>>
>> i am the packager of the package vdr-live  (martinkg).
>>
>>  
>>
>> vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
>> On x86_64:
>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires
>> libtntnet.so.12()(64bit)
>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires
>> libcxxtools.so.9()(64bit)
>> On i386:
>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libtntnet.so.12
>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libcxxtools.so.9
>> On armhfp:
>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libtntnet.so.12
>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libcxxtools.so.9
>> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
>>
>>  
>>
>> vdr-live depends on the 2 packages
>>
>> tntnet-2.3rc1-1.fc23
>> 
>>
>> cxxtools-2.3rc1-1.fc23
>> 
>>
>>  
>>
>> can you please delete this 2 packages, because there is no vdr-live
>> package available that compiles against the new tntnet/cxxtools-2.3 version,
>>
>> but vdr-live compiles fine against tntnet/cxxtools-2.2.
> Hi Martin,
>
> It's actually self-service if you want to do it yourself before the cut
> off date:
>
> fedpkg retire "Reasons for retirement here"
>
> ... and repeat it on both f23 and master branches.
>

I don't think he want's to retire the packages, but revert from 2.3rc1
back to 2.2  this is possible but it will need epoch bump ... but I
might be wrong in interpretation :)


Vít
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

2015-10-05 Thread Mattias Ellert 
mån 2015-10-05 klockan 14:59 +0200 skrev Kalev Lember:
> Hi all,
> 
> Here's another look at F23 broken dependencies. A number of packages
> have been fixed last week, but there's also a new broken dependency,
> CableSwig, due to gccxml retirement.

There is a replacement for gccxml available called castxml, which does
mostly the same thing. It is however not a drop-in replacement, since
the name of the binary is different and it has different command line
options, so the castxml package (available in Fedora 23 and rawhide)
does not Provide: gccxml.

The castxml binary has a --castxml-gccxml option which creates output
compatible with the old gccxml, so adapting to use castxml should not
be terribly complicated.

Mattias




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct