On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 01:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
> > 2) juffed was broken by
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14301/ . Interestingly
> > enough the update passed the Taskatron depcheck test there, even though it
> > created a new broken dependency in the repo.
>
> The Taskatron depcheck appears to be broken or incomplete: It might be
> effective at checking whether the new package has any broken dependencies,
> but it definitely does not appear to check whether the update breaks OTHER
> packages' dependencies (at least I've seen 2 instances where it didn't catch
> that, and this is the third). The old AutoQA got that right.
http://tirfa.com/current-state-of-depcheck-and-paths-forward.html
I'm sort-of volunteered to write the approach I suggested in a comment
as a new test, but it's going to have to wait until at least post-f21.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
