Re: Unretiring the tolua++ package

2019-10-11 Thread Hans de Goede

Hi,

On 10/11/19 1:20 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 11. 10. 19 12:11, Hans de Goede wrote:

Hi All,

Per the 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to
unretire tolua++:  https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895

tolua++ was retired as part of the recent semi-automated retiring of packages
which FTBFS, but I just found out that we still have several libraries depending
on it and then a bunch of packages depending on these libraries. So currently we
have a bunch of broken deps in the F31 repo.

Therefore I have requested to become the owner of the tolua++ package and to
unretire tolua++, I will take care of the FTBFS issue.

Note the depending packages were not listed in the orphan reports to the devel 
list,
likely due to this dnf bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760772



No dependent packages were listed in the orphan reports because the packages 
were not orphaned.

See:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8599


Ah I see, I've added a comment to the releng issue.

Regards,

Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Unretiring the tolua++ package

2019-10-11 Thread Miro Hrončok

On 11. 10. 19 12:11, Hans de Goede wrote:

Hi All,

Per the 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package 


procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to
unretire tolua++:  https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895

tolua++ was retired as part of the recent semi-automated retiring of packages
which FTBFS, but I just found out that we still have several libraries depending
on it and then a bunch of packages depending on these libraries. So currently we
have a bunch of broken deps in the F31 repo.

Therefore I have requested to become the owner of the tolua++ package and to
unretire tolua++, I will take care of the FTBFS issue.

Note the depending packages were not listed in the orphan reports to the devel 
list,

likely due to this dnf bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760772



No dependent packages were listed in the orphan reports because the packages 
were not orphaned.


See:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8599

And:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NKFYAWL4GWYR37C6XA63JMNBZYEM6BI3/

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Unretiring the tolua++ package

2019-10-11 Thread Hans de Goede

Hi All,

Per the 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to
unretire tolua++:  https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895

tolua++ was retired as part of the recent semi-automated retiring of packages
which FTBFS, but I just found out that we still have several libraries depending
on it and then a bunch of packages depending on these libraries. So currently we
have a bunch of broken deps in the F31 repo.

Therefore I have requested to become the owner of the tolua++ package and to
unretire tolua++, I will take care of the FTBFS issue.

Note the depending packages were not listed in the orphan reports to the devel 
list,
likely due to this dnf bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760772

Regards,

Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Unretiring the tolua++ package

2019-10-11 Thread Hans de Goede

Hi All,

Per the 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to
unretire tolua++:  https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895

tolua++ was retired as part of the recent semi-automated retiring of packages
which FTBFS, but I just found out that we still have several libraries depending
on it and then a bunch of packages depending on these libraries. So currently we
have a bunch of broken deps in the F31 repo.

Therefore I have requested to become the owner of the tolua++ package and to
unretire tolua++, I will take care of the FTBFS issue.

Note the depending packages were not listed in the orphan reports to the devel 
list,
likely due to this dnf bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760772

Regards,

Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org