Re: buildroot size growth
Dne 13. 01. 22 v 13:23 Pavel Březina napsal(a): On 1/12/22 16:33, Vít Ondruch wrote: I have reported this here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039869 Should be fixed now with authselect-1.3.0-7.fc36. Just quickly fired some scratch build and we are down to 149 packages: ~~~ DEBUG util.py:446: Install 149 Packages DEBUG util.py:446: Total download size: 51 M DEBUG util.py:446: Installed size: 183 M ~~~ Which is even better then where we started. So thx Pavel and thx to whoever else reduced the buildroot content in the mean time. Vít [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9719/81189719/root.log OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: buildroot size growth
On 1/12/22 16:33, Vít Ondruch wrote: I have reported this here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039869 Should be fixed now with authselect-1.3.0-7.fc36. Vít Dne 05. 01. 22 v 11:30 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:25:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: One of the packages which caught my attention and previously was not installed is systemd (there always were just systemd-libs). So is systemd to blame or is it something else? I think the difference is that authselect is now pulled in. authselect pulls in authselect-libs, which pulls in systemd, which I think pulls in the other things. The reason authselect gets pulled in is that pam now requires it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pam/c/ff21ecd19213fce0570d448831d21f66db6abc2c?branch=rawhide that change landed in Rawhide in pam-1.5.2-8.fc36, which was built late on December 9th, and so likely appeared in the December 10th compose. This is unfortunate as it most likely affects not just the buildroot but also other types of minimal installs. I think the best place to cut this dependency chain would be in authselect-libs: it should not require systemd. What exactly does it need from systemd? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: buildroot size growth
I have reported this here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039869 Vít Dne 05. 01. 22 v 11:30 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:25:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: One of the packages which caught my attention and previously was not installed is systemd (there always were just systemd-libs). So is systemd to blame or is it something else? I think the difference is that authselect is now pulled in. authselect pulls in authselect-libs, which pulls in systemd, which I think pulls in the other things. The reason authselect gets pulled in is that pam now requires it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pam/c/ff21ecd19213fce0570d448831d21f66db6abc2c?branch=rawhide that change landed in Rawhide in pam-1.5.2-8.fc36, which was built late on December 9th, and so likely appeared in the December 10th compose. This is unfortunate as it most likely affects not just the buildroot but also other types of minimal installs. I think the best place to cut this dependency chain would be in authselect-libs: it should not require systemd. What exactly does it need from systemd? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: buildroot size growth
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:25:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > One of the packages which caught my attention and previously was not > > installed is systemd (there always were just systemd-libs). So is > > systemd to blame or is it something else? > > I think the difference is that authselect is now pulled in. authselect > pulls in authselect-libs, which pulls in systemd, which I think pulls > in the other things. > > The reason authselect gets pulled in is that pam now requires it: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pam/c/ff21ecd19213fce0570d448831d21f66db6abc2c?branch=rawhide > > that change landed in Rawhide in pam-1.5.2-8.fc36, which was built late > on December 9th, and so likely appeared in the December 10th compose. This is unfortunate as it most likely affects not just the buildroot but also other types of minimal installs. I think the best place to cut this dependency chain would be in authselect-libs: it should not require systemd. What exactly does it need from systemd? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: buildroot size growth
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > It seems that Rawhide buildroot has grown some dependencies between 10th > and 23rd of December. > > The last official build of Ruby I did [1] installs 152 packages: > > ~~~ > > DEBUG util.py:446: Install 152 Packages > DEBUG util.py:446: Total download size: 59 M > DEBUG util.py:446: Installed size: 231 M > > ~~~ > > > While scratch build [2] done by Koschei on Dec 23 already installs 169 > packages: > > > ~~~ > > DEBUG util.py:446: Install 169 Packages > DEBUG util.py:446: Total download size: 65 M > DEBUG util.py:446: Installed size: 250 M > > ~~~ > > > One of the packages which caught my attention and previously was not > installed is systemd (there always were just systemd-libs). So is > systemd to blame or is it something else? I think the difference is that authselect is now pulled in. authselect pulls in authselect-libs, which pulls in systemd, which I think pulls in the other things. The reason authselect gets pulled in is that pam now requires it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pam/c/ff21ecd19213fce0570d448831d21f66db6abc2c?branch=rawhide that change landed in Rawhide in pam-1.5.2-8.fc36, which was built late on December 9th, and so likely appeared in the December 10th compose. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
buildroot size growth
It seems that Rawhide buildroot has grown some dependencies between 10th and 23rd of December. The last official build of Ruby I did [1] installs 152 packages: ~~~ DEBUG util.py:446: Install 152 Packages DEBUG util.py:446: Total download size: 59 M DEBUG util.py:446: Installed size: 231 M ~~~ While scratch build [2] done by Koschei on Dec 23 already installs 169 packages: ~~~ DEBUG util.py:446: Install 169 Packages DEBUG util.py:446: Total download size: 65 M DEBUG util.py:446: Installed size: 250 M ~~~ One of the packages which caught my attention and previously was not installed is systemd (there always were just systemd-libs). So is systemd to blame or is it something else? Vít [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ruby/3.0.3/155.fc36/data/logs/x86_64/root.log [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3061/80383061/root.log OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
