Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
Thanks to all! Yesterday I took a couple of days of vacation and I'll rebuild my broken packages (gdcm,insight toolkit and libigtl) on monday. Best, Mario On Aug 7, 2013 4:15 PM, Than Ngo t...@redhat.com wrote: ** the bug is fixed in new texlive, it will be available soon in rawhide. big thanks to niels philipp for the fix! Than - Original Message - could you please open a bug in bugzilla? i will take a look at this. Than, Jan referenced this FTBFS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992788 Jaroslav thanks, Than Dear all, I'm trying to fix gdcm FTBFS and it seems that there is something broken with texlive in rawhide: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/691/5780691/root.log -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) --- For now I built without it but that means no pdf doc and no vtk support so I would like to fix that. Thanks for any help you might provide, With best regards, Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. I really hope the next mantainer can manage a 14 mb spec file :) In Mandriva I did a work very similar to current Fedora texlive, but I did create almost 3k packages so that could update only was really required; it should be possible to live with around 1.6k packages, but I preferred to let upstream handle dependencies, and match 1 to 1 upstream packages (http://mirrors.ctan.org/systems/texlive/tlnet/archive). But, I am still to start updating it again, now in OpenMandriva, was just left in a stable state as of like 6 months ago... But something like that would not be viable in Fedora, if needing a review request and approval for every small package... The single SRPM was sold as a *feature* when 2012 was added: The centralized packaging (i.e. everything is generated and built form single SRPM) also allows simpler maintenance than having several thousands separate TeX packages. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive When I had occasion to look at how texlive is built a few months back it struck me as the most hideous packaging thing I've ever come across, but that's just MHO. In case anyone isn't aware: you're not even supposed to manage the 14MB spec file, you are supposed to manage the C code and ersatz build system which *generates* the 14MB spec file. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/texlive.git/tree/tl2rpm.c - I have to admit, when I was trying to fix a bug, I could never get to the point of getting that to compile and spit out the .spec file at all. I think you're supposed to run http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/texlive.git/tree/b_one_srpm , but it failed in weird ways, for me. I would be hoping with the maintainers departure from Red Hat he might have handed over both the package and the knowledge to one of his team members... Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
- Original Message - On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:38:27 +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote: -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) --- I have the same error building GDB. There is F-20 mass-rebuild FTBFS for texlive itself: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992788 Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. Than is the new textlive maintainer and I'm sure he's already working on it. Jaroslav Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
could you please open a bug in bugzilla? i will take a look at this. thanks, Than Dear all,I'm trying to fix gdcm FTBFS and it seems that there is something broken with texlive in rawhide: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/691/5780691/root.log[1] For now I built without it but that means no pdf doc and no vtk support so I would like to fix that. Thanks for any help you might provide, With best regards, Mario [1] http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/691/5780691/root.log -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
- Original Message - could you please open a bug in bugzilla? i will take a look at this. Than, Jan referenced this FTBFS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992788 Jaroslav thanks, Than Dear all, I'm trying to fix gdcm FTBFS and it seems that there is something broken with texlive in rawhide: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/691/5780691/root.log -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) --- For now I built without it but that means no pdf doc and no vtk support so I would like to fix that. Thanks for any help you might provide, With best regards, Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
the bug is fixed in new texlive, it will be available soon in rawhide. big thanks to niels philipp for the fix! Than - Original Message - could you please open a bug in bugzilla? i will take a look at this. Than, Jan referenced this FTBFS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992788 Jaroslav thanks, Than Dear all, I'm trying to fix gdcm FTBFS and it seems that there is something broken with texlive in rawhide: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/691/5780691/root.log -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) --- For now I built without it but that means no pdf doc and no vtk support so I would like to fix that. Thanks for any help you might provide, With best regards, Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:38:27 +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote: -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) --- I have the same error building GDB. There is F-20 mass-rebuild FTBFS for texlive itself: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992788 Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
On 6 August 2013 17:38, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote: Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. I really hope the next mantainer can manage a 14 mb spec file :) Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
2013/8/6 Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com: On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:38:27 +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote: -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) --- I have the same error building GDB. I am also waiting for it to be fixed, and guess there are plenty others :-( There is F-20 mass-rebuild FTBFS for texlive itself: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992788 Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. Appears to be not too difficult to correct: DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 DEBUG util.py:264: Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:264: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1 Just ensure provides/requires match and resubmit it? Jan Paulo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
2013/8/6 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com: On 6 August 2013 17:38, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote: Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. I really hope the next mantainer can manage a 14 mb spec file :) In Mandriva I did a work very similar to current Fedora texlive, but I did create almost 3k packages so that could update only was really required; it should be possible to live with around 1.6k packages, but I preferred to let upstream handle dependencies, and match 1 to 1 upstream packages (http://mirrors.ctan.org/systems/texlive/tlnet/archive). But, I am still to start updating it again, now in OpenMandriva, was just left in a stable state as of like 6 months ago... But something like that would not be viable in Fedora, if needing a review request and approval for every small package... Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ Paulo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:16 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: 2013/8/6 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com: On 6 August 2013 17:38, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote: Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. I really hope the next mantainer can manage a 14 mb spec file :) In Mandriva I did a work very similar to current Fedora texlive, but I did create almost 3k packages so that could update only was really required; it should be possible to live with around 1.6k packages, but I preferred to let upstream handle dependencies, and match 1 to 1 upstream packages (http://mirrors.ctan.org/systems/texlive/tlnet/archive). But, I am still to start updating it again, now in OpenMandriva, was just left in a stable state as of like 6 months ago... But something like that would not be viable in Fedora, if needing a review request and approval for every small package... The single SRPM was sold as a *feature* when 2012 was added: The centralized packaging (i.e. everything is generated and built form single SRPM) also allows simpler maintenance than having several thousands separate TeX packages. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive When I had occasion to look at how texlive is built a few months back it struck me as the most hideous packaging thing I've ever come across, but that's just MHO. In case anyone isn't aware: you're not even supposed to manage the 14MB spec file, you are supposed to manage the C code and ersatz build system which *generates* the 14MB spec file. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/texlive.git/tree/tl2rpm.c - I have to admit, when I was trying to fix a bug, I could never get to the point of getting that to compile and spit out the .spec file at all. I think you're supposed to run http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/texlive.git/tree/b_one_srpm , but it failed in weird ways, for me. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?
Dear all, I'm trying to fix gdcm FTBFS and it seems that there is something broken with texlive in rawhide: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/691/5780691/root.log -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20 Installing: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) --- For now I built without it but that means no pdf doc and no vtk support so I would like to fix that. Thanks for any help you might provide, With best regards, Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
