Re: libbluray soname bump
On 03/17/2017 12:31 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > On 17/03/2017 12:26, Kalev Lember wrote: >> Thanks. I've kicked off a gvfs rebuilt for rawhide now. >> >> Would you mind if I include the libblueray F26 update in the next week's >> upcoming GNOME 3.24.0 megaupdate? This way it's much easier to >> coordinate the soname bump as we already have a gvfs update in >> updates-testing and there's a new update coming next week and in the >> mean time we can't get anything pushed stable because of the ongoing >> Alpha freeze. >> >> Just do the libblueray build for F26 please and I can take care of the >> rest :) >> > Thanks Kalev, I gladly take the offer. > > libbluray-1.0.0-1.fc26 is built. > No need for a buildroot override nor anything else ? Great, thanks. No need for a buildroot override. I've tagged the libblueray build over to f26-gnome side tag where we'll be preparing the 3.24.0 update and that should be all that's needed for now. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libbluray soname bump
On 17/03/2017 12:26, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 03/17/2017 12:04 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: >> On 09/03/2017 17:38, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: >>> Am 09.03.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Xavier Bachelot: oops, with the proper fedora devel mail now... On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early > enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname > bump. This is a critical path package. > > According to repoquery, the following packages will need to be rebuild : > > In Fedora : > - gvfs > > In RPM Fusion : > - ffmpeg > - mplayer > - mpv > - vdr-xineliboutput > - vlc > - xine-lib > > I can take care of the rebuilds for RPM Fusion, but I don't have enough > privileges to do the same for gvfs in Fedora, so it will need to be > coordinated with gvfs maintainer(s). > > RPM Fusion maintainers, let me know if you want me to either take care > of the rebuild or leave it to me. > > Shall you have anything to discuss about this update, feel free to reach > out to me by mail or irc (xavierb on freenode). > > Regards, > Xavier > >>> >>> Well, I'm a provenpackager and can take care of rebuilding gvfs for >>> Fedora. Just let me know, when you updated libblueray. >> >> Thanks Björn, I've rebuilt libbluray for rawhide, please proceed with >> gvfs rebuild at your earlier convenience. >> >> I will follow up with f26 and request a buildroot override. > > Thanks. I've kicked off a gvfs rebuilt for rawhide now. > > Would you mind if I include the libblueray F26 update in the next week's > upcoming GNOME 3.24.0 megaupdate? This way it's much easier to > coordinate the soname bump as we already have a gvfs update in > updates-testing and there's a new update coming next week and in the > mean time we can't get anything pushed stable because of the ongoing > Alpha freeze. > > Just do the libblueray build for F26 please and I can take care of the > rest :) > Thanks Kalev, I gladly take the offer. libbluray-1.0.0-1.fc26 is built. No need for a buildroot override nor anything else ? Regards, Xavier ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libbluray soname bump
On 03/17/2017 12:04 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > On 09/03/2017 17:38, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: >> Am 09.03.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Xavier Bachelot: >>> oops, with the proper fedora devel mail now... >>> >>> On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname bump. This is a critical path package. According to repoquery, the following packages will need to be rebuild : In Fedora : - gvfs In RPM Fusion : - ffmpeg - mplayer - mpv - vdr-xineliboutput - vlc - xine-lib I can take care of the rebuilds for RPM Fusion, but I don't have enough privileges to do the same for gvfs in Fedora, so it will need to be coordinated with gvfs maintainer(s). RPM Fusion maintainers, let me know if you want me to either take care of the rebuild or leave it to me. Shall you have anything to discuss about this update, feel free to reach out to me by mail or irc (xavierb on freenode). Regards, Xavier >>> >> >> Well, I'm a provenpackager and can take care of rebuilding gvfs for >> Fedora. Just let me know, when you updated libblueray. > > Thanks Björn, I've rebuilt libbluray for rawhide, please proceed with > gvfs rebuild at your earlier convenience. > > I will follow up with f26 and request a buildroot override. Thanks. I've kicked off a gvfs rebuilt for rawhide now. Would you mind if I include the libblueray F26 update in the next week's upcoming GNOME 3.24.0 megaupdate? This way it's much easier to coordinate the soname bump as we already have a gvfs update in updates-testing and there's a new update coming next week and in the mean time we can't get anything pushed stable because of the ongoing Alpha freeze. Just do the libblueray build for F26 please and I can take care of the rest :) Thanks, Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libbluray soname bump
On 09/03/2017 17:38, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 09.03.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Xavier Bachelot: >> oops, with the proper fedora devel mail now... >> >> On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early >>> enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname >>> bump. This is a critical path package. >>> >>> According to repoquery, the following packages will need to be rebuild : >>> >>> In Fedora : >>> - gvfs >>> >>> In RPM Fusion : >>> - ffmpeg >>> - mplayer >>> - mpv >>> - vdr-xineliboutput >>> - vlc >>> - xine-lib >>> >>> I can take care of the rebuilds for RPM Fusion, but I don't have enough >>> privileges to do the same for gvfs in Fedora, so it will need to be >>> coordinated with gvfs maintainer(s). >>> >>> RPM Fusion maintainers, let me know if you want me to either take care >>> of the rebuild or leave it to me. >>> >>> Shall you have anything to discuss about this update, feel free to reach >>> out to me by mail or irc (xavierb on freenode). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Xavier >>> >> > > Well, I'm a provenpackager and can take care of rebuilding gvfs for > Fedora. Just let me know, when you updated libblueray. Thanks Björn, I've rebuilt libbluray for rawhide, please proceed with gvfs rebuild at your earlier convenience. I will follow up with f26 and request a buildroot override. Regards, Xavier ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libbluray soname bump
Am 09.03.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Xavier Bachelot: oops, with the proper fedora devel mail now... On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname bump. This is a critical path package. According to repoquery, the following packages will need to be rebuild : In Fedora : - gvfs In RPM Fusion : - ffmpeg - mplayer - mpv - vdr-xineliboutput - vlc - xine-lib I can take care of the rebuilds for RPM Fusion, but I don't have enough privileges to do the same for gvfs in Fedora, so it will need to be coordinated with gvfs maintainer(s). RPM Fusion maintainers, let me know if you want me to either take care of the rebuild or leave it to me. Shall you have anything to discuss about this update, feel free to reach out to me by mail or irc (xavierb on freenode). Regards, Xavier Well, I'm a provenpackager and can take care of rebuilding gvfs for Fedora. Just let me know, when you updated libblueray. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libbluray soname bump
oops, with the proper fedora devel mail now... On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname bump. This is a critical path package. According to repoquery, the following packages will need to be rebuild : In Fedora : - gvfs In RPM Fusion : - ffmpeg - mplayer - mpv - vdr-xineliboutput - vlc - xine-lib I can take care of the rebuilds for RPM Fusion, but I don't have enough privileges to do the same for gvfs in Fedora, so it will need to be coordinated with gvfs maintainer(s). RPM Fusion maintainers, let me know if you want me to either take care of the rebuild or leave it to me. Shall you have anything to discuss about this update, feel free to reach out to me by mail or irc (xavierb on freenode). Regards, Xavier ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libbluray soname bump
W dniu 07.03.2012 10:13, Xavier Bachelot pisze: > On 03/06/2012 11:49 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname >>> was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's >>> incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've >>> made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so >>> Fedora/RPM Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild. >>> >>> I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the >>> updated package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active >>> releases ( F-16, F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that >>> upstream is ready to push releases, I think it will be easier to keep >>> the package in good shape if we follow them. >>> >>> Affected packages are as follow : >>> >>> For F17 and F16 : >>> gvfs(fedora) >>> mplayer (rpmfusion-free) >>> xbmc(rpmfusion-free) >>> >>> For F15 : >>> mplayer (rpmfusion-free) >>> xbmc(rpmfusion-free) >>> >>> EL-6 doesn't have any affected package. >>> >>> Please let me know if you're ok with that, and I'll proceed with the >>> builds and the build overrides request. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Xavier >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> So what happened with pushing libbluray to older Fedora branches? I am >> fine with rebuilding mplayer, do other apps rebuild cleanly? >> > > gvfs was rebuilding fine against either the older or the newer API and > the maintainer was ok to rebuild. > > xbmc 10.1 needed some patches. They were applied. They are not needed > for xbmc 11, so depending on the version in F16 and F15, they might > still need to be applied. The maintainer was ok with rebuilding too. See > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011019.html > > > mplayer needed a patch too, but it wasn't applied. The patch might not > be needed anymore as mplayer has been updated to a more recent snapshot. > See > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011017.html > > > The whole discussion is in rpmfusion-devel archives : > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/010981.html > > > The vlc maintainer was looking at pushing vlc 2.0 to F16 and maybe F15 > too. This release can use libbluray. > > For completeness, xine-lib 1.2 and xine-lib 1.1.21 can also use > libbluray. 1.1.21 is not released yet and I'm not sure what the state of > xine-lib in Fedora/RPM Fusion is at the moment anyway. An update to 1.2 > for F17 was discussed, but this version cannot be easily split into a > patent-free and a patent-encumbered package, so that will need to be in > RPM Fusion and it will drag a couple other packages too. > > Regards, > Xavier OK, so basically everything which depends on libbluray *currently* can be patched and rebuilt. Shall we do the update then? I can take care of applying the patch to mplayer since I am its new co-maintainer. Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: libbluray soname bump
On 03/06/2012 11:49 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze: Hi, libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so Fedora/RPM Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild. I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the updated package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active releases ( F-16, F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that upstream is ready to push releases, I think it will be easier to keep the package in good shape if we follow them. Affected packages are as follow : For F17 and F16 : gvfs(fedora) mplayer (rpmfusion-free) xbmc(rpmfusion-free) For F15 : mplayer (rpmfusion-free) xbmc(rpmfusion-free) EL-6 doesn't have any affected package. Please let me know if you're ok with that, and I'll proceed with the builds and the build overrides request. Regards, Xavier So what happened with pushing libbluray to older Fedora branches? I am fine with rebuilding mplayer, do other apps rebuild cleanly? gvfs was rebuilding fine against either the older or the newer API and the maintainer was ok to rebuild. xbmc 10.1 needed some patches. They were applied. They are not needed for xbmc 11, so depending on the version in F16 and F15, they might still need to be applied. The maintainer was ok with rebuilding too. See http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011019.html mplayer needed a patch too, but it wasn't applied. The patch might not be needed anymore as mplayer has been updated to a more recent snapshot. See http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011017.html The whole discussion is in rpmfusion-devel archives : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/010981.html The vlc maintainer was looking at pushing vlc 2.0 to F16 and maybe F15 too. This release can use libbluray. For completeness, xine-lib 1.2 and xine-lib 1.1.21 can also use libbluray. 1.1.21 is not released yet and I'm not sure what the state of xine-lib in Fedora/RPM Fusion is at the moment anyway. An update to 1.2 for F17 was discussed, but this version cannot be easily split into a patent-free and a patent-encumbered package, so that will need to be in RPM Fusion and it will drag a couple other packages too. Regards, Xavier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: libbluray soname bump
W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze: > Hi, > > libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname > was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's > incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've > made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so > Fedora/RPM Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild. > > I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the > updated package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active > releases ( F-16, F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that > upstream is ready to push releases, I think it will be easier to keep > the package in good shape if we follow them. > > Affected packages are as follow : > > For F17 and F16 : > gvfs(fedora) > mplayer (rpmfusion-free) > xbmc(rpmfusion-free) > > For F15 : > mplayer (rpmfusion-free) > xbmc(rpmfusion-free) > > EL-6 doesn't have any affected package. > > Please let me know if you're ok with that, and I'll proceed with the > builds and the build overrides request. > > Regards, > Xavier > > > > > So what happened with pushing libbluray to older Fedora branches? I am fine with rebuilding mplayer, do other apps rebuild cleanly? Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
libbluray soname bump
Hi, libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so Fedora/RPM Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild. I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the updated package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active releases ( F-16, F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that upstream is ready to push releases, I think it will be easier to keep the package in good shape if we follow them. Affected packages are as follow : For F17 and F16 : gvfs(fedora) mplayer (rpmfusion-free) xbmc(rpmfusion-free) For F15 : mplayer (rpmfusion-free) xbmc(rpmfusion-free) EL-6 doesn't have any affected package. Please let me know if you're ok with that, and I'll proceed with the builds and the build overrides request. Regards, Xavier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
