Re: mingw pkgconfig reqs/provides
On 5/5/23 10:20, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:14 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: I've submitted a test version of autogenerating mingw pkgconfig provides and reqs here: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2504 This generates provides like: Provides: mingw32(libtiff-5.dll) mingw32(libtiffxx-5.dll) mingw32-libtiff = 4.4.0-2.fc39 mingw32-pkgconfig(libtiff-4) = 4.4.0 Provides: mingw64(libtiff-5.dll) mingw64(libtiffxx-5.dll) mingw64-libtiff = 4.4.0-2.fc39 mingw64-pkgconfig(libtiff-4) = 4.4.0 I think it would probably make sense to have that as part of the mingw-filesystem package for each mingw type (w32, ucrt, w64, etc.) rather than in the rpm pkgconfigdeps generator upstream. Otherwise it's a great idea! Thanks for the info. Filed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-filesystem/pull-request/11 I think we'll need to run for a release before adding the corresponding requires (if desired). -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: mingw pkgconfig reqs/provides
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:14 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I've submitted a test version of autogenerating mingw pkgconfig provides > and reqs here: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2504 > > This generates provides like: > > Provides: mingw32(libtiff-5.dll) mingw32(libtiffxx-5.dll) > mingw32-libtiff = 4.4.0-2.fc39 mingw32-pkgconfig(libtiff-4) = 4.4.0 > > Provides: mingw64(libtiff-5.dll) mingw64(libtiffxx-5.dll) > mingw64-libtiff = 4.4.0-2.fc39 mingw64-pkgconfig(libtiff-4) = 4.4.0 > I think it would probably make sense to have that as part of the mingw-filesystem package for each mingw type (w32, ucrt, w64, etc.) rather than in the rpm pkgconfigdeps generator upstream. Otherwise it's a great idea! -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
mingw pkgconfig reqs/provides
I've submitted a test version of autogenerating mingw pkgconfig provides and reqs here: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2504 This generates provides like: Provides: mingw32(libtiff-5.dll) mingw32(libtiffxx-5.dll) mingw32-libtiff = 4.4.0-2.fc39 mingw32-pkgconfig(libtiff-4) = 4.4.0 Provides: mingw64(libtiff-5.dll) mingw64(libtiffxx-5.dll) mingw64-libtiff = 4.4.0-2.fc39 mingw64-pkgconfig(libtiff-4) = 4.4.0 Thoughts? -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
