Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs (2nd attempt)
W dniu 11.09.2010 20:53, Julian Sikorski pisze: Dear all, I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the updates myself on a fedorapeople repo [3].In the bug report, all responses were positive - I assume other maintainers don't care. Even debian has a newer version right now [4]. It seems that Thomas' last bugzilla activity was on 24th May, and he was not responding to my later emails either. My application for comaintainership is left untouched as well. I'm not sure if this qualifies for the fast track procedure, but the long lack of response might favour that. Thomas, if you can read this, please accept my twisted co-maintainership, and I'll be happy to reduce your burden. Regards, Julian [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/131415 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572372 [3] http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/belegdol/twisted/ [4] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/python-twisted After giving it some thought, I decided to go for fast track process: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/463 Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs (2nd attempt)
Dear all, I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the updates myself on a fedorapeople repo [3]. In the bug report, all responses were positive - I assume other maintainers don't care. It seems that Thomas' last bugzilla activity was on 24th May, and he was not responding to my later emails either. My application for comaintainership is left untouched as well. I'm not sure if this qualifies for the fast track procedure, but the long lack of response might favour that. Thomas, if you can read this, please accept my twisted co-maintainership, and I'll be happy to reduce your burden. Regards, Julian [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/131415 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572372 [3] http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/belegdol/twisted/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs (2nd attempt)
Dear all, I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the updates myself on a fedorapeople repo [3].In the bug report, all responses were positive - I assume other maintainers don't care. Even debian has a newer version right now [4]. It seems that Thomas' last bugzilla activity was on 24th May, and he was not responding to my later emails either. My application for comaintainership is left untouched as well. I'm not sure if this qualifies for the fast track procedure, but the long lack of response might favour that. Thomas, if you can read this, please accept my twisted co-maintainership, and I'll be happy to reduce your burden. Regards, Julian [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/131415 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572372 [3] http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/belegdol/twisted/ [4] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/python-twisted -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
W dniu 09.04.2010 11:42, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: Hi, Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? Twisted in general is really good about keeping API, but they do deprecate stuff. When they do so they typically make it clear with DeprecationWarning's. I think it's mostly just a matter of testing the applications using it by someone who knows the application. Just to be clear, we want to do this for F-13 only, right ? Or are you thinking about upgrading F-12 too ? I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, and check if they work at all. Do you have newly built twisted packages ? Then, I think it would be a good idea to bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch I didn't know this was in already; I'm going to assume they're based on my packages from a few months ago but I'll check. elisa-base-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-bad-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-ugly-0:0.5.35-1.fc11.noarch I can check these. flumotion-0:0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64 This is mine, I'll take this. python-desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch Same as desktopcouch above. python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch nevow is another library - not sure if anything else depends on nevow. Thomas Sorry it took so long, but my PhD is very good at keeping me busy. Anyway, I have now updated all packages to 10.0.0. All 9 build, 3 (core, conch and words) required some minor tweaks apart from updating version and release fields. How do we proceed from here? I would suggest building for F-13 testing, and then asking maintainers of dependent packages (by mass mail or bugzilla) to test if their package is still working as expected. What do you think? Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
Hi, Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? Twisted in general is really good about keeping API, but they do deprecate stuff. When they do so they typically make it clear with DeprecationWarning's. I think it's mostly just a matter of testing the applications using it by someone who knows the application. Just to be clear, we want to do this for F-13 only, right ? Or are you thinking about upgrading F-12 too ? I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, and check if they work at all. Do you have newly built twisted packages ? Then, I think it would be a good idea to bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch I didn't know this was in already; I'm going to assume they're based on my packages from a few months ago but I'll check. elisa-base-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-bad-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-ugly-0:0.5.35-1.fc11.noarch I can check these. flumotion-0:0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64 This is mine, I'll take this. python-desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch Same as desktopcouch above. python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch nevow is another library - not sure if anything else depends on nevow. Thomas -- You either earn your keep or you don't get kept. -- Moovida - future TV today ! http://www.moovida.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
W dniu 09.04.2010 11:42, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: Hi, Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? Twisted in general is really good about keeping API, but they do deprecate stuff. When they do so they typically make it clear with DeprecationWarning's. I think it's mostly just a matter of testing the applications using it by someone who knows the application. Just to be clear, we want to do this for F-13 only, right ? Or are you thinking about upgrading F-12 too ? Well, F-13 for sure. Then, depending if hell breaks loose or not, we might think about other branches. I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, and check if they work at all. Do you have newly built twisted packages ? Not yet, but I can try to prepare them over the weekend. Then, I think it would be a good idea to bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch I didn't know this was in already; I'm going to assume they're based on my packages from a few months ago but I'll check. elisa-base-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-bad-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-ugly-0:0.5.35-1.fc11.noarch I can check these. flumotion-0:0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64 This is mine, I'll take this. python-desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch Same as desktopcouch above. python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch nevow is another library - not sure if anything else depends on nevow. Thomas Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:53:10PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 06.04.2010 15:56, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 20:10 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th of March. None of the queries met any response. Should I initiate the non-responsive maintainer process? Hi Julian, I'm still around, but a direct mail to me is the easiest way to get my attention (as I suspect is the case for most developers). I saw you did two weeks ago asking about an update, but that's a different beast then marking me as unresponsive :) I think in general it would be good that when people want to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process, they first of all mail the person involved saying so. For practical reasons contacting me over IRC doesn't always work since I'm on three different machines regularly, and I only check bugzilla stuff once a month relying on getting a mail or poke if something is critical. As for the issue at hand, Twisted is a complex beast to upgrade and validate, so I sure could use help there! I see in the bug report you made a list of current dependendants, we could divide them up and verify them ? Thomas Sorry if I acted to quickly, but the lack of response to my email made me afraid that you might be gone. Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, and check if they work at all. Then, I think it would be a good idea to bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: buildbot-0:0.7.12-1.fc12.noarch cnucnu-0:0-0.3.20100110.fc12.noarch desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch elisa-base-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-bad-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-ugly-0:0.5.35-1.fc11.noarch entertainer-0:0.4.2-7.fc12.noarch flumotion-0:0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64 gadget-0:0.0.3-4.fc12.noarch itaka-0:0.2.2-1.fc12.noarch jabbim-0:0.5-0.12.svn20091030.fc12.noarch londonlaw-0:0.2.1-7.fc12.noarch nwsserver-0:2.0.0-1.fc12.noarch openxcap-0:1.1.2-1.fc12.noarch orbited-0:0.7.10-3.fc12.noarch poker-network-0:1.7.3-3.fc12.noarch postr-0:0.12.3-8.fc12.x86_64 pyicq-t-0:0.8.1.5-5.fc12.noarch pyjigdo-0:0.4.0.1-2.fc12.noarch python-Coherence-0:0.6.4-1.fc12.noarch python-desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch python-foolscap-0:0.4.2-3.fc12.noarch python-gnutls-0:1.1.9-1.fc12.x86_64 python-morbid-0:0.8.7.3-1.fc12.noarch python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch python-pyrad-0:1.1-3.fc12.noarch python-sippy-0:1.0.1-1.fc12.noarch python-wokkel-0:0.6.3-1.fc12.noarch pyutil-0:1.6.1-4.fc12.noarch pywbem-0:0.7.0-3.fc12.noarch rhythmbox-upnp-0:0.12.5-8.fc12.x86_64 supybot-0:0.83.4.1-2.fc12.noarch telepathy-sunshine-0:0.1.6-1.fc12.noarch The python-mwlib package is dependent on twisted-core; will packages like that one be affected too? -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 20:10 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th of March. None of the queries met any response. Should I initiate the non-responsive maintainer process? Hi Julian, I'm still around, but a direct mail to me is the easiest way to get my attention (as I suspect is the case for most developers). I saw you did two weeks ago asking about an update, but that's a different beast then marking me as unresponsive :) I think in general it would be good that when people want to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process, they first of all mail the person involved saying so. For practical reasons contacting me over IRC doesn't always work since I'm on three different machines regularly, and I only check bugzilla stuff once a month relying on getting a mail or poke if something is critical. As for the issue at hand, Twisted is a complex beast to upgrade and validate, so I sure could use help there! I see in the bug report you made a list of current dependendants, we could divide them up and verify them ? Thomas -- I'm alive. I can tell because of the pain. -- GStreamer - bringing multimedia to your desktop http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
W dniu 06.04.2010 15:56, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 20:10 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th of March. None of the queries met any response. Should I initiate the non-responsive maintainer process? Hi Julian, I'm still around, but a direct mail to me is the easiest way to get my attention (as I suspect is the case for most developers). I saw you did two weeks ago asking about an update, but that's a different beast then marking me as unresponsive :) I think in general it would be good that when people want to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process, they first of all mail the person involved saying so. For practical reasons contacting me over IRC doesn't always work since I'm on three different machines regularly, and I only check bugzilla stuff once a month relying on getting a mail or poke if something is critical. As for the issue at hand, Twisted is a complex beast to upgrade and validate, so I sure could use help there! I see in the bug report you made a list of current dependendants, we could divide them up and verify them ? Thomas Sorry if I acted to quickly, but the lack of response to my email made me afraid that you might be gone. Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, and check if they work at all. Then, I think it would be a good idea to bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: buildbot-0:0.7.12-1.fc12.noarch cnucnu-0:0-0.3.20100110.fc12.noarch desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch elisa-base-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-bad-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch elisa-plugins-ugly-0:0.5.35-1.fc11.noarch entertainer-0:0.4.2-7.fc12.noarch flumotion-0:0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64 gadget-0:0.0.3-4.fc12.noarch itaka-0:0.2.2-1.fc12.noarch jabbim-0:0.5-0.12.svn20091030.fc12.noarch londonlaw-0:0.2.1-7.fc12.noarch nwsserver-0:2.0.0-1.fc12.noarch openxcap-0:1.1.2-1.fc12.noarch orbited-0:0.7.10-3.fc12.noarch poker-network-0:1.7.3-3.fc12.noarch postr-0:0.12.3-8.fc12.x86_64 pyicq-t-0:0.8.1.5-5.fc12.noarch pyjigdo-0:0.4.0.1-2.fc12.noarch python-Coherence-0:0.6.4-1.fc12.noarch python-desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch python-foolscap-0:0.4.2-3.fc12.noarch python-gnutls-0:1.1.9-1.fc12.x86_64 python-morbid-0:0.8.7.3-1.fc12.noarch python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch python-pyrad-0:1.1-3.fc12.noarch python-sippy-0:1.0.1-1.fc12.noarch python-wokkel-0:0.6.3-1.fc12.noarch pyutil-0:1.6.1-4.fc12.noarch pywbem-0:0.7.0-3.fc12.noarch rhythmbox-upnp-0:0.12.5-8.fc12.x86_64 supybot-0:0.83.4.1-2.fc12.noarch telepathy-sunshine-0:0.1.6-1.fc12.noarch Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:56 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: For practical reasons contacting me over IRC doesn't always work since I'm on three different machines regularly, and I only check bugzilla Have you considered using an IRC bouncer? I set up Bip (http://bip.t1r.net/ ) a few months back, it's made my IRC-across-multiple-devices life hugely nicer. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:53:10PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, and check if they work at all. Then, I think it would be a good idea to bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: cnucnu-0:0-0.3.20100110.fc12.noarch Cnucnu does not really use twisted so as long as the python import still works, nothing will be broken. Regards Till pgp6A9VdMlYvL.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote: W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze: I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. Felix Maybe Thomas is still active as a morituri upstream, but a quick look through the bugzilla seems to indicate that he has not posted a single comment since October. He filed his last koji build request on 15th November, though - flumotion 0.6.1-1. Do I have to take over Thomas' packages if they get orphaned? I'm not sure I understand the process correctly. Thomas, if you can read this, please respond. You don`t have to take the packages over once they`re orphaned. If you`re the co-maintainer right now, you can take it over, or anyone who feels comfortable with it. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze: I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. Felix Maybe Thomas is still active as a morituri upstream, but a quick look through the bugzilla seems to indicate that he has not posted a single comment since October. He filed his last koji build request on 15th November, though - flumotion 0.6.1-1. Do I have to take over Thomas' packages if they get orphaned? I'm not sure I understand the process correctly. Thomas, if you can read this, please respond. Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
Dear all, it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th of March. None of the queries met any response. Should I initiate the non-responsive maintainer process? Regards, Julian [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562379 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572372 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. Felix -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs
W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze: I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. Felix I tried a couple of times, but we seem to miss one another. Does anyone know another way to contact Thomas? Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
