Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)

[Fabio Valentini]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:43 PM Ankur Sinha  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 12:35:21 GMT, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3.
> > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please?
> > >
> > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663:
> > >   rust-google-cloud-auth
> > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668:
> > >   rust-google-cloud-storage
> > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375:
> > >   rust-taskchampion
> >
> > Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard?
> > If they did, I'd have reviewed them already.
>
> I'm not sure. I don't see anything in the reviews that pops out to
> me. Does the dashboard take the fedora-review-service build status into
> account perhaps? These wouldn't build before because they depended on
> packages that were also in review (the ones you had previously reviewed :)).

Yeah, I see now why.
They're blocked by bugs that are not CLOSED, even though the packages
were already imported.

Fabio
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)

[Cristian Le via devel]

On 2024/09/17 12:35, Fabio Valentini wrote:


On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:

Hi folks,

I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3.
Would anyone like to swap reviews please?

-https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663:
   rust-google-cloud-auth
-https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668:
   rust-google-cloud-storage
-https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375:
   rust-taskchampion

Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard?
If they did, I'd have reviewed them already.
Looks like the commits do not have a `rhbz#...` mesage and the bodhi 
updates do not reference it for closure. I usually use `fbrnch import` 
which makes sure the message is formatted accordingly.

Fabio-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)

[Ankur Sinha]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 12:35:21 GMT, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha  wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3.
> > Would anyone like to swap reviews please?
> >
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663:
> >   rust-google-cloud-auth
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668:
> >   rust-google-cloud-storage
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375:
> >   rust-taskchampion
> 
> Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard?
> If they did, I'd have reviewed them already.

I'm not sure. I don't see anything in the reviews that pops out to
me. Does the dashboard take the fedora-review-service build status into
account perhaps? These wouldn't build before because they depended on
packages that were also in review (the ones you had previously reviewed :)).

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)

[Fabio Valentini]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3.
> Would anyone like to swap reviews please?
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663:
>   rust-google-cloud-auth
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668:
>   rust-google-cloud-storage
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375:
>   rust-taskchampion

Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard?
If they did, I'd have reviewed them already.

Fabio
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi folks,

I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3.
Would anyone like to swap reviews please?

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663:
  rust-google-cloud-auth
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668:
  rust-google-cloud-storage
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375:
  rust-taskchampion

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps (python packages)

[Michal Ambroz]

Hello Peter,
I am taking python-solc-ast.
Please if you can have a look on python-pyxlsb2 
seems I have lost reviewer there - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
id=2246454

Best regards
Michal Ambroz

-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Peter Lemenkov 
Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora 
Datum: 6. 9. 2024 16:07:07
Předmět: Review swaps (python packages)
"Hello! And once again I have a few Python packages queued for
reviewing and I am willing to review yours in return. Come pick your
own one!

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2309362 python-eth_typing - Python types
for type hinting commonly used Ethereum types
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2309366 python-eth_hash - The Ethereum
hashing function
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2309448 python-solc-ast - A tool for
exploring the solc abstract syntax tree

--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of
-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.
fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new
_issue
"-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps (python packages)

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello! And once again I have a few Python packages queued for
reviewing and I am willing to review yours in return. Come pick your
own one!

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2309362 python-eth_typing - Python types
for type hinting commonly used Ethereum types
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2309366 python-eth_hash - The Ethereum
hashing function
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2309448 python-solc-ast - A tool for
exploring the solc abstract syntax tree

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello All! 2-nd try (a first message was sent w/o subject).
I swill have a few packages for Review and I am willing to return a favour.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2304209 - solidity - Object-oriented,
high-level language for implementing smart contracts
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2304178 - python-solcx - Python wrapper
and version management tool for the Solidity compiler
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2304214 - python-cid - Self-describing
content-addressed identifiers
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2304321 - python-ledgerwallet - A
library to control Ledger devices

The last one is tricky. Although it passes the tests a small part of
it isn't going to work without a more recent Google's protobuf library
which is still not available even in Rawhide.


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello!
I've just reviewed a couple of your packages and started reviewing
another one. Could you please grab any of these for review?

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2303653 - python-multibase - Multibase
implementation in Python. Another requirement for Ethereum/IPFS/Web3
stack. Also archived at GitHub but considered stable.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2303776 - python-vvm - Vyper version
manager. What this library does is lets user to download verified and
signed Vyper compiler binaries into user's ~/.vvm directory. Later
user can use these binaries for smart-contracts' reproducible and
verified builds.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2303760 - erlang-rebar3-gpb - A protobuf
compiler for rebar3. This is a Rebar3 plugin intended for Erlang
source code generation from Google protobuffs' protocol definition
files.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2303752 -
erlang-rebar3-riak_pb_msgcodegen - A riak_pb message compiler for
rebar3. LIkewise but for Erlang source code generarion from Riak
so-called message-definitions.


On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 11:59 PM Jerry James  wrote:
>
> I've got some GAP packages awaiting review.  I am willing to swap
> reviews.  Some people are reluctant to review these packages, because
> they are unfamiliar with GAP and the package descriptions sound scary.
> But the spec files are actually quite simple.  Besides, if you review
> one of these, you can go to the pub tonight, turn to the person next
> to you and say, "I don't mean to brag, but today I reviewed a package
> that computes with numerical semigroups and affine semigroups.  It
> wasn't easy, but somebody had to do it."
>
> gap-pkg-kbmag: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277899
> gap-pkg-4ti2interface: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303280
> gap-pkg-normalizinterface: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303281
> gap-pkg-numericalsgps: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303282
> gap-pkg-lins: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303283
>
> These are the GAP packaging guidelines:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/GAP/.  I
> wrote them, so feel free to hit me up with questions.
>
> Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

I've got some GAP packages awaiting review.  I am willing to swap
reviews.  Some people are reluctant to review these packages, because
they are unfamiliar with GAP and the package descriptions sound scary.
But the spec files are actually quite simple.  Besides, if you review
one of these, you can go to the pub tonight, turn to the person next
to you and say, "I don't mean to brag, but today I reviewed a package
that computes with numerical semigroups and affine semigroups.  It
wasn't easy, but somebody had to do it."

gap-pkg-kbmag: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277899
gap-pkg-4ti2interface: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303280
gap-pkg-normalizinterface: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303281
gap-pkg-numericalsgps: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303282
gap-pkg-lins: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303283

These are the GAP packaging guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/GAP/.  I
wrote them, so feel free to hit me up with questions.

Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

More review swaps!

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello All!
I've got a few more reviews to swap. 1st here are Python ones:

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2299988 - python-asn1tools - ASN.1
parsing, encoding and decoding
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302539 python-lazy_load - A
minimalistic interface that allows lazy evaluation
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302726 - python-dataclassy - An
enhanced, tiny reimplementation of dataclasses
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302732 - python-morphys - Smart
conversions between unicode and bytes types

A more complex application is

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2299981 - vyper - Pythonic Smart
Contract Language for the EVM

I would want to say a bit about the latter one. It it considered that
in case of a Ethereum contract  you need a very specific build. This
one isn't very aligned with this deployment strategy. However I
believe that simplifying a smart contract testing/deployment can be
done with this one. Adding this to Fedora simplifies things so I
believe we should consider adding it.

And the last Erlang-related one is this one (Re-review):

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2299656 - erlang-esip - ProcessOne SIP
server component in Erlang
-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps once again.

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello All!
I've got a few packages waiting for review and I am willing to review
yours in return.

First I have two Erlang-related packages. Both passes unit-tests,
builds just fine,

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2299556 - erlang-gpb, a modern Google
Protobuf compiler for Erlang.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2296364 - erlang-hut, yet another one
logging library for Erlang.

Also I have these three Python packages:

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2297640 - python-base58, Base58 and
Base58Check implementation
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293913 - python-lru-dict, A fast and
memory efficient LRU cache
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293503 -
python-pygments-lexer-solidity, Solidity lexer for Pygments

Please choose any of these ones.
-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:22 AM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
> I can do one or both of these OCaml packages if Peter doesn't take
> them.  Just assign them to me in BZ.

Thank you, Rich, but Peter did review them.  I have started the builds
in f41-build-side-92005.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:20 AM Peter Lemenkov  wrote:
> Hello and thanks for the opportunity. I'll review a few of your
> packages. Could you please pick any of these ones and review them
> back?
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293369 - erlang-gun (a HTTP client).
> Unfortunately no %check section for this one yet.
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2294403 - erlang-hyper (a re-review of a
> retired package)
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2295183 - erlang-jose (a re-review of a
> retired package). Unfortunately no %check section either since the
> tests relies on a few packages we don't have in Fedora yet..

Thank you, Peter.  I have reviewed all three.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello and thanks for the opportunity. I'll review a few of your
> packages. Could you please pick any of these ones and review them
> back?
> 
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293369 - erlang-gun (a HTTP client).
> Unfortunately no %check section for this one yet.
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2294403 - erlang-hyper (a re-review of a
> retired package)
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2295183 - erlang-jose (a re-review of a
> retired package). Unfortunately no %check section either since the
> tests relies on a few packages we don't have in Fedora yet..
> 
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:15 AM Jerry James  wrote:
> >
> > I have a few packages needing review.  I am happy to swap reviews or
> > do other packaging chores of comparable complexity for you.
> >
> > These first two are needed to do a large update of the Jane Street
> > OCaml packages.  There is a COPR here with the packages involved:
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/JaneStreet/builds/
> >
> > ocaml-intrinsics-kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294765
> > ocaml-ppxlib-jane: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294766

I can do one or both of these OCaml packages if Peter doesn't take
them.  Just assign them to me in BZ.

Rich.

> > These two are lower priority.  They are additions to our collection of
> > GAP packages.
> >
> > gap-pkg-idrel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277898
> > gap-pkg-kbmag: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277899
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Jerry James
> > http://www.jamezone.org/
> > --
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
> -- 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW

-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello and thanks for the opportunity. I'll review a few of your
packages. Could you please pick any of these ones and review them
back?

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293369 - erlang-gun (a HTTP client).
Unfortunately no %check section for this one yet.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2294403 - erlang-hyper (a re-review of a
retired package)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2295183 - erlang-jose (a re-review of a
retired package). Unfortunately no %check section either since the
tests relies on a few packages we don't have in Fedora yet..

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:15 AM Jerry James  wrote:
>
> I have a few packages needing review.  I am happy to swap reviews or
> do other packaging chores of comparable complexity for you.
>
> These first two are needed to do a large update of the Jane Street
> OCaml packages.  There is a COPR here with the packages involved:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/JaneStreet/builds/
>
> ocaml-intrinsics-kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294765
> ocaml-ppxlib-jane: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294766
>
> These two are lower priority.  They are additions to our collection of
> GAP packages.
>
> gap-pkg-idrel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277898
> gap-pkg-kbmag: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277899
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

I have a few packages needing review.  I am happy to swap reviews or
do other packaging chores of comparable complexity for you.

These first two are needed to do a large update of the Jane Street
OCaml packages.  There is a COPR here with the packages involved:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/JaneStreet/builds/

ocaml-intrinsics-kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294765
ocaml-ppxlib-jane: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294766

These two are lower priority.  They are additions to our collection of
GAP packages.

gap-pkg-idrel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277898
gap-pkg-kbmag: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277899

Thanks,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps anyone?

[Gordon Messmer]

On 2024-06-18 12:56 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:

Is anyone willing to swap reviews?



I haven't conducted any reviews yet, but this is probably a good chance 
to learn.


I can swap for a review of 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276821


--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps anyone?

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello All!
Is anyone willing to swap reviews? I've got the following
Erlang-related.ones. Although the language isn't a popular one the
spec-files are quite clean and simple, packages builds cleanly with
Koji and one of them passed all the tests successfully.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279634 erlang-epgsql -
Erlang PostgreSQL client library. This one requires PostgreSQL set up
and running for tests so they are disabled for now. Re-Review.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279676 Review Request:
erlang-cache_tab - Erlang cache table application. Build and Runtime
dependency for some other libraries. Re-Review.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292962 erlang-ct_helper
- Helper modules for common_test suites. Requires for some other
packages to pass the unit-tests. Unstream doesn't provide any tests
yet.


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Antoine Damhet]

Hi everyone,

I have a few packages awaiting reviews. Off course, I am willing to
exchange (yet I'm still new so be gentle :D ).

Two `pass` related packages:
* An audit plugin for the password store to find leaks or weak
  passwords, written in python
  pass-audit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249375
* The native agent for browser integration, written in go
  browserpass: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251506

Woob, a python utilities suite allowing API/command line usage of many
websites that do not provide a public API.

  woob: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251506

And lastly a synapse (the matrix homeserver) plugin that allows bridges
or bot to authenticate as any user on the homeserver, written in python.

  matrix-synapse-shared-secret-auth: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251507

Cheers,

-- 
Antoine 'xdbob' Damhet


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Kan-Ru Chen]

Hi!

On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 12:05 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:10 AM Kan-Ru Chen  wrote:
>> The other two are trivial rust packages that I need for upcoming libchewing 
>> release:
>>
>>   rust-xflags-macrios: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276537
>>   rust-xflags: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276539
>
> Hello!
>
> I see now that you have withdrawn the two Rust package reviews.
> Do you no longer need them?

Upstream (me) have decided to use clap instead, so I'll not need them
for now.

Kan-ru
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Fabio Valentini]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:10 AM Kan-Ru Chen  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have 3 packages awaiting reviews. I'm happy to exchange.
>
> First is a new IBus input method (code includes bits of C and Python):
>
>   ibus-array: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275556
>
> The other two are trivial rust packages that I need for upcoming libchewing 
> release:
>
>   rust-xflags-macrios: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276537
>   rust-xflags: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276539

Hello!

I see now that you have withdrawn the two Rust package reviews.
Do you no longer need them?

Fabio
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

python-networkx 3.3 + review swaps

[Jerry James]

Version 3.3 of NetworkX was released a few weeks ago.  It needs pydot
>= 2.0.0.  I have opened
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pydot/pull-request/4.

Also, if we are going to continue generating documentation for
python-networkx [1], then I need some package reviews.  I am willing
to swap reviews for these:
- python-jupytext: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278420
- python-jupyter-server-mathjax:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278421
- python-nbdime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278422
- python-jupyter-cache: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278423
- python-myst-nb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278424

Builds for all of these packages, plus pydot and python-networkx, are
available from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/Jupyter/.

Footnotes:
[1] And I want to, if for no other reason than that the doctests have
turned up problems in the past.
I feel much better about doing a python-networkx upgrade if the
doctests all pass.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Kan-Ru Chen]

Hi all,

I have 3 packages awaiting reviews. I'm happy to exchange.

First is a new IBus input method (code includes bits of C and Python):

  ibus-array: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275556

The other two are trivial rust packages that I need for upcoming libchewing 
release:

  rust-xflags-macrios: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276537
  rust-xflags: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276539

Cheers,
Kan-ru
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:05 AM Benson Muite
 wrote:
> Will get mine done tomorrow.

I'd just like to give a shout out to Benson, who has done the lion's
share of the reviews for this effort.  Thank you, Benson!  You have
been an enormous help.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Benson Muite]

On 20/02/2024 19.08, Kai A. Hiller wrote:
> I’ll take care of scip. I’d be glad if you could take a look at one or
> more of these (not urgent, though):
> 
> golang-gopkg-macaroon2:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250314
> golang-github-matrix-org-util:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250311
> golang-github-matrix-org-gomatrix:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250312
> 
 - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
 - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
 - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
 - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363

 These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
 above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
 can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
 so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.

 Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above
 reviews.
>>> Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
>>> review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
>>> don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
>>> rain check, or I can do some other task for you.
>> I still need a reviewer for scip.  If we can get the last couple of
>> reviews finished by tomorrow, I will still have time to get this all
>> built before F40 beta freeze.  Please help.
Will get mine done tomorrow.
> -- 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:09 AM Kai A. Hiller  wrote:
> I’ll take care of scip. I’d be glad if you could take a look at one or
> more of these (not urgent, though):
>
> golang-gopkg-macaroon2:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250314
> golang-github-matrix-org-util:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250311
> golang-github-matrix-org-gomatrix:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250312

Will do.  Thank you, Kai!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Kai A. Hiller]

I’ll take care of scip. I’d be glad if you could take a look at one or 
more of these (not urgent, though):


golang-gopkg-macaroon2: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250314
golang-github-matrix-org-util: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250311
golang-github-matrix-org-gomatrix: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250312


On 2024-02-20 16:58, Jerry James wrote:

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:22 PM Jerry James  wrote:

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:11 AM Jerry James  wrote:

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:

I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap reviews.
- asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
- ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
- lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
- pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
- zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
- zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
- spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364

Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:

- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363

These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.

Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.

Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
rain check, or I can do some other task for you.

I still need a reviewer for scip.  If we can get the last couple of
reviews finished by tomorrow, I will still have time to get this all
built before F40 beta freeze.  Please help.

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:22 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:11 AM Jerry James  wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> > > I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap 
> > > reviews.
> > > - asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
> > > - ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
> > > - lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
> > > - pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
> > > - zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
> > > - zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
> > > - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> > > - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> > > - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> > > - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> > > - spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364
> >
> > Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:
> >
> > - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> > - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> > - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> > - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> >
> > These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
> > above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
> > can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
> > so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.
> >
> > Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.
>
> Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
> review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
> don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
> rain check, or I can do some other task for you.

I still need a reviewer for scip.  If we can get the last couple of
reviews finished by tomorrow, I will still have time to get this all
built before F40 beta freeze.  Please help.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:11 AM Jerry James  wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> > I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap 
> > reviews.
> > - asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
> > - ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
> > - lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
> > - pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
> > - zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
> > - zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
> > - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> > - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> > - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> > - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> > - spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364
>
> Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:
>
> - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
>
> These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
> above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
> can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
> so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.
>
> Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.

Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
rain check, or I can do some other task for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap reviews.
> - asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
> - ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
> - lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
> - pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
> - zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
> - zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
> - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> - spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364

Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:

- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363

These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.

Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Two review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 7:31 PM Lyes Saadi  wrote:
> I have two review requests I'd like to swap with anyone willing to !

I have taken both reviews.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Two review swaps

[Lyes Saadi]

Hello and happy holidays !

I have two review requests I'd like to swap with anyone willing to !

1. python-pyfiglet : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876108
This one has been in a legal hell for a 3 years ! But, it is finally freed from 
legal and updated to the new guidelines ! I'm swapping this because it would 
otherwise never get reviewed ^^'. Everything concerning legalese should be 
sorted and it had initially been approved, but it might cause you some trouble 
if you are allergic to anything legal :P.

2. python-willow : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255935
Just a simple dependency needed to upgrade Setzer ! This package though needs 
another one to be updated before being shipped to Fedora, I'm just hoping to 
get it approved so that I can push it as soon as the dependency in question is 
updated. A successful COPR build with the updated dependency is provided, so 
that shouldn't be a problem.

Happy holidays,
Lyes Saadi--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps for deps needed for conda update

[Orion Poplawski]

On 12/2/23 19:32, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have a number of packages needing review that are required for the 
latest round of updates to the conda package manager:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025802&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13378412#

I'm particularly excited by libmamba and its micromamba 
package/executable as a faster/leaner replacement for conda itself.


Just for the record - Jerry James picked up the reviews.  Big shout out 
for that!


--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

Kevin Kofler noted about a year ago [1] that new versions of the solvers
SoPlex [2] and SCIP [3] were released under free software licenses.  Over the
last year, I've been working little by little on building them in a COPR [4]
and rebuilding various Fedora packages with SoPlex and SCIP support.  I
believe we have reached the point where we can start integrating this work
into Fedora.

References:
[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GGGRTBI3ZQYXMNLTPAYCW5IT4FYNY6GX/
[2] https://soplex.zib.de/
[3] https://scipopt.org/
[4] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/

I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap reviews.
- asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
- ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
- lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
- pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
- zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
- zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
- spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364

I will shortly open pull requests for each of the following packages.  I wanted
to post this message first so that the PR text can include a reference to it.
- bliss
- coin-or-Alps
- coin-or-Bcp
- coin-or-Bcps
- coin-or-Blis
- coin-or-Bonmin
- coin-or-Cbc
- coin-or-Cgl
- coin-or-Clp
- coin-or-CoinMP
- coin-or-CoinUtils
- coin-or-Couenne
- coin-or-Dip
- coin-or-DyLP
- coin-or-FlopC++
- coin-or-lemon
- coin-or-Ipopt
- coin-or-OS
- coin-or-Osi
- coin-or-SYMPHONY
- freefem++
- gfan
- latte-integrale
- Macaulay2
- mp
- opencv
- openms
- polymake
- python-cyipopt
- python-pysingular
- qsopt-ex
- seqan
- seqan2
- seqan3
- Singular
- sympol
- TOPCOM

ASL vs. mp
--
Many of the coin-or packages currently BuildRequires mp-devel.  They really
only need the ASL part of mp.  Upstream has split the two projects into
separate git repositories; see the new asl package listed above.  This will
reduce the number of runtime dependencies for the coin-or packages.

Since the new asl package conflicts with the current mp package, the
introduction of asl, modification of mp, and rebuilding of affected coin-or
packages all need to be done at once.  Once all of the reviews are complete,
they will be built in a side tag.

i386 removal

Some of the new packages need some work to build correctly on i386.  Why
bother?  Let's not build for i386 in the first place.  That means, however,
that some of the packages that sit on top of them will need to be modified to
stop building for i386 as well.  That is the extent of the modifications to
some of these packages (e.g., freefem++).

Since opencv and openms are both still built for i386, the packages that they
depend on (including the new asl package) must also be built for i386 for now.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps for deps needed for conda update

[Orion Poplawski]

I have a number of packages needing review that are required for the 
latest round of updates to the conda package manager:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025802&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13378412#

I'm particularly excited by libmamba and its micromamba 
package/executable as a faster/leaner replacement for conda itself.


I think I have some bandwidth now to do some reviews in exchange.

Thanks.

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 07:05:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:16:41AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to be
> > reviewed:
> > 
> > ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
> > ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
> > ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905
> 
> I should be able to look at the OCaml ones, but not til Monday,
> so if anyone wants to take them in the meantime please go ahead.

I just took these 3.  Looking at them right now.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:16:41AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to be
> reviewed:
> 
> ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
> ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
> ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905

I should be able to look at the OCaml ones, but not til Monday,
so if anyone wants to take them in the meantime please go ahead.

Rich.

> JUnitParams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247877
> 
> Let me know what I can review for you.
> 
> A note for those trying to get us to move from this mailing list to
> discussion.fedoraproject.org.  I have been asking for these reviews there for 
> 3
> weeks now [1], and am getting nowhere.  We don't seem to have a critical mass
> of packagers looking there for package reviews.
> 
> [1] 
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/1-c-1-java-and-3-ocaml-reviews/93946
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/

> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Benson Muite]

On 11/17/23 19:16, Jerry James wrote:
> Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need
> to be reviewed:
> 
> ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
> 
> ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
> 
> ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905
> 
> JUnitParams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247877
> 
> 
Will take JUnitParams
> Let me know what I can review for you.
> 
> A note for those trying to get us to move from this mailing list to
> discussion.fedoraproject.org .  I
> have been asking for these reviews there for 3 weeks now [1], and am
> getting nowhere.  We don't seem to have a critical mass of packagers
> looking there for package reviews.
> 
> [1]
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/1-c-1-java-and-3-ocaml-reviews/93946 
> 
> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/ 
> 
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to
be reviewed:

ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905
JUnitParams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247877

Let me know what I can review for you.

A note for those trying to get us to move from this mailing list to
discussion.fedoraproject.org.  I have been asking for these reviews there
for 3 weeks now [1], and am getting nowhere.  We don't seem to have a
critical mass of packagers looking there for package reviews.

[1]
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/1-c-1-java-and-3-ocaml-reviews/93946
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps - hyprland packages

[Pavel Solovev]

Could someone (perhaps someone interested in Hyprland) please review:

hyprland-protocols - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244285
hyprland - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244377
xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244378

I'd love to offer a review swap, but note I'm not very experienced in it.

Thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Trivial review swaps

[Leigh Scott]

I have this simple review pending if you interested.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213540
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Trivial review swaps

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Hello folks,

I have a couple of trivial packages waiting for reviews:

- libahp-gt - Driver library for the AHP GT Controllers 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237299)
- libahp-xc - Driver library for the AHP XC Correlators 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237300)

I'd happy to swap reviews with anyone in need. Comments from new 
packagers in need of sponsorship are welcome (though I'm not a sponsor).

Thank you

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:35 PM Scott Talbert  wrote:
> I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while
> back.  But yeah, it would be nice to have a working fedora-review.

Thank you, Scott.  Having someone familiar with cvc5 review it would be great.

Like I just told Richard, there is a thread about fixing fedora-review
in place: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QMCHW3ZUTKLPIDARUFKPINA3VBSI3OT5/

I've used that to do ... what?  Four reviews, I think?  I haven't
encountered any trouble so far.  (Which doesn't mean you won't, of
course!)
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
> Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages
> (without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of
> fedora-review on Rawhide.

Thank you.  I can wait. :-)

I started a thread about fixing fedora-review in place, although I
won't claim that is a good idea:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QMCHW3ZUTKLPIDARUFKPINA3VBSI3OT5/
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Scott Talbert]

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Jerry James wrote:


Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package:
cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012


I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while 
back.  But yeah, it would be nice to have a working fedora-review.


Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages
(without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of
fedora-review on Rawhide.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hi all,

Is anyone interested in swapping reviews?  I've got some nontrivial
packages awaiting review, and am willing to review nontrivial packages
in exchange.

Font packages needed to update MuseScore to 4.x:
makemusic-finale-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
edwin-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180241
leland-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180242

MuseScore 4.1.0, along with a package rename:
musescore: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180243

All of the above are available in a COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/MuseScore4/

Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package:
cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012

Thank you!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps for easy Rust packages

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:21 AM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In order to update the "log" crate (the canonical logging facade for
> Rust; packaged as rust-log) to the latest version, I need to package a
> few new dependencies. Some have already been updated / built in a
> rawhide side tag (f39-build-side-69898), but some are still missing. I
> hope to be able to finish this update before the mass rebuild happens,
> otherwise the packages will be broken.

Sorry, that was a typo, it should've been f39-build-side-69808.
Packages that are pending review can be test-built against the
packages in this side tag.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps for easy Rust packages

[Fabio Valentini]

Hi all,

In order to update the "log" crate (the canonical logging facade for
Rust; packaged as rust-log) to the latest version, I need to package a
few new dependencies. Some have already been updated / built in a
rawhide side tag (f39-build-side-69898), but some are still missing. I
hope to be able to finish this update before the mass rebuild happens,
otherwise the packages will be broken.

The packages that are still pending review are very simple. They are
100% unmodified output of rust2rpm, with tests enabled, with license
files included, etc. I can offer to review similarly simple packages
(Rust, Python, CMake, meson) in return.

- rust-sval_test: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217030
- rust-sval_ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217032
- rust-sval_buffer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217037
- rust-sval_fmt: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217034
- rust-serde_buf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217023
- rust-sval_serde: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217044
- rust-value-bag-serde1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217024
- rust-value-bag-sval2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217056

I'm also waiting for reviews of the missing dependencies of ntpd-rs
(an NTP implementation with NTS support written in Rust):

- rust-tower: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214392
- rust-tower-http: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214428
- rust-axum: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214429
- rust-prometheus-client: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214431

These are pretty simple packages as well, but not quite 100%
boilerplate as the sval/value-bag stuff.

I've also submitted a review for the "gimoji" application:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214339

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: review swaps

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:17:09AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  wrote:
> >
> > I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:
> >
> > #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output
> 
> I've taken the profiler. Do you think you could take 2180418? I would
> really appreciate your input.

Thanks. It's definitely an interesting package ;). I left some initial
comments.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: review swaps

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hi Zbigniew,


On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:
>
> #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output

I've taken the profiler. Do you think you could take 2180418? I would
really appreciate your input.
pyinstrument seems simple enough, I think I might be able to take on
another review if nobody else steps up.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

review swaps

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:

#2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output
#2203529 blosc2 - High performance compressor optimized for binary data
#2203544 python-ndindex - Python library for manipulating indices of ndarrays
#2203546 python-blosc2 - Python wrapper for the Blosc2 compression library

The last three are for python-tables update to the latest version.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello Jerry,

I've taken the musescore review (I haven't been able to keep up with
the font packaging changes).
Could you please have a look at this package in return?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Benson Muite]

On 3/21/23 08:18, Riya Bisht wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ?
> I'm beginner trying to understand fedora packaging.
> 
Welcome to Fedora!
https://jamezone.org/pleasure/software/Fedora/packager/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
> Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Riya Bisht]

Hello,

I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ? I'm
beginner trying to understand fedora packaging.

Thanks.



On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, 8:58 am Jerry James,  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am in need of some package reviews, and am happy to swap.  First, I
> think I have finally beaten MuseScore 4.x into good enough shape for
> Fedora.  This has been a months-long process.  I need some font
> reviews:
>
> makemusic-finale-fonts:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
> edwin-fonts
> :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180241
> leland-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180242
>
> We currently have MuseScore in the mscore package.  I have been asked
> a couple of times to rename the package to musescore, to make it
> easier for users to discover.  Here is a rename review, while
> simultaneously changing to version 4.0.2, just to make things more
> complicated:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180243
>
> I also have a couple of simple python packages that need reviews, but
> these are lower priority for me than the reviews above.
>
> python-accessible-pygments:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176933
> python-pytest-cython
> :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173018
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hi all,

I am in need of some package reviews, and am happy to swap.  First, I
think I have finally beaten MuseScore 4.x into good enough shape for
Fedora.  This has been a months-long process.  I need some font
reviews:

makemusic-finale-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
edwin-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180241
leland-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180242

We currently have MuseScore in the mscore package.  I have been asked
a couple of times to rename the package to musescore, to make it
easier for users to discover.  Here is a rename review, while
simultaneously changing to version 4.0.2, just to make things more
complicated:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180243

I also have a couple of simple python packages that need reviews, but
these are lower priority for me than the reviews above.

python-accessible-pygments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176933
python-pytest-cython: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173018

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Mattia Verga via devel]

I have filed a few package requests to get python's openapi-core into
Fedora repositories, each one depends on the previous one:

- python-pathable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154186
  |- python-jsonschema-spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154188
     |- python-openapi-spec-validator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154236
     |- python-openapi-core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154240

They should be all quite straightforward, I can swap some reviews in
exchange.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jonny Heggheim]

Hello fellow packagers,

I'd like to ask your help for a handful of reviews.

Most of them are Lua dependencies for the SILE Typesetter,
any help is appreciated.

I offer my help in exchange for reviews, I have experience with Java, Python,
Lua, C and C++ packages.

Best regards,

Jonny Heggheim

lua-fluent - Lua implementation of Project Fluent:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142798 

lua-cliargs - A command-line argument parser:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143056 

lua-vstruct - Lua library to manipulate binary data:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143351 

lua-cosmo - Safe templates for Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142671 

lua-luarepl - REPL.lua a reusable Lua REPL written in Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143382 

lua-linenoise - A binding for the linenoise command line library:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143020 

lua-cldr - Lua interface to Unicode CLDR data:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142653 

lua-zlib - Simple streaming interface to zlib for Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143050 

lua-epnf - Extended PEG Notation Format (easy grammars for LPeg):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142786 

lua-utf8 - A UTF-8 support module for Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143391 

lua-loadkit - Loadkit allows you to load arbitrary files within the Lua package 
path:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143028 

libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 

hack-fonts - A typeface designed for source code:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149686 

sile - The SILE Typesetter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149698 

randomx - A proof-of-work algorithm that is optimized for general-purpose CPUs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078535
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review Swaps

[Mark E. Fuller]

Hi all,

I have two packages for which I'd like to offer to swap reviews:

1) Bug 2135036 - Review Request: golang-github-sajari-fuzzy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2135036

This is a new dependency blocking an update to one of my existing (Go) 
packages. Autogenerated spec, should be a trivial review.


2) Bug 2126785 - Review Request: usbrelay
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126785

USB-connected electrical relay control, based on hidapi


Thank you

--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@mefuller.dev
@fuller:fedora.im
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://mefuller.dev
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Wi do, thank you!

-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 5th, 2022 at 7:10 AM, Mattia Verga via devel 
 wrote:


> Il 04/10/22 17:34, Gwyn Ciesla via devel ha scritto:
> 

> > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more 
> > of yours.
> > 

> > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> > 

> > And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
> > 

> > libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
> > 

> > Thanks in advance!
> > 

> > 

> 

> I've taken CalcMySky.
> 

> If you have some time to spare, I'd like a review of XEphem 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242
> 

> Mattia

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 04/10/22 17:34, Gwyn Ciesla via devel ha scritto:

> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd 
> be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of 
> yours.
>
> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
>
> And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
>
> libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
>
> Thanks in advance!

I've taken CalcMySky.

If you have some time to spare, I'd like a review of XEphem 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242

Mattia___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 16:14:08 +
Mattia Verga via devel  wrote:

> Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> > Gwyn Ciesla via devel  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> >> you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or 
> >> more of yours.
> >>
> >> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> >> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> >> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> > I have taken indi
> 
> INDI is already packaged, see "libindi".
> 
> I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8).

I have vaguely recalled that we have something like "indi", but I
searched only for "indi", not for "*indi*" :-)

Taking QXlsx then ...


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Thank you!



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 11:14 AM, Mattia Verga via devel 
 wrote:


> Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto:
> 

> > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> > Gwyn Ciesla via devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > 

> > > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> > > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or 
> > > more of yours.
> > > 

> > > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> > > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> > > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> > > I have taken indi
> 

> 

> INDI is already packaged, see "libindi".
> 

> I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8).
> 

> Mattia
> 

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> Gwyn Ciesla via devel  wrote:
>
>> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
>> you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more 
>> of yours.
>>
>> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
>> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
>> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> I have taken indi

INDI is already packaged, see "libindi".

I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8).

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Thank you, on it!



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 10:46 AM, Dan Horák  wrote:


> On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> Gwyn Ciesla via devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> 

> > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more 
> > of yours.
> > 

> > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> 

> 

> I have taken indi and would appreciate a review for pageedit
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2131949), it
> should be pretty straightforward
> 

> 

> Dan
> 

> > And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
> > 

> > libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
> > 

> > Thanks in advance!
> > 

> > --
> > Gwyn Ciesla
> > she/her/hers
> > 
> > in your fear, seek only peace
> > in your fear, seek only love
> > -d. bowie
> > 

> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> 

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel  wrote:

> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd 
> be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of 
> yours.
> 
> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014

I have taken indi and would appreciate a review for pageedit
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2131949), it
should be pretty straightforward


Dan

> 
> And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
> 
> libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> -- 
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>  
> in your fear, seek only peace 
> in your fear, seek only love
> -d. bowie
> 
> 
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd 
be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of yours.

QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014

And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:

libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958

Thanks in advance!

-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps for 3 nagios plugins

[Otto Liljalaakso]

2. lokakuuta 2022 22.30.02 GMT+03:00 Till Hofmann  
kirjoitti:
>I'm looking for reviews or review swaps for 3 nagios plugins:
>
>python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886
>
>nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602
>
>nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603
>
>All those packages are trivial to review. I'd be happy to review 
>packages in exchange!

I can review these later today. I have the following simple CMake C++ library 
to swap:

iir1 - DSP IIR Realtime C++ filter library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129191

And another CMake C++ library, Loguru, coming up soon. I will ask you about 
when I get the review request up.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps for 3 nagios plugins

[Till Hofmann]

Hi all,

I'm looking for reviews or review swaps for 3 nagios plugins:

python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886

nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602

nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603

All those packages are trivial to review. I'd be happy to review 
packages in exchange!


Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:37 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> They're all done, except for this one:
>
> python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
>
> It's a bit complicated, due to needing a pile of JavaScript at build
> time.  Who would like to swap reviews?  Give me a complicated one. :-)

I am still looking for a reviewer for python-furo.  Who needs a
review?  I'll swap you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 7:36 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> It is no longer possible to build the sympy documentation, due to
> missing dependencies.  However, I have already noted other packages I
> maintain that need each of these.  That tells me it is time to get
> them into Fedora.  I would like to swap reviews for the following:

They're all done, except for this one:

python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594

It's a bit complicated, due to needing a pile of JavaScript at build
time.  Who would like to swap reviews?  Give me a complicated one. :-)
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jonathan Wright via devel
 wrote:
> I'll start on yours if you'll start on mine, I have a pile of my own :)

It's a deal.  I'll get started on yours.  Thank you!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

I'll start on yours if you'll start on mine, I have a pile of my own :)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&component=Package%20Review&email1=jonathan%40almalinux.org&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=equals&known_name=My%20review%20requests&list_id=12864886&product=Fedora&query_based_on=My%20review%20requests&query_format=advanced

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:38 PM Jerry James  wrote:

> I'm working on an update to sympy, to version 1.11.  This version has
> several backwards incompatible changes.  I inspected the consuming
> packages for use of the backwards incompatible APIs and found none.
> Just in case, I did local mock builds of each one, and the builds were
> all successful, including runs of their test suites.  The consuming
> packages are:
>
> - python-boutdata
> - python-brian2
> - python-fiat
> - python-nipy
> - python-pysb
> - python-trimesh
> - sagemath
>
> It is no longer possible to build the sympy documentation, due to
> missing dependencies.  However, I have already noted other packages I
> maintain that need each of these.  That tells me it is time to get
> them into Fedora.  I would like to swap reviews for the following:
>
> - python-sphinx-basic-ng:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121593
> - python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594,
> needs python-sphinx-basic-ng
> - python-uc-micro-py: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121595
> - python-linkify-it-py:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121596, needs
> python-uc-micro-py
> - python-sphinx-documatt-theme:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
> - python-sphinx-reredirects:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121598, needs
> python-sphinx-documatt-theme
>
> Let me know what I can review for you.
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

I'm working on an update to sympy, to version 1.11.  This version has
several backwards incompatible changes.  I inspected the consuming
packages for use of the backwards incompatible APIs and found none.
Just in case, I did local mock builds of each one, and the builds were
all successful, including runs of their test suites.  The consuming
packages are:

- python-boutdata
- python-brian2
- python-fiat
- python-nipy
- python-pysb
- python-trimesh
- sagemath

It is no longer possible to build the sympy documentation, due to
missing dependencies.  However, I have already noted other packages I
maintain that need each of these.  That tells me it is time to get
them into Fedora.  I would like to swap reviews for the following:

- python-sphinx-basic-ng: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121593
- python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594,
needs python-sphinx-basic-ng
- python-uc-micro-py: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121595
- python-linkify-it-py:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121596, needs
python-uc-micro-py
- python-sphinx-documatt-theme:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
- python-sphinx-reredirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121598, needs
python-sphinx-documatt-theme

Let me know what I can review for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

Hey all, 

I have two packages which have been sitting in review for some time now:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095732
daniel-wikholm-segment16-fonts - collection of 3 font families.
Bit problematic because of missing license text, not having an official source 
website, nor a way to contact the author.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098373
gearhead2 - an RPG game, written in Pascal, using SDL1.2.
Fairly straight-forward. The prequel, gearhead1, is already in the repos, and 
the spec files are very similar.

If anyone could take a look at one of these, I'd be grateful.
I'm willing to review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:31 AM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
> I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the place.

Thank you!

> > ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693
>
> Do you know which other package(s) need this?

The latest version of frama-c needs it.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:43:43PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I need 2 OCaml package reviews in order to update existing packages to
> the most recent versions.
> 
> ocaml-camlp-streams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283

I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the place.

> ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693

Do you know which other package(s) need this?

Rich.

> I am willing to swap reviews.  (But note that I am vanishing in a puff
> of smoke on Saturday and will be largely incommunicado for about a
> week.)
> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

I need 2 OCaml package reviews in order to update existing packages to
the most recent versions.

ocaml-camlp-streams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283
ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693

I am willing to swap reviews.  (But note that I am vanishing in a puff
of smoke on Saturday and will be largely incommunicado for about a
week.)
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Looking for 2 review swaps

[Robert-André Mauchin]

Hi,

I'm looking to get review of these two packages:

#2103380 NEW- nob...@fedoraproject.org - Review Request: rust-cradle - Execute child 
processes with ease https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103380


which depends on:

#2103367 NEW- nob...@fedoraproject.org - Review Request: rust-gag - Redirect, or 
hold stdout/stderr output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103367


Can do anything in exchange.

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Arthur Bols]

Hi,

I have 2 small python packages and 1 C/C++/Qt program, but it shouldn't 
be too much work.


btrfs-assistant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093585
python-axolotl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2043231
python-axolotl-curve25519 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2043228


Let me know if you'd like to swap (or do some of them)!

Kind regards,
Arthur
fas: principis

On 3/06/2022 21:46, Mark E. Fuller wrote:

Dear all,

I'm looking to package task (https://taskfile.dev/) for Fedora and 
would like to offer to swap reviews:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078117
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078118
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467

All three spec files were generated automatically and the reviews 
should be trivial (at least I hope so).


Thanks all,
fuller

--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Mark E. Fuller]

Dear all,

I'm looking to package task (https://taskfile.dev/) for Fedora and would 
like to offer to swap reviews:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078117
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078118
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467

All three spec files were generated automatically and the reviews should 
be trivial (at least I hope so).


Thanks all,
fuller

--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 5:04 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
 wrote:
> Taken all three.

Thank you!

> I have the following two python packages up for review:
> python-mrcfile - MRC2014 file format used in structural biology to store 
> image and volume data
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063369
>
> python-vcert - Automate key generation and certificate enrollment using 
> Venafi machine identity services
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072428
>
> I also have a golang package up for a rename review, if anyone is available:
> golang-github-jfrog-gofrog - Collection of Go utilities
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063191

I have taken all 3 of these.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 21:54, Jerry James wrote:
> I need three new python packages to update python-pydata-sphinx-theme
> to its latest version.  Who would like to swap reviews?
> 
> python-pep621: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647
> python-sphinx-autobuild (unretire):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651
> python-sphinx-theme-builder (depends on the previous two):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652

Taken all three.

I have the following two python packages up for review:
python-mrcfile - MRC2014 file format used in structural biology to store image 
and volume data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063369

python-vcert - Automate key generation and certificate enrollment using Venafi 
machine identity services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072428

I also have a golang package up for a rename review, if anyone is available:
golang-github-jfrog-gofrog - Collection of Go utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063191

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

I need three new python packages to update python-pydata-sphinx-theme
to its latest version.  Who would like to swap reviews?

python-pep621: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647
python-sphinx-autobuild (unretire):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651
python-sphinx-theme-builder (depends on the previous two):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652

-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Dave Dykstra]

I would really appreciate a review for 'apptainer', just a name change
from 'singularity':
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758

Dave


On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:47:10AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:34 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
>  wrote:
> > I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685 
> > pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code
> >
> > I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.
> 
> Since Arthur Bols is giving me some freebies (thank you, Arthur!), I
> will do the same for you.
> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/ 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:34 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
 wrote:
> I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685
> pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code
>
> I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

Since Arthur Bols is giving me some freebies (thank you, Arthur!), I
will do the same for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685
pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code

I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Arthur Bols]

On 5/01/2022 05:04, Jerry James wrote:

On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James  wrote:

Happy New Year!

I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:

- ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
- ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395
- ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396
- ocaml-stdcompat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036398
- ocaml-pyml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036399

Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,

I am still in need of these reviews.  If you don't need a package
reviewed, I am willing to swap for something else.  Let me know what I
can do for you.

Happy new year to you too!

It's been a bit quiet over the holidays, so I'll take the reviews.

I currently don't need any help, if someone else is in desperate need of 
a review (and maybe didn't have time to do yours), maybe you could help 
them!


Arthur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> Happy New Year!
>
> I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:
>
> - ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
> - ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395
> - ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396
> - ocaml-stdcompat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036398
> - ocaml-pyml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036399
>
> Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,

I am still in need of these reviews.  If you don't need a package
reviewed, I am willing to swap for something else.  Let me know what I
can do for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Happy New Year!

I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:

- ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
- ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395
- ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396
- ocaml-stdcompat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036398
- ocaml-pyml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036399

Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hello all,

The odoc (OCaml documentation) project has started releasing its
version 2.x series.  They come with a small tree of new dependencies.
Here are the first few.  I am willing to swap for reviews of these
packages.  Let me know what I can review for you.

ocaml-logs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2029560
ocaml-rresult: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031159
ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
ocaml-version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031161

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps for git-lfs/go-minify deps

[Sandro Mani]

Hi

I can take these.

I'd have a bunch of mingw-qt6-* packages up for review, all straight 
forward:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214 - 
mingw-qt6-qtlocation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009215 - 
mingw-qt6-qtsensors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009217 - 
mingw-qt6-qtserialport
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221 - 
mingw-qt6-qtshadertools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009223 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009268 - 
mingw-qt6-qtmultimedia (depends on mingw-qt6-qtshadertools)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009269 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebchannel (depends on mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets)


Thanks
Sandro

On 29.09.21 23:31, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:

Hello,

I haven't done a review in a while, and since I need some new reviews, 
I thought I'd see if anyone wanted to swap.


The latest git-lfs requires 2 new dependencies:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007909 golang-github-git-lfs-pktline - 
Git pkt-line Toolkit
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007920 
golang-github-git-lfs-wildmatch-2 - Pattern matching language for 
filepaths compatible with Git


The latest go-minify requires 1 new dependency:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2003415 golang-github-djherbis-atime - 
Access Times for files


I can review C, Go, Python, R packages in return.

--
Elliott

___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps for git-lfs/go-minify deps

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

Hello,

I haven't done a review in a while, and since I need some new reviews, I
thought I'd see if anyone wanted to swap.

The latest git-lfs requires 2 new dependencies:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007909 golang-github-git-lfs-pktline - Git
pkt-line Toolkit
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007920 golang-github-git-lfs-wildmatch-2 -
Pattern matching language for filepaths compatible with Git

The latest go-minify requires 1 new dependency:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2003415 golang-github-djherbis-atime - Access
Times for files

I can review C, Go, Python, R packages in return.

--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: python-keyrings-alt and python-annexremote

[Ankur Sinha]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 10:13:39 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684

This one remains to be reviewed, any one for a swap please? :)

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps: python-keyrings-alt and python-annexremote

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi folks,

I'd like to get these two Python modules reviewed please. Would anyone
like to swap reviews?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001678
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684

They're required to package datalad, which is required for
spikeextractors---both on the Neuro SIG's package queue.

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:16 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> Who would like to swap package reviews?  I need these 6:
>
> fontawesome5-fonts
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300
> This one has been mentioned previously on this mailing list.  It is
> blocking the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme, which is needed to
> update python-networkx.

Many thanks to Ben Beasley, who reviewed all of the other packages.  I
still need a reviewer for this one.  Who is up for a font package
review?  I'll do something for you in return.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hi all,

Who would like to swap package reviews?  I need these 6:

fontawesome5-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300
This one has been mentioned previously on this mailing list.  It is
blocking the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme, which is needed to
update python-networkx.

flintqs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992877
Currently bundled with sagemath, but useful in its own right.

gp2c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992878
A PARI/GP script to C converter, needed by sagemath.

pari-nflistdata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992879
Data tables for PARI, needed by sagemath.

pari-nflistdata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992880
More data tables for PARI, needed by sagemath.

python-pari-jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992881
A Jupyter kernel for PARI/GP, needed by sagemath.

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:02 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> python-pydata-sphinx-theme:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997, requires
> python-jupyter-sphinx and python-pytest-regressions

This is the last review I need for the python-networkx update.  I'm
willing to swap reviews or other technical favors.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

[Remi Collet]

Le 16/07/2021 à 10:39, Christopher Engelhard a écrit :

Hi all,
I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer
libraries from the nextcloud package.

The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a
total of 24 new packages that need reviewing.
The good news is that I think quite a few of them will be generally
useful beyond just nextcloud.

They are all fairly small & simple PHP libraries, build without issues
and are basically identical in terms of packaging. If there are people
out there who'd like to try their hand at reviewing for the first time,
one of these might be a good place to start.


From a quick look, for all these packages
it seems useful to include upstream test suite
by pulling a git snapshot (common practice in PHP to workaround
the stupid .gitattributes usage)

Unbundling make sense when we can run CI (Koschei) and ensure
changes in the PHP stack (ex PHP 8.0 in F35 or 8.1 in F36) don't break

Also use range dependencies everywhere (even if a single version 
packaged), this can change in the future.


I should be able to review (or help) on this set of reviews.

the PHP SIG mailing list (php-devel@...) is probably a better
place if you have any question about PHP specific packaging


Remi



Obviously, if you need something reviewed in return, I'd be happy to do
that.

Full list of links is below, but to make it easier for people
- I set up a dependency tree (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1981857&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=12016550
) so you can pick a leaf.
- I made a copr repository (
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/nextcloud/packages/ ) that
has builds for all of these, including fedora-review/rpmlint logs (and a
big thank you to whoever made that last bit possible in Copr, that was
*extremely* useful). The repo also contains a few forks of existing
packages, ignore those :) .

Best,
Christopher

List of links:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982619
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982624
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982627
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982629
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982630
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982631
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982632
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982635
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982636
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982637
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982638
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982639
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982640
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982643
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982645
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982646
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982647
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982648
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982651
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982652





___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure