syslog-ng

2010-04-08 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/branches:/Base:/System/openSUSE_Factory/src/
), and it is also being upgraded in Debian (
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syslog-ng.html ) and Gentoo (
http://gentoo.linuxhowtos.org/portage/app-admin/syslog-ng ) and Mandriva
( http://sophie.zarb.org/viewrpm/b8182fa1eee109cc655a020a2cb62f5f ).

For a complete list of changes, please see:
http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.0.5/changelog-en.txt
http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.1.0/changelog-en.txt

Major changes from the packaging point of view:

- addition of new utilities:
/usr/bin/pdbtool
/usr/sbin/syslog-ng-ctl

- apparmor (or SElinux in case of Fedora) needs some extra permissions:
/var/run/syslog-ng.ctl rw,
/var/run/syslog-ng/additional-log-sockets.conf r,
capability sys_tty_config,

Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
allowed in /, and SSL is not available statically for security reasons.
As far as I can see (I have a Fedora 13 snapshot installed in vmware),
Fedora has the same problem.

Please let me know, if you need any additional help/information to get
syslog-ng updated for Fedora.

Best regards,
Peter Czanik

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-04-08 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote:

> Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
> can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
> is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
> allowed in /, and SSL is not available statically for security reasons.
> As far as I can see (I have a Fedora 13 snapshot installed in vmware),
> Fedora has the same problem.

OpenSSL being in /usr/lib instead of /lib is a regression that was
introduced in Fedora 11 afaics and partly broke pam_mount:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239375

Hopefully it will be moved back to /lib eventually and then syslog-ng
could use SSL support, too.

Regards
Till


pgp5vLISDg2px.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: syslog-ng

2010-04-08 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
> version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/branches:/Base:/System/openSUSE_Factory/src/
> ), and it is also being upgraded in Debian (
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syslog-ng.html ) and Gentoo (
> http://gentoo.linuxhowtos.org/portage/app-admin/syslog-ng ) and Mandriva
> ( http://sophie.zarb.org/viewrpm/b8182fa1eee109cc655a020a2cb62f5f ).
> 
> For a complete list of changes, please see:
> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.0.5/changelog-en.txt
> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.1.0/changelog-en.txt
> 
> Major changes from the packaging point of view:
> 
> - addition of new utilities:
> /usr/bin/pdbtool
> /usr/sbin/syslog-ng-ctl
> 
Are these tools executed by init scripts or just by administrators?
> - apparmor (or SElinux in case of Fedora) needs some extra permissions:
> /var/run/syslog-ng.ctl rw,
Is this a sock_file?
> /var/run/syslog-ng/additional-log-sockets.conf r,
Why not put syslog-ng.ctl in /var/run/syslog-ng?
> capability sys_tty_config,

What other processes need to read/write in these directories or sock_files?
> 
> Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
> can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
> is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
> allowed in /, and SSL is not available statically for security reasons.
> As far as I can see (I have a Fedora 13 snapshot installed in vmware),
> Fedora has the same problem.
> 
> Please let me know, if you need any additional help/information to get
> syslog-ng updated for Fedora.
> 
> Best regards,
> Peter Czanik
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAku+KUsACgkQrlYvE4MpobNBeQCfRvP3ykhSY8xaAMCL6PlOY+18
fY8AoIo2TyUSPXEYDiUWs5ts/U6IMh8B
=G3LL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-04-08 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
>> version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/branches:/Base:/System/openSUSE_Factory/src/
>> ), and it is also being upgraded in Debian (
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syslog-ng.html ) and Gentoo (
>> http://gentoo.linuxhowtos.org/portage/app-admin/syslog-ng ) and Mandriva
>> ( http://sophie.zarb.org/viewrpm/b8182fa1eee109cc655a020a2cb62f5f ).
>>
>> For a complete list of changes, please see:
>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.0.5/changelog-en.txt
>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.1.0/changelog-en.txt
>>
>> Major changes from the packaging point of view:
>>
>> - addition of new utilities:
>> /usr/bin/pdbtool
>> /usr/sbin/syslog-ng-ctl
>>
>> 
> Are these tools executed by init scripts or just by administrators?
>   
Just by administrators. The first manages the pattern database (patterns
are not included), the second gives stats and controls debugging:

bigone112:~ # pdbtool
Syntax: pdbtool  [options]
Possible commands are:
matchMatch a message against the pattern database
dump Dump pattern datebase tree
mergeMerge pattern databases
bigone112:~ # syslog-ng-ctl
Syntax: syslog-ng-ctl  [options]
Possible commands are:
statsDump syslog-ng statistics
verbose  Enable/query verbose messages
debugEnable/query debug messages
traceEnable/query trace messages


>> - apparmor (or SElinux in case of Fedora) needs some extra permissions:
>> /var/run/syslog-ng.ctl rw,
>> 
> Is this a sock_file?
>   
Yes, it is.

>> /var/run/syslog-ng/additional-log-sockets.conf r,
>> 
Ooops, sorry, this is a SuSE related config file, where additional log
sockects from chroots are added on start by the init script.

> Why not put syslog-ng.ctl in /var/run/syslog-ng?
>   
It is controlled by configure parameter: --with-pidfile-dir=/var/run
which also affects pid file location (see src/syslog-ng.h):
#define PATH_PIDFILE        PATH_PIDFILEDIR "/syslog-ng.pid"
#define PATH_CONTROL_SOCKET PATH_PIDFILEDIR "/syslog-ng.ctl"
Fedora seems to be a bit more flexible here, than SuSE, so one could
easily set to use /var/run/syslog-ng/ for both of these files.

>> capability sys_tty_config,
>> 
> What other processes need to read/write in these directories or sock_files?
>   
Only syslog-ng and syslog-ng-ctl.

Bye,
CzP

>> Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
>> can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
>> is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
>> allowed in /, and SSL is not available statically for security reasons.
>> As far as I can see (I have a Fedora 13 snapshot installed in vmware),
>> Fedora has the same problem.
>>
>> Please let me know, if you need any additional help/information to get
>> syslog-ng updated for Fedora.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter Czanik
>>
>> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAku+KUsACgkQrlYvE4MpobNBeQCfRvP3ykhSY8xaAMCL6PlOY+18
> fY8AoIo2TyUSPXEYDiUWs5ts/U6IMh8B
> =G3LL
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>   

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-04-13 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

Quick heads up: version 3.1.1 of syslog-ng is now available, which among
other things fixes a problem with pipe(). In 3.X, pipe used 100% CPU,
when a file parameter was used instead of a pipe (as was in the default
openSUSE syslog-ng.conf).

Bye,
CzP

2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
>> version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/branches:/Base:/System/openSUSE_Factory/src/
>> ), and it is also being upgraded in Debian (
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syslog-ng.html ) and Gentoo (
>> http://gentoo.linuxhowtos.org/portage/app-admin/syslog-ng ) and Mandriva
>> ( http://sophie.zarb.org/viewrpm/b8182fa1eee109cc655a020a2cb62f5f ).
>>
>> For a complete list of changes, please see:
>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.0.5/changelog-en.txt
>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.1.0/changelog-en.txt
>>
>> Major changes from the packaging point of view:
>>
>> - addition of new utilities:
>> /usr/bin/pdbtool
>> /usr/sbin/syslog-ng-ctl
>>
>> 
> Are these tools executed by init scripts or just by administrators?
>   
>> - apparmor (or SElinux in case of Fedora) needs some extra permissions:
>> /var/run/syslog-ng.ctl rw,
>> 
> Is this a sock_file?
>   
>> /var/run/syslog-ng/additional-log-sockets.conf r,
>> 
> Why not put syslog-ng.ctl in /var/run/syslog-ng?
>   
>> capability sys_tty_config,
>> 
> What other processes need to read/write in these directories or sock_files?
>   
>> Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
>> can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
>> is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
>> allowed in /, and SSL is not available statically for security reasons.
>> As far as I can see (I have a Fedora 13 snapshot installed in vmware),
>> Fedora has the same problem.
>>
>> Please let me know, if you need any additional help/information to get
>> syslog-ng updated for Fedora.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter Czanik
>> 

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-05-12 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
>> version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/branches:/Base:/System/openSUSE_Factory/src/
>> ), and it is also being upgraded in Debian (
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syslog-ng.html ) and Gentoo (
>> http://gentoo.linuxhowtos.org/portage/app-admin/syslog-ng ) and Mandriva
>> ( http://sophie.zarb.org/viewrpm/b8182fa1eee109cc655a020a2cb62f5f ).
>>
>> For a complete list of changes, please see:
>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.0.5/changelog-en.txt
>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.1.0/changelog-en.txt
>>
>> Major changes from the packaging point of view:
>>
>> - addition of new utilities:
>> /usr/bin/pdbtool
>> /usr/sbin/syslog-ng-ctl
>>
>> 
> Are these tools executed by init scripts or just by administrators?
>   
>> - apparmor (or SElinux in case of Fedora) needs some extra permissions:
>> /var/run/syslog-ng.ctl rw,
>> 
> Is this a sock_file?
>   
>> /var/run/syslog-ng/additional-log-sockets.conf r,
>> 
> Why not put syslog-ng.ctl in /var/run/syslog-ng?
>   
>> capability sys_tty_config,
>> 
> What other processes need to read/write in these directories or sock_files?
>   
>> Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
>> can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
>> is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
>> allowed in /, and SSL is not available statically for security reasons.
>> As far as I can see (I have a Fedora 13 snapshot installed in vmware),
>> Fedora has the same problem.
>>
>> Please let me know, if you need any additional help/information to get
>> syslog-ng updated for Fedora.
>> 
I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
at all. Here on the list I got some questions about the new syslog-ng
version, but while I update my rawhide installation quite often, I still
did not see an update for syslog-ng.

Now I looked around on the Fedora wiki, how I could to the packaging
work myself. I found a page with many interesting details:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join , but this seems
to be for packagers joining to add a new package. How could I get an
existing package upgraded?

Bye,
CzP
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-05-12 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 05/12/2010 08:28 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>>   
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>>> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
>>> version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
>>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/branches:/Base:/System/openSUSE_Factory/src/
>>> ), and it is also being upgraded in Debian (
>>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syslog-ng.html ) and Gentoo (
>>> http://gentoo.linuxhowtos.org/portage/app-admin/syslog-ng ) and Mandriva
>>> ( http://sophie.zarb.org/viewrpm/b8182fa1eee109cc655a020a2cb62f5f ).
>>>
>>> For a complete list of changes, please see:
>>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.0.5/changelog-en.txt
>>> http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/open-source-edition/3.1.0/changelog-en.txt
>>>
>>> Major changes from the packaging point of view:
>>>
>>> - addition of new utilities:
>>> /usr/bin/pdbtool
>>> /usr/sbin/syslog-ng-ctl
>>>
>>>     
>> Are these tools executed by init scripts or just by administrators?
>>   
>>> - apparmor (or SElinux in case of Fedora) needs some extra permissions:
>>> /var/run/syslog-ng.ctl rw,
>>> 
>> Is this a sock_file?
>>   
>>> /var/run/syslog-ng/additional-log-sockets.conf r,
>>> 
>> Why not put syslog-ng.ctl in /var/run/syslog-ng?
>>   
>>> capability sys_tty_config,
>>> 
>> What other processes need to read/write in these directories or sock_files?
>>   
>>> Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
>>> can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
>>> is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
>>> allowed in /, and SSL is not available statically for security reasons.
>>> As far as I can see (I have a Fedora 13 snapshot installed in vmware),
>>> Fedora has the same problem.
>>>
>>> Please let me know, if you need any additional help/information to get
>>> syslog-ng updated for Fedora.
>>> 
> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
> contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
> at all. Here on the list I got some questions about the new syslog-ng
> version, but while I update my rawhide installation quite often, I still
> did not see an update for syslog-ng.
> 
> Now I looked around on the Fedora wiki, how I could to the packaging
> work myself. I found a page with many interesting details:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join , but this seems
> to be for packagers joining to add a new package. How could I get an
> existing package upgraded?
> 
> Bye,
> CzP

Have you opened a bugzilla requesting the update?

I think you need to sign up and work to become a provenpackager.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvqxBwACgkQrlYvE4MpobM23wCfQ5xQpnNRyHsPeoe9YaD8HdEr
bMMAn2LFPC816t62NK1uTw9urz0Tfzgq
=SfLy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-02 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
>> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
>> contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
>> at all. Here on the list I got some questions about the new syslog-ng
>> version, but while I update my rawhide installation quite often, I still
>> did not see an update for syslog-ng.
>>
>> Now I looked around on the Fedora wiki, how I could to the packaging
>> work myself. I found a page with many interesting details:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join , but this seems
>> to be for packagers joining to add a new package. How could I get an
>> existing package upgraded?
>>
>> Bye,
>> CzP
>> 
> Have you opened a bugzilla requesting the update?
>
> I think you need to sign up and work to become a provenpackager.
>   
I did not open a bugzilla request yet, but it does not seem to be
appropriate any more, as syslog-ng and related libraries seem to be
dropped from Fedora (it is the same on FC13 and rawhide):

[r...@fedora13 ~]# yum install syslog-ng
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process   
Resolving Dependencies   
--> Running transaction check
---> Package syslog-ng.i686 0:2.1.4-6.fc12 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libevtlog.so.0 for package:
syslog-ng-2.1.4-6.fc12.i686
--> Processing Dependency: libnet.so.1 for package:
syslog-ng-2.1.4-6.fc12.i686  
--> Running transaction
check
---> Package eventlog.i686 0:0.2.7-4.fc12 set to be
updated  
---> Package libnet.i686 0:1.1.4-3.fc12 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved


 Package Arch   Version 
Repository    Size

Installing:
 syslog-ng   i686   2.1.4-6.fc12
fedora   138 k
Installing for dependencies:
 eventlogi686   0.2.7-4.fc12
fedora16 k
 libnet  i686   1.1.4-3.fc12
fedora49 k

Transaction Summary

Install   3 Package(s)
Upgrade   0 Package(s)

Total download size: 204 k
Installed size: 638 k
Is this ok [y/N]:
Exiting on user Command
Complete!
[r...@fedora13 ~]#

So the question is modified: how can I get it (and the supporting
packages) back into Fedora. I have now updated the syslog-ng spec file
from Fedora 12 to syslog-ng version 3.1.1 and compiled with mock on FC12
FC13 and Rawhide. These packages work fine, except for SElinux, as there
is an additional control socket now and some rlimit settings. I'll have
a separate e-mail about it.

And a bonus question, as I work now for the upstream developer of
syslog-ng: what was the reason for dropping syslog-ng from the distribution?

Bye,
CzP
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-02 Thread Frank Murphy
On 02/06/10 11:56, Peter Czanik wrote:
--snip--
> 
> And a bonus question, as I work now for the upstream developer of
> syslog-ng: what was the reason for dropping syslog-ng from the distribution?
> 
> Bye,
> CzP

No idea but this is when rsyslog was mooted.

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-July/msg00941.html

-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-02 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

2010-06-02 12:56 keltezéssel, Peter Czanik írta:
>
> So the question is modified: how can I get it (and the supporting
> packages) back into Fedora. I have now updated the syslog-ng spec file
> from Fedora 12 to syslog-ng version 3.1.1 and compiled with mock on FC12
> FC13 and Rawhide.
Almost forgot, the sources are available at
http://peter.czanik.hu/syslog-ng3.tgz
"rpmbuild -bs syslog-ng.spec" is your friend, if you want a source rpm,
I did not want to upload that for three releases...
Bye,
CzP
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-02 Thread Petr Lautrbach
On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
>>> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
>>> contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
>>> at all. Here on the list I got some questions about the new syslog-ng
>>> version, but while I update my rawhide installation quite often, I still
>>> did not see an update for syslog-ng.
>>>
>>> Now I looked around on the Fedora wiki, how I could to the packaging
>>> work myself. I found a page with many interesting details:
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join , but this seems
>>> to be for packagers joining to add a new package. How could I get an
>>> existing package upgraded?
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> CzP
>>>
>> Have you opened a bugzilla requesting the update?
>>
>> I think you need to sign up and work to become a provenpackager.
>>
> I did not open a bugzilla request yet, but it does not seem to be
> appropriate any more, as syslog-ng and related libraries seem to be
> dropped from Fedora (it is the same on FC13 and rawhide):
>

You really should open bugzilla request.

> [r...@fedora13 ~]# yum install syslog-ng
...
> Installing:
>   syslog-ng   i686   2.1.4-6.fc12
> fedora   138 k
> Installing for dependencies:
>   eventlogi686   0.2.7-4.fc12
> fedora16 k
>   libnet  i686   1.1.4-3.fc12
> fedora49 k
>

So syslog-ng is still there. It wasn't just rebuilt since fc12 as there was no
mass rebuild for fc13 and no update by package maintainer. Last changelog
entry is from f12(-rawhide) times:

* Tue Sep 15 2009 Ray Van Dolson  - 2.1.4-8
- Adjust eventlog build requirement

> And a bonus question, as I work now for the upstream developer of
> syslog-ng: what was the reason for dropping syslog-ng from the distribution?

It's still there, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/syslog-ng

Regards,

Petr
-- 
Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-02 Thread Peter Czanik
2010-06-02 14:02 keltezéssel, Petr Lautrbach írta:
> On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>> 
>>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
>>>> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
>>>> contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
>>>> at all. Here on the list I got some questions about the new syslog-ng
>>>> version, but while I update my rawhide installation quite often, I still
>>>> did not see an update for syslog-ng.
>>>>
>>>> Now I looked around on the Fedora wiki, how I could to the packaging
>>>> work myself. I found a page with many interesting details:
>>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join , but this seems
>>>> to be for packagers joining to add a new package. How could I get an
>>>> existing package upgraded?
>>>>
>>>> Bye,
>>>> CzP
>>>>
>>>> 
>>> Have you opened a bugzilla requesting the update?
>>>
>>> I think you need to sign up and work to become a provenpackager.
>>>
>>>   
>> I did not open a bugzilla request yet, but it does not seem to be
>> appropriate any more, as syslog-ng and related libraries seem to be
>> dropped from Fedora (it is the same on FC13 and rawhide):
>>
>> 
> You really should open bugzilla request.
>   
Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961

>> [r...@fedora13 ~]# yum install syslog-ng
>> 
> ...
>   
>> Installing:
>>   syslog-ng   i686   2.1.4-6.fc12
>> fedora   138 k
>> Installing for dependencies:
>>   eventlogi686   0.2.7-4.fc12
>> fedora16 k
>>   libnet  i686   1.1.4-3.fc12
>> fedora49 k
>>
>> 
> So syslog-ng is still there. It wasn't just rebuilt since fc12 as there was no
> mass rebuild for fc13 and no update by package maintainer.
Ah, good to know. I just teach sometimes Fedora/RHEL/CentOS, I never
developed for it :-) I package for openSUSE and FreeBSD, where each
little change triggers a rebuild of all dependent packages.

>  Last changelog
> entry is from f12(-rawhide) times:
>
> * Tue Sep 15 2009 Ray Van Dolson  - 2.1.4-8
> - Adjust eventlog build requirement
>
>   
>> And a bonus question, as I work now for the upstream developer of
>> syslog-ng: what was the reason for dropping syslog-ng from the distribution?
>> 
> It's still there, see 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/syslog-ng
>   
Which is very good news :)
Thanks, bye,
CzP
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-10 Thread Peter Czanik
2010-06-02 14:02 keltezéssel, Petr Lautrbach írta:
> On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>> 
>>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
>>>> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
>>>> contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
>>>> at all. Here on the list I got some questions about the new syslog-ng
>>>> version, but while I update my rawhide installation quite often, I still
>>>> did not see an update for syslog-ng.
>>>>
>>>> Now I looked around on the Fedora wiki, how I could to the packaging
>>>> work myself. I found a page with many interesting details:
>>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join , but this seems
>>>> to be for packagers joining to add a new package. How could I get an
>>>> existing package upgraded?
>>>>
>>>> Bye,
>>>> CzP
>>>>
>>>> 
>>> Have you opened a bugzilla requesting the update?
>>>
>>> I think you need to sign up and work to become a provenpackager.
>>>
>>>   
>> I did not open a bugzilla request yet, but it does not seem to be
>> appropriate any more, as syslog-ng and related libraries seem to be
>> dropped from Fedora (it is the same on FC13 and rawhide):
>>
>> 
> You really should open bugzilla request.
>   

Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request? Is 
there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I have to wait patiently 
until something happens? I was suggested, that as "provenpackager" I could do 
this, but as I don't have any Fedora packages, it is a no-go. Or could an other 
"provenpackager" do it for me? Updated sources, prepared by me, are also in 
bugzilla...
Bye,
CzP

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-10 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request? Is 
> there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I have to wait patiently 
> until something happens? I was suggested, that as "provenpackager" I could do 
> this, but as I don't have any Fedora packages, it is a no-go. Or could an 
> other "provenpackager" do it for me? Updated sources, prepared by me, are 
> also in bugzilla...
> Bye,
>   

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

Yes,  a proven packager could also do it for you.

Rahul


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Czanik
2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>   
>> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
>> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request? 
>> Is there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I have to wait 
>> patiently until something happens? I was suggested, that as "provenpackager" 
>> I could do this, but as I don't have any Fedora packages, it is a no-go. Or 
>> could an other "provenpackager" do it for me? Updated sources, prepared by 
>> me, are also in bugzilla...
>> Bye,
>>   
>> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>   
OK, created a 'non-responsive maintainer' bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603012

> Yes,  a proven packager could also do it for you.
>   
Could, but I start to have some doubts, as this thread is over a month
old, and contains URL to updated package, which was never downloaded...
So, the three weeks countdown just started, and I hope, that either the
maintainer will respond or I can take the package over. Well, actuall
I'd be more happy with the original maintainer or a proven packager, as
I have some packaging experience, but no Fedora infrastructure experience...
Bye,
CzP
Bye,
CzP
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-14 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

2010-06-11 18:44 keltezéssel, Doug Warner írta:
> On 06/11/2010 05:32 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>   
>> 2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
>> 
>>> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>>>   
>>>   
>>>> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
>>>> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request? 
>>>> Is there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I have to wait 
>>>> patiently until something happens? I was suggested, that as 
>>>> "provenpackager" I could do this, but as I don't have any Fedora packages, 
>>>> it is a no-go. Or could an other "provenpackager" do it for me? Updated 
>>>> sources, prepared by me, are also in bugzilla...
>>>> Bye,
>>>>   
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>>>   
>>>   
>> OK, created a 'non-responsive maintainer' bug:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603012
>>
>> 
>>> Yes,  a proven packager could also do it for you.
>>>   
>>>   
>> Could, but I start to have some doubts, as this thread is over a month
>> old, and contains URL to updated package, which was never downloaded...
>> So, the three weeks countdown just started, and I hope, that either the
>> maintainer will respond or I can take the package over. Well, actuall
>> I'd be more happy with the original maintainer or a proven packager, as
>> I have some packaging experience, but no Fedora infrastructure experience...
>> 
> I responded to the original bug and closed the non-responsive maintainer bug.
>
> The updated package was published as a tgz file which made it difficult to see
> what was being changed in the spec file; a link to the new spec file or patch
> would be much easier to see what's going on.
>   
Sorry, I just wanted to help by providing it. I don't really now the
Fedora development process yet, so I looked at other bugzilla entries,
and found that people provide spec files or srpm-s for new or updated
packages.

> To be honest, maintaining syslog-ng (while I use it all the time) is a very
> tiring process; there isn't much "support" for multiple sysloggers in Fedora
> and it was a real pain to get everyone cooperating to make them not have to
> conflict with each other.  I can see why the previous maintainers left the
> syslog-ng package go unmaintained now as well.
>
> I'll try to work on getting this package updated as I do still prefer
> syslog-ng's syntax over rsyslog even if it has other problems.
>   
Thank you. Please let me know, if you need any help or information from
syslong-ng upstream.
Bye,
CzP
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: syslog-ng

2010-06-22 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

2010-06-11 18:44 keltezéssel, Doug Warner írta:
> To be honest, maintaining syslog-ng (while I use it all the time) is a
> very
> tiring process; there isn't much "support" for multiple sysloggers in Fedora
> and it was a real pain to get everyone cooperating to make them not have to
> conflict with each other.  I can see why the previous maintainers left the
> syslog-ng package go unmaintained now as well.
>
> I'll try to work on getting this package updated as I do still prefer
> syslog-ng's syntax over rsyslog even if it has other problems.
>   
I checked http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/syslog-ng/devel/ but
I don't see any changes. Is there anything more I could help in getting
syslog-ng updated to the latest stable version?
Bye,
CzP
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Seeking co-maintainers for syslog-ng

2011-02-02 Thread Doug Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

syslog-ng is an alternative syslog daemon that provides high flexibility and a
great configuration syntax.  I've done a lot of work to make sure this is
parallel-installable with the other syslog daemons, but lately I haven't had
the time to keep up with new releases.

I'm looking for help maintaining the syslog-ng package and especially getting
3.2 tested [1]

I have a personal repository that I've been testing 3.1 in [2] [3] but I
haven't been able to test out 3.2 yet.

Feel free to shoot me an email if you're interested in helping and I'll get
you approved in pkgdb!

- -Doug

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651823
[2] https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/file/9e541893bdbd/syslog-ng
[3] http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/syslog-ng/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNSWkYJV36su0A0xIRAnYPAKCTDu8hSrJN+bsAtnTiISOvzByLhwCfe4EB
xUOtfVZR7IEDIKjYwSdDuIg=
=Zw/p
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


karma for syslog-ng-3.2.3-2

2011-05-08 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings,

we all know, the final change freeze arrives tomorrow, May 9th.

I would like to ask you, if you could provide some (positive) karma for
syslog-ng. It is the latest stable version and I'd like to pull it into
F15 before change freeze.

Thanks,
Matthias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNxvnlAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWr/4IAIeEYCMD88uJH8g7IeHk71r2
tQ0jm7QanUrTIldn2DRKROWo0IAHclOLidwbAI4eujHZcC+KUtctkVP81GqvZsDO
P/xoOD0U/CNqgzAdsZFMroqHzNjqfhoSndK0YeZVAdj/tnQIl11RtwnMo15mvXd7
fPZkGvmBZYznP78MdNNxg6lw05eHaVqyqCarpevXGAG18yz1qE+LQptIa6ArFkCk
t/Em4fzPb+j/gg2+rJiZIMol/0ndKUjJQUWXp3zMd/zc9nd/GMOvd6oa7aHG0/Bf
VgnVmSDftfAq6ql6FoLMEytm2wyPbUeQQyHL70osTpxqvBJgPmqHpXHCKvsQeug=
=vub4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Seeking co-maintainers for syslog-ng

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello,

On 02/02/2011 03:24 PM, Doug Warner wrote:
> syslog-ng is an alternative syslog daemon that provides high
> flexibility and a
> great configuration syntax.  I've done a lot of work to make sure this is
> parallel-installable with the other syslog daemons, but lately I
> haven't had
> the time to keep up with new releases.
>
> I'm looking for help maintaining the syslog-ng package and especially
> getting
> 3.2 tested [1]
>
> I have a personal repository that I've been testing 3.1 in [2] [3] but I
> haven't been able to test out 3.2 yet.
>
> Feel free to shoot me an email if you're interested in helping and
> I'll get
> you approved in pkgdb!
I'll be at FOSDEM this weekend. If you happen to be there and also
interested in the syslog-ng port, I'd be happy to meet you there. I
helped in creating the v3.2 package for openSUSE and FreeBSD and I could
share my experiences, patches, etc. there.

Bye,

-- 

Peter Czanik (CzP) 
BalaBit IT Security / syslog-ng upstream
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: karma for syslog-ng-3.2.3-2

2011-05-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 22:15 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> we all know, the final change freeze arrives tomorrow, May 9th.
> 
> I would like to ask you, if you could provide some (positive) karma for
> syslog-ng. It is the latest stable version and I'd like to pull it into
> F15 before change freeze.

as it's not on the media, whether it makes final stable package set or
not makes virtually no difference...just sayin :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel