Re: yum-builddep (Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora)
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:37:10AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 09/08/2011 03:44 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
> > yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
> > builddeps on a 64-bit system?
>
> It's been recently implemented at upstream, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734983 for details.
>
> Note that this is only possible when feeding spec-files to yum-builddep,
> and even then it requires that spec BuildRequires are using %{_isa}
> where relevant.
Thanks I'll test it out when it hits rawhide.
Yours Tony
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: yum-builddep (Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora)
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:27:20AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > > Hi All, > > On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get > > yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit > > builddeps on a 64-bit system? > > Is 'setarch i686 yum-builddep foo' not enough? I swear when I tried that nothing sensible happend. However trying it again today it seems to do the right thing for the 1 or 2 packages I care about. Yours Tony -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: yum-builddep (Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora)
On 09/08/2011 06:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: >> Hi All, >> On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get >> yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit >> builddeps on a 64-bit system? > > Is 'setarch i686 yum-builddep foo' not enough? It seems rather nasty to wholly switch repo archs, when what you really want are the multilibs as they exist in the x84_64 repo. For instance, you need glibc-devel.i686, but pkgconfig.x86_64 will do just fine. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: yum-builddep (Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora)
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get > yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit > builddeps on a 64-bit system? Is 'setarch i686 yum-builddep foo' not enough? - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: yum-builddep (Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora)
On 09/08/2011 03:44 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hi All,
> On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
> yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
> builddeps on a 64-bit system?
It's been recently implemented at upstream, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734983 for details.
Note that this is only possible when feeding spec-files to yum-builddep,
and even then it requires that spec BuildRequires are using %{_isa}
where relevant.
- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
yum-builddep (Re: Compiling 32bit on 64bit Fedora)
Hi All, On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit builddeps on a 64-bit system? Yours Tony -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
