12.1.0 release candidate 3 (build 16) released

2012-07-02 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi,

We're pleased to announce the next release candidate of our new 12.1.0
software release.

Information and installation instructions can be found here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0

Quick links for those who know which files need to be grabbed and save
to USB disks:
http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/

This is a signed release candidate that can be installed on all XOs,
even those with security enabled.

We're looking for testing and feedback on all aspects of the system.
Thanks for any help you can offer, and for all the feedback that was
received throughout development.

Our scheduled release date is July 9th.

Please review the Known problems section of the release notes. Some
documented issues are carried over from previous releases, but others
are new and are things that we will aim to fix in the time remaining
before release.

Compared to 12.1.0 release candidate 2 (build 15), we have fixed and changed:

The Welcome screen (and activity) has been updated with new content
providing a quick introduction on how to use Sugar and the XO.

Implode has been fixed to show the animated help information again (SL#3463).

Labyrinth can now resize images without hanging (SL#3669).

A sugar-artwork update fixes drawing of the SpinButton widget in Read
and Abacus (SL#3406) and the bookmark edit area in Read (SL#3561).

The totem media player in GNOME was failing to launch; we've reverted
to an older version to fix that.

Ogg media on websites now works again: the totem-based media player
plugin has been fixed to display this media in most cases (#11963),
using WebKit's own media support in the other cases. When the webkit
internal audio support is used, we've fixed the display of the
playback controls (#11913).

The battery meter now behaves better when plugging/unplugging AC power (#11957).

Booting after activation no longer results in misnamed network devices
(#11967) and loss of mesh networking on XO-1 (#11975). After
activating, the black cursor no longer appears on top of the boot
animation or on the desktop (#11940).

A new instability in the XO-1 wireless driver has been fixed (#11941).

XO-1.5 has been fixed for manufacturing tests involving suspend/resume
(#11867, #11964). The manufacturing tests also exposed a bug in how
the wtmp file is updated on shutdown, that's been fixed too (#11952).


Thanks!
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Kernel development setup for XO-1.75

2012-07-02 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote:
  - Our defconfig file is in arch/arm/configs/xo_175_defconfig. I
 normally copy it to .config and then perl -pi -e 's/=m/=y/' to make a
 monolithic kernel that Just Boots.

As someone pointed out, I did not explain this step clearly enough.
Our standard defconfig has many drivers enabled as modules. To make
things easy during development however, we usually build monolithic
kernels. It saves you from having to copy all the drivers along with
the kernel.

So I run a quick search and replace over the defconfig file, changing
every location where a driver is set to module (=m) to be a built-in
driver (=y). There's a few ways to skin this cat, my quick one is

  perl -pi -e 's/=m/=y/' .config

cheers,



m
-- 
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Announcing OLPC OS 11.3.1 for XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2012-07-02 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org wrote:
 We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 11.3.1 for XO-1,
 XO-1.5 and as a formal release for XO-1.75.

Wooohoo! Thanks!

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: XO-1 update to 885

2012-07-02 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I was actually monitoring free space at 15sec intervals during olpc-update.
 Updating from os883 to os885 requires just 30MB free space.
 It is likely that from older builds will be a problem but not from the last 
 official release.

That's a good data point. Thanks!


m

-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Nandblasting not working in one xo

2012-07-02 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
 Nandbalsting simply doesn't start in that problematic xo.

Could you please give more detail on this?

Please try the nb command manually:

ok nb

Is the message No multicast NAND server displayed?

 no error and I also can connect and use Internet from sugar. Though
 all of the xo in sets have same firmware I even tried updating the
 firmware to latest version to see if it would help.
 
 open-wlan 6 multinand-traffic? . close-wlan doesn't return
 . I tried changing server, starting them in different
 channel. What could be the problem here?

This is a good test, only if your sender is operating on channel 6.
If it is not, the test is not good.

You say it doesn't return .  What does this test do instead?

I have tested here.  If the multinand-traffic? command is not
returning  then it should return 0 (zero).

If it returns zero, then it is because there was no multicast traffic
received with a valid multicast address.

Do you see zero, or does it not return to ok prompt at all?

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:36:57AM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
 I tried doing as you've mentioned. My results are no matter which
 antenna is selected covering the right antenna caused
 decrease(number increased) in average RSSI. Left antenna didn't
 react. There's only around -1 difference in average RSSI between
 antenna 1 and 2. In diversity mode covering any or both antenna
 didn't cause any change in average RSSI.
 
 BTW pressing 'd' allowed me to go back to diversity mode.

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:53:54AM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
 I performed the diagnostic in one of the working XO as well. The
 outcome for single antenna selected mode was exact i.e. covering
 left antenna didn't change
 
 anything while covering right did in both antennas.  While in
 diversity mode covering any caused average RSSI to decrease (number
 increase).

Thanks.  I have tested with two XO-1 and see identical trends.

What are your results in average RSSI dB, with antenna uncovered?

Here are my results.  Numbers are average RSSI dB after 10 seconds.
Access point is in another room 10m away.

Test start, SKU1 -59, SKU39 -56.

SKU1 covered left antenna -69, covered right antenna -68,
SKU39 covered left antenna -66, covered right antenna -70.
Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

press 1, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -54
SKU1 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -82,
SKU39 covered left antenna -54, covered right antenna -71,
Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

press d, SKU1 -59, SKU39 -56
SKU1 covered left antenna -76, covered right antenna -75,
SKU39 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -66,
Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

press 2, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -56
SKU1 covered left antenna -64, covered right antenna -77,
SKU39 covered left antenna -55, covered right antenna -70,
Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

press d, SKU1 -61, SKU39 -57
SKU1 covered left antenna -74, covered right antenna -66,
SKU39 covered left antenna -63, covered right antenna -69,
Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

press 0, SKU1 -60, SKU39 -57
SKU1 covered left antenna -75, covered right antenna -70,
SKU39 covered left antenna -66, covered right antenna -67,
Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

press d, SKU1 -61, SKU39 -57

press l, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -55
SKU1 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -77,
SKU39 covered left antenna -55, covered right antenna -69,
Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

press d, SKU1 -60, SKU39 -57

press r, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -54
SKU1 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -82,
SKU39 covered left antenna -55, covered right antenna -67,
Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

press d, SKU1 -59, SKU39 -56

Overall conclusion: XO-1 SKU1 and SKU39 have diversity receive and can
also be configure for right antenna only.  The test cannot configure
for left antenna only.

Therefore this test is not very useful to you, sorry!

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


RE: 12.1.0 release candidate 3 (build 16) released

2012-07-02 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn


Good!
I test it on a XO-1. Works good!Thanks for the 342 mb after install :-)
Maybe it's too late to say this, but: I don't like the system to selectthe 
colors at the first time. I will prefer a similiar thing (or equal) toXOEditor: 
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4085
The folder: /etc/udev/rules.d is empty.. Fedora 17 moves the rulesto another 
folder?
Regards!
Alan

 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:18:26 -0600
 Subject: 12.1.0 release candidate 3 (build 16) released
 From: d...@laptop.org
 To: devel@lists.laptop.org
 
 Hi,
 
 We're pleased to announce the next release candidate of our new 12.1.0
 software release.
 
 Information and installation instructions can be found here:
 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0
 
 Quick links for those who know which files need to be grabbed and save
 to USB disks:
 http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
 http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
 http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
 
 This is a signed release candidate that can be installed on all XOs,
 even those with security enabled.
 
 We're looking for testing and feedback on all aspects of the system.
 Thanks for any help you can offer, and for all the feedback that was
 received throughout development.
 
 Our scheduled release date is July 9th.
 
 Please review the Known problems section of the release notes. Some
 documented issues are carried over from previous releases, but others
 are new and are things that we will aim to fix in the time remaining
 before release.
 
 Compared to 12.1.0 release candidate 2 (build 15), we have fixed and changed:
 
 The Welcome screen (and activity) has been updated with new content
 providing a quick introduction on how to use Sugar and the XO.
 
 Implode has been fixed to show the animated help information again (SL#3463).
 
 Labyrinth can now resize images without hanging (SL#3669).
 
 A sugar-artwork update fixes drawing of the SpinButton widget in Read
 and Abacus (SL#3406) and the bookmark edit area in Read (SL#3561).
 
 The totem media player in GNOME was failing to launch; we've reverted
 to an older version to fix that.
 
 Ogg media on websites now works again: the totem-based media player
 plugin has been fixed to display this media in most cases (#11963),
 using WebKit's own media support in the other cases. When the webkit
 internal audio support is used, we've fixed the display of the
 playback controls (#11913).
 
 The battery meter now behaves better when plugging/unplugging AC power 
 (#11957).
 
 Booting after activation no longer results in misnamed network devices
 (#11967) and loss of mesh networking on XO-1 (#11975). After
 activating, the black cursor no longer appears on top of the boot
 animation or on the desktop (#11940).
 
 A new instability in the XO-1 wireless driver has been fixed (#11941).
 
 XO-1.5 has been fixed for manufacturing tests involving suspend/resume
 (#11867, #11964). The manufacturing tests also exposed a bug in how
 the wtmp file is updated on shutdown, that's been fixed too (#11952).
 
 
 Thanks!
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
  ___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Nandblasting not working in one xo

2012-07-02 Thread Roshan Karki
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:35 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:

 On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
  Nandbalsting simply doesn't start in that problematic xo.

 Could you please give more detail on this?

 Please try the nb command manually:

 ok nb

 Is the message No multicast NAND server displayed?


Yes, I get this message.



  no error and I also can connect and use Internet from sugar. Though
  all of the xo in sets have same firmware I even tried updating the
  firmware to latest version to see if it would help.
 
  open-wlan 6 multinand-traffic? . close-wlan doesn't return
  . I tried changing server, starting them in different
  channel. What could be the problem here?

 This is a good test, only if your sender is operating on channel 6.
 If it is not, the test is not good.


Yes the sender is operating on channel 6.



 You say it doesn't return .  What does this test do instead?

 I have tested here.  If the multinand-traffic? command is not
 returning  then it should return 0 (zero).

 If it returns zero, then it is because there was no multicast traffic
 received with a valid multicast address.

 Do you see zero, or does it not return to ok prompt at all?


It returns to OK prompt. No 0 or any thing.



 On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:36:57AM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
  I tried doing as you've mentioned. My results are no matter which
  antenna is selected covering the right antenna caused
  decrease(number increased) in average RSSI. Left antenna didn't
  react. There's only around -1 difference in average RSSI between
  antenna 1 and 2. In diversity mode covering any or both antenna
  didn't cause any change in average RSSI.
 
  BTW pressing 'd' allowed me to go back to diversity mode.

 On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:53:54AM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
  I performed the diagnostic in one of the working XO as well. The
  outcome for single antenna selected mode was exact i.e. covering
  left antenna didn't change
 
  anything while covering right did in both antennas.  While in
  diversity mode covering any caused average RSSI to decrease (number
  increase).

 Thanks.  I have tested with two XO-1 and see identical trends.

 What are your results in average RSSI dB, with antenna uncovered?


I also have access point in another room 10m away. I averaged around -75
with antenna uncovered.



 Here are my results.  Numbers are average RSSI dB after 10 seconds.
 Access point is in another room 10m away.

 Test start, SKU1 -59, SKU39 -56.

 SKU1 covered left antenna -69, covered right antenna -68,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -66, covered right antenna -70.
 Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

 press 1, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -54
 SKU1 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -82,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -54, covered right antenna -71,
 Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

 press d, SKU1 -59, SKU39 -56
 SKU1 covered left antenna -76, covered right antenna -75,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -66,
 Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

 press 2, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -56
 SKU1 covered left antenna -64, covered right antenna -77,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -55, covered right antenna -70,
 Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

 press d, SKU1 -61, SKU39 -57
 SKU1 covered left antenna -74, covered right antenna -66,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -63, covered right antenna -69,
 Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

 press 0, SKU1 -60, SKU39 -57
 SKU1 covered left antenna -75, covered right antenna -70,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -66, covered right antenna -67,
 Conclusion: both antennas are in use.

 press d, SKU1 -61, SKU39 -57

 press l, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -55
 SKU1 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -77,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -55, covered right antenna -69,
 Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

 press d, SKU1 -60, SKU39 -57

 press r, SKU1 -62, SKU39 -54
 SKU1 covered left antenna -62, covered right antenna -82,
 SKU39 covered left antenna -55, covered right antenna -67,
 Conclusion: right antenna is in exclusive use.

 press d, SKU1 -59, SKU39 -56

 Overall conclusion: XO-1 SKU1 and SKU39 have diversity receive and can
 also be configure for right antenna only.  The test cannot configure
 for left antenna only.


 Therefore this test is not very useful to you, sorry!


No worries :) . I think I should once send this XO for maintenance. Any
other checks you want me to do before that?



 --
 James Cameron
 http://quozl.linux.org.au/

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


RE: 12.1.0 release candidate 3 (build 16) released

2012-07-02 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn


I forgot to mention the activities that need update (exist a newest version):
from toMeasure 37 42Portfolio21 
 26Implode 11.1  12Pippy 46  49Maze  20 
 21TurtleArt   143   148Terminal39 40Memorize  40 41
Regards!
Alan
 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:18:26 -0600
 Subject: 12.1.0 release candidate 3 (build 16) released
 From: d...@laptop.org
 To: devel@lists.laptop.org
 
 Hi,
 
 We're pleased to announce the next release candidate of our new 12.1.0
 software release.
 
 Information and installation instructions can be found here:
 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0
 
 Quick links for those who know which files need to be grabbed and save
 to USB disks:
 http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
 http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
 http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
 
 This is a signed release candidate that can be installed on all XOs,
 even those with security enabled.
 
 We're looking for testing and feedback on all aspects of the system.
 Thanks for any help you can offer, and for all the feedback that was
 received throughout development.
 
 Our scheduled release date is July 9th.
 
 Please review the Known problems section of the release notes. Some
 documented issues are carried over from previous releases, but others
 are new and are things that we will aim to fix in the time remaining
 before release.
 
 Compared to 12.1.0 release candidate 2 (build 15), we have fixed and changed:
 
 The Welcome screen (and activity) has been updated with new content
 providing a quick introduction on how to use Sugar and the XO.
 
 Implode has been fixed to show the animated help information again (SL#3463).
 
 Labyrinth can now resize images without hanging (SL#3669).
 
 A sugar-artwork update fixes drawing of the SpinButton widget in Read
 and Abacus (SL#3406) and the bookmark edit area in Read (SL#3561).
 
 The totem media player in GNOME was failing to launch; we've reverted
 to an older version to fix that.
 
 Ogg media on websites now works again: the totem-based media player
 plugin has been fixed to display this media in most cases (#11963),
 using WebKit's own media support in the other cases. When the webkit
 internal audio support is used, we've fixed the display of the
 playback controls (#11913).
 
 The battery meter now behaves better when plugging/unplugging AC power 
 (#11957).
 
 Booting after activation no longer results in misnamed network devices
 (#11967) and loss of mesh networking on XO-1 (#11975). After
 activating, the black cursor no longer appears on top of the boot
 animation or on the desktop (#11940).
 
 A new instability in the XO-1 wireless driver has been fixed (#11941).
 
 XO-1.5 has been fixed for manufacturing tests involving suspend/resume
 (#11867, #11964). The manufacturing tests also exposed a bug in how
 the wtmp file is updated on shutdown, that's been fixed too (#11952).
 
 
 Thanks!
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
  ___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Nandblasting not working in one xo

2012-07-02 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:45:56AM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:35 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
  Is the message No multicast NAND server displayed?
 
 Yes, I get this message.

Thanks.

Re: the multinand-traffic? command

 It returns to OK prompt. No 0 or any thing.

That is a surprise.  It may mean an abort happened.  But if an abort
happened, then you should not get message No multicast NAND server.
Confusing.

Let us debug further together.

Test 1: check that you typed in the command exactly as shown:

ok open-wlan 6 multinand-traffic? . close-wlan

The . (dot, period) is important.  It prints the result.

If dot was typed, proceed to tests below, as these tests are for
finding if an abort happened:

Test 2:

ok open-wlan close-wlan . done

Tell me the output?  Will be either ok or done ok.

Test 3:

ok open-wlan . opened
ok 6 multinand-traffic? . . done

Tell me the output?

Test 4:

ok open-wlan 6 multinand-traffic? . close-wlan
ok ftrace

Tell me the output?

 I also have access point in another room 10m away. I averaged around
 -75 with antenna uncovered.

Your -75 feels like low signal for me.  Try another XO?

 No worries :) . I think I should once send this XO for
 maintenance.  Any other checks you want me to do before that?

I'm not yet convinced you have an antenna problem or a software
problem.  Something wrong is happening, but I don't know what it is
yet.

Do you have another NANDblaster nearby, for different XO model?

For maintenance: check to see if the antenna cable is twisted.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: 12.1.0 release candidate 3 (build 16) released

2012-07-02 Thread Samuel Greenfeld
At this point in time there would have to be a significant reason to
include a full activity update as opposed to creating a new dotted activity
version with a specific fix.

As mentioned in Daniel's email the final release is currently scheduled for
July 9th.  The final build therefore needs to be tested before that date.

We are looking for versions we know are stable, not the most recent
bugfixes.

Do any of these updates have a particular fix you require or strongly
recommend?

---
SJG

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn 
alan...@hotmail.com wrote:


 I forgot to mention the activities that need update (exist a newest
 version):

 from to
 Measure 37 42
 Portfolio21  26
 Implode 11.1  12
 Pippy 46  49
 Maze  20  21
 TurtleArt   143   148
 Terminal39 40
 Memorize  40 41

 Regards!

 Alan

  Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:18:26 -0600
  Subject: 12.1.0 release candidate 3 (build 16) released
  From: d...@laptop.org
  To: devel@lists.laptop.org
 
  Hi,
 
  We're pleased to announce the next release candidate of our new 12.1.0
  software release.
 
  Information and installation instructions can be found here:
  http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0
 
  Quick links for those who know which files need to be grabbed and save
  to USB disks:
  http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
  http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
  http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/os/candidate/12.1.0-16/
 
  This is a signed release candidate that can be installed on all XOs,
  even those with security enabled.
 
  We're looking for testing and feedback on all aspects of the system.
  Thanks for any help you can offer, and for all the feedback that was
  received throughout development.
 
  Our scheduled release date is July 9th.
 
  Please review the Known problems section of the release notes. Some
  documented issues are carried over from previous releases, but others
  are new and are things that we will aim to fix in the time remaining
  before release.
 
  Compared to 12.1.0 release candidate 2 (build 15), we have fixed and
 changed:
 
  The Welcome screen (and activity) has been updated with new content
  providing a quick introduction on how to use Sugar and the XO.
 
  Implode has been fixed to show the animated help information again
 (SL#3463).
 
  Labyrinth can now resize images without hanging (SL#3669).
 
  A sugar-artwork update fixes drawing of the SpinButton widget in Read
  and Abacus (SL#3406) and the bookmark edit area in Read (SL#3561).
 
  The totem media player in GNOME was failing to launch; we've reverted
  to an older version to fix that.
 
  Ogg media on websites now works again: the totem-based media player
  plugin has been fixed to display this media in most cases (#11963),
  using WebKit's own media support in the other cases. When the webkit
  internal audio support is used, we've fixed the display of the
  playback controls (#11913).
 
  The battery meter now behaves better when plugging/unplugging AC power
 (#11957).
 
  Booting after activation no longer results in misnamed network devices
  (#11967) and loss of mesh networking on XO-1 (#11975). After
  activating, the black cursor no longer appears on top of the boot
  animation or on the desktop (#11940).
 
  A new instability in the XO-1 wireless driver has been fixed (#11941).
 
  XO-1.5 has been fixed for manufacturing tests involving suspend/resume
  (#11867, #11964). The manufacturing tests also exposed a bug in how
  the wtmp file is updated on shutdown, that's been fixed too (#11952).
 
 
  Thanks!
  ___
  Devel mailing list
  Devel@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Nandblasting not working in one xo

2012-07-02 Thread Roshan Karki
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:16 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:45:56AM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
  On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:35 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
   Is the message No multicast NAND server displayed?
 
  Yes, I get this message.

 Thanks.

 Re: the multinand-traffic? command

  It returns to OK prompt. No 0 or any thing.

 That is a surprise.  It may mean an abort happened.  But if an abort
 happened, then you should not get message No multicast NAND server.
 Confusing.

 Let us debug further together.

 Test 1: check that you typed in the command exactly as shown:

 ok open-wlan 6 multinand-traffic? . close-wlan

 The . (dot, period) is important.  It prints the result.

 If dot was typed, proceed to tests below, as these tests are for
 finding if an abort happened:


I'm sorry I never noticed the period. Actually I was typing one command per
line and thought . was for period. With dot I'm getting 0 as result.



 Test 2:

 ok open-wlan close-wlan . done

 Tell me the output?  Will be either ok or done ok.

 Test 3:

 ok open-wlan . opened
 ok 6 multinand-traffic? . . done

 Tell me the output?

 Test 4:

 ok open-wlan 6 multinand-traffic? . close-wlan
 ok ftrace

 Tell me the output?

  I also have access point in another room 10m away. I averaged around
  -75 with antenna uncovered.

 Your -75 feels like low signal for me.  Try another XO?


You are right. There is around -20 difference between working and this xo.



  No worries :) . I think I should once send this XO for
  maintenance.  Any other checks you want me to do before that?

 I'm not yet convinced you have an antenna problem or a software
 problem.  Something wrong is happening, but I don't know what it is
 yet.

 Do you have another NANDblaster nearby, for different XO model?


We only have one XO model. :)



 For maintenance: check to see if the antenna cable is twisted.


 --
 James Cameron
 http://quozl.linux.org.au/

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Nandblasting not working in one xo

2012-07-02 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:04:07AM +0545, Roshan Karki wrote:
 I'm sorry I never noticed the period. Actually I was typing one
 command per line and thought . was for period. With dot I'm getting
 0 as result.

Sorry about that.  The Forth word . pops an item from the stack and
prints it as a number in the current radix.

Okay, this means that during 300ms of listening on the specified
channel, the wireless device was unable to receive any of the
multicast packets from the sender.

The transmit power used by the NANDblaster sender is likely to be much
lower than the transmit power used by your access point.  The result
of the RF link budget [1] may not allow successful receive.

 You are right. There is around -20 difference between working and
 this xo. 

Try placing this XO with the antennas 25cm from the sender, with the
antennas of both XO set vertical.

I'm now convinced you have an antenna cable problem that needs
maintenance.  There is likely to be about 20 dB extra loss in the
cables, compared to the working XO.

As an optimisation, you can also use test-antenna to find which XO has
the best RSSI, and use that XO as the NANDblaster sender.  A high RSSI
also means the XO will transmit better, in most cases.

References:

1.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_budget

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel