Re: [OLPC-AU] Retina display

2012-07-27 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
> IANAL, but the term "Retina" in reference to computers and mobile
> devices is an Apple trademark, so any such use (referring to anything
> but an Apple device) would be violating their rights to that mark.

IANAL too (although I Am Known As Legalist fits me) ... and any bid 
specification from a purchaser that uses the trademark would be effectively 
saying "we want an Apple".

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [OLPC-AU] Retina display

2012-07-27 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 28 July 2012 13:51, James Cameron  wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
>> IANAL, but the term "Retina" in reference to computers and mobile
>> devices is an Apple trademark, so any such use (referring to anything
>> but an Apple device) would be violating their rights to that mark.
>
> IANAL too (although I Am Known As Legalist fits me) ... and any bid 
> specification from a purchaser that uses the trademark would be effectively 
> saying "we want an Apple".

Just to be clear, my question was not based on any external request.
It was just an instance of curiosity from yours truly :)

Sridhar
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [OLPC-AU] Retina display

2012-07-27 Thread John Watlington

Don't go there.

It is hard to talk about the resolution of the PixelQi display.
In BW mode, it is 1200 x 900.In color mode, it is something
closer to 690 x 520, but the human visual system has much
less color resolution anyway so it appears sharper.
MLJ did a great job of matching the display to the HVS.

Cheers,
wad

On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:

> On 28 July 2012 13:51, James Cameron  wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
>>> IANAL, but the term "Retina" in reference to computers and mobile
>>> devices is an Apple trademark, so any such use (referring to anything
>>> but an Apple device) would be violating their rights to that mark.
>> 
>> IANAL too (although I Am Known As Legalist fits me) ... and any bid 
>> specification from a purchaser that uses the trademark would be effectively 
>> saying "we want an Apple".
> 
> Just to be clear, my question was not based on any external request.
> It was just an instance of curiosity from yours truly :)
> 
> Sridhar
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel