RE: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-08-02 Thread J.M. Maurer

On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 13:10 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
 
 Hi everyone,
I'm perfectly willing to do this work but how I can be sure
 it will actually be used?
 
 What do we need to do to get libabiword updated?
 
 sugar-jhbuild uses an ancient patched tree dating from November last
 year. We've released 2.6.4 3 weeks ago with *tons* of bug fixes on
 that.

Afaik, 2.6.4 is on the images

 What version is actually being shipped with sucrose? What do we need
 to
 do to get it updated?

Someone should just update jhbuild... i could do that when i find some
spare time and motivaten; feel free to beat me to it.

 I'd just like to know what I need to do to get the required libabiword
 into the tree so that this feature can be implemented.

We'll need to backport the featured to 2.6.x first. Will do that soonish
as well.

  Marc

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-08-02 Thread J.M. Maurer
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 16:47 +0200, J.M. Maurer wrote:
 
  What version is actually being shipped with sucrose? What do we
  need to do to get it updated?
 
 Someone should just update jhbuild... i could do that when i find some
 spare time and motivaten; feel free to beat me to it.

Updated jhbuild to abiword 2.6.4. Let's hope we can get the coloring per
collaborator in 2.6.5, or at least 2.6.6.

  Marc

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


RE: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-08-01 Thread Martin Sevior
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 22:12 +0200, J.M. Maurer wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 21:37 +1000, Martin Edmund Sevior wrote:
  
  Thanks Tomeu and Eben. Yes, we'll need to expand the abiwidget api.
  I'll look to do this if I can can get sugar-jhbuild to work again.
 
 That, or we could just add an 'EditMethod', so we can invoke it using a
 'well known' function name. Not sure what the nicest approach is. I'm
 inclined to expand the api though.
 

Hi everyone,
   I'm perfectly willing to do this work but how I can be sure
it will actually be used?

What do we need to do to get libabiword updated?

sugar-jhbuild uses an ancient patched tree dating from November last
year. We've released 2.6.4 3 weeks ago with *tons* of bug fixes on that.

What version is actually being shipped with sucrose? What do we need to
do to get it updated?

I'd just like to know what I need to do to get the required libabiword
into the tree so that this feature can be implemented.

Cheers

Martin

   Marc
 

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


RE: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-31 Thread Martin Edmund Sevior



-Original Message-
From: Eben Eliason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 7/31/2008 2:29 AM
To: Tomeu Vizoso
Cc: Martin Edmund Sevior; Walter Bender; OLPC Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
Chris Ball; Sugar Mailing List
Subject: Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO
 
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 14:50 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 23:32 -0400, Brian Jordan wrote:
   The open source project Gobby also uses this sort of who-wrote-what
   text highlighting, SJ and I have recently (right before he left for
   Wikimania) been looking into getting similar functionality on the XO.
   Having this highlighting integrated with Write would be fantastic.
  
 
  OK Guys, I get the message :-) I'll look to see how this can be enabled
  by default in the most UI-easy way possible.
 
 
  OK Guys,
 Your wish is my command.
 
  See:
 
  http://msevior.livejournal.com/2008/07/29/

 Awesome, anybody would like to expose this functionality in Write?
 Should be quite easy, but may involve adding API to abiwidget.


The original mockups for Write have been waiting for this moment to arrive.
For the reference of any who dare to take on the task (The button being
clicked is a Highlight text by author button):
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Image:Activity_write_view.jpg


Thanks Tomeu and Eben. Yes, we'll need to expand the abiwidget api. I'll look 
to do this if I can can get sugar-jhbuild to work again.

BTW for those who recommend we abandon sugar-jhbuild, I definitely disagree. 
You definitely always want the fastest machine you can get for development work 
and for all it's problems, sugar-jhbuild gives the best way to get an up to the 
second snapshot of the development trees everywhere.

Of course activities require regular testing on the xo hardware, which is now 
much more available. After I tried out Write on a B2 back in 2007 I realised 
that many speedups and optimizations were needed to get decent performance.

Martin Sevior



 Thanks a lot,

 Tomeu
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


RE: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-31 Thread J.M. Maurer

On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 21:37 +1000, Martin Edmund Sevior wrote:
 
 Thanks Tomeu and Eben. Yes, we'll need to expand the abiwidget api.
 I'll look to do this if I can can get sugar-jhbuild to work again.

That, or we could just add an 'EditMethod', so we can invoke it using a
'well known' function name. Not sure what the nicest approach is. I'm
inclined to expand the api though.

  Marc

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 14:50 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 23:32 -0400, Brian Jordan wrote:
  The open source project Gobby also uses this sort of who-wrote-what
  text highlighting, SJ and I have recently (right before he left for
  Wikimania) been looking into getting similar functionality on the XO.
  Having this highlighting integrated with Write would be fantastic.
 

 OK Guys, I get the message :-) I'll look to see how this can be enabled
 by default in the most UI-easy way possible.


 OK Guys,
Your wish is my command.

 See:

 http://msevior.livejournal.com/2008/07/29/

Awesome, anybody would like to expose this functionality in Write?
Should be quite easy, but may involve adding API to abiwidget.

Thanks a lot,

Tomeu
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-30 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 14:50 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 23:32 -0400, Brian Jordan wrote:
   The open source project Gobby also uses this sort of who-wrote-what
   text highlighting, SJ and I have recently (right before he left for
   Wikimania) been looking into getting similar functionality on the XO.
   Having this highlighting integrated with Write would be fantastic.
  
 
  OK Guys, I get the message :-) I'll look to see how this can be enabled
  by default in the most UI-easy way possible.
 
 
  OK Guys,
 Your wish is my command.
 
  See:
 
  http://msevior.livejournal.com/2008/07/29/

 Awesome, anybody would like to expose this functionality in Write?
 Should be quite easy, but may involve adding API to abiwidget.


The original mockups for Write have been waiting for this moment to arrive.
For the reference of any who dare to take on the task (The button being
clicked is a Highlight text by author button):
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Image:Activity_write_view.jpg

- Eben



 Thanks a lot,

 Tomeu
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-29 Thread Martin Sevior
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 14:50 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 23:32 -0400, Brian Jordan wrote:
  The open source project Gobby also uses this sort of who-wrote-what
  text highlighting, SJ and I have recently (right before he left for
  Wikimania) been looking into getting similar functionality on the XO.
  Having this highlighting integrated with Write would be fantastic.
  
 
 OK Guys, I get the message :-) I'll look to see how this can be enabled
 by default in the most UI-easy way possible.


OK Guys,
Your wish is my command.

See:

http://msevior.livejournal.com/2008/07/29/

Cheers

Martin


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-19 Thread J.M. Maurer

On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 21:41 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Martin Sevior wrote:
 | Hi Folks,
 | Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
 | haven't put the UI in to enable it.
 
 I would like an additional control for background color.  Eben, what do
 you think?
 
 | I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
 | though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
 | want to do this they can.
 
 Have you used Gobby?  It's the shared editor that people at OLPC
 _actually_ use, and having per-user background colors is among its key
 features. 

Not sure if I read this correctly, but are you implying that Write's
collaboration is not used, but Gobby's is? If so, is there any
particular collaboration issue/bug that needs my attention?

  Marc

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Write needs your help (was Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO)

2008-07-19 Thread J.M. Maurer

On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 10:16 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Bobby Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Marc is a bit of a perfectionist so I'm not sure how usable 95% of the
  work is and whether it could be finished by simply using it and
  providing bug reports as needed would be.
 
  Is this something the community could help with?  I know myself and
  maybe another person or two who would be willing to help if it was
  clear what else needed to be done.

There is 1 issue in abiword's layout engine that prevents this from
being finished. Martin and I discussed it on IRC, and we might have a
way to do it.

It needs some more explicit designing before we should implement it
though.

As for me being a perfectionist: I don't want to allow hacks in the code
that fix a particular problem now, but will haunt us in the future :)

 Martin and Marc will know better about the syntax highlighting stuff,
 but if you can help with the very important activity that Write is,
 please consider properly packaging pyabiword for fedora (and other
 distros):
 
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList#OLPC_Wishlist
 
 We are using a _really_ old prerelease tarball of abiword:
 2.6.0.svn20071127 . The Abi guys have already released 2.6.4 :/

I'm working on pushing proper packages in Fedora as we speak. It could
take a few days before it's finished as this is all spare time work.

AbiSource Corporation employees (read: me) can be hired though
*hint* :-)

  Marc


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-19 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

J.M. Maurer wrote:
| Have you used Gobby?  It's the shared editor that people at OLPC
| _actually_ use, and having per-user background colors is among its key
| features.
|
| Not sure if I read this correctly, but are you implying that Write's
| collaboration is not used, but Gobby's is?

Yes.  OLPC developers may have been using Write for collaborative document
authoring, but I am not aware of it.  I am aware of several occasions on
which Gobby has been used for this purpose, for example for preparing
minutes for a meeting on IRC.

| If so, is there any
| particular collaboration issue/bug that needs my attention?

Not a bug.  There are two issues:
1. To the best of my knowledge, Write's collaboration system does not
interoperate with any application that is available on non-Sugar desktops.
~ Thus, in order to make use of Write, all participants must have an XO,
emulator, or sugar-jhbuild running.  I do not see this as a significant
obstacle in a Rwandan elementary school, but in the diverse environments
of OLPC volunteers, we cannot assume that everyone has easy access to a
Sugar instance.

In my view, the ultimate solution to this is to push our Telepathy-based
collaboration stack upstream into the standard Linux desktop environments.
~ Until then, we should come up with a streamlined Sugar emulator that
makes it easy to run an Activity like Write under any standard Linux desktop.

2. Sugar collaboration over the internet requires a specialized Jabber
server.  It has proven difficult to set up such a server at all, and
impossible to set up a server that can be made public without collapsing
under the load.  Hopefully, after the Gadget work is complete, we will
begin to see reliable public collaboration servers appear.

- --Ben
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiCZHkACgkQUJT6e6HFtqSjfQCfaoF+5IbBo6aFsRFwX5LV6jOb
vmoAoIZ/VhpLCcygbI1eHQa2jjzLo99k
=DkVL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-19 Thread J.M. Maurer

On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 18:02 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 J.M. Maurer wrote:
 | Have you used Gobby?  It's the shared editor that people at OLPC
 | _actually_ use, and having per-user background colors is among its key
 | features.
 |
 | Not sure if I read this correctly, but are you implying that Write's
 | collaboration is not used, but Gobby's is?
 
 Yes.  OLPC developers may have been using Write for collaborative document
 authoring, but I am not aware of it.  I am aware of several occasions on
 which Gobby has been used for this purpose, for example for preparing
 minutes for a meeting on IRC.

But does this hold for kids as well? After all, they are the primary
audience for Write.

 | If so, is there any
 | particular collaboration issue/bug that needs my attention?
 
 Not a bug.  There are two issues:
 1. To the best of my knowledge, Write's collaboration system does not
 interoperate with any application that is available on non-Sugar desktops.

Well, the AbiCollab plugin existed before Write did, so making Write
'interoperate' with AbiWord would be trivial (in fact, they are exactly
the same).

 ~ Thus, in order to make use of Write, all participants must have an XO,
 emulator, or sugar-jhbuild running.  I do not see this as a significant
 obstacle in a Rwandan elementary school, but in the diverse environments
 of OLPC volunteers, we cannot assume that everyone has easy access to a
 Sugar instance.
 
 In my view, the ultimate solution to this is to push our Telepathy-based
 collaboration stack upstream into the standard Linux desktop environments.
 ~ Until then, we should come up with a streamlined Sugar emulator that
 makes it easy to run an Activity like Write under any standard Linux desktop.

There is no technical reason at all that Write could not be made to
collaborate with normal AbiWord's. Technically, it already works. There
is just no UI that currently exposes it.

One could for example add a UI that would allow Write to use
abicollab.net's service. This way normal AbiWord users could
interoperate trivially with Write, on a global scale. This already works
*now*, and has been built from the ground up to scale. Millions of users
should be no problem at all for the service.

What I'm trying to say: Write's collaboration protocol is *exactly* the
same as AbiWord's protocol.

 2. Sugar collaboration over the internet requires a specialized Jabber
 server.  It has proven difficult to set up such a server at all, and
 impossible to set up a server that can be made public without collapsing
 under the load.  Hopefully, after the Gadget work is complete, we will
 begin to see reliable public collaboration servers appear.

I've always been of the opinion that using Jabber for this sort of thing
was a bad choice. That's why we don't depend on it anymore.

  Marc


 - --Ben
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAkiCZHkACgkQUJT6e6HFtqSjfQCfaoF+5IbBo6aFsRFwX5LV6jOb
 vmoAoIZ/VhpLCcygbI1eHQa2jjzLo99k
 =DkVL
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Bobby Powers
Hello Martin -


On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Samuel,
  Marc Maurer has done 95% of the work required to do
 multi-programming language syntax highlighting in libabiword. The
 advantage of using libabiword is that you get collaboration for free. It
 is easy enough to embed this in your own canvas and hook up the controls
 you need or want, just as we've done for Write.

that sounds great!

 Marc is a bit of a perfectionist so I'm not sure how usable 95% of the
 work is and whether it could be finished by simply using it and
 providing bug reports as needed would be.

Is this something the community could help with?  I know myself and
maybe another person or two who would be willing to help if it was
clear what else needed to be done.


yours,
Bobby


 Hopefully, Marc will chime in soon.

 Cheers

 Martin


 On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:39 -0400, Samuel Klein wrote:
 There has been talk about expanding Pippy to support a variety of
 programming languages, perhaps as plugins; to add syntax highlighting;
 and general interest in seeing Develop proceed.  Syntax highlighting
 in Write has been brought up as well.  C and Javascript environments
 have been specifically highlighted, since C is used for a fair bit of
 code that we ship; but enthusiasts of Ruby and many other languages
 have considered providing an intro dev environment as a standalone
 activity, one per language.  And HTML creation is possible in Write
 but without highlighting, and it is not obvious how to put this to
 good use.

 Finally, we now have activities for Etoys (Squeak), Scratch, and
 Turtle Art, but not yet a Logo activity; though a few people are
 working on the latter.

 Where are we with these developments?  What plans are there to
 complete any of the above this year?  What specific features should we
 schedule to support the above, and which is most important?

 SJ
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Write needs your help (was Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO)

2008-07-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Bobby Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Marc is a bit of a perfectionist so I'm not sure how usable 95% of the
 work is and whether it could be finished by simply using it and
 providing bug reports as needed would be.

 Is this something the community could help with?  I know myself and
 maybe another person or two who would be willing to help if it was
 clear what else needed to be done.

Martin and Marc will know better about the syntax highlighting stuff,
but if you can help with the very important activity that Write is,
please consider properly packaging pyabiword for fedora (and other
distros):

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList#OLPC_Wishlist

We are using a _really_ old prerelease tarball of abiword:
2.6.0.svn20071127 . The Abi guys have already released 2.6.4 :/

The abi devs have also asked for help in testing Write with non-latin
scripts, this is something of high importance for OLPC.

If we cannot bring all the abiword potential to Sugar's Write, we risk
someone will start asking for running unsugarized OpenOffice or
Abiword on the XO, just as happened with Browse :/

Thanks,

Tomeu
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Chris Ball wrote:
| Another useful feature would be for
| Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as Gobby does.
| I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to take on.

See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background colors at all.

- --Ben
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkh/ZTUACgkQUJT6e6HFtqSdzwCfXnq/N5tEk/jhuBttxx77vauD
wtkAnj4JzHOxwswpf/12WKnoPeKA4LBd
=FTjC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Walter Bender
I'd vote that we not expend too much effort in supporting multiple
development environments in Pippy at the moment--there are so many
other high-priority things to be working on. Is there really a lot of
demand for this from the field?

-walter

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Chris Ball wrote:
 | Another useful feature would be for
 | Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as Gobby does.
 | I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to take on.

 See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background colors at all.

 - --Ben
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iEYEARECAAYFAkh/ZTUACgkQUJT6e6HFtqSdzwCfXnq/N5tEk/jhuBttxx77vauD
 wtkAnj4JzHOxwswpf/12WKnoPeKA4LBd
 =FTjC
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Martin Sevior
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 20:45 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
 I'd vote that we not expend too much effort in supporting multiple
 development environments in Pippy at the moment--there are so many
 other high-priority things to be working on. Is there really a lot of
 demand for this from the field?
 
 -walter
 
 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Chris Ball wrote:
  | Another useful feature would be for
  | Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as Gobby does.
  | I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to take on.
 
  See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background colors at all.
 

Hi Folks,
Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
haven't put the UI in to enable it. libabiword supports background
colors. If the Powers That Be decide that this is an important feature
for children it is very easy to implement it. Every feature of AbiWord
is present in libabiword, say the word and we'll implement it for Write.

I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
want to do this they can.

Cheers

Martin
  - --Ben
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
  Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
  iEYEARECAAYFAkh/ZTUACgkQUJT6e6HFtqSdzwCfXnq/N5tEk/jhuBttxx77vauD
  wtkAnj4JzHOxwswpf/12WKnoPeKA4LBd
  =FTjC
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
  ___
  Sugar mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
 
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Martin Sevior wrote:
| Hi Folks,
| Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
| haven't put the UI in to enable it.

I would like an additional control for background color.  Eben, what do
you think?

| I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
| though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
| want to do this they can.

Have you used Gobby?  It's the shared editor that people at OLPC
_actually_ use, and having per-user background colors is among its key
features.  The colors are stripped for print; clearing the text colors in
a Write document is similarly easy.

Per-user coloring could work even better in Write, because text has a
foreground and background color, and each user also has a foreground color
and a background color that appear all over the UI.  Those colors are
guaranteed to have good contrast against each other, as required in the
rest of the UI.  Automatically setting the user's text to those settings
in a shared Write session would make it instantly obvious who is typing what.

I would most prefer a design in which the scheme is black on white by
default.  When the first user shares the document, the text entry colors
are converted to her XO colors, but the existing text is not altered.  As
each user joins, that person's colors are set to their XO colors, but
users may modify their color settings at any time after join+share.

It occurs to me that this may work best if colors can be made more
sticky, so that anything I type keeps my current colors, not the colors
of the text I've selected or am typing into.  This is a tricky UI
question, which I will leave to the UI folks.  Perhaps a sticky checkbox
next to the color selectors that checks itself upon sharing?

- --Ben
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkh/9LYACgkQUJT6e6HFtqTiFQCgiwn7n2I5FT253t30YxDAN57M
D2wAn0Qaw5gkl/4X/wOsQwYjZ13g/pXw
=ovJY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Gary C Martin
On 18 Jul 2008, at 02:25, Martin Sevior wrote:

 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Chris Ball wrote:
 | Another useful feature would be for
 | Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as  
 Gobby does.
 | I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to  
 take on.

 See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background  
 colors at all.


 Hi Folks,
Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
 haven't put the UI in to enable it. libabiword supports background
 colors. If the Powers That Be decide that this is an important feature
 for children it is very easy to implement it. Every feature of AbiWord
 is present in libabiword, say the word and we'll implement it for  
 Write.

 I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
 though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
 want to do this they can.


The codingmonkeys with their great SubEthaEdit also made very good use  
out of background colour tints to indicate authorship. Works really  
well:

http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/images/sessionbig.png

As I remember, there is a button to toggle the background colours on  
and off depending what you want to see (and I think mouse over pop-ups  
in addition to show the authorship of a text block).

Now if I actually had other friends to work with, SubEthaEdit, would  
have been my editor of choice ;-)

--Gary


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 20:45 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
 I'd vote that we not expend too much effort in supporting multiple
 development environments in Pippy at the moment--there are so many
 other high-priority things to be working on. Is there really a lot of
 demand for this from the field?

 -walter

 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Chris Ball wrote:
  | Another useful feature would be for
  | Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as Gobby does.
  | I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to take on.
 
  See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background colors at all.
 

 Hi Folks,
Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
 haven't put the UI in to enable it. libabiword supports background
 colors. If the Powers That Be decide that this is an important feature
 for children it is very easy to implement it. Every feature of AbiWord
 is present in libabiword, say the word and we'll implement it for Write.

 I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
 though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
 want to do this they can.

 Cheers

 Martin

It will be much more of a mess if you can't tell who wrote what in a
collaborative editing session. Does Abiword provide change tracking,
so that users can turn author coloring on and off at will?

-- 
Edward Cherlin
End Poverty at a Profit by teaching children business
http://www.EarthTreasury.org/
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.--Alan Kay
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Martin Sevior
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 02:53 +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
 On 18 Jul 2008, at 02:25, Martin Sevior wrote:
 
  On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Chris Ball wrote:
  | Another useful feature would be for
  | Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as  
  Gobby does.
  | I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to  
  take on.
 
  See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background  
  colors at all.
 
 
  Hi Folks,
 Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
  haven't put the UI in to enable it. libabiword supports background
  colors. If the Powers That Be decide that this is an important feature
  for children it is very easy to implement it. Every feature of AbiWord
  is present in libabiword, say the word and we'll implement it for  
  Write.
 
  I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
  though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
  want to do this they can.
 
 
 The codingmonkeys with their great SubEthaEdit also made very good use  
 out of background colour tints to indicate authorship. Works really  
 well:
 
   http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/images/sessionbig.png
 
 As I remember, there is a button to toggle the background colours on  
 and off depending what you want to see (and I think mouse over pop-ups  
 in addition to show the authorship of a text block).
 
 Now if I actually had other friends to work with, SubEthaEdit, would  
 have been my editor of choice ;-)
 

This is a good idea for coding. We do not do this at present, though we
do have different colored carets.

Cheers

Martin

 --Gary
 
 
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Martin Sevior
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 18:54 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 20:45 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
  I'd vote that we not expend too much effort in supporting multiple
  development environments in Pippy at the moment--there are so many
  other high-priority things to be working on. Is there really a lot of
  demand for this from the field?
 
  -walter
 
  On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
  
   Chris Ball wrote:
   | Another useful feature would be for
   | Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as Gobby 
   does.
   | I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to take on.
  
   See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background colors at 
   all.
  
 
  Hi Folks,
 Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
  haven't put the UI in to enable it. libabiword supports background
  colors. If the Powers That Be decide that this is an important feature
  for children it is very easy to implement it. Every feature of AbiWord
  is present in libabiword, say the word and we'll implement it for Write.
 
  I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
  though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
  want to do this they can.
 
  Cheers
 
  Martin
 
 It will be much more of a mess if you can't tell who wrote what in a
 collaborative editing session. Does Abiword provide change tracking,
 so that users can turn author coloring on and off at will?
 

AbiWord has change tracking but my experience with it is that it is more
trouble than it's worth. That said, there is a bug in AbiWord-2.6.4 so
that if you turn change tracking on all changes in a collaborative
document are marked with the same colour. I'd better fix this so that
different users get different colours during a collaboration session.

Is there some feedback from the field about how kids are finding
collaborative writing? Do they use it all?

Cheers

Martin


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Jordan
The open source project Gobby also uses this sort of who-wrote-what
text highlighting, SJ and I have recently (right before he left for
Wikimania) been looking into getting similar functionality on the XO.
Having this highlighting integrated with Write would be fantastic.

Brian

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 18:54 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 20:45 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
  I'd vote that we not expend too much effort in supporting multiple
  development environments in Pippy at the moment--there are so many
  other high-priority things to be working on. Is there really a lot of
  demand for this from the field?
 
  -walter
 
  On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
  
   Chris Ball wrote:
   | Another useful feature would be for
   | Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as Gobby 
   does.
   | I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to take on.
  
   See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background colors at 
   all.
  
 
  Hi Folks,
 Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
  haven't put the UI in to enable it. libabiword supports background
  colors. If the Powers That Be decide that this is an important feature
  for children it is very easy to implement it. Every feature of AbiWord
  is present in libabiword, say the word and we'll implement it for Write.
 
  I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
  though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
  want to do this they can.
 
  Cheers
 
  Martin

 It will be much more of a mess if you can't tell who wrote what in a
 collaborative editing session. Does Abiword provide change tracking,
 so that users can turn author coloring on and off at will?


 AbiWord has change tracking but my experience with it is that it is more
 trouble than it's worth. That said, there is a bug in AbiWord-2.6.4 so
 that if you turn change tracking on all changes in a collaborative
 document are marked with the same colour. I'd better fix this so that
 different users get different colours during a collaboration session.

 Is there some feedback from the field about how kids are finding
 collaborative writing? Do they use it all?

 Cheers

 Martin


 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-17 Thread Martin Sevior
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 23:32 -0400, Brian Jordan wrote:
 The open source project Gobby also uses this sort of who-wrote-what
 text highlighting, SJ and I have recently (right before he left for
 Wikimania) been looking into getting similar functionality on the XO.
 Having this highlighting integrated with Write would be fantastic.
 

OK Guys, I get the message :-) I'll look to see how this can be enabled
by default in the most UI-easy way possible.

In the meantime one can fudge this very simply by having each user agree
to use their own color for writing text.

ie Joe chooses red, Alice choose green, Sarah chooses blue etc.

When everyone is happy with the final document choose select-all and
change all colours to black. This will work immediately.

BTW people might interested in our new service:

http://abicollab.net

As an easy way to share and collaborate on document creation in a
scalable world-wide fashion. With this you can easily setup group
documents and work on them in real-time (just like Write does).

AbiWord-2.6.4 has the code to connect to this but it is not enabled by
default as we're still working on some final bug fixes. You'll have to
compile your own version by passing --enable-abicollab
--with-abicollab-service-backend to the configure stage when you
compile the plugins.

Here is my configure line for abiword-plugins (which includes my
favourite plugins).

./configure --with-abiword=../abiword-2.6 --prefix=/home/msevior/abidir
--disable-all --enable-abicollab --with-abicollab-service-backend
--enable-abimathview --enable-abicommand --enable-loadbindings
--enable-presentation --enable-OpenDocument

Cheers,

Martin

 Brian
 
 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 18:54 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Martin Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 20:45 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
   I'd vote that we not expend too much effort in supporting multiple
   development environments in Pippy at the moment--there are so many
   other high-priority things to be working on. Is there really a lot of
   demand for this from the field?
  
   -walter
  
   On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
   
Chris Ball wrote:
| Another useful feature would be for
| Write to have unique background colors for collaborators, as Gobby 
does.
| I wonder if that would be a small enough task for someone to take 
on.
   
See also #7447.  Currently, Write doesn't support background colors 
at all.
   
  
   Hi Folks,
  Just so you know. The only reason for #7447 is because we
   haven't put the UI in to enable it. libabiword supports background
   colors. If the Powers That Be decide that this is an important feature
   for children it is very easy to implement it. Every feature of AbiWord
   is present in libabiword, say the word and we'll implement it for Write.
  
   I'm not sure different colors for different users is such a good idea
   though. The document will quickly become a mess.  Though if the kids
   want to do this they can.
  
   Cheers
  
   Martin
 
  It will be much more of a mess if you can't tell who wrote what in a
  collaborative editing session. Does Abiword provide change tracking,
  so that users can turn author coloring on and off at will?
 
 
  AbiWord has change tracking but my experience with it is that it is more
  trouble than it's worth. That said, there is a bug in AbiWord-2.6.4 so
  that if you turn change tracking on all changes in a collaborative
  document are marked with the same colour. I'd better fix this so that
  different users get different colours during a collaboration session.
 
  Is there some feedback from the field about how kids are finding
  collaborative writing? Do they use it all?
 
  Cheers
 
  Martin
 
 
  ___
  Devel mailing list
  Devel@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
 

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [sugar] Programming environments on the XO

2008-07-16 Thread Martin Sevior
Hi Samuel,
  Marc Maurer has done 95% of the work required to do
multi-programming language syntax highlighting in libabiword. The
advantage of using libabiword is that you get collaboration for free. It
is easy enough to embed this in your own canvas and hook up the controls
you need or want, just as we've done for Write.

Marc is a bit of a perfectionist so I'm not sure how usable 95% of the
work is and whether it could be finished by simply using it and
providing bug reports as needed would be.

Hopefully, Marc will chime in soon.

Cheers

Martin


On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:39 -0400, Samuel Klein wrote:
 There has been talk about expanding Pippy to support a variety of
 programming languages, perhaps as plugins; to add syntax highlighting;
 and general interest in seeing Develop proceed.  Syntax highlighting
 in Write has been brought up as well.  C and Javascript environments
 have been specifically highlighted, since C is used for a fair bit of
 code that we ship; but enthusiasts of Ruby and many other languages
 have considered providing an intro dev environment as a standalone
 activity, one per language.  And HTML creation is possible in Write
 but without highlighting, and it is not obvious how to put this to
 good use.
 
 Finally, we now have activities for Etoys (Squeak), Scratch, and
 Turtle Art, but not yet a Logo activity; though a few people are
 working on the latter.
 
 Where are we with these developments?  What plans are there to
 complete any of the above this year?  What specific features should we
 schedule to support the above, and which is most important?  
 
 SJ
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel