Re: [olpc-nz] Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-14 Thread Alastair Munro
Hi Cameron,

I checked a couple of the laptops after seeing your email about the
suspending, the wifi disappearing was after a suspend. I was thinking of
suspend in the terms of a normal laptop where suspending effectively turns
off the computer and saves state to the hard disk. I find it odd that the
suspend is still allowed to occur even when running off AC power though.

 -Alastair

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:13 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:

 G'day Alastair,

 Thanks for responding.  I'd like to drill down further into the facts
 just to make sure we're not missing anything.

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:19:19AM +1300, Alastair Munro wrote:
  We did not disable suspend before testing, all these observations were
  made on a fresh boot while plugged into AC power with no suspending.

 You did not disable suspend, yet there was no suspending at all?  That's
 surprising.  The design since about build os49 is that dim screen with
 begin at about 15 seconds and suspend will begin at about 25 seconds of
 idle.  The suspend doesn't turn off the screen, so you might not notice
 it.  The power LED begins to blink at about a five second rate.

 Can you confirm that you keep the keyboard and touchpad active, and
 never idle for more than 30 seconds?  It is very hard to do that,
 especially with other people interrupting.

  The wireless just didn't seem to activate at all. When checking
  'ifconfig -a' the only device shown was the local loopback device
  'lo'.

 This is quite consistent with not knowing that an automatic idle suspend
 has happened.

 --
 James Cameron
 http://quozl.linux.org.au/

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [olpc-nz] Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-14 Thread Gary C Martin
On 14 Dec 2009, at 19:54, Alastair Munro wrote:

 Hi Cameron,
 
 I checked a couple of the laptops after seeing your email about the 
 suspending, the wifi disappearing was after a suspend. I was thinking of 
 suspend in the terms of a normal laptop where suspending effectively turns 
 off the computer and saves state to the hard disk. I find it odd that the 
 suspend is still allowed to occur even when running off AC power though.

I think the idea is that power is precious in the majority of deployments (if 
not all of us). Burning cycles on a diesel generator, wind turbine, or solar is 
detrimental to every other device plugged into that limited power source.

Regards,
--Gary

  -Alastair
 
 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:13 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
 G'day Alastair,
 
 Thanks for responding.  I'd like to drill down further into the facts
 just to make sure we're not missing anything.
 
 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:19:19AM +1300, Alastair Munro wrote:
  We did not disable suspend before testing, all these observations were
  made on a fresh boot while plugged into AC power with no suspending.
 
 You did not disable suspend, yet there was no suspending at all?  That's
 surprising.  The design since about build os49 is that dim screen with
 begin at about 15 seconds and suspend will begin at about 25 seconds of
 idle.  The suspend doesn't turn off the screen, so you might not notice
 it.  The power LED begins to blink at about a five second rate.
 
 Can you confirm that you keep the keyboard and touchpad active, and
 never idle for more than 30 seconds?  It is very hard to do that,
 especially with other people interrupting.
 
  The wireless just didn't seem to activate at all. When checking
  'ifconfig -a' the only device shown was the local loopback device
  'lo'.
 
 This is quite consistent with not knowing that an automatic idle suspend
 has happened.
 
 --
 James Cameron
 http://quozl.linux.org.au/
 
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [olpc-nz] Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-14 Thread James Cameron
Hi Munro,

This isn't an ordinary laptop, and some of our deployment areas have very
expensive external DC power; from solar panels, cows, or a grid that
needs maintenance.  When we make a million laptops suspend like that
even though they are on external power, we save megawatts.

An ordinary laptop passes that burden to the consumer.  We're not really
wanting to do that here.  We have to think of the cost per child.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [olpc-nz] Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-13 Thread Alastair Munro
We did not disable suspend before testing, all these observations were made
on a fresh boot while plugged into AC power with no suspending. The wireless
just didn't seem to activate at all. When checking 'ifconfig -a' the only
device shown was the local loopback device 'lo'.

-Alastair

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 2:11 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:40:04PM +1300, Tabitha Roder wrote:
  On all XO 1.5s we updated to OS54 wifi does not work (except on 1 of 5
  machines showed wireless connections for about 20 seconds then gone)
  although we now realise there is OS56 so maybe we need to just update
  again.

 You probably hit the known problem described in the release candidate
 announcement If you have a B2 without hardware mods, you must disable
 suspend using Control Panel-Power-Automatic power management, else
 your wireless device will disconnect on suspend and not come back until
 the next reboot.

 Can you confirm that you did not disable suspend before testing
 wireless?

 --
 James Cameron
 http://quozl.linux.org.au/
 ___
 olpc-nz mailing list
 olpc...@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-nz

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [olpc-nz] Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-13 Thread James Cameron
G'day Alastair,

Thanks for responding.  I'd like to drill down further into the facts
just to make sure we're not missing anything.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:19:19AM +1300, Alastair Munro wrote:
 We did not disable suspend before testing, all these observations were
 made on a fresh boot while plugged into AC power with no suspending.

You did not disable suspend, yet there was no suspending at all?  That's
surprising.  The design since about build os49 is that dim screen with
begin at about 15 seconds and suspend will begin at about 25 seconds of
idle.  The suspend doesn't turn off the screen, so you might not notice
it.  The power LED begins to blink at about a five second rate.

Can you confirm that you keep the keyboard and touchpad active, and
never idle for more than 30 seconds?  It is very hard to do that,
especially with other people interrupting.

 The wireless just didn't seem to activate at all. When checking
 'ifconfig -a' the only device shown was the local loopback device
 'lo'.

This is quite consistent with not knowing that an automatic idle suspend
has happened.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-11 Thread Tabitha Roder
Testing summary -  12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

Who: Tabitha, Alastair, Grant

Updated 5 XO 1.5 machines and 4 XO 1.0 machines.
On XO 1.5s the open firmware help is unhelpful. The new fs-update command
for reflashing the XO is not described in the help and the old flash-nand
command which no longer works is listed.
On all XO 1.5s we updated to OS54 wifi does not work (except on 1 of 5
machines showed wireless connections for about 20 seconds then gone)
although we now realise there is OS56 so maybe we need to just update again.


Foodforce2-4: didn't work on the eee running Ubuntu based Sugar. On XO 1.5
machine the mouse arrow flickers. Scrolling land map should be disabled when
pop up boxes are displayed and when you are trying to press current
objective button. Believe it or not, the XO 1.0 is nicer to use with
FoodforceII than the XO 1.5 machine as it has no mouse arrow flicker and is
smooth. On both XO 1.0 and XO 1.5 the buttons are not that responsive.
There was a weird message from the helper guy (in the conversation after
finishing the first level) that says I will leave you the responsibility of
the village for the next 3 months while I go out for your cousin sister
wedding - that could do with a grammar check. The medicine resource should
say medicine but says medicines. Second level difficulty is impossible
(think it is the clicking things 5 times to get a response that makes this
impossible). The current objective box doesnt stay on screen long enough to
read when there is a lot of text. We do love the improvements though in the
GUI so keep up the good work :-)

Some small people played with some XOs, found first choice was Speak.

We worked on our LCA2010 workshop presentation for January 2010 as well as
discussed the Open Day and our OLPC XO stall as well as Sugar stall.

We discussed how we will manage test requests in the future. Loaded some in
dev.laptop.org and assigned to me as a trial of this way of managing the
test requests.

Thanks
Tabitha
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Testing] Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-11 Thread Mitch Bradley


Tabitha Roder wrote:

 Updated 5 XO 1.5 machines and 4 XO 1.0 machines.
 On XO 1.5s the open firmware help is unhelpful. The new fs-update 
 command for reflashing the XO is not described in the help and the old 
 flash-nand command which no longer works is listed.


Thanks, I entered this into trac as 9882.

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-11 Thread James Cameron
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:40:04PM +1300, Tabitha Roder wrote:
 On all XO 1.5s we updated to OS54 wifi does not work (except on 1 of 5
 machines showed wireless connections for about 20 seconds then gone)
 although we now realise there is OS56 so maybe we need to just update
 again.

You probably hit the known problem described in the release candidate
announcement If you have a B2 without hardware mods, you must disable
suspend using Control Panel-Power-Automatic power management, else
your wireless device will disconnect on suspend and not come back until
the next reboot.

Can you confirm that you did not disable suspend before testing
wireless?

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-12-11 Thread John Watlington

#9865 illustrates the danger in telling all of our testers
to disable automatic suspend/resume.   I would prefer
that testers leave suspend/resume enabled, and give
up their wireless.

Suspend/resume has seen very little testing!

Cheers,
wad

On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:11 PM, James Cameron wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:40:04PM +1300, Tabitha Roder wrote:
 On all XO 1.5s we updated to OS54 wifi does not work (except on 1  
 of 5
 machines showed wireless connections for about 20 seconds then gone)
 although we now realise there is OS56 so maybe we need to just update
 again.

 You probably hit the known problem described in the release candidate
 announcement If you have a B2 without hardware mods, you must disable
 suspend using Control Panel-Power-Automatic power management, else
 your wireless device will disconnect on suspend and not come back  
 until
 the next reboot.

 Can you confirm that you did not disable suspend before testing
 wireless?

 -- 
 James Cameron
 http://quozl.linux.org.au/
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel