Ralph, I can do that starting from monday
Cheers, Gilles Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: >Thanks Brice! > >Our 1.8 branch probably has another 2 or so years in it, but I think we can >lock it down fairly soon. Since we’ve shaken a lot of the bugs out of 1.8, we >are now seeing the “adoption wave” that is causing bug reports. Once we get >thru this, I expect things will settle down again. > >I know Jeff is hosed, and I’m likewise next week. Can someone create a PR to >update 1.8 with these patches? > > >> On Dec 12, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote: >> >> Le 12/12/2014 07:36, Gilles Gouaillardet a écrit : >>> Brice, >>> >>> ompi master is based on hwloc 1.9.1, isn't it ? >> >> Yes sorry, I am often confused by all these OMPI vs hwloc branch numbers. >> >>> >>> if some backport is required for hwloc 1.7.2 (used by ompi v1.8), then >>> could you please update the hwloc v1.7 branch ? >> >> Done. I pushed 14 commits there. This branch lags significantly behind >> master and v1.10 so I don't think I'll be able to maintain it much longer. >> >> Brice >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this post: >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/12/16538.php > >_______________________________________________ >devel mailing list >de...@open-mpi.org >Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >Link to this post: >http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/12/16540.php
