Re: [OMPI devel] OpenRTE telecon?

2007-01-11 Thread Ralph H Castain
Okay, I have heard back from several people. The consensus seems to be that:

1. a regular telecon is probably not worth doing at this time. We will look
at this again as more people start regularly contributing to the code

2. some kind of web-based system that keeps people apprised of what people
are doing - and are planning on doing - would be very helpful

3. more frequent "announcements" of changes would help, especially when they
are significant

Based on the feedback, I am going to setup an OpenRTE wiki to track current
areas of activity and planned "next-steps". In addition, I will try to keep
some kind of "blog-like" record of my activities on that site so people can
get a view of what I'm up to (since I am the primary - though not exclusive
- person modifying the code). For instance, I frequently find and fix minor
"bugs" as I'm working on adding functionality to the code - I will note
those on the site as I am fixing them.

Again, I would like to note that people are always welcome to drop me a note
or call me on the phone if they have a question about what I'm doing or
planning to do.

Thanks
Ralph


On 1/4/07 7:41 AM, "Ralph H Castain"  wrote:

> Hi everyone
> 
> Several of us were on a telecon yesterday and the topic of better coordinating
> the activities on OpenRTE came up. While things have percolated along
> reasonably well, the general feeling was that better, wider knowledge of
> current OpenRTE development activities and directions would help - especially
> as more people are becoming involved and/or looking to use OpenRTE in
> different ways.
> 
> Two ideas for responding to that suggestion have been kicked around:
> 
> 1. a weekly telecon specifically to discuss OpenRTE development activities,
> directions, and issues. I would appreciate some feedback from people
> interested in participating in such a telecon. If there is sufficient
> interest, I will coordinate a time with the interested people and setup a
> phone bridge.
> 
> 2. posted activities (both ongoing and planned) on the OpenRTE web site. This
> could initially just be a posted list (that I would maintain) of what people
> are doing along with a list of "known next steps". Eventually, this could
> transform into a blog or a wiki, as interests dictate.
> 
> Any feedback on either/both of these ideas would be welcome. I also should
> point out that there is an OpenRTE developers mailing list (see
> http://www.open-rte.org) - it doesn't see a lot of traffic as most of the
> discussion tends to take place on the Open MPI mailing lists (where the
> primary usage currently occurs). However, as interest migrates into other
> applications, I expect to see that activity grow.
> 
> Thanks
> Ralph




[OMPI devel] OpenRTE telecon?

2007-01-04 Thread Ralph H Castain
Hi everyone

Several of us were on a telecon yesterday and the topic of better
coordinating the activities on OpenRTE came up. While things have percolated
along reasonably well, the general feeling was that better, wider knowledge
of current OpenRTE development activities and directions would help -
especially as more people are becoming involved and/or looking to use
OpenRTE in different ways.

Two ideas for responding to that suggestion have been kicked around:

1. a weekly telecon specifically to discuss OpenRTE development activities,
directions, and issues. I would appreciate some feedback from people
interested in participating in such a telecon. If there is sufficient
interest, I will coordinate a time with the interested people and setup a
phone bridge.

2. posted activities (both ongoing and planned) on the OpenRTE web site.
This could initially just be a posted list (that I would maintain) of what
people are doing along with a list of "known next steps". Eventually, this
could transform into a blog or a wiki, as interests dictate.

Any feedback on either/both of these ideas would be welcome. I also should
point out that there is an OpenRTE developers mailing list (see
http://www.open-rte.org) - it doesn't see a lot of traffic as most of the
discussion tends to take place on the Open MPI mailing lists (where the
primary usage currently occurs). However, as interest migrates into other
applications, I expect to see that activity grow.

Thanks
Ralph