Re: [OMPI devel] RES: v pml question
I just agree with Josh. We though about it a bit, and nothing should prevent to use both. Aurelien Le 29 janv. 08 à 15:01, Josh Hursey a écrit : At the moment I do not plan on joining the crcpw and v_protocol. However those two components may currently work just fine together. They are both designed to wrap around whatever the 'selected' PML happens to be. If you tried to do this, I would expect the PML call stack to look something like the following: PML_SEND -> v_protocol -> crcpw -> ob1/cm But since I have not tried this out I cannot say for sure. Let us know if you have any problems. Cheers, Josh On Jan 23, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Leonardo Fialho wrote: I'm testing the v protocol just now. Anybody have plans to do a message wrapper mixing crcpw and v_protocol? Leonardo Fialho University Autonoma of Barcelona ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
Re: [OMPI devel] RES: v pml question
At the moment I do not plan on joining the crcpw and v_protocol. However those two components may currently work just fine together. They are both designed to wrap around whatever the 'selected' PML happens to be. If you tried to do this, I would expect the PML call stack to look something like the following: PML_SEND -> v_protocol -> crcpw -> ob1/cm But since I have not tried this out I cannot say for sure. Let us know if you have any problems. Cheers, Josh On Jan 23, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Leonardo Fialho wrote: I'm testing the v protocol just now. Anybody have plans to do a message wrapper mixing crcpw and v_protocol? Leonardo Fialho University Autonoma of Barcelona ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
Re: [OMPI devel] RES: v pml question
Hi, Actually it might already work. We never tried yet but nothing should prevent it. The symlinks are necessary to trick the autogen and configure stages. This is required to avoid code replication from autogen.sh. If you look carefully you will see that the simlinks are created only inside the build directory, and not in the source directory. Thus it does not help to add them to the trunk. Aurelien Le 23 janv. 08 à 16:55, Leonardo Fialho a écrit : I'm testing the v protocol just now. Anybody have plans to do a message wrapper mixing crcpw and v_protocol? Leonardo Fialho University Autonoma of Barcelona -Mensagem original- De: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] Em nome de Jeff Squyres Enviada em: miércoles, 23 de enero de 2008 22:45 Para: Open Developers Assunto: [OMPI devel] v pml question Just curious: what are the "mca" and "vprotocol" symlinks to "." for in the v/vprotocol directory for? If they're necessary, can they be committed to svn? If they're not necessary, can they be removed? -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
