Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 test results

2012-01-24 Thread Jeff Squyres 
Paul -- *Many* thanks for all of this; sorry for the slow followup.

I've green lighted the 1.5 patch for netbsd (I think we need a corresponding 
fix posted for v1.4), and asked Terry to act on your Solaris comments.

We'll talk today on the call about what to do with OS X 10.3/ppc and opensbd 
ROMIO issues.  


On Jan 19, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:

> 
> I neglected to mention that all FreeBSD and OpenBSD tests were conducted 
> using GNU Make.
> If I use /usr/bin/make (BSD make), then I encounter the same problem I 
> reported against ompi-1.5.5rc1:
>https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2954
> 
> Note that there is a patch (against 1.5.5rc1) attached to that ticket that 
> may be sufficient to fix this.
> 
> Oddly, NetBSD doesn't display the problem.  I don't know if there is 
> something different happening with respect to the atomics that simply avoids 
> the problem, or if NetBSD's version of Make may share the GNU Make behavior 
> with respect to VPATH.
> 
> -Paul
> 
> On 1/19/2012 1:33 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
>> 
>> Here is a report on my findings with "configure && make all && make install 
>> && make check" with ompi-1.4.5rc2.
>> All platforms built the "self", "sm" and "tcp" btls.  I've noted where 
>> addition btl/mtl components were built.
>> 
>> PASS with no special configure arguments (just --prefix and things like 
>> "CFLAGS=-m64" when appropriate).
>> This means GNU compilers were used in all cases.
>>linux/x86 [including gm1, gm2 and elan]
>>linux/x86-64 [including gm2, elan, ofud, openib and psm]
>>linux/ia64 (SGI Altix)
>>linux/ppc32
>>linux/ppc64
>>macos-10.4/x86
>>macos-10.4/ppc
>>macos-10.5/x86
>>macos-10.5/ppc
>>macos-10.6/x86
>>solaris-11(snv_151a)/amd64 [including ofud, openib and dapl]
>>freebsd-6.3-RELEASE/amd64
>>freebsd-7.2-RELEASE/amd64
>>freebsd-8.2-RELEASE/amd64
>>freebsd-8.2-RELEASE/i386
>>netbsd-5.0.2/i386
>>netbsd-5.1/amd64
>>netbsd-5.1/i386
>> 
>> PASS with addition of --disable-io-romio
>>openbsd-5.0/amd64
>>openbsd-5.0/i386
>> This need do disable ROMIO is "known", having been reported against 1.4.5rc1 
>> (see http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/12/10086.php ) as 
>> well as against 1.4.3rc1 in the past (see 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2010/08/8338.php ).
>> 
>> FAIL
>>macos-10.3/ppc
>> Same problem as reported against 1.4.5rc1 in 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/12/10086.php
>> 
>> I have additional Solaris platforms which I will report on later.
>> 
>> -Paul
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul H. Hargrove  phhargr...@lbl.gov
> Future Technologies Group
> HPC Research Department   Tel: +1-510-495-2352
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 test results

2012-01-24 Thread Paul Hargrove 
I did warn Jeff off-list at one point that I was planning/plotting to
automate my testing of RCs.  Now you've seen the result of that.

Terry has been in contact on the Solaris issue.

On the GNU-vs-Berkeley make issue (bug #2954): the patch Jeff green lighted
has only been tested on FreeBSD and hypothesized (in the mailing list
thread) to work correctly with GNU Make. It would be good if others can
test it too.
As for a corresponding patch for 1.4: the only difference is OPAL_ vs OMPI_
prefixes for configure variables in the relevant portion of
opal/asm/Makefile.am.  With that in mind it should be simple to
"s/OPAL_/OMPI_/g" the existing patch to get it to apply to 1.4.x.

Keep in mind that I can provide system access to a developer or two if
needed to help resolve any of these issues.
Unfortunately, the OS X 1.3/ppc is one of the few I test on that I don't
have the ability to grant accounts.

I never looked into the OpenBSD/ROMIO problems beyond what appears in the
mailing list archive.

-Paul


On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Jeff Squyres  wrote:

> Paul -- *Many* thanks for all of this; sorry for the slow followup.
>
> I've green lighted the 1.5 patch for netbsd (I think we need a
> corresponding fix posted for v1.4), and asked Terry to act on your Solaris
> comments.
>
> We'll talk today on the call about what to do with OS X 10.3/ppc and
> opensbd ROMIO issues.
>
> [snip]

-- 
Paul H. Hargrove  phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
HPC Research Department   Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900