[OMPI devel] Time to unify OpenFabrics configury?

2012-04-27 Thread Jeff Squyres
OpenFabrics vendors --

Now that there's a verbs-based component in orte, it really suggests that we 
should update / reform the configure options and behavior w.r.t. 
OpenFabrics-based components.

For example:

- is it finally time to rename --with-openib to --with-ofa?

  - should we also allow --with-openib as a deprecated synonym for the 1.7/1.8 
series, and then kill it in 1.9?

- should we hack up ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4:

  1. split it up to check for smaller things (e.g., one macro to check for 
basic OpenFabrics, another to check for the RDMACM, another to check for XRC, 
...etc.).  The rationale here is that oob/ud requires very little from OFA -- 
it does not need RDMACM, XRC, ...etc.

  2. move the resulting OFA-based .m4 out to the top-level config/ directory 
(vs. ompi/config)?

==> Jeff's $0.02 on all of this is "yes".  :-)



Begin forwarded message:

> From: jsquy...@osl.iu.edu
> Subject: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r26350
> Date: April 27, 2012 7:32:56 AM EDT
> To: svn-f...@open-mpi.org
> Reply-To: de...@open-mpi.org
> 
> Author: jsquyres
> Date: 2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 27 Apr 2012)
> New Revision: 26350
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/26350
> 
> Log:
> Update configury in the new oob ud component: actually check to see if
> it succeeds and run $1 or $2, accordingly.  This allows "make dist" to
> run properly on machines that do not have OpenFabrics stuff installed
> (e.g., the nightly tarball build machine).
> 
> There's still more to be done here -- it doesn't check for non-uniform
> directories where the OpenFabrics headers/libraries might be
> installed.  We might need to re-tool/combine
> ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4 (which checks for way more than
> oob/ud needs) and move it up to config/ompi_check_ofa.m4, or
> something...?
> 
> Properties modified: 
>   trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/   (props changed)
> Text files modified: 
>   trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am  | 8 ++-- 
>
>   trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4 |32 ++-- 
>
>   2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am
> ==
> --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am (original)
> +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am 2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 27 Apr 
> 2012)
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> # $HEADER$
> #
> 
> +AM_CPPFLAGS = $(orte_oob_ud_CPPFLAGS)
> +
> dist_pkgdata_DATA = help-oob-ud.txt
> 
> sources = \
> @@ -49,9 +51,11 @@
> mcacomponentdir = $(pkglibdir)
> mcacomponent_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_install)
> mca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
> -mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -libverbs
> +mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
> +mca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
> 
> noinst_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_noinst)
> libmca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
> -libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
> +libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
> +libmca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
> 
> 
> Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4
> ==
> --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4(original)
> +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m42012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 
> 27 Apr 2012)
> @@ -22,6 +22,34 @@
> AC_DEFUN([MCA_orte_oob_ud_CONFIG],[
> AC_CONFIG_FILES([orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile])
> 
> -AC_CHECK_HEADER([infiniband/verbs.h])
> -AC_CHECK_LIB([ibverbs], [ibv_create_qp])
> +# JMS Still have problems with AC_ARG ENABLE not yet having been
> +# called or CHECK_WITHDIR'ed.
> +
> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS
> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS
> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_LIBS=$LIBS
> +
> +OMPI_CHECK_PACKAGE([orte_oob_ud],
> +   [infiniband/verbs.h],
> +   [ibverbs],
> +   [ibv_open_device],
> +   [],
> +   [$ompi_check_openib_dir],
> +   [$ompi_check_openib_libdir],
> +   [orte_oob_ud_check_happy=yes],
> +   [orte_oob_ud_check_happy=no])])
> +
> +CPPFLAGS=$orte_oob_ud_check_save_CPPFLAGS
> +LDFLAGS=$orte_oob_ud_check_save_LDFLAGS
> +LIBS=$orte_oob_ud_check_save_LIBS
> +
> +AS_IF([test "$orte_oob_ud_check_happy" = "yes"],
> +  [$1],
> +  [$2])
> +
> +# substitute in the things needed to build this component
> +AC_SUBST([orte_oob_ud_CFLAGS])
> +AC_SUBST([orte_oob_ud_CPPFLAGS])
> +AC_SUBST([orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS])
> +AC_SUBST([orte_oob_ud_LIBS])
> ])dnl
> ___
> svn-full mailing list
> svn-f...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/svn-full


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal inform

Re: [OMPI devel] Time to unify OpenFabrics configury?

2012-04-27 Thread Shamis, Pavel
It is a good idea to unify the OFED configure scripts. BUT, I would prefer to 
do this rework after merge with the new collectives component, since we are 
going to bring totally new IB components based on extended verbs interface and 
it obviously adds new configure logic.

Pavel (Pasha) Shamis
---
Application Performance Tools Group
Computer Science and Math Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory






On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> OpenFabrics vendors --
> 
> Now that there's a verbs-based component in orte, it really suggests that we 
> should update / reform the configure options and behavior w.r.t. 
> OpenFabrics-based components.
> 
> For example:
> 
> - is it finally time to rename --with-openib to --with-ofa?
> 
>  - should we also allow --with-openib as a deprecated synonym for the 1.7/1.8 
> series, and then kill it in 1.9?
> 
> - should we hack up ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4:
> 
>  1. split it up to check for smaller things (e.g., one macro to check for 
> basic OpenFabrics, another to check for the RDMACM, another to check for XRC, 
> ...etc.).  The rationale here is that oob/ud requires very little from OFA -- 
> it does not need RDMACM, XRC, ...etc.
> 
>  2. move the resulting OFA-based .m4 out to the top-level config/ directory 
> (vs. ompi/config)?
> 
> ==> Jeff's $0.02 on all of this is "yes".  :-)
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: jsquy...@osl.iu.edu
>> Subject: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r26350
>> Date: April 27, 2012 7:32:56 AM EDT
>> To: svn-f...@open-mpi.org
>> Reply-To: de...@open-mpi.org
>> 
>> Author: jsquyres
>> Date: 2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 27 Apr 2012)
>> New Revision: 26350
>> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/26350
>> 
>> Log:
>> Update configury in the new oob ud component: actually check to see if
>> it succeeds and run $1 or $2, accordingly.  This allows "make dist" to
>> run properly on machines that do not have OpenFabrics stuff installed
>> (e.g., the nightly tarball build machine).
>> 
>> There's still more to be done here -- it doesn't check for non-uniform
>> directories where the OpenFabrics headers/libraries might be
>> installed.  We might need to re-tool/combine
>> ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4 (which checks for way more than
>> oob/ud needs) and move it up to config/ompi_check_ofa.m4, or
>> something...?
>> 
>> Properties modified: 
>>  trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/   (props changed)
>> Text files modified: 
>>  trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am  | 8 ++-- 
>>
>>  trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4 |32 ++-- 
>>
>>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am
>> ==
>> --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am(original)
>> +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 
>> 27 Apr 2012)
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>> # $HEADER$
>> #
>> 
>> +AM_CPPFLAGS = $(orte_oob_ud_CPPFLAGS)
>> +
>> dist_pkgdata_DATA = help-oob-ud.txt
>> 
>> sources = \
>> @@ -49,9 +51,11 @@
>> mcacomponentdir = $(pkglibdir)
>> mcacomponent_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_install)
>> mca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
>> -mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -libverbs
>> +mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
>> +mca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
>> 
>> noinst_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_noinst)
>> libmca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
>> -libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
>> +libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
>> +libmca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
>> 
>> 
>> Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4
>> ==
>> --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4   (original)
>> +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4   2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 
>> 27 Apr 2012)
>> @@ -22,6 +22,34 @@
>> AC_DEFUN([MCA_orte_oob_ud_CONFIG],[
>>AC_CONFIG_FILES([orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile])
>> 
>> -AC_CHECK_HEADER([infiniband/verbs.h])
>> -AC_CHECK_LIB([ibverbs], [ibv_create_qp])
>> +# JMS Still have problems with AC_ARG ENABLE not yet having been
>> +# called or CHECK_WITHDIR'ed.
>> +
>> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS
>> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS
>> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_LIBS=$LIBS
>> +
>> +OMPI_CHECK_PACKAGE([orte_oob_ud],
>> +   [infiniband/verbs.h],
>> +   [ibverbs],
>> +   [ibv_open_device],
>> +   [],
>> +   [$ompi_check_openib_dir],
>> +   [$ompi_check_openib_libdir],
>> +   [orte_oob_ud_check_happy=yes],
>> +   [orte_oob_ud_check_happy=no])])
>> +
>> +CPPFLAGS=$orte_oob_ud_check_save_CPPFLAGS
>> +LDFLAGS=$orte_o

Re: [OMPI devel] Time to unify OpenFabrics configury?

2012-04-27 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Apr 27, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:

> It is a good idea to unify the OFED configure scripts. BUT, I would prefer to 
> do this rework after merge with the new collectives component, since we are 
> going to bring totally new IB components based on extended verbs interface 
> and it obviously adds new configure logic.

Did you add new stuff to ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4?

When do you expect to merge the new collective stuff?

> Pavel (Pasha) Shamis
> ---
> Application Performance Tools Group
> Computer Science and Math Division
> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> 
>> OpenFabrics vendors --
>> 
>> Now that there's a verbs-based component in orte, it really suggests that we 
>> should update / reform the configure options and behavior w.r.t. 
>> OpenFabrics-based components.
>> 
>> For example:
>> 
>> - is it finally time to rename --with-openib to --with-ofa?
>> 
>> - should we also allow --with-openib as a deprecated synonym for the 1.7/1.8 
>> series, and then kill it in 1.9?
>> 
>> - should we hack up ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4:
>> 
>> 1. split it up to check for smaller things (e.g., one macro to check for 
>> basic OpenFabrics, another to check for the RDMACM, another to check for 
>> XRC, ...etc.).  The rationale here is that oob/ud requires very little from 
>> OFA -- it does not need RDMACM, XRC, ...etc.
>> 
>> 2. move the resulting OFA-based .m4 out to the top-level config/ directory 
>> (vs. ompi/config)?
>> 
>> ==> Jeff's $0.02 on all of this is "yes".  :-)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: jsquy...@osl.iu.edu
>>> Subject: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r26350
>>> Date: April 27, 2012 7:32:56 AM EDT
>>> To: svn-f...@open-mpi.org
>>> Reply-To: de...@open-mpi.org
>>> 
>>> Author: jsquyres
>>> Date: 2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 27 Apr 2012)
>>> New Revision: 26350
>>> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/26350
>>> 
>>> Log:
>>> Update configury in the new oob ud component: actually check to see if
>>> it succeeds and run $1 or $2, accordingly.  This allows "make dist" to
>>> run properly on machines that do not have OpenFabrics stuff installed
>>> (e.g., the nightly tarball build machine).
>>> 
>>> There's still more to be done here -- it doesn't check for non-uniform
>>> directories where the OpenFabrics headers/libraries might be
>>> installed.  We might need to re-tool/combine
>>> ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4 (which checks for way more than
>>> oob/ud needs) and move it up to config/ompi_check_ofa.m4, or
>>> something...?
>>> 
>>> Properties modified: 
>>> trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/   (props changed)
>>> Text files modified: 
>>> trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am  | 8 ++-- 
>>>
>>> trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4 |32 ++-- 
>>>
>>> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am
>>> ==
>>> --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am   (original)
>>> +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am   2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 
>>> 27 Apr 2012)
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>>> # $HEADER$
>>> #
>>> 
>>> +AM_CPPFLAGS = $(orte_oob_ud_CPPFLAGS)
>>> +
>>> dist_pkgdata_DATA = help-oob-ud.txt
>>> 
>>> sources = \
>>> @@ -49,9 +51,11 @@
>>> mcacomponentdir = $(pkglibdir)
>>> mcacomponent_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_install)
>>> mca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
>>> -mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -libverbs
>>> +mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
>>> +mca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
>>> 
>>> noinst_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_noinst)
>>> libmca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
>>> -libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
>>> +libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
>>> +libmca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4
>>> ==
>>> --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4  (original)
>>> +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4  2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 
>>> 27 Apr 2012)
>>> @@ -22,6 +22,34 @@
>>> AC_DEFUN([MCA_orte_oob_ud_CONFIG],[
>>>   AC_CONFIG_FILES([orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile])
>>> 
>>> -AC_CHECK_HEADER([infiniband/verbs.h])
>>> -AC_CHECK_LIB([ibverbs], [ibv_create_qp])
>>> +# JMS Still have problems with AC_ARG ENABLE not yet having been
>>> +# called or CHECK_WITHDIR'ed.
>>> +
>>> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS
>>> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS
>>> +orte_oob_ud_check_save_LIBS=$LIBS
>>> +
>>> +OMPI_CHECK_PACKAGE([orte_oob_ud],
>>> +   [infiniband/verbs.h],
>>> +   [ibverbs],
>>> +   [ibv_open_device],
>>> +   [],
>

Re: [OMPI devel] Time to unify OpenFabrics configury?

2012-04-27 Thread Shamis, Pavel

> On Apr 27, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
> 
>> It is a good idea to unify the OFED configure scripts. BUT, I would prefer 
>> to do this rework after merge with the new collectives component, since we 
>> are going to bring totally new IB components based on extended verbs 
>> interface and it obviously adds new configure logic.
> 
> Did you add new stuff to ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4?

I think the answer yes. As well we added new configure scripts.

> 
> When do you expect to merge the new collective stuff?

Yesterday :-) I would say about 2-3 weeks.

> 
>> Pavel (Pasha) Shamis
>> ---
>> Application Performance Tools Group
>> Computer Science and Math Division
>> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> 
>>> OpenFabrics vendors --
>>> 
>>> Now that there's a verbs-based component in orte, it really suggests that 
>>> we should update / reform the configure options and behavior w.r.t. 
>>> OpenFabrics-based components.
>>> 
>>> For example:
>>> 
>>> - is it finally time to rename --with-openib to --with-ofa?
>>> 
>>> - should we also allow --with-openib as a deprecated synonym for the 
>>> 1.7/1.8 series, and then kill it in 1.9?
>>> 
>>> - should we hack up ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4:
>>> 
>>> 1. split it up to check for smaller things (e.g., one macro to check for 
>>> basic OpenFabrics, another to check for the RDMACM, another to check for 
>>> XRC, ...etc.).  The rationale here is that oob/ud requires very little from 
>>> OFA -- it does not need RDMACM, XRC, ...etc.
>>> 
>>> 2. move the resulting OFA-based .m4 out to the top-level config/ directory 
>>> (vs. ompi/config)?
>>> 
>>> ==> Jeff's $0.02 on all of this is "yes".  :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
 From: jsquy...@osl.iu.edu
 Subject: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r26350
 Date: April 27, 2012 7:32:56 AM EDT
 To: svn-f...@open-mpi.org
 Reply-To: de...@open-mpi.org
 
 Author: jsquyres
 Date: 2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 27 Apr 2012)
 New Revision: 26350
 URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/26350
 
 Log:
 Update configury in the new oob ud component: actually check to see if
 it succeeds and run $1 or $2, accordingly.  This allows "make dist" to
 run properly on machines that do not have OpenFabrics stuff installed
 (e.g., the nightly tarball build machine).
 
 There's still more to be done here -- it doesn't check for non-uniform
 directories where the OpenFabrics headers/libraries might be
 installed.  We might need to re-tool/combine
 ompi/config/ompi_check_openib.m4 (which checks for way more than
 oob/ud needs) and move it up to config/ompi_check_ofa.m4, or
 something...?
 
 Properties modified: 
 trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/   (props changed)
 Text files modified: 
 trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am  | 8 ++--
 
 trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4 |32 
 ++--
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 
 Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am
 ==
 --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am  (original)
 +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile.am  2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 
 27 Apr 2012)
 @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
 # $HEADER$
 #
 
 +AM_CPPFLAGS = $(orte_oob_ud_CPPFLAGS)
 +
 dist_pkgdata_DATA = help-oob-ud.txt
 
 sources = \
 @@ -49,9 +51,11 @@
 mcacomponentdir = $(pkglibdir)
 mcacomponent_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_install)
 mca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
 -mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -libverbs
 +mca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
 +mca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
 
 noinst_LTLIBRARIES = $(component_noinst)
 libmca_oob_ud_la_SOURCES = $(sources)
 -libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
 +libmca_oob_ud_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version $(orte_oob_ud_LDFLAGS)
 +libmca_oob_ud_la_LIBADD = $(orte_oob_ud_LIBS)
 
 
 Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4
 ==
 --- trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4 (original)
 +++ trunk/orte/mca/oob/ud/configure.m4 2012-04-27 07:32:56 EDT (Fri, 
 27 Apr 2012)
 @@ -22,6 +22,34 @@
 AC_DEFUN([MCA_orte_oob_ud_CONFIG],[
  AC_CONFIG_FILES([orte/mca/oob/ud/Makefile])
 
 -AC_CHECK_HEADER([infiniband/verbs.h])
 -AC_CHECK_LIB([ibverbs], [ibv_create_qp])
 +# JMS Still have problems with AC_ARG ENABLE not yet having been
 +# called or CHECK_WITHDIR'ed.
 +
 +orte_oob_ud_check_save_CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS
 +orte_oob_ud_check_save_LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS
 +orte_o

Re: [OMPI devel] June Developers Meeting

2012-04-27 Thread Jeff Squyres
Please put your name on that wiki page if you plan to attend.

Thanks.


On Apr 19, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:

> Hi folks
> 
> On the weekly telecon, we settled on the dates for a developer's meeting to 
> discuss the OMPI 1.7 release series. Because some of us will be at the MPI 
> Forum meeting in Japan in June, and we are hitting the typical vacation 
> season, the choice of dates was severely limited. Accordingly, we have 
> decided to meet June 6-8 at Cisco in San Jose, with the meeting starting at 
> 1pm on the 6th and ending at noon on the 8th to accommodate travel.
> 
> I have setup a wiki page for the meeting:
> 
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/June12Meeting
> 
> and populated it with some initial items for the agenda. Note: the details on 
> the Cisco meeting room are just taken from the last meeting there and will 
> likely change.
> 
> I would appreciate it if folks edited the page (or sent email to me) with 
> additional items they would like discussed, plus suggestions on how much time 
> they feel the discussion should be allocated. I'll then try to create a 
> first-cut at the agenda.
> 
> Thanks
> Ralph
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/