[OpenSIPS-Devel] [ opensips-Patches-3411513 ] Consistently use rtpproxy switches
Patches item #3411513, was opened at 2011-09-19 08:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by vladut-paiu You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086412aid=3411513group_id=232389 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Peter Lemenkov (peter_lemenkov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Consistently use rtpproxy switches Initial Comment: The flag for marking party as being behind the symmetric proxy is 'S', not 'W' as it was implemented in nathelper. Moreover 'W' has also different meaning in rtpproxy protocol syntax. Unfortunately this is obviously an incompatible change, however I think that elimination one source of confusing worth applying this, -- Comment By: Razvan Crainea (razvancrainea) Date: 2011-09-21 01:32 Message: Hi Peter, Thank you for your patch. As you might know, the 'S' flag was used in the nathelper module to swap between session creation and confirmation. This flag became later deprecated, when rtpproxy_offer and rtpproxy_answer functions were introduced. We haven't changed the 'W' flag into 'S' yet for backward compatibility, but we are considering it in the future. Thanks again and regards, Răzvan Crainea -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086412aid=3411513group_id=232389 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSIPS-Devel] [ opensips-Patches-3411513 ] Consistently use rtpproxy switches
Patches item #3411513, was opened at 2011-09-19 18:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by razvancrainea You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086412aid=3411513group_id=232389 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Peter Lemenkov (peter_lemenkov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Consistently use rtpproxy switches Initial Comment: The flag for marking party as being behind the symmetric proxy is 'S', not 'W' as it was implemented in nathelper. Moreover 'W' has also different meaning in rtpproxy protocol syntax. Unfortunately this is obviously an incompatible change, however I think that elimination one source of confusing worth applying this, -- Comment By: Razvan Crainea (razvancrainea) Date: 2011-09-21 11:32 Message: Hi Peter, Thank you for your patch. As you might know, the 'S' flag was used in the nathelper module to swap between session creation and confirmation. This flag became later deprecated, when rtpproxy_offer and rtpproxy_answer functions were introduced. We haven't changed the 'W' flag into 'S' yet for backward compatibility, but we are considering it in the future. Thanks again and regards, Răzvan Crainea -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086412aid=3411513group_id=232389 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSIPS-Devel] [ opensips-Patches-3411513 ] Consistently use rtpproxy switches
Patches item #3411513, was opened at 2011-09-19 19:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by peter_lemenkov You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086412aid=3411513group_id=232389 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Peter Lemenkov (peter_lemenkov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Consistently use rtpproxy switches Initial Comment: The flag for marking party as being behind the symmetric proxy is 'S', not 'W' as it was implemented in nathelper. Moreover 'W' has also different meaning in rtpproxy protocol syntax. Unfortunately this is obviously an incompatible change, however I think that elimination one source of confusing worth applying this, -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086412aid=3411513group_id=232389 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
