[OpenSIPS-Devel] SF.net SVN: opensips:[6041] branches/1.5/modules/rls/subscribe.c
Revision: 6041 http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=6041view=rev Author: anca_vamanu Date: 2009-08-28 11:38:22 + (Fri, 28 Aug 2009) Log Message: --- - revert change made in commit rev #4944: return to_presence code for Subscribe messages that contain Supported:eventlist header but for which a list definition is not found Revision Links: -- http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=4944view=rev Modified Paths: -- branches/1.5/modules/rls/subscribe.c This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSIPS-Devel] SF.net SVN: opensips:[6041] branches/1.5/modules/rls/subscribe.c
Anca Vamanu writes: - revert change made in commit rev #4944: return to_presence code for - Subscribe messages that contain Supported:eventlist header but for - which a list definition is not found anca, in case of in-dialog subscribe, the module still returns 404 if document is not found. isn't the idea that rls_handle_subscribe() can be called also for in-dialog requests and get 'to_presence_code' back if the in-dialog subscribe was not for rls server? -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSIPS-Devel] SF.net SVN: opensips:[6041] branches/1.5/modules/rls/subscribe.c
anca, regarding in-dialog subscribe requests, perhaps it could be checked in the script if the request is for rls server or not, for example, checking that request uri matches server_address. if so, then rls_handle_subscribe would not need to handle non-list subscribes. -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] SF.net SVN: opensips:[6041] branches/1.5/modules/rls/subscribe.c
Hi Juha, You are right, I fixed that. Thanks, Anca Juha Heinanen wrote: anca, regarding in-dialog subscribe requests, perhaps it could be checked in the script if the request is for rls server or not, for example, checking that request uri matches server_address. if so, then rls_handle_subscribe would not need to handle non-list subscribes. -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
